J4 ›› 2010, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (5): 1194-1198.

• 地球探测与信息技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

利用测井资料计算阳离子交换量Qv的方法对比

张冲1,2|毛志强1|肖亮1|孙中春3|张健3   

  1. 1.中国石油大学 油气资源与探测国家重点实验室|北京 102249;2.长江大学 油气资源与勘探技术教育部重点实验室|湖北 荆州 434023;3.中国石油新疆油田分公司|新疆 克拉玛依 843000
  • 收稿日期:2010-01-08 出版日期:2010-09-26 发布日期:2010-09-26
  • 作者简介:张冲(1983-)|男|湖北汉川人|博士|主要从事测井资料综合解释与数据处理的研究|E-mail:zhangchong1983@qq.com
  • 基金资助:

    中国石油天然气集团公司应用基础研究项目(030301)

Comparation of Calculating Methods of Cation Exchange Capacity Qv Using Logging Data

ZHANG Chong1,2, MAO Zhi-qiang1, XIAO Liang1, SUN Zhong-chun3, ZHANG Jian3   

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resource and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China;
    2.Key Laboratory of Exploration Technologies for Oil and Gas Resources of Ministry of Education at Yangtze University, Jingzhou 434023, China;
    3.CNPC Xinjiang Oilfield Branch, Kelamayi,Xinjiang 843000, China
  • Received:2010-01-08 Online:2010-09-26 Published:2010-09-26

摘要:

为了准确计算泥质砂岩储层的Qv,提出了利用核磁共振测井计算Qv的方法,通过对56块同时具有阳离子交换量和孔隙度、渗透率数据的岩心样品的分析,建立了阳离子交换量与综合物性指数的关系模型。为了解决准确而连续地计算综合物性指数的问题,提出了利用核磁共振测井横向驰豫时间几何平均值求取Swanson参数、进而利用Swanson参数获取综合物性指数的方法。同时利用核磁共振测井法、自然伽马测井相对值法、自然电位测井图版法3种计算Qv的方法对准噶尔盆地南缘4口井资料进行了处理,并对处理结果作了对比分析。结果表明:在泥质砂岩厚层段,3种方法都可以简单而有效地计算Qv。与岩心资料相比,核磁共振测井法计算的相对误差为13%,自然伽马测井法计算的相对误差为19%,自然电位测井法计算的相对误差为22%;在砂泥岩薄互层,用核磁共振测井法计算的Qv比其它两种方法计算的结果更为可靠,更能反映地层的真实情况。

关键词: 阳离子交换量Qv, 核磁共振, 自然伽马射线, 自然电位测井

Abstract:

In order to accurately calculate the cation exchange capacity Qv of shaly sand reservoirs, a Qv calculating method using NMR logging data was presented, a correlation model between Qv and synthesized index was established by analyzing 56 core samples with porosity, permeability and CEC, considering the problem that it was difficult to accurately calculate synthesized index, the novel method was presented to calculate Swanson parameter from NMR T2 geometric mean value and to obtain the synthesize index from Swanson parameter. At the same time the data of four wells at the southern margin of Junggar Basin were processed using Qv calculated by three different methods of NMR logging, natural gamma ray logging and spontaneous potential logging, and comparative analysis was carried out. It is showed that Qv can be simply and efficiently calculated by these three methods in thick layers of shaly sand, compared with the core analysis results, the relative error based on NMR logging, natural gamma ray logging and spontaneous potential logging respectively is 13%, 19% and 22%; in thin alternating layers of shale and sandstone, Qv calculated using NMR logging is more reliable than that calculated by the other two methods, and better reflects the true situation of formations.

Key words: cation exchange capacity Qv, NMR(nuclear magnetic resonance), natural gamma rays, spontaneous potential logging

中图分类号: 

  • P631.8
[1] 庞振宇, 赵习森, 孙卫, 党海龙, 任大忠, 解伟. 致密气藏成藏动力及成藏模式——以鄂尔多斯盆地L区块山1储层为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(3): 674-684.
[2] 于向前,赵义平,王明新,刘迪,王文婷,汪馨竹. 音频大地电磁法与核磁共振法结合划分含水层的试验[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(1): 350-358.
[3] 范晓敏, 李舟波. 自然电位测井数值计算中的激励源分布[J]. J4, 2012, 42(4): 895-899.
[4] 李鹏举, 姜大鹏, 李鹏飞, 宋延杰. 核磁共振T2谱M-P广义逆反演研究[J]. J4, 2011, 41(2): 579-585.
[5] 魏存弟, 孙彦彬, 杨殿范, 孙双. 电气石活化水效应的应用[J]. J4, 2010, 40(6): 1450-1455.
[6] 苏俊磊, 王艳, 孙建孟. 应用可变T2截止值确定束缚水饱和度[J]. J4, 2010, 40(6): 1491-1495.
[7] 林峰, 王祝文, 刘菁华, 丁阳, 李长春. 核磁共振T2谱奇异值反演改进算法[J]. J4, 2009, 39(6): 1150-1155.
[8] 张继令, 翁爱华. 地面核磁共振模型约束反演含水层参数[J]. J4, 2008, 38(4): 692-0697.
[9] 张文权,翁爱华. 地面核磁共振正则化反演方法研究[J]. J4, 2007, 37(4): 809-0813.
[10] 翁爱华,王雪秋. 高精度地面核磁共振数据正演计算[J]. J4, 2007, 37(3): 620-0623.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!