| 2022年青海门源MS6.9地震后冷龙岭断裂未来强震的水平位错量评估 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 吴果,孙浩越,吕丽星,冉洪流,周庆,周介元.2022年青海门源MS6.9地震后冷龙岭断裂未来强震的水平位错量评估[J].震灾防御技术,2022,17(2):308-315. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 吴果 孙浩越 吕丽星 冉洪流 周庆 周介元 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国地震局地质研究所, 北京 100029 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家重点研发计划（2021YFC3000605） |
| |
| 摘 要： | 2022年1月8日青海门源发生ＭS6.9地震，该地震造成冷龙岭断裂西端错断了兰新铁路大梁隧道，导致铁路长期停运，经济损失巨大。制定隧道修复方案时，需对冷龙岭断裂未来强震的水平位错量进行评估。结合近年来冷龙岭断裂的最新研究进展，同时采用确定性方法和概率断层位错危险性分析方法评估冷龙岭断裂未来强震的水平位错量。考虑不确定因素影响，同时采用3名研究者提供的震级与最大位错量经验关系式进行估算。结果表明，不同经验关系式会对评估结果产生显著影响，其中根据确定性方法得到的冷龙岭断裂未来强震的水平位错量为2.32～4.36 m，均值为3.57 m。概率断层位错危险性分析结果随着超越概率的降低而增大，50年超越概率2%、100年超越概率2%和100年超越概率1%的结果均值分别为1.82 m、3.17 m、4.61 m。相较于确定性方法，概率断层位错危险性分析可提供不同超越概率水平下的位错参数，以供不同抗震设防要求的建筑采用。此外，对于地震活动性强的断裂，可采用低超越概率下的概率断层位错危险性分析结果，该结果可能会大于确定性方法评估结果。
|
| 关 键 词： | 门源MS6.9地震 冷龙岭断裂 水平位错 概率断层位错危险性分析 |
| 收稿时间： | 2022-03-01 |
Assessment of Horizontal Displacements for Future Strong Earthquakes on the Lenglongling Fault after the 2022 MS6.9 Menyuan Earthquake,Qinghai Province,China |
| |
| Wu Guo,Sun Haoyue,Lv Lixing,Ran Hongliu,Zhou Qing,Zhou Jieyuan.Assessment of Horizontal Displacements for Future Strong Earthquakes on the Lenglongling Fault after the 2022 MS6.9 Menyuan Earthquake,Qinghai Province,China[J].Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention,2022,17(2):308-315. |
| |
| Authors: | Wu Guo Sun Haoyue Lv Lixing Ran Hongliu Zhou Qing Zhou Jieyuan |
| |
| Affiliation: | Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100029, China |
| |
| Abstract: | On January 8, 2022, a Ms6.9 earthquake occurred in Menyuan, Qinghai province, China. During the earthquake, the west end of the Lenglongling fault broke the Daliang tunnel of the Lanxin Railway, resulting in a long-term suspension of the railway and huge economic losses. When formulating the tunnel repair plan, it is necessary to assess the horizontal displacement amount of the future strong earthquakes on the Lenglongling fault. Based on the latest research progress of the Lenglongling fault, we simultaneously use the deterministic method and the probabilistic fault displacement hazard analysis (PFDHA) method to evaluate this parameter. To account for uncertainty, the empirical relationships between the magnitude and the maximum displacement provided by three researchers are used for estimation. The results show that different empirical relationships have a significant impact on the evaluation results, and the results of the deterministic method are varying from 2.32 m to 4.36 m, with an average value of 3.57 m. The results of PFDHA increase with the decrease of the exceedance probability. The mean values of the PFDHA results under exceeding probabilities of 2% in 50 years, 2% in 100 years, and 1% in 100 years are 1.82 m, 3.17 m, and 4.61 m, respectively. Compared with the deterministic method, PFDHA can provide displacement parameters at different levels of exceeding probability, which is convenient for buildings with different anti-seismic design requirements. In addition, for faults with strong seismic activity, the PFDHA results under low probability of exceedance can be used, which may be larger than those assessed by deterministic method. |
| |
| Keywords: | Menyuan M< i>S< sub>6 9 earthquake Lenglongling fault Horizontal displacements Probabilistic fault displacement hazard analysis |
|
| 点击此处可从《震灾防御技术》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《震灾防御技术》下载全文 |
|
