新疆北部基性岩脉40Ar/39Ar年代学研究

周晶,季建清,韩宝福,马芳,龚俊峰,徐芹芹,郭召杰. 新疆北部基性岩脉40Ar/39Ar年代学研究[J]. 岩石学报, 2008, 24(5).
引用本文: 周晶,季建清,韩宝福,马芳,龚俊峰,徐芹芹,郭召杰. 新疆北部基性岩脉40Ar/39Ar年代学研究[J]. 岩石学报, 2008, 24(5).
ZHOU Jing,JI JianQing,HAN BaoFu,MA Fang,GONG JunFeng,XU QinQin,GUO ZhaoJie. 40Ar/39Ar Geochronology of mafic dykes in north Xinjiang[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2008, 24(5).
Citation: ZHOU Jing,JI JianQing,HAN BaoFu,MA Fang,GONG JunFeng,XU QinQin,GUO ZhaoJie. 40Ar/39Ar Geochronology of mafic dykes in north Xinjiang[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2008, 24(5).

新疆北部基性岩脉40Ar/39Ar年代学研究

  • 基金项目:

    国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划),国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)

40Ar/39Ar Geochronology of mafic dykes in north Xinjiang

  • 晚古生代以来,新疆北部地区侵入了一系列的基性岩脉,成为了解该地区地壳生长过程的重要窗口.本文采用激光40Ar/39Ar年代学方法,对整个北疆地区出露的基性岩脉进行了精细年代学研究.从数据特征上分析.低本底激光加40Ar/39Ar方法能对低钾含量、极少量样品(0.1mg~5mg)进行精细定年,所以非常适合进行基性岩脉的精细定年.本文展示的基性岩脉激光40Ar/39Ar方法的高质量数据显示新疆北部基性岩脉群的活动时限跨越332~174Ma,为石炭纪-侏罗纪.由数据分析可以看出,新疆北部基性岩脉群在时间上,呈现脉动式侵位特征,在332~174Ma之间,有多达6~7次脉动式活动,时间间隔大致为20~30Ma.从基性岩脉所揭示的大地构造含义来分析,新疆北部地区从石炭纪到侏罗纪处在一个相似的地壳演化阶段.为一个陆壳垂向生长、区域构造应力场显示拉张的构造环境,并在时间、空间上具有相对统一的特征.
  • 加载中
  • [1]

    Halls HC and Fahring WF. 1987. Mafic dykes swarms. Geol. Assoc. Can. Spec. Paper, 34:483 -491

    [2]

    Han BF, He GQ, Wang SG et al. 1998. Posteollisional mantle-derived magmatism and vertical growth of the continental crust in north Xinjiang. Geological Review, 44 (4) : 396 - 406

    [3]

    Han BF, He GQ and Wang SG. 1999. Postcollisional mantle-derived magrnatism, underplating and implications for basement of the Junggar Basin. Science in China (Series D), 42(2) : 113 - 119

    [4]

    Han BF, Ji JQ, Song B, Chen LH and Zhang L. 2006. Late Paleozoic vertical growth of continental crust around the Junggar Basin, Xinjiang, China (Part Ⅰ). Acta Petrologica Sinica, 22(5): 1077 - 1086

    [5]

    He GQ, Li MS, Liu DQ, Tang YL and Zhou RH. 1994. Paleozoic crustal evolution and mineralization in Xinjiang, China. HongKong: Educational and Cultural Press Ltd. , 132 - 160

    [6]

    He GQ, Li JB, Zhao YQ and Xu X. 2007. Keramay ophiolitic m~lange formed during Early Paleozoic in western Junggar basin. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 23(7 ) : 1573 - 1576

    [7]

    Huang X, Jin CW, Sun BS,et al. 1997. Study on the age of Armantai ophiolite, Xinjiang by Nd-Sr Isotope Geology. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 13 ( 1 ) : 85 - 91

    [8]

    Li XZ, Han BF, Ji JQ, et al. 2004. Geology, geochemistry and K-Ar ages of the Karamay basic-intermediate dyke swarms from Xinjiang and implications for crustal growth duing post-collisional stage. Geochimica, 33 (6) : 574 - 584

    [9]

    OuYang ZJ, Zhou DW, Lin JY and Feng JP. 2006. Geochemistry and Geological implications of the Baiyanghe basic-intermediate dyke swarm in the Bogda orogenic belt in Xinjiang, China. Geolectonic et Metallogenia, 30(4) : 495 -503

    [10]

    Parker AJ, Rickwood RC and Tucker DH. 1990. Congres mafic dykes and emplacement mechanisms. Rotterdam : Balkema, 13 - 74

    [11]

    Shu LS and Wang YJ. 2003. Late Devonian-Early Carboniferous radiolarian fossils from siliceous rocks of the Kalameili ophiolite, Xinjiang. Geological Review, 49(4) : 408 -412

    [12]

    Steiger RH and Jager E. 1977. Subcommission on geochronology: Convention on the use of decay constants in geo- and cosmochronology. Earth. Planet. Sci. Lett., 36:359-362

    [13]

    Xu QQ, Ji JQ, Han BF, Zhu MF, Chu ZY and Zhou J. 2008. Petrology, geochemistry and geochronology of the intermediate to marie dykes in northern Xinjiang since Late Paleozoic. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 24 (5) :977 - 996

    [14]

    Zhang C and Huang X. 1992. The age and tectonic settings of ophiolites in West Junggar, Xinjiang. Geological Review, 38 ( 6 ) : 509 - 524

    [15]

    韩宝福 何国琦.后碰撞幔源岩浆活动,底垫作用及准噶尔盆地基底的性质[J].中国科学:D辑,:.

  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  7418
  • PDF下载数:  5682
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
刊出日期:  2008-05-31

目录