Study on the soil hydro-structure function of restored vegetations in the Yunnan Shilin park of China
-
摘要: 基于喀斯特恢复植被生态系统功能评价的要求,采用土壤水文结构功能模型评价云南石林景区恢复植被的土壤水文结构功能。选取原生滇青冈林、恢复26a的次生林B、恢复21a次生林A、恢复8a的灌丛、石漠化灌草丛和恢复30a云南松林6个样地,分别调查它们的土壤水文结构特征。相对于原生林,石漠化样地经过8a的封禁,其土壤水文结构功能可恢复31%,21a可恢复45%,人工飞播的云南松林经过30a恢复的只有38%,而砍伐林地封禁26a可恢复71%。土壤水文结构功能评价模型基本适用于岩溶区不同恢复林地的土壤水文结构功能的恢复评价。Abstract: Based on the requirement of ecosystem function assessment of restored vegetations in karst area, the soil hydro-structures function of restored vegetations were evaluated by the soil hydro-structure function model in the famous Shilin park in Yunnan province of China, which is a part of south China karst world natural heritage. Six vegetation sample plots, which form a succession of restored vegetations in the karst area ,including original forest (forest of Cyclobalanopsis glaucoides), 26 years secondary forest B (secondary forest of Cyclobalanopsis glaucoides), 21 years secondary forest A (secondary forest of Neolitsea homilantha) , 8 years brush, rock-desertification bushy grasses and 30 years secondary forest of Pinus yunanesnis, were chosen for assessment. As contrasted with the original forest, 31% of soil hydro-structure function can be restored after ecology recover and blockading administer for 8 years, and 45% can be restored after 21 years of ecology recovery in rocky desertification plots. And only 38% in secondary forest of Pinus yunnanensis can be restored after 30 years of ecology recovery, while 71% of soil hydro-structure function can recover after 26 years of eco-closing .The model of soil hydro-structure function is basically suitable for evaluation of restored vegetations in karst areas.
-
[1] 袁道先.我国西南岩溶石山的环境地质问题[J].世界科技研究与发展,1997,19(5):41-43. [2] 王世杰,李阳兵,李瑞玲.喀斯特石漠化的形成背景、演化与治理[J].第四世纪研究,2003,23(6):657-666. [3] 刘玉,李林立,赵柯,等.岩溶山地石漠化地区不同土地利用方式下的土壤物理性状分析[J].水土保持学报,2004,18(5):142-145. [4] Peňuela M C , Drew A P. A model to assess restoration of abandoned pasture in Costa Rica based on soil hydrologic feature and forest structure[J].Restoration Ecology,2004,12:516-524. [5] 吴钲镒,朱彦丞著.云南植被[M].北京:科学出版社,1987,231-248. [6] 金振洲,彭鉴著.昆明植被[M].昆明:云南科技出版社,1998,431-444. [7] 李阳兵,王世杰,李瑞玲.岩溶生态系统的土壤[J].生态环境,2004,13(3):434-438. [8] Miller R W,and Donahue R L. Soils: an introduction to soils and plant growth (6th edition)[M]. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey,1990,163-189. [9] Fisher R F, and Binkley D. Ecology and management of forest soils [M]. 3rd edition. New York: John Wiley and Sons,2000,198-225. [10] Harmon M F,Ferrell W K,and Franklin J F.Effects on carbon storage of conversion of old-growth forests to young forests[J]. Science 1990,24:699-702. [11] Reiners W A,Bouwan A F,Parsons W F J ,et al. Tropical rain forest conversion to pasture: changes in vegetation and soil properties[J]. Ecological Applications 1994,4:363-377. [12] 刘方,王世杰,刘元生,等.喀斯特石漠化过程土壤质量变化及生态环境影响评价[J].生态学报,2005,25(3):639-644. [13] 蔡年辉,李根前,陆元昌.云南松纯林近自然化改造的探讨[J].西北林学院学报,2006,19(3):85-88. [14] 李阳兵,谢德体,魏朝富.岩溶生态系统土壤及表生植被某些特性变异与石漠化的相关性[J].土壤学报,2004,41(2):196-202.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 1345
- HTML浏览量: 347
- PDF下载量: 363
- 被引次数: 0