Community‐Derived Standards for LA‐ICP‐MS U‐(Th‐)Pb Geochronology – Uncertainty Propagation,Age Interpretation and Data Reporting |
| |
| Authors: | Matthew S A Horstwood George Gehrels Simon E Jackson Noah M McLean Chad Paton Norman J Pearson Keith Sircombe Paul Sylvester Pieter Vermeesch James F Bowring Daniel J Condon Blair Schoene |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. NERC Isotope Geosciences Laboratory, British Geological Survey, Nottingham, UK;2. Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA;3. Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada;4. Department of Geology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA;5. Centre for Star and Planet Formation, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark;6. Faculty of Science, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, ARC National Key Centre for Geochemical Evolution and Metallogeny of Continents (GEMOC), Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia;7. Geoscience Australia, Cnr. Jerrabomberra Ave and Hindmarsh Drive, Canberra, ACT, Australia;8. Department of Geosciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA;9. Department of Earth Sciences, University College London, London, UK;10. Department of Computer Science, College of Charleston, 29424, Charleston, SC, USA;11. Department of Geosciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA |
| |
| Abstract: | The LA‐ICP‐MS U‐(Th‐)Pb geochronology international community has defined new standards for the determination of U‐(Th‐)Pb ages. A new workflow defines the appropriate propagation of uncertainties for these data, identifying random and systematic components. Only data with uncertainties relating to random error should be used in weighted mean calculations of population ages; uncertainty components for systematic errors are propagated after this stage, preventing their erroneous reduction. Following this improved uncertainty propagation protocol, data can be compared at different uncertainty levels to better resolve age differences. New reference values for commonly used zircon, monazite and titanite reference materials are defined (based on ID‐TIMS) after removing corrections for common lead and the effects of excess 230Th. These values more accurately reflect the material sampled during the determination of calibration factors by LA‐ICP‐MS analysis. Recommendations are made to graphically represent data only with uncertainty ellipses at 2s and to submit or cite validation data with sample data when submitting data for publication. New data‐reporting standards are defined to help improve the peer‐review process. With these improvements, LA‐ICP‐MS U‐(Th‐)Pb data can be considered more robust, accurate, better documented and quantified, directly contributing to their improved scientific interpretation. |
| |
| Keywords: | laser ablation ICP‐MS U‐(Th‐)Pb geochronology uncertainty propagation data reporting ablation laser ICP‐MS U‐(Th‐)Pb propagation des incertitudes la communication des donné es |
|
|
