| HRCLDAS-V1.0和ERA5海面风场对比评估分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 渠鸿宇,黄彬,赵伟,宋佳凝,郭乙莹,胡海川,曹越男.HRCLDAS-V1.0和ERA5海面风场对比评估分析[J].热带气象学报,2022,38(4):569-579. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 渠鸿宇 黄彬 赵伟 宋佳凝 郭乙莹 胡海川 曹越男 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 国家气象中心，北京 100081 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 广东省重点领域研发计划项目2019B111101002中国气象局创新发展专项CXFZ2021J021国家重点研发计划2018YFC1506904 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 基于2020年中国近海31个浮标的逐小时数据，使用统计分析方法对中国气象局高分辨率陆面数据同化系统(HRCLDAS-V1.0)和欧洲中期天气预报中心第5代全球大气再分析数据(ERA5)海面风场进行了系统的检验，检验结果表明:两者在我国近海均具有较高的可信度，风速平均绝对误差(MAE)分别为1.16 m/s和1.09 m/s，风向MAE分别为23 °和22 °。随着风力增大两者的风速准确度均有所降低，当风力等级≥10级时，前者准确度优于后者；对于风向而言，随着风力增大，两者准确度均升高。此外，选取2020年典型的两次冷空气过程和2008号台风“巴威”过程，检验两者在不同天气过程影响下的准确度，两类融合产品均能较好地再现冷空气过程引起的风向变化，而对不同强度的冷空气过程下的风速反映存在差异；对于台风引起的大风，在风速较低时两者风速均具有不错的表现，但HRCLDAS-V1.0对峰值强度的表现优于ERA5。
|
| 关 键 词： | 海面风场 融合数据 HRCLDAS-V1.0 风场评估 浮标 ERA5 |
| 收稿时间： | 2021-08-28 |
COMPARISON AND EVALUATION OF HRCLDAS-V1.0 AND ERA5 SEA-SURFACE WIND FIELDS |
| |
| QU Hongyu,HUANG Bin,ZHAO Wei,SONG Jianing,GUO Yiying,HU Haichuan,CAO Yuenan.COMPARISON AND EVALUATION OF HRCLDAS-V1.0 AND ERA5 SEA-SURFACE WIND FIELDS[J].Journal of Tropical Meteorology,2022,38(4):569-579. |
| |
| Authors: | QU Hongyu HUANG Bin ZHAO Wei SONG Jianing GUO Yiying HU Haichuan CAO Yuenan |
| |
| Affiliation: | National Meteorological Center, Beijing 100081, China |
| |
| Abstract: | Based on hourly data from 31 buoys in the offshore areas of China in 2020, the sea-surface wind products available from the High Resolution China Meteorological Administration Land Surface Data Assimilation System (HRCLDAS-V1.0) and the Fifth Generation Global Atmospheric Reanalysis (ERA5) dataset were evaluated. The results showed that both HRCLDAS-V1.0 and ERA5 sea-surface wind had high credibility in the offshore areas of China. Their wind speed mean absolute error (MAE) were 1.16 m/s and 1.09 m/s respectively and wind direction MAE were 23 ° and 22 ° respectively. As wind intensity increased, their wind speed bias all became larger. When wind intensity level was greater than or equal to 10, the HRCLDAS-V1.0 wind speed was better than the ERA5 wind speed. In terms of wind direction, the accuracy of both improved with the increase of wind intensity. In addition, two typical cold air events in 2020 and Typhoon Bavi (2008) were used to examine the accuracy of HRCLDAS-V1.0 and ERA5 sea-surface wind. Both HRCLDAS-V1.0 and ERA5 could reproduce the wind direction change caused by cold air events. However, there were some differences in wind speed during cold air events of different intensities. The HRCLDAS-V1.0 and ERA5 wind speed all had good performance when the wind speed was low during Typhoon Bavi. However, the performance of HRCLDAS-V1.0 was better than that of ERA5 for wind at peak intensity. |
| |
| Keywords: | sea-surface wind field data fusion HRCLDAS-V1 0 wind field evaluation buoy ERA5 |
|
| 点击此处可从《热带气象学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《热带气象学报》下载全文 |
