首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

BDS-2/BDS-3伪距单点定位精度分析
引用本文:方欣颀,范磊.BDS-2/BDS-3伪距单点定位精度分析[J].全球定位系统,2020,45(1):19-25.
作者姓名:方欣颀  范磊
作者单位:北京航空航天大学电子信息工程学院,北京100191;卫星导航与移动通信融合技术工信部重点实验室,北京100191;北京航空航天大学电子信息工程学院,北京100191;卫星导航与移动通信融合技术工信部重点实验室,北京100191
基金项目:中国卫星导航系统重大专项(GFZX030302030204)。
摘    要:北斗三号(BDS-3)基本系统于2018年底开始提供全球服务.通过处理37个全球GNSS服务组织(IGS)多模实验跟踪网(MGEX)观测站90天北斗数据,评估了北斗二号(BDS-2)和BDS-3在全球范围内的可见卫星数、几何精度衰减因子(GDOP)和单频伪距单点定位精度,分析了BDS-2/BDS-3组合对BDS-2、BDS-3单系统空间几何构型、伪距单点定位(SPP)精度的改善程度.结果表明,BDS-3的空间几何构型较BDS-2有明显的提升,定位精度在东方向、北方向和高程方向分别为1.490、2.610、5.238 m(RMS),相较于BDS-2分别提高了58%、1%、24%.BDS-2/BDS-3组合在东方向、北方向和高程方向分别为1.45、2.36、4.90 m(RMS),较BDS-2与BDS-3单系统分别提高了59%、11%、29%,以及3%、10%、6%.并且BDS-2/BDS-3组合明显削弱了BDS-2定位精度与地理经度相关的边缘效应. 

关 键 词:北斗二号  北斗三号  单频伪距单点定位  GDOP  定位精度

Accuracy analysis of BDS-2/BDS-3 standard point positioning
FANG Xinqi,FAN Lei.Accuracy analysis of BDS-2/BDS-3 standard point positioning[J].Gnss World of China,2020,45(1):19-25.
Authors:FANG Xinqi  FAN Lei
Affiliation:1.School of Electronic Information Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China2.Laboratory of Navigation and Communication Fusion Technology, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Beijing 100191, China
Abstract:The third-generation of Chinese BeiDou Satellite System(BDS-3) has been providing global service since the end of 2018. In order to evaluate the accuracy of BDS-2 and BDS-3 standard point positioning(SPP) as well as visible satellites and GDOP, 90 days of BDS-2 and BDS-3 data collected from 37 globally distributed International GNSS Service(IGS) Multi-GNSS Experiment network(MGEX) stations was used to perform data analysis. Results show that: 1) The geometry of BDS-3 is significantly improved when compared with that of BDS-2 by analyzing the visible satellites and GDOP. 2) The RMS of BDS-3 SPP error is 1.490, 2.610, 5.238 m in the east, north and up directions, which is improved by 58%, 1%, and 24% respectively when compared with that of BDS-2. 3) The RMS of combined BDS-2/BDS-3 SPP error is 1.45, 2.36, 4.90 m, which is improved by 59%, 11% 29% when compared with the BDS-2 results. 4) The RMS of combined BDS-2/BDS-3 SPP error is improved by 3%, 10%, 6% when compared with the BDS-3 results. We also find that the combination of BDS-2 and BDS-3 weakens the marginal effect of BDS-2 SPP which is related to the geographical longitude.
Keywords:BDS-2  BDS-3  standard point positioning  GDOP  accuracy
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《全球定位系统》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《全球定位系统》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号