| 山东东营杜邦1井注水诱发破裂活动分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李行船,郭飚,曲国胜,刘启元,李顺成,陈九辉,李岩峰,谢晓峰.山东东营杜邦1井注水诱发破裂活动分析[J].地震学报,2007,29(3):274-284. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李行船 郭飚 曲国胜 刘启元 李顺成 陈九辉 李岩峰 谢晓峰 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1) 中国北京100029中国地震局地质研究所2) 中国北京100049中国地震应急搜救中心 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 2005年12月3日——2006年5月18日，中国地震局对山东东营杜邦1井(直井)进行了6个月的注水诱发地震监测. 对该井1 464～3 034 m， 即纵向跨度1 570 m的4个注水层段（沙三中、 沙三上顶部、沙三上底部、沙二段）11个注水作业过程进行了完整记录. 应用长短项平均和多台比较方法共获得地震事件记录5 090个， 最终获得定位事件274个. 监测期间记录到的事件信号能量都比较小， 没有ML0.5的震动信号. 从注水开始，事件的数量随时间呈现出不同的变化， 在沙三上的中等胶结程度地层中， 震动破裂事件最为频繁. 破裂事件空间位置随时间从注水中心向外围扩展， 在不同的注水层段呈现出不同的方向性: 在低渗透储层段， 破裂事件的展布趋向与最大水平主压应力方向一致； 在中高渗透层段， 震动事件更多地沿主渗流通道展布.
|
| 关 键 词： | 注水诱发地震 地层破裂 地震监测 地震定位 |
| 文章编号： | 0253-3782(2007)03-0274-11 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006年9月29日 |
ANALYSIS OF INJECTION-INDUCED FAILURE FOR DUPONT WELL 1, DONGYING, SHANDONG PROVINCE |
| |
| Li Xingchuan,Guo Biao,Qu Guosheng,Liu Qiyuan,Li Shuncheng,Chen Jiuhui,Li Yanfeng,Xie Xiaofeng.ANALYSIS OF INJECTION-INDUCED FAILURE FOR DUPONT WELL 1, DONGYING, SHANDONG PROVINCE[J].Acta Seismologica Sinica,2007,29(3):274-284. |
| |
| Authors: | Li Xingchuan Guo Biao Qu Guosheng Liu Qiyuan Li Shuncheng Chen Jiuhui Li Yanfeng Xie Xiaofeng |
| |
| Abstract: | From December 3, 2005 to May 18, 2006, a water injection-induced seismicity test was conducted on DuPont test well 1 for about six months by China Earthquake Administration. To the vertical injected well, 11 water injection processes were conducted on four depth intervals, including middle Shahejie3, the top of the upper Shahejie3, the bottom of the upper Shahejie3 and Shahejie2, with the vertical span from 1 464 m to 3 034 m. Monitoring stations has been run throughout the procedure. From the recorded data, there were 5 090 events being picked out manually, 274 events located. It indicates that the energy of seismic signal is very small, and the largest magnitude is no more than ML0.5. And also, the major energy is centered on the vertical component, while amplitude of the other horizontal components is very small. From the start of water injection, the number of seismic events varied with time. And the event was most frequent in the period of upper Shahejie3 injection. The distribution of events extended from the injected well to the outside with time, and the direction of events distribution rotated in different injected interval. Of which, in the low permeability interval, events trend close to the direction of principal compressive stress direction; while in higher permeability interval, they trend close to the predominant seepage direction. |
| |
| Keywords: | injection-induced seismicity formation failure seismic monitoring earthquake location |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《地震学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《地震学报》下载全文 |
|
