Midlittoral polychaete communities in the Eastern Mediterranean Sea: new information from the implementation of the Natural Geography in Shore Areas (NaGISA) protocol and comparisons at local and regional scales |
| |
| Authors: | Georgios Chatzigeorgiou Kleoniki Keklikoglou Sarah Faulwetter Fabio Badalamenti Miltiadis‐Spyridon Kitsos Christos Arvanitidis |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Biology Department, University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete, Greece;2. Institute of Marine Biology, Biotechnology and Aquaculture, Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Heraklion, Crete, Greece;3. Department of Zoology, School of Biology, University of Patras, Rio, Greece;4. CNR‐IAMC, Laboratorio di Ecologia Marina, Castellammare del Golfo, Trapani, Italy;5. Department of Zoology, School of Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece |
| |
| Abstract: | The aim of this study was to attempt to fill current knowledge gaps on midlittoral Mediterranean biodiversity at local and regional scales, by using benthic polychaetes as a model taxon. Two different data sets were analysed: (i) a quantitative data set from the two Natural Geography in Shore Areas (NaGISA) study sites in Crete and (ii) a qualitative data set from multiple sites across the Mediterranean. At the local scale, the results provide evidence that (i) discrete species communities are formed in midlittoral Mediterranean habitats, which vary by geographical location and year, depending on the scale of observation; (ii) macrophyte coverage and Chl‐a are the only environmental variables associated, albeit weakly, with the above pattern; (iii) although naturally disturbed, the Cretan NaGISA sites do not seem to experience any anthropogenic stress; (iv) environmental heterogeneity and history seem to be much less important in shaping the polychaete communities than inter‐specific interactions; however, it is not possible to specify at this stage whether local or regional processes or even their interactions may shape the polychaete communities. At the regional scale, the results indicate that (i) the only factor that seems to be involved in the regional pattern is the identity of the study providing the data sets, which implies variability and bias in how research projects are carried out, from the sampling design through to data collection and analysis; (ii) the Cretan NaGISA sites may be considered as representative of the habitat in the Mediterranean, under certain conditions. |
| |
| Keywords: | Biodiversity inter‐tidal zone Mediterranean Sea NaGISA rocky shores |
|
|
