共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 859 毫秒
1.
南华冰期的底界讨论:来自沉积学与同位素年代学证据 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
目前国内对于我国新元古代南华系划分的分歧很大,主要原因之一在于对板溪群及其相当层位地层的构造属性及其上限年龄的认识存在较大差异,为此,在详细的沉积学调查的基础上,对湘黔桂地区典型丹州群和下江群(与板溪群相当)有关剖面上顶部地层沉凝灰岩开展了锆石年代学研究.沉积学调查表明,板溪期沉积地层与上覆南华冰期沉积地层之间的转换界面清晰,界面上下岩性、结构、构造、沉积相特征迥异,显示板溪群和上覆南华纪冰期沉积期间存在明显的沉积—构造转换过程.而板溪晚期沉凝灰岩的锆石U-Pb同位素年代学研究则表明,板溪群及其相当层位的上限年龄均趋向于720 Ma,这与Sturtian冰期的启动年龄718 Ma接近.因此,基于沉积盆地演化的阶段性、全球性重要古气候演化的区域可对比性以及同位素年代学分析,将南华冰期启动年龄设定为720 Ma是恰当的,将我国南华系底界置于江口冰期沉积层系之底也是合理的,这为我国南华系底界GSSP的选定提供了重要的年代学和沉积学约束. 相似文献
2.
关于建立“板溪系”的建议及其基础的讨论——以黔东地区为例汪正江 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
作者在分析黔东新元古代早期沉积时限的基础上,结合前人关于Sturtian冰期、南华系底界、青白口系年代学的最新研究成果,指出华南新元古代裂谷盆地早期沉积（板溪群或与之相当的高涧群、芙蓉溪群、丹洲群、下江群、登山群、历口群等）时限为740～820Ma,是南华纪冰期前的非冰成沉积,是Rodinia裂解机制下的填平补齐沉积;而青白口系沉积可能是与Rodinia形成相关的板块碰撞机制下坳陷盆地沉积,南华系是与国际成冰系相对应的冰期沉积,是华南新元古代裂谷盆地的第一个盖层,因此,将板溪群、下江群等归入南华系或青白口系均不合理。由此提出了“板溪系”概念,它包括板溪群或与之相当的一套楔状地层。结合目前华南裂谷盆地开启年龄和南华纪冰期的起始年龄,板溪纪的时限暂定为850～740Ma。 板溪系的提出不仅将有利于解决长期存在的南华系划分对比问题,同时也必将有利于新元古代裂谷盆地早期演化及其与Rodinia超大陆裂解、冰期形成等关系的研究和相关重大气候、环境巨变问题的探讨。 相似文献
3.
关于建立“板溪系”的建议及其基础的讨论——以黔东地区为例 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
作者在分析黔东新元古代早期沉积时限的基础上,结合前人关于Sturtian冰期、南华系底界、青白口系年代学的最新研究成果,指出华南新元古代裂谷盆地早期沉积(板溪群或与之相当的高涧群、芙蓉溪群、丹洲群、下江群、登山群、历口群等)时限为740～820Ma,是南华纪冰期前的非冰成沉积,是Rodinia裂解机制下的填平补齐沉积;而青白口系沉积可能是与Rodinia形成相关的板块碰撞机制下坳陷盆地沉积,南华系是与国际成冰系相对应的冰期沉积,是华南新元古代裂谷盆地的第一个盖层,因此,将板溪群、下江群等归入南华系或青白口系均不合理。由此提出了"板溪系"概念,它包括板溪群或与之相当的一套楔状地层。结合目前华南裂谷盆地开启年龄和南华纪冰期的起始年龄,板溪纪的时限暂定为850～740Ma。板溪系的提出不仅将有利于解决长期存在的南华系划分对比问题,同时也必将有利于新元古代裂谷盆地早期演化及其与Rodinia超大陆裂解、冰期形成等关系的研究和相关重大气候、环境巨变问题的探讨。 相似文献
4.
桂北地区丹洲群是南华裂谷盆地南段的一套连续裂谷充填沉积,厘定各组沉积时限及区域地层关系,对理解华南新元古代裂谷作用期次具有重要意义。本文利用LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb同位素测年,获得丹洲群合桐组二段和拱洞组底部凝灰岩夹层形成年龄分别为801±4 Ma和781±5 Ma。研究表明,丹洲群白竹组和合桐组一段与下江群甲路组和乌叶组、板溪群沧水铺组和马底驿组、西乡群孙家河组及陆良组一段相当,沉积时限为820~800 Ma;合桐组二段与下江群番召组相当,沉积时限为800~780 Ma;拱洞组可与下江群清水江组、平略组和隆里组,板溪群五强溪组中上部和牛牯坪组,西乡群大石沟组中上部和三郎铺组,陆良组二段及澄江组、开建桥组、莲沱组、虹赤村组和上墅组的中上部直接对比,沉积时限为780~725 Ma。华南新元古代裂谷盆地系统的典型地层锆石年龄存在5组高峰,峰值年龄分别为818±2 Ma、802±1 Ma、780±4 Ma、756±4 Ma及728±5 Ma。综合华南新元古代岩浆活动特征及盆地沉积演化过程,确定华南新元古代裂谷作用可分为两期:820~800 Ma和800~725 Ma。此外,华南新元古代岩浆活动与裂谷作用之间存在明显的耦合关系,但各期岩浆活动对各裂谷盆地的影响程度存在差异。 相似文献
5.
关于板溪群的时代归属及其地层划分对比,一直以来存在较大争议,为此作者在重新研究了秀山—梵净山地区板溪群的沉积序列及其演化的基础上,首次对秀山凉桥地区的板溪群红子溪组顶部的晶屑凝灰岩进行了SHRIMP锆石U-Pb测年,研究显示板溪群早期的盆地扩张阶段结束于790Ma左右,随后盆地转入快速充填和差异升降阶段。地层对比研究表明,秀山—梵静山地区的板溪群沉积仅相当于黔东的下江群、湘西的板溪群下部,沉积时限为820～790Ma,是新元古代中期Rodinia裂解背景下的裂陷盆地的早期充填。 相似文献
6.
湘中地区冷家溪群和板溪群锆石U-Pb年龄、Hf同位素特征及对华南新元古代构造演化的意义 总被引：7，自引：4，他引：3
通过对江南造山带中段冷家溪群和板溪群凝灰岩及碎屑岩锆石U-Pb定年及系统的Hf同位素分析表明,冷家溪群沉积时代大致在860～820 Ma,不整合在其上的板溪群沉积下限在820 Ma左右,这表明在江南造山带,晋宁造山运动之后,很快进入伸展裂解阶段。锆石的Hf同位素组成显示,在850～800 Ma之间,锆石Hf初始值表现出快速上升趋势,表明这一时期有显著的地幔物质加入。造成这一现象的原因,一方面是早期的岛弧岩浆岩(850～820 Ma,尤其是I型花岗岩)是碎屑物的主要来源,另一方面造山后快速裂解形成的壳幔混合岩浆物质(如凝灰岩)形成板溪群部分物质来源。结合本研究和前人的研究成果,表明新元古代板块俯冲、拼合以及拼合后由于板片的拆沉引起的快速裂解(plate-rift model)是江南造山带形成的比较合理的地球动力学模型。 相似文献
7.
华南陆块在新元古时期经历了复杂的地质演化过程,其中以江南褶皱带的形成和南华盆地的裂解为标志。江南褶皱带是一套浅变质强变形的新元古代早-中期沉积-火山岩组合,之后经历了820Ma酸性岩浆岩侵入。新元古代晚期地层沉积在南华盆地中,以不整合上覆于江南褶皱带和过铝质花岗岩。过去几十年,科学家们对这一系列地质过程提出了多种演化模型,如地幔柱模型,裂解模型和岛弧模型。笔者通过该区沉积岩和岩浆岩的详细研究,结合已有模式,建立了全新的演化模型——俯冲-弧后伸展模型,该模型认为:扬子东南缘新元古代俯冲作用开始于850Ma左右,四堡群及其相应地层为弧前盆地沉积;扬子与华夏板块的拼接发生在830Ma左右;扬子西北缘持续的俯冲作用引发弧后拉张,导致了南华盆地的形成和大规模花岗质岩石侵位。 相似文献
8.
下江群沉积地质特征及其对华南
新元古代构造演化的约束 总被引：3，自引：1，他引：2
华南西部新元古代裂陷纪大地构造属性和原型盆地性质是一个涉及到扬子古陆在全球构造中的定位、且争议较大的基础地质问题。新元古代下江群发育于强变形变质的盐边群和弱变形变质的板溪群之间, 处于以滨浅海沉积为主的板溪群向深海沉积转化的过渡带内。下江群以浊流沉积的杂砂岩为主, 沉积物扩散方向指向西。下江群清水江组砂岩骨架颗粒统计分析表明, 物源来自再旋回造山带。常量元素地球化学特征显示, 下江群碎屑岩系形成于活动陆缘区的弧后盆地靠大陆一侧。结合盐边群、苏雄组大地构造属性及其与下江群的空间关系, 推测当时的华南西部处于汇聚型板块边缘内, 总体属弧后伸展型盆地。 相似文献
9.
《地层学杂志》2016,(2)
近年来,随着离子探针等同位素定年技术的广泛应用,华南扬子区新元古代地层确切的时间框架愈发清晰。来自四堡群、板溪群及相应地层的同位素年龄数据表明,扬子区晋宁—四堡造山运动发生的时间约为8.3~8.2亿年前,持续时间可能不到10 Myr。板溪群与莲沱组地层不是上下关系,二者基本上是同时异相,莲沱组比板溪群沉积起始时间稍晚。南华系(成冰系)的底界应放在新元古代比较公认的最早的全球性冰期沉积地层的底部,在华南即长安组或江口组的底部(~720 Ma)。受华南新元古代裂谷盆地演化的控制,扬子区从东南盆地相区往西北浅水台地相区,南华系地层厚度变小、发育越来越不完整。南华系最上部南沱组及相应地层的沉积在扬子区分布最为广泛。 相似文献
10.
华南新元古代沉积盆地演化与Rodinia超大陆裂解存在紧密联系,但仍缺乏精细刻画.对扬子西缘澄江组开展了系统的碎屑锆石年代学和沉积学研究.澄江组砂岩的碎屑锆石U-Pb年龄主要为新元古代（870~780 Ma）,少数为前新元古代（2 850~1 010 Ma）,最显著的峰值为820 Ma,最年轻一组碎屑锆石206Pb/238U年龄加权平均值为804.5±5.4 Ma.结合已发表年龄数据,将澄江组沉积时限进一步限定为800~720 Ma.物源分析揭示澄江组的新元古代碎屑锆石剥蚀自邻近的新元古代岩浆岩,而前新元古代锆石可能来自于邻近新元古代岩体的剥蚀或地层的沉积再循环.扬子西缘新元古代中期沉积盆地具有由冲积扇相逐渐过渡为前扇三角洲相的沉积演化序列,最终形成了具有裂谷充填特征的“楔状地层”.这种沉积超覆演化过程在整个华南新元古代裂谷系普遍存在,指示在800 Ma左右华南全面进入裂谷盆地成熟阶段. 相似文献
11.
T. S. Zaitseva M. A. Semikhatov I. M. Gorokhov V. N. Sergeev A. B. Kuznetsov T. A. Ivanovskaya N. N. Melnikov G. V. Konstantinova 《Stratigraphy and Geological Correlation》2016,24(6):549-574
The structure of Riphean deposits developed on the western slope of the Anabar Massif is described with analysis of their depositional environments, distribution of stromatolite assemblages and organic-walled and silicified microfossils through sections, and evolution of views on stratigraphic significance of some of these assemblages. The investigation included complex mineralogical, geochemical, structural, and isotopic?geochronological study of globular phyllosilicates (GPS) of the glauconite?illite series from paleontologically well substantiated Riphean sequences (Ust’-Il’ya and Yusmastakh formations of the Billyakh Group) of the Anabar Massif in the Kotuikan River basin. Isotopic dating of monomineral size and density fractions of GPS from the Billyakh Group was performed in combination with simulation of the distribution of octahedral cations and comparison of the results obtained with Mössbauer spectrometry data. The applied approach is based on an assumption that the formation and transformation of Rb?Sr and K?Ar systems in GPS are synchronous with stages in their structural evolution, which are determined by the geological and geochemical processes during depositional history. Such an approach combined with the mineralogical and structural analysis contributes to correct interpretation of stratigraphic significance of isotopic data. The results obtained provide grounds for the conclusion that isotopic dates of GPS from the Ust’-Il’ya (Rb?Sr, 1485 ± 13 Ma; K?Ar, 1459 ± 20 Ma) and Yusmastakh (Rb?Sr, 1401 ± 10 Ma; K?Ar, 1417 ± 44 Ma) formations mark the stage of early diagenesis of sediments and are suitable for estimating the age of formations in question. 相似文献
12.
Geochronology and Tectonic Evolution of the West Section of the Jiangnan Orogenic Belt 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0
ZHANG Heng LI Tingdong XIE Ying ZHANG Chuanheng GAO Linzhi GENG Shufang CHEN Tingyu YOU Guoqing 《《地质学报》英文版》2015,89(5):1497-1515
As an important part of South China Old Land, the Jiangnan Orogenic Belt plays a significant role in explaining the assembly and the evolution of the Upper Yangtze Block and Cathaysia, as well as the structure and growth mechanism of continental lithosphere in South China.The Lengjiaxi and the Banxi groups are the base strata of the west section of the Jiangnan Orogenic Belt.Thus, the research of geochronology and tectonic evolution of the Lengjiaxi and the Banxi groups is significant.The maximum sedimentary age of the Lengjiaxi Group is ca.862 Ma, and the minimum is ca.822 Ma.The Zhangjiawan Formation, which is situated in the upper part of the Banxi Group is ca.802 Ma.The Lengjiaxi Group and equivalent strata should thus belong to the Neoproterozoic in age.The Jiangnan Orogenic Belt consisting of the Lengjiaxi and the Banxi groups as important constituents is not a Greenville Orogen Belt(1.3 Ga–1.0 Ga).The Jiangnan Orogenic Belt is a recyclic orogenic belt, and the prototype basin is a foreland basin with materials derived from the southwest and the sediments belong to the active continental sedimentation.By combining large amounts of dating data of the Lengjiaxi and the Banxi groups as well as equivalent strata, the evolutionary model of the western section of the Jiangnan Orogenic Belt is established as follows: Before 862 Ma, the South China Ocean was subducted beneath the Upper Yangtze Block, while a continental island arc was formed on the side near the Upper Yangtze Block.The South China Ocean was not closed in this period.From 862 Ma to 822 Ma, the Upper Yangtze Block was collided with Cathaysia; and sediments began to be deposited in the foreland basin between the two blocks.The Lengjiaxi Group and equivalent strata were thus formed and the materials might be derived from the recyclic orogenic belt.From 822 Ma to 802 Ma, Cathaysia continued pushing to the Upper Yangtze Block, experienced the Jinning-Sibao Movement(Wuling Movement); as result, the folded basement of the Jiangnan Orogenic Belt was formed.After 802 Ma, Cathaysia and the Upper Yangtze Block were separated from each other, the Nanhua rift basin was formed and began to receive the sediments of the Banxi Group and equivalent strata.These large amounts of dating data and research results also indicate that before the collision of the Upper Yangtze Block with Cathaysia, materials of the continental crust became less and less from the southwest to the east in the Jiangnan Orogeneic Belt; only island arc and neomagmatic arc were developed in the eastern section.Ocean-continent subduction or continent-continent subduction took place in the western and southern sections, while intra-oceanic subduction occurred in the eastern section.Comprehensive analyses on U-Pb ages and Hf model ages of zircons, the main provenance of the Lengjiaxi Group is Cathaysia. 相似文献
13.
《International Geology Review》2012,54(14):1806-1824
In this article, we present in situ U–Pb and Lu–Hf isotope data for Upper Triassic detritus in the Sichuan region of northwestern South China, which was a foreland basin during the Late Triassic. The aim is to determine the provenance of sediments in the foreland basin and to constrain the evolution of the surrounding mountain belts. U–Pb age data for the Late Triassic detrital zircons generally show populations at 2.4–2.6 Ga, 1.7–1.9 Ga, 710–860 Ma, 410–460 Ma, and 210–300 Ma. By fitting the zircon data into the tectonic, sedimentologic, and palaeographic framework, we propose that the north Yangtze Block and South Qinling–Dabie Orogen were the important source areas of sediments in the northern part of the foreland basin, whereas the Longmen Shan thrust-fold belt was the main source region for detritus in other parts of the foreland basin. The South Qinling–Dabie Orogen could also have served as a physical barrier to block most detritus shed from the southern North China Block into the foreland basin during the sedimentation of the Xujiahe Formation. Our results also reveal that part of the flysch from the eastern margin of the Songpan–Ganzi region had been displaced into the Longmen Shan thrust-fold belt before the deposition of the foreland basin sediments. In addition, the Lu-Hf data indicate that Phanerozoic igneous rocks in central China show insignificant formation of the juvenile crust. 相似文献
14.
1∶25万怀化幅图区主要位于扬子陆块东南缘,自西向东划分为武陵断弯褶皱带、沅麻盆地、雪峰冲断带及邵阳坳褶带4个构造单元。通过此次调查研究,取得了以下主要进展及成果: 基本查明了区内板溪群与高涧群的相变关系及界线; 提出了南华纪长安期沿雪峰山与涟邵盆地的结合带存在一凹陷槽; 对区内岩浆岩侵入时代和期次做了详细的划分,建立了岩浆演化序列; 结合同位素年龄数据,系统地对白马山—龙山复式岩基带及其周边的中酸性—酸性花岗岩体侵入时代、火山岩系的喷发时代进行了统一厘定; 查明了雪峰造山带的构造变形特征、构造样式以及沅麻盆地的构造特征和形成演化过程。 相似文献
15.
苏鲁造山带东缘的灵山岛上发育有早白垩世碎屑岩,目前人们对其沉积的精确时代、成因机制和大地构造环境仍然存在着广泛的争议.利用LA-ICP-MS的方法对灵山岛上两套碎屑岩进行了锆石U-Pb测年,并对特征年龄谱中的代表性碎屑锆石进行了Lu-Hf同位素分析.结果表明:（1）碎屑锆石U-Pb测年结果显示,莱阳群法家茔组和青山群八亩地组下部的碎屑岩沉积时代分别为127±3 Ma和128±4 Ma,表明两套碎屑岩都是早白垩世中晚期的沉积产物;（2）灵山岛上两套碎屑岩具有完全相似的年龄谱以及锆石Hf同位素组成,表明发育软沉积变形的粉砂岩、泥岩和上覆的含砾粗砂岩具有相似的物源,并且源区组成较为单一,主要以亲华北的胶北地体为主,其次的物源区为苏鲁造山带;（3）胶莱盆地下白垩统莱阳群和灵山岛下白垩统莱阳群的碎屑锆石年龄谱对比表明,灵山岛上的莱阳群碎屑岩明显不同于胶莱盆地的莱阳群,暗示在早白垩世时,灵山岛上的两套碎屑岩可能受到区域断裂的控制,沉积于一个相对独立的盆地.综合结果表明,灵山岛地区莱阳群法家茔组可能沉积于断陷湖盆的萎缩期,早期的沉积以湖相为主,晚期主要以河流相为主,在此期间遭受到了强烈的火山地震作用,诱发了下部的湖相的砂泥岩发生大规模的滑塌和软沉积变形. 相似文献
16.
滇西无量山岩群为原1:100万下关幅(1975)命名,为一套浅变质砂岩和泥岩,形成于滨海相-浅海陆棚相,其时代一般认为属古生代,但一直缺乏化石依据或准确的年龄数据。本次1:5万区调在澜沧江西岸云龙县毛草坪村无量山岩群四段(Pz W4)的下部和上部获得两层变质基性火山岩夹层,根据野外岩石产状、镜下薄片鉴定、岩石地球化学综合分析恢复其原岩为玄武岩,形成于大洋扩张环境。采用LA-ICP-MS技术,对下部和上部变质基性火山岩中的锆石进行了U-Pb同位素测定,分别获得206Pb/238U年龄为(327±11) Ma(N=14, MSWD=6.7)和(284±3.7) Ma(N=27, MSWD=4.9),为早石炭世晚期和早二叠世晚期,这为无量山岩群形成时代及其演化提供了重要的年龄依据,对于进一步深入研究古特提斯洋晚古生代的构造属性与演化历史具有重要意义。 相似文献
17.
《Gondwana Research》2016,29(4):1294-1309
The Cuddapah Basin is one of a series of Proterozoic basins that overlie the cratons of India that, due to limited geochronological and provenance constraints, have remained subject to speculation as to their time of deposition, sediment source locations, and tectonic/geodynamic significance.Here we present 21 new, stratigraphically constrained, U–Pb detrital zircon samples from all the main depositional units within the Cuddapah Basin. These data are supported by Hf isotopic data from 12 of these samples, that also encompass the stratigraphic range, and detrital muscovite 40Ar/39Ar data from a sample of the Srisailam Formation. Taken together, the data demonstrate that the Papaghni and lower Chitravati Groups were sourced from the Dharwar Craton, in what is interpreted to be a rift basin that evolved into a passive margin. The Nallamalai Group is here constrained to be deposited between 1659 ± 22 Ma and ~ 1590 Ma. It was sourced from the coeval Krishna Orogen to the east, and was deposited in its foreland basin. Nallamalai Group detrital zircon U–Pb and Hf isotope values directly overlap with similar data from the Ongole Domain metasedimentary rocks. Depositional age constraints on the Srisailam Formation are permissive with it being coeval with the Nallamalai Group and it was possibly deposited within the same basin. The Kurnool Group saw a return to Dharwar Craton derived provenance and is constrained to being Neoproterozoic. It may represent deposition in a long-wavelength basin forelandward of the Tonian Eastern Ghats Orogeny. Detrital zircons from the Gandikota Formation, which is traditionally considered a part of the Chitravati Group, constrain it to being deposited after 1181 ± 29 Ma, more than 700 Ma after the lower Chitravati Group. It is possible that the Gandikota Formation is correlative with the Kurnool Group.The new data suggest that the Nallamalai Group correlates temporally and tectonically with the Somanpalli Group of the Pranhita–Godavari Valley Basin, which is tightly constrained to being deposited at ~ 1620 Ma. These syn-orogenic foreland basin deposits firmly link the SE India Proterozoic basins to their orogenic hinterland with their discovery filling a ‘missing-link’ in the tectonic development of the region. 相似文献
18.
19.
Jian ZHANG Guochun ZHAO LI Sanzhong Min SUN LIU Shuwen Xiaoping XIA Yanhong HE Department of Earth Sciences The University of Hong Kong Pokfulam Ro Hong Kong College of Marine Geosciences Ocean University of Chin Qingdao Shandong 《《地质学报》英文版》2006,80(6):886-898
1 Introduction The North China Craton (NCC) is considered to be the oldest and largest cratonic block in China. Recent studies to gain understanding of basement architecture of the NCC has led to its division into the Western and Eastern Blocks, separated by a N-S trending Paleoproterozoic Trans-North China Orogen (TNCO) (Fig. 1; Zhao et al., 1998, 1999a, 2000a, 2001a; Wilde et al., 2002). Although there is now abroad consensus that the final assembly of the NCC was completed by th… 相似文献
20.
新生代龙门山前盆地和盐源盆地是青藏高原东缘龙门山－锦屏山冲断带内及前缘地区发育和保存最好的新生代沉积盆地，本次以地层不整合面和ESR测年资料为主要依据，将该区新生代构造地层序列划分为5个构造层序，即TS1（65－55Ma)、TS2(40-50Ma)、TS3（23－16Ma)、TS4(4．7-1.6Ma)和TS5（0．74－0Ma)，据此将青藏高原东缘新生代构造变形和隆升事件划分为5期，其中TS1与喜马拉雅地体和拉萨地体拼合事件相关，TS2与印亚碰撞事件相关，TS3与青藏高原第一次隆升事件相关，TS4与青藏高原第二次隆升事件相关，TS5与青藏高原第三次隆升事件相关。 相似文献