中国大陆科学钻探主孔钻孔崩落与现场应力状态的确定

李朋武 崔军文 王连捷 王微 乔子江. 中国大陆科学钻探主孔钻孔崩落与现场应力状态的确定[J]. 岩石学报, 2005, 21(2): 421-426.
引用本文: 李朋武 崔军文 王连捷 王微 乔子江. 中国大陆科学钻探主孔钻孔崩落与现场应力状态的确定[J]. 岩石学报, 2005, 21(2): 421-426.
LI PengWu,CUI JunWen,WANG Lianjie,WANG Wei and QIAO ZiJiang Institute of Geology,Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences,Beijing 100037,China Institute of Geodynamics,Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences,Beijing 100081,China. The determination of in-situ stress from wellbore breakouts in the main borehole of the Chinese Continental Scientific Drilling[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2005, 21(2): 421-426.
Citation: LI PengWu,CUI JunWen,WANG Lianjie,WANG Wei and QIAO ZiJiang Institute of Geology,Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences,Beijing 100037,China Institute of Geodynamics,Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences,Beijing 100081,China. The determination of in-situ stress from wellbore breakouts in the main borehole of the Chinese Continental Scientific Drilling[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2005, 21(2): 421-426.

中国大陆科学钻探主孔钻孔崩落与现场应力状态的确定

  • 基金项目:

    科技部国家重点基础研究发展规划项目资助(编号:2003CB716500)

The determination of in-situ stress from wellbore breakouts in the main borehole of the Chinese Continental Scientific Drilling

  • 中国大陆科学钻探主钻孔在1200m深度以下出现了钻孔崩落现象,我们在1200m至2015m的范围内采集了82个钻孔成像测井图象资料。对钻孔崩落长轴方位进行了方向统计,结果表明近似对称的崩落平均方位为324.8°±3.3°,对应的平均最大水平主应力方位为54.8°±3.3°。利用崩落形状要素(崩落深度和崩落宽度)以及岩石力学实验确定的岩石内聚力和摩擦系数,计算了1269m、1500m、2000m等16个深度上的最大和最小水平主应力的大小。根据岩石密度测井资料计算了各个深度上静负载应力。三个主应力的大小和方向反映出主钻孔位置的应力场处于走滑应力状态,与地震震源机制解得到的走滑应力场一致。
  • 加载中
  • [1]

    Barton C A, Zoback M D, Burns K L. 1988. In-situ stress orientation and magnitude at the Fenton geothermal site, New Mexico, determined from wellbore breakouts. Geophysical Research Letters, 15 (5) :467 -470.

    [2]

    Bell J S, Gough D I. 1979. Northeast-southwest compressive stress in Alberta-Evidence from oil wells. Earth and Planetary Science Letters,45:475 - 482.

    [3]

    Bungum H, Alsaker A, Kvamme L B, Hansen R A. 1991. Seismicity and seismotectonics of Norway and nearby continental shelf areas. Journal of Geophysical Research, 96(B2), 2249-2265.

    [4]

    Dong X G, Zhou C Y, Li H, Zheng J C. 1999. Study on tectonic stress field and the seismicity in Shandong area. Earthquake research in Plateau, 11 (3): 37 -43 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    [5]

    Gough D I, Bell J S. 1982. Stress orientations from oil-well fractures with examples from Colorado, east Texas, and northern Canada. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 19(7) :1358 -1370.

    [6]

    Hickman S H, Healy J H, Zoback M D. 1985. In situ stress, natural fracture distribution, and borehole elongation in the Auburn Geothermal Well, Auburn, New York. Journal of Geophysical Research, 90(B7): 5497-5512.

    [7]

    Hua A J, Zhou C Y, Liu X L. 1997. Traced study on stress field region in Yishu fault zone and Cangshan earthquake of Ms 5.2. Journal of Seismology, (3): 18 -23 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    [8]

    Huber K, Fuchs K, Palmer J, Roth F, Khakaev B, Van-Kin L, Pevzner L, Moos D, Zoback M D, Schmitt D. 1997. Analysis of borehole televiewer measurements in the Vorotilov drillhole, Russia - first results. Tectonophysics, 275 (1-3): 261 - 272.

    [9]

    Plumb R A, Hickman S H. 1985. Stress-induced borehole elongation: a comparison between the four-arm dipmeter and the borehole televiewer in the Auburn geothermal well. Journal of Geophysical Research, 90(B7), 5513-5521.

    [10]

    Vernik L, Zoback M D. 1992. Estimation of the maximum horizontal principal stress magnitude from stress-induced wellbore breakouts in the Cajon Pass scientific research borehole. Journal of Geophysical.Research, 97(B4): 5109 -5119.

    [11]

    XieZ, liu Y X, Hu W J, Xie JJ, Ma j L, Zhao H. 2002. The focal mechanism of earthquake in Henan and its adjacent region.Northwestern Seismological Journal, 24 (3): 283 - 286 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    [12]

    Yu Y X, Xu Z H. 1994. A study on orientations of horizontal principal stress in Jizhong depression using borehole breakout data. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 21 (2):48 - 55 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    [13]

    Yu Y X, Xu Z H. 1996. The inverse of the stress state of upper crust in Jizhong depression using borehole breakout data from inclined well.Acta Seismologica Sinica, 18 (2): 246 - 253 ( in Chinese with no English abstract).

    [14]

    Zhou C Y, Jiang Z F, Wang H W, Dong X G, Ma Y X, fang Y L. 1994. Dynamic variation of stress field and seismic activity in juncture area of Jiangsu, Shandong and Yellow Sea. Seismological Research of Northeast China, 10(1) :10 -17 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    [15]

    Zoback M D, Moos D, Mastin L, Anderson R N. 1985. Well bore breakouts and in situ stress. Journal of Geophysical Research, 90(B7) :5523 -5530.

    [16]

    Zoback M L, Zoback M D. 1989. Tectonic stress field of the continental United States. In: Paiser L C, Mooney W D, (eds.). Geophysical Framework of the Continental United States: Boulder, Colorado,Geological Society of America Memoir, 172:523 -539.

    [17]

    Zoback M L. 1992. First- and Second-Order Patterns of Stress in the Lithosphere: The World Stress Map Project. Journal of Geophysical Research, 97 ( B8 ), 11703 - 11728.

  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  6130
  • PDF下载数:  7712
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
修回日期:  2005-01-30
刊出日期:  2005-03-31

目录