Orogen‐scale drainage network evolution and response to erodibility changes: insights from numerical experiments |
| |
| Authors: | Emanuele Giachetta Alberto Refice Domenico Capolongo Nicole M Gasparini Frank J Pazzaglia |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra e Geoambientali, Università degli studi di Bari “Aldo Moro”, Bari, Italy;2. Now at Dipartimento di Scienze, Università degli studi Roma Tre, Roma, Italy;3. Istituto di Studi sui Sistemi Intelligenti per l'Automazione, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Bari, Italy;4. Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA;5. Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA |
| |
| Abstract: | The continuous feedbacks among tectonics, surface processes, and climate are reflected in the distribution of catchments on active mountain ranges. Previous studies have shown a regularity of valley spacing across mountain ranges worldwide, but the origin of this geomorphological feature is currently not well known. In this work, we use a landscape evolution model to investigate the process of fluvial network organization and the evolution of regular ridge‐and‐valley patterns on simulated mountain ranges. In particular, we investigate the behavior of such patterns when subjected to a perturbation in landscape processes from a previous steady state, resulting from a sudden variation in the pattern of bedrock erodibility, from homogeneous to a gradient. We analyze the time evolution of the mean ratio λ' between the linear spacing of adjacent valleys and the half width of the mountain range. We show how a valley spacing ratio of ~0.5 is first achieved at steady state under uniform bedrock erodibility. After applying the gradient of bedrock erodibility across the landscape, we observe that λ' first increases and then decreases to a new steady‐state value that is smaller than the original value. A detailed analysis of the simulations, through observations of surface ‘snapshots’ at repeated time intervals, allows to gain some insight into the mechanisms governing this fluvial network reorganization process, driven by the migration of the main divide toward the side characterized by lower bedrock erodibility. On both sides of the range the new steady‐state valley spacing is obtained through mechanisms of catchment reorganization and competition between adjacent fluvial networks. In particular, catchment reorganization is characterized by the growth of smaller catchments between shrinking larger catchments on the side with lower erodibility, and the growth of larger catchments on the side with higher erodibility. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
| |
| Keywords: | landscape evolution valley spacing catchments reorganization bedrock erodibility SIGNUM |
|
|
