| 针对模式风场的格点预报订正方案对比 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 曾晓青,薛峰,姚莉,赵声蓉.针对模式风场的格点预报订正方案对比[J].应用气象学报,2019,30(1):49-60. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 曾晓青 薛峰 姚莉 赵声蓉 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 国家气象中心, 北京 100081 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家重点研究发展计划（2017YFC1502005，2018YFC1506606），国家气象中心预报员专项（Y201722，Y201724） |
| |
| 摘 要： | 为了将格点观测融合产品用于模式预报产品的滚动订正中，获得精准的预报效果，使用国家气象信息中心HRCLDAS（High Resolution China Meteorological Administration Land Data Assimilation System）业务系统产生的高频次格点风场融合产品作为实况资料，采用两种风场模型和8种格点误差订正方案，对模式风预报产品进行订正预报试验，试验选择欧洲中期天气预报中心10 m风预报产品的2017年1月1日—2月28日以及2017年6月1日—7月31日两个时间段，进行了预报模拟试验，对8种格点误差订正方案的订正结果进行检验，同时将订正场插值到站点，使用国家级2400个地面气象站风场资料进行站点检验，结果表明:无论从格点还是站点检验的平均绝对偏差、准确率、绝对偏差分布频率结果看，采用基于模式和实况因子的全格点滑动建模订正方案具有最佳的订正效果。
|
| 关 键 词： | 风场释用 精细化格点预报 误差订正 |
| 收稿时间： | 2018/6/22 0:00:00 |
| 修稿时间： | 2018/10/11 0:00:00 |
Comparative Study of Different Error Correction Methods on Model Output Wind Field |
| |
| Zeng Xiaoqing,Xue Feng,Yao Li and Zhao Shengrong.Comparative Study of Different Error Correction Methods on Model Output Wind Field[J].Quarterly Journal of Applied Meteorology,2019,30(1):49-60. |
| |
| Authors: | Zeng Xiaoqing Xue Feng Yao Li and Zhao Shengrong |
| |
| Affiliation: | National Meteorological Center, Beijing 100081 |
| |
| Abstract: | The meshing forecast products is an important direction for the future development of China Meteorological Administration. With the development of the grid forecast business and approaching of Beijing Olympic Winter Games in 2022, the forecast of the wind is very important. In order to promptly correct forecast results using grid observation fusion products, grid forecasting products with higher resolution and accuracy are obtained, and the high-frequency grid wind fusion products generated by the HRCLDAS (High Resolution China Meteorological Administration Land Data Assimilation System) system of National Meteorological Information Center as observations are studied. Eight different error correction methods and two different wind field models are used to correct European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) 10 m wind forecast field. The test sample time is selected from 1 January 2017 to 28 February 2017, and from 1 June 2017 to 31 July 2017, and two forecast simulations are conducted. In each trial, 24 h corrected forecast test is carried out for two start times at 1400 BT and 2000 BT, and eight different correction methods are used to correct the prediction of ECMWF 10 m wind forecast field. Grid forecast verification is performed on grid results. At the same time, grid prediction results from 8 corrected methods is interpolated to 2400 national surface meteorological stations and station forecast verification is performed on grid results. From the grid verification result and site verification result of two trials, using the latest observations as a predictor, wind forecast effects of 3-6 h is significantly improved. For the correction of the wind direction, the correction effects are slightly improved. Results show that the two-factor model with dynamic coefficient has the best correction effects on the average absolute error, accuracy and absolute error distribution frequency of both grid and site test. Sliding modeling allows the correction model to follow the trend of ECMWF 10 m wind forecast system error. After the optimal method is corrected, the wind speed error in most parts of South China, East China and North China is below 1 m·s-1, especially the large error is significantly reduced, and the wind direction error is also reduced. However, there are still some mean absolute error of 1-3 m·s-1 in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, central Xinjiang and Inner Mongolia. Due to local effects of the wind, the correction field of the interpolation to the site still has a certain gap with the actual situation of the site. If prediction result fusion technology is carried out, it is expected that there will be better grid prediction results. |
| |
| Keywords: | wind grid MOS accurate and high-resolution grid forecasting error correction |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《应用气象学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《应用气象学报》下载全文 |
|
