山东省鲁西金刚石的类型、源区及区域壳幔演化背景
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

本文为山东省重点研发计划(软科学项目)(编号2019RKB48002)、山东省泰山学者建设工程专项经费(编号ts201511076)和山东省重点研发计划(编号 2017CXGC1604)资助的成果。


Types, sources, and regional crustmantle evolution background of diamonds in the western Shandong Province
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    山东省鲁西地区具有工业价值的金刚石矿有原生金刚石矿和金刚石砂矿两种类型,前者的母岩类型主要有金伯利岩型和煌斑岩型;后者的母岩类型有砾岩型和砂岩型,产于第四纪小埠岭组和于泉组中。寒武纪李官组、石炭纪本溪组、侏罗纪三台组、古近纪官庄群和新近纪白彦组也是金刚石的储集层,但均达不到工业利用的要求。这些储集层中所含的金刚石比较而言,蒙阴和费县等地的本溪组中的粒度最大,平邑—泗水地区白彦组中的含量最富,临沂金雀山三台组中的完整晶型者占比最高,枣庄上泥河和泗水踅庄地区李官组中的金刚石熔蚀、磨圆最严重。不同层位和类型的金刚石,其源区、形成时代和构造背景不同。岩相古地理分析表明,李官组金刚石来源于其西南侧马山—四海山一带早前寒武纪结晶基底中的超镁铁质岩,这些超镁铁质岩形成于新太古代,元古宙末早前寒武纪结晶基底隆起、超镁铁质岩遭受剥蚀,少量金刚石沉积于寒武纪底部的李官组砾岩中;本溪组和三台组金刚石的分布和特征指示其源区为蒙阴金伯利岩,蒙阴金伯利岩形成于早—中奥陶世,金伯利岩形成之后发生的加里东运动和印支运动—早燕山运动造成鲁西中部的徂徕山—蒙山一带隆起,金伯利岩被抬升至地表遭受剥蚀,金刚石分别沉积于本溪组和三台组砾岩中;官庄群、白彦组、小埠岭组和于泉组中金刚石的分布和特征指示其源区也主要是蒙阴金伯利岩,新生代鲁西北部的徂徕山蒙山隆起仍然处于强烈隆升状态,造成白彦组、小埠岭组和于泉组的金刚石富集区均分布于鲁西的南部区域。不同时代金刚石源区的地幔地球化学性状明显不同,华北陆块自太古宙至古元古代地幔源区的εNd( t )=+05~+4,指示上地幔处于弱亏损状态;鲁西金伯利岩的 ε Nd( t )值变化于-478~+276,暗示鲁西早古生代地幔总体处于弱富集状态;鲁西中生代镁铁质岩石的εNd( t )介于-92~-2121,说明地幔于中生代发生强烈富集。鲁西金伯利岩型金刚石原生矿源自于早古生代弱富集地幔。

    Abstract:

    There are two types of diamond ores, the primary diamond ore and the alluvial diamond ore, with industrial value in the western Shandong Province. Diamond- bearing mother rocks of primary diamond ores are mainly kimberlite and lamprophyre. Diamond- bearing mother rocks of alluvial diamond ores are conglomerate and sandstone occurring in the Quaternary Xiaobuling and the Yuquan Formations. The Cambrian Liguan, the Carboniferous Benxi, the Jurassic Santai, the Neogene Baiyan Formations and the Paleogene Guanzhuang Group are also diamond- bearing strata, but do not meet the industrial utilization requirement. Compared to the diamonds contained in these reservoirs, the diamond particle size in the Mengyin and the Feixian of the Benxi Formation is the largest, the diamond content in the Pingyi- Sishui area of the Baiyan Formation is the richest, the proportion of complete crystal shape in the Linyi Jinqueshan of the Santai Formation is the highest, and the erosion and roundness in the Zaozhuang Shangnihe and the Sishui Xuezhuang area of the Liguan Formation are most prominent. Different strata and types of diamond indicate different source regions, formation age and tectonic background. Lithofacies and paleogeography analyses show that the diamonds of the Liguan Formation originated from southwest of ultramafic rocks in the Early Precambrian crystal basement of the Mashan- Sihaishan region. These ultramafic rocks were formed in the Neoarchean followed by the Early Precambrian crystal basement uplift in the Late Proterozoic. The ultramafic rocks thereafter underwent denudation. Finally, a small amount of diamonds were deposited in the Liguan Formation conglomerates at the base of the Cambrian. The distribution and characteristics of diamonds in the Benxi and the Santai Formations indicates that the source region is the Mengyin kimberlite. The kimberlite in the Mengyin was formed in the Early- Middle Ordovician. After the formation of kimberlite, the Caledonian and Indosinian Movement- the Early Yanshan Movement resulted in the uplift of the Culaishan- Mengshan district. Afterwards, the kimberlites were lifted to the surface and denuded, and the diamonds were deposited in conglomerate of the Benxi and Santai Formations. The distribution and characteristics of diamonds in the Guanzhuang Group,and the Baiyan, the Xiaobuling and the Yuquan Formations indicates that they also mainly come from the Mengyin kimberlites. The Cenozoic Culaishan- Mengshan in the north of the western Shandong Province is still in a strong uplift state, which results in the distribution of the Baiyan, the Xiaobuling, and the Yuquan Formations diamond enrichment areas in the south of the western Shandong Province. The geochemical characteristics of the diamond source region in different ages indicates chemical evolution of mantle. North China block from Archean to Paleoproterozoic mantle source region with ε Nd ( t ) value from +0. 5 to +4 indicates that the upper mantle is in a weak deficit condition. The ε Nd ( t ) value of kimberlite in the western Shandong Province varied from -4. 78 to +2. 76, suggesting that the Paleozoic mantle was in a state of weak enrichment. The ε Nd ( t ) value of Mesozoic mafic rocks in the western Shandong Province varied from -9. 2 to +21. 21, suggesting that the Mesozoic mantle was in a state of strong enrichment. Diamond deposits in kimberlite pipes were derived from the early Paleozoic weakly enriched mantle in the western Shandong Province.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

宋明春,余西顺,宋英昕,肖丙建,周登诗,高存山,冯爱平.2020.山东省鲁西金刚石的类型、源区及区域壳幔演化背景[J].地质学报,94(9):2606-2625.
SONG Mingchun, YU Xishun, SONG Yingxin, XIAO Bingjian, ZHOU Dengshi, GAO Cunshan, FENG Aiping.2020. Types, sources, and regional crustmantle evolution background of diamonds in the western Shandong Province[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica,94(9):2606-2625.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-02-17
  • 最后修改日期:2020-06-04
  • 录用日期:2020-06-14
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-06-23
  • 出版日期: