不同土地利用类型下土壤碳酸酐酶剖面分异特征研究
Spatial differentiation of soil carbonic anhydrase under different types of land use
-
摘要: 利用pH计法来研究西南岩溶区4类土地利用类型11个样地20 cm、40 cm和60 cm土层碳酸酐酶（Carbonic Anhydrase，CA）的剖面分异特征，并与非岩溶样地进行对比。结果表明：西南岩溶区不同土地利用类型不同土层的CA活性存在较大差异。在林地中，40 cm和60 cm土层的CA活性明显高于20 cm土层；而在乔灌丛、灌丛和耕地中，土壤CA活性表现出60 cm土层处最高，20 cm土层处最低，并与弃耕地不同土壤层CA活性变化趋势截然相反，这是因为弃耕地受人类活动干扰导致土壤CA活性出现逆转。进一步分析还可以看出林地、乔灌丛、灌丛和耕地4种土地利用类型下土壤CA活性总体呈现出随植物根系深度增加而增加的变化趋势，从而说明土地利用类型是导致土壤碳酸酐酶剖面产生分异的主要因素，并为进一步研究土壤CA在自然界碳酸盐岩风化过程中的作用提供了科学依据。Abstract: Carbonic anhydrase (CA) plays an important role in catalyzing the reversible hydration of CO2, which connects with chemical weathering (including the carbonate rock dissolution and silicate weathering) in atmospheric CO2 sink and the mysterious missing sink in carbon cycling. In order to explore the soil CA activity by means of pH method from different types of land use in southwest China karst area, 11 sampling plots from four different karst ecosystems and 5 sampling plots from non-karst ecosystems as a contrast are selected for the study.The results show that there are larger differences in soil CA activity among different soil layers under different types of land use in southwest China karst area.Under woodland, the soil CA activity in 40 cm and 60 cm soil layers is higher than that in 20 cm. The soil CA activity under tree-shrub land, shrub land and farmland is the highest in 60 cm soil layer, but the lowest in 20 cm. However, in abandoned field, soil CA activity is the highest in 20 cm soil layer but the lowest in 60 cm. It can be seen that the land use type is the main factor affecting the soil CA activity. The soil CA activity increases with the plant root depth due to the CO2increases along with the soil depth.Moreover, karst landform is another important factor that affects the soil CA activity. For example, in the Yaji karst experimental site, the soil CA activity is controlled by the physiognomy character due to the weathering product of carbonate rock and organic matter migration from the bealock and piedmont slope to the karst depression. So, the soil microbe will be assembled, which lead to the soil CA activity in 20 cm layer at depression is 0.782 U/g and higher than those at the bealock and piedmont slope. At last, we also need to consider the effect from the change of sample sites. For the future comparison, the samples should be collected at the border of the same site. Then, the research can provides a certain theoretical basis for further study on the role of soil CA activity in karst processes.
-
Key words:
- carbonic anhydrase /
- type of land use /
- karst soil /
- pH method
-
[1] 张新时.中国关键生态区的评价与对策［J］.中国基础科学，2001，(5)：11-14. [2] 曹建华，袁道先.受地质条件制约的中国西南岩溶生态系统［M］.北京：地质出版社，2005. [3] 潘根兴，曹建华.表层带岩溶作用：以土壤为媒介的地球表层生态系统过程——以桂林峰丛洼地岩溶系统为例［J］.中国岩溶，1999，18（4）：287-296. [4] 徐胜友，何师意.碳酸盐岩土壤CO2的动态及其对溶蚀作用的驱动［C］//袁道先，谢云鹤，主编.岩溶与人类生存、环境、资源和灾害［C］. 桂林：广西师范大学出版社，1996. [5] 俞锦标，李春华，赵培道，等.贵州普定县岩溶地区土壤空气中CO2含量发布及溶蚀作用的研究［J］.中国岩溶，1985，4（4）：325-332. [6] Bracey M H J，Christiansen P，Tovar S P，et al. Spinach carbonic anhydrase：investigation of the zinc binding ligands by site directed mutagenesis，elemental analysis，and exafs ［J］. Biochemistry，1994，33：13126-13131. [7] 刘再华.碳酸酐酶对碳酸盐岩溶解的催化作用及其在大气CO2沉降中的意义［J］.地球学报，2000，22（5）：477-480. [8] 李为，余龙江，贺秋芳，等.微生物及其碳酸酐酶对岩溶生态系统钙镁元素淋失的影响［J］.中国岩溶，2004，23（1）：1-6. [9] Brownell P F，Bielig L M，Grof C P L. Increased carbonic anhydrase activity in leaves of sodium-deficient C4 plants ［J］. Australian Journal of plant physiology,1991，18（6）：589-592. [10] Li W，Yu L J，Yuan D X，et al. A study of the activity and ecological significance of carbonic anhydrase from soil and its microbes from different karst ecosystems of Southwest China ［J］. Plant and Soil，2005，272：133-141. [11] 王福星，曹建华，黄俊发，等.生物岩溶［M］.北京：地质出版社，1993. [12] Courchesne F，Gobran G R. Mineralogical variations of bulk and rhizosphere soils from a Norway spruce stand ［J］. Soil Science Society of America Journal，1997，61（4）：1245-1249. [13] 早野恒一，王家玉译.土壤微生物活性的测定Ⅹ.土壤酶活性［J］. 土壤学进展，1979，（3）：49-54. [14] 龙健，李娟，江新荣，等.贵州茂兰喀斯特森林土壤微生物活性的研究［J］.土壤学报，2004，41（4）：597-602. [15] 靳振江，李强，黄静云，等.典型岩溶生态系统土壤酶活性、微生物数量有机碳及其相关性——以丫吉岩溶试验场为例［J］.农业环境科学学报，2013，32（2）：307-313. [16] 何师意，冉景丞，袁道先，等.不同岩溶环境系统的水文和生态效应研究［J］.地球学报，2001，22（3）：265-270. [17] 马晓梅，尹林克.荒漠河岸林植物根际和非根际微生物的季节性变化［J］.干旱区资源与环境，2009，23(5)：165-171. [18] 郝瑞军，方海兰，车玉萍.上海典型植物群落土壤微生物生物量碳、呼吸强度及酶活性比较［J］.上海交通大学学报（农业科学版），2010，28（5）：442-448. [19] 王冬银，谢世友，章程.典型岩溶区不同土地利用方式下雨季、旱季岩溶作用研究［J］.生态环境学报，2009，18（6）：2366-2372. [20] 张伟，陈洪松，王克林，等.典型喀斯特峰丛洼地坡面土壤养分空间变异性研究［J］.农业工程学报，2008，12（1）：68-73. [21] 李强，靳振江，李忠义，等.岩溶地貌部位对土壤微生物丰度与酶活性的影响［J］.水土保持通报，2014，34（3）（待刊）. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 2448
- HTML浏览量: 316
- PDF下载量: 1478
- 被引次数: 0
下载:
