Precise zircon U-Pb age dating of two mafic-ultramafic complexes at Tulargen large Cu-Ni district and its geological implications.
-
摘要: 图拉尔根铜镍矿位于新疆黄山-镜儿泉铜镍矿带东段,其发现和探明是近年来该区带找矿的重大突破。矿区内分布有Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ号3个小岩体,其中Ⅰ号岩体含矿性最佳,勘查程度也最高。Ⅰ号杂岩体为一同构造基性-超基性杂岩体,具有典型的环带状岩相分带结构。图拉尔根Ⅰ号岩体的辉长岩单颗粒锆石SHRIMP U-Pb精确定年结果为300.5±3.2Ma,而Ⅱ号岩体锆石SIMS U-Pb精确定年结果为357.5±2.5Ma,明显早于Ⅰ号岩体。Ⅰ号岩体成岩时代为晚石炭世-早二叠世,与东天山地区大多数镁铁-超镁铁岩体的形成时代相近,而Ⅱ号岩体时代为早石炭世,表明二者不是同期岩浆活动的产物,其形成背景与东天山早二叠世大规模成矿期的碰撞后伸展背景形成的基性-超基性侵入岩体不同。稀土元素及微量元素分析表明,两个岩体的轻重稀土分异明显,都为向右倾的轻稀土富集型配分模式,具负的Nb、Ta异常。但Ⅱ号岩体的斜率高于Ⅰ号岩体。Ⅰ号岩体富集大离子亲石元素Rb,Th轻微亏损,高场强元素Zr、Hf呈正异常,而Ⅱ号岩体明显亏损Rb,富集Ba,同时有Sr的正异常和Zr、Hf的明显负异常。Ⅰ号岩体微量元素具有Nb、Ta相对于Th、La亏损,Ba、Th、U含量高的特点,表现出地壳物质混染的特征。Ⅱ、Ⅲ号岩体目前所见均以辉长岩为主体岩石类型,含矿性较差。Ⅱ号岩体和Ⅰ号岩体微量元素富集特征不一致,也显示这两个岩体的母岩浆性质可能不尽相同,但两个岩体的微量元素特征都显示出遭受了一定程度的地壳混染,这对成矿是有利的。由于Ⅱ、Ⅲ号岩体发育有高磁、高重力和低阻异常,我们尚不能排除其深部产出矿化的可能性,有必要开展进一步的勘查评价。图拉尔根两个镁铁-超镁铁岩体的最新定年结果,将东天山地区与铜镍硫化物矿床相伴的镁铁-超镁铁质岩浆活动时限提前了10Ma,为在该区进一步找矿提供了年代学依据。
-
关键词:
- 图拉尔根铜镍矿区 /
- Ⅰ、Ⅱ号镁铁-超镁铁岩体 /
- 岩石地球化学 /
- 锆石U-Pb定年 /
- 东天山
Abstract: Tulargen Cu-Ni deposit, its discovery was the most important exploration breakthrough of recent years, located in the eastern section of Huangshan-Jingrquan ore belt,eastern Xinjiang. There are three small intrusions in the ore district which named Ⅰ, Ⅱand Ⅲ complex,respectively. The ore-bearing property and exploration degree are both best in Ⅰ intrusion. It shows typical ring-band structural lithofacies zones, soⅠcomplex is a syntectonic mafic-ultramafic intrusion. The result of gabbro zircon SHRIMP U-Pb age of Ⅰ intrusion is 300.5±3.2Ma, determined zircon SIMS age of Ⅱintrusion is 357.5±2.5Ma. So the emplacement of Ⅱcomplex is earlier than Ⅰcomplex. Ⅰ Intrusion formed in Late Carboniferous-Early Permian, which consists with formation ages of most east Tianshan mafic-ultramafic intrusions and associated Cu-Ni deposits. Furthermore the age makes the mafic-ultramafic magma activity related with magmatic Cu-Ni sulfide deposits ahead of about 10Ma in eastern Tianshan. While Ⅱ intrusion formed in Early Carboniferous. So the two intrusions of Tulargen ore district are not formed in the same period of magmatic activity. The tectonic setting of Ⅱ intrusion is different from the major metallogenic structure, extension setting of the late collision, of large-scale Early Permian magmatic Cu-Ni sulfide deposits in eastern Tianshan. REEs and trace elements analysis data of two intrusions both show LREE and HREE clear fractionation, enrichment of LREE and negative Nb and Ta anomalies. However, the slope of Ⅱintrusion is higher thanⅠintrusion. Ⅰintrusion have Rb, Zr and Hf positive anomalies, while significant loss of Rb, enrichment of Ba in Ⅱ intrusion. Furthermore, there are Sr positive anomalies and Zr, Hf negative anomalies. The trace elements characteristics of these two intrusions both display the feature of crustal contamination. Ⅱand Ⅲ intrusions are both mainly consist of gabbro and ore-poor. The significant difference of forming age and geochemical characteristics of these two complexes indicated that the characteristics of parental magma are not like each other, but the both show the characteristics of crustal contamination, which is beneficial to mineralization. The ore potential of Ⅱ and Ⅲ complexes are not very good since the difference of forming age, trace elements geochemical characteristics and lithofacies zones among Ⅱ and Ⅲ complex. Owing to the Ⅱ and Ⅲ complexes are corresponding to the distribution of rock magnetic, gravity and resistivity, anomalies. We can’t rule out the possibility of mineralization in deeper about them. It’s worthy of further exploration and evaluation. Furthermore, the age makes the mafic-ultramafic magma activity related with magmatic Cu-Ni sulfide deposits ahead of about 10Ma in eastern Tianshan. It provided a basis for chronology in further exploration in eastern Tianshan area. -
[1] 韩宝福, 季建清, 宋彪, 陈立辉, 李宗怀. 2004. 新疆喀拉通克和黄山东含铜镍矿镁铁-超镁铁杂岩体的SHRIMP锆石U-Pb年龄及其地质意义.科学通报, 49(2):2324-2328
李锦轶, 王克卓, 孙桂华, 莫申国, 李文铅, 杨天南, 高立明. 2006. 东天山吐哈盆地南缘古生代活动陆缘残片:中亚地区古亚洲洋板块俯冲的地质记录. 岩石学报, 22(5):1087-1102
梁光河, 徐兴旺, 肖骑斌, 蔡新平, 秦克章, 张宝林, 三金柱, 惠卫东, 彭晓明. 2007. 大地电磁测深法在铜镍矿勘查中的应用——以与超基性岩有关的新疆图拉尔根铜镍矿为例.矿床地质, 26(1):120-127
刘敦一, 简平, 张旗, 张福勤, 石玉若, 施光海, 张履桥, 陶华. 2003. 内蒙古图林凯蛇绿岩中埃达克岩SHRIMP测年:早古生代洋壳消减的证据. 地质学报, 77(3): 317-327
毛启贵, 肖文交, 韩春明, 孙敏, 袁超, 闫臻, 李继亮, 雍拥, 张继恩. 2006. 新疆东天山白石泉铜镍矿床基性-超基性岩体锆石U-Pb同位素年龄、地球化学特征及其对古亚洲洋闭合时限的制约. 岩石学报, 22(1): 153-162
牛宏, 吕新彪, 惠卫东, 梅微. 2009. 哈密图拉尔根铜镍矿Ⅰ号岩体矿床特征及成矿研究.新疆地质, 27(2): 136-140
秦克章, 方同辉, 王书来, 朱宝清, 冯益民, 于海峰, 修群业. 2002. 东天山板块构造分区、演化与成矿地质背景研究. 新疆地质, 20:302-307
秦克章, 徐兴旺, 梁光河等. 2006. 东天山东段大型铜、镍、金矿床成矿规律研究、靶区优选与隐伏矿定位预测的重要进展. 矿床地质, 25(增刊): 301-304
秦克章, 丁奎首, 许英霞, 孙赫, 徐兴旺, 唐冬梅, 毛骞. 2007. 东天山图拉尔根、白石泉铜镍钴矿床钴、镍赋存状态及原岩含矿性研究. 矿床地质, 26:1-14
冉红彦, 肖森宏. 1994. 喀拉通克含矿岩体的微量元素与成岩构造环境. 地球化学, 23(4): 392-401
三金柱, 田斌, 雷军文, 康峰, 秦克章, 徐兴旺. 2003. 新疆东天山新发现图拉尔根全岩矿化岩浆铜镍矿床.矿床地质, 3:270
三金柱, 惠卫东, 秦克章,孙赫,徐兴旺,梁光河,魏俊瑛,康峰,肖庆华. 2007. 新疆哈密图拉尔根全岩矿化岩浆铜-镍-钴矿床地质特征及找矿方向. 矿床地质, 26(3): 307-316
孙赫, 秦克章, 李金祥, 徐兴旺, 三金柱, 丁奎首, 惠卫东, 许英霞. 2006. 东天山图拉尔根铜镍钴硫化物矿床岩相、岩石地球化学特征及其形成的构造背景.中国地质, 33: 606-617
孙赫, 秦克章, 徐兴旺, 李金祥, 丁奎首, 许英霞, 三金柱. 2007. 东天山镁铁质-超镁铁质岩带岩石特征及铜镍成矿作用. 矿床地质, 26: 98-108
汤中立, 钱壮志, 姜常义等. 2006. 中国镍铜铂族岩浆硫化物矿床与成矿预测. 北京:地质出版社, 1-270
唐冬梅, 秦克章, 孙赫, 苏本勋, 肖庆华, 程松林, 李军. 2009. 天宇铜镍矿床的岩相学、年代学、地球化学特征:对东疆镁铁-超镁铁质岩体源区和成因的制约. 岩石学报, 25(4): 817-831
王玉往, 王京彬, 王莉娟, 彭晓明, 惠卫东, 秦全新. 2006. 岩浆铜镍矿与矾钛磁铁矿的过度类型-新疆哈密香山西矿床. 地质学报, 80: 61-73
张旗, 钱青, 王焰. 1999. 造山带火成岩地球化学研究.地学前缘,6(3):113-120][2] []
计量
- 文章访问数: 9371
- PDF下载数: 6425
- 施引文献: 0