共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 673 毫秒
1.
Aloísio J.B. Cotta Jacinta Enzweiler Stephen A. Wilson Carlos A. Pérez Antonio J.R. Nardy João H. Larizzatti 《Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research》2007,31(4):379-393
Reference materials (RM) are required for quantitative analyses and their successful use is associated with the degree of homogeneity, and the traceability and confidence limits of the values established by characterisation. During the production of a RM, the chemical characterisation can only commence after it has been demonstrated that the material has the required level of homogeneity. Here we describe the preparation of BRP-1, a proposed geochemical reference material, and the results of the tests to evaluate its degree of homogeneity between and within bottles. BRP-1 is the first of two geochemical RM being produced by Brazilian institutions in collaboration with the United States Geological Survey (USGS) and the International Association of Geoanalysts (IAG). Two test portions of twenty bottles of BRP-1 were analysed by wavelength dispersive-XRF spectrometry and major, minor and eighteen trace elements were determined. The results show that for most of the investigated elements, the units of BRP-1 were homogeneous at conditions approximately three times more rigorous than those strived for by the test of "sufficient homogeneity". Furthermore, the within bottle homogeneity of BRP-1 was evaluated using small beam (1 mm2 ) synchrotron radiation XRF spectrometry and, for comparison, the USGS reference materials BCR-2 and GSP-2 were also evaluated. From our data, it has been possible to assign representative minimum masses for some major constituents (1 mg) and for some trace elements (1-13 mg), except Zr in GSP-2, for which test portions of 74 mg are recommended. 相似文献
2.
在分析地质标准物质标准值不确定度来源的基础上,提出了在多个实验室协作研制地质标准物质时,协作单位除提供重现性检测数据外,还应分别提供各项目检测数据的合成不确定度。分析方法或实验室之间的平均值的合成不确定度按不等精度方法处理。标准物质标准值的不确定度由分析方法、检测实验室、样品均匀性和样品稳定性的不确定度合成后乘以扩展不确定度置信水平下的包含因子而得。 相似文献
3.
An Interpretation of ISO Guidelines for the Certification of Geological Reference Materials 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
Recommendations for the certification of reference materials, as published by the International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO), are reviewed and proposals made as to how they can be adapted for the certification of new geological reference materials. Whilst acknowledging the important contribution made by the large number of existing matrix-matched geological reference materials, it is recommended that future characterisation programmes should follow the ISO guidelines for certification, not the least so that laboratories can readily use the resultant samples to establish the traceability of geoanalytical results. 相似文献
4.
黑色页岩样品中痕量级铂族元素地球化学成分标准物质研制 总被引：2，自引：2，他引：0
介绍了黑色页岩样品中6个铂族元素铂、钯、钌、锇、铑、铱的标准物质研制过程。黑色页岩样品采自贵州黄家湾,为一次采集、一次混样的原始样品,随机抽取包装好后的样品进行检验与定值。均匀性、稳定性符合要求后,按照国际标准化组织(ISO)34、35指南的基本要求和我国一级标准物质的技术规范,采用多个实验室协同测试的定值方式,利用不同原理的分析方法对此样品的6个铂族元素进行定值。以各实验室组数据作为最小统计单元,用Grubbs准则、Dixon法检验剔除离群数据,Shapiro-Wilk法检验各元素数据分布的正态性。检验结果100%的元素呈正态或近似正态分布。定值的6个元素均符合标准值水平。 相似文献
5.
P.R. HOOPER S.P. REIDEL D.M. JOHNSON C.M. KNAACK 《Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research》1994,18(2):203-210
A preliminary report is presented on a basalt reference sample, Umatilla Columbia River Basalt, UMAT-1. Prepared in over 100 kg by the Columbia River Basalt Group, UMAT-1 was, initially, tested for its homogeneity by two US laboratories for major, minor and several trace elements; mean values of these two laboratories are presented. More recent data on 50 elements by a French laboratory attest to the excellent homogeneity of the sample. UMAT-1 is now available for further studies. 相似文献
6.
Klaus Peter Jochum Steven A. Wilson Wafa Abouchami Marghaleray Amini Jérome Chmeleff Anton Eisenhauer Ernst Hegner Linda M. Iaccheri Bruno Kieffer Joachim Krause William F. McDonough Regina Mertz‐Kraus Ingrid Raczek Roberta L. Rudnick Denis Scholz Grit Steinhoefel Brigitte Stoll Andreas Stracke Sonia Tonarini Dominique Weis Ulrike Weis Jon D. Woodhead 《Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research》2011,35(2):193-226
This paper contains the results of an extensive isotopic study of United States Geological Survey GSD‐1G and MPI‐DING reference glasses. Thirteen different laboratories were involved using high‐precision bulk (TIMS, MC‐ICP‐MS) and microanalytical (LA‐MC‐ICP‐MS, LA‐ICP‐MS) techniques. Detailed studies were performed to demonstrate the large‐scale and small‐scale homogeneity of the reference glasses. Together with previously published isotopic data from ten other laboratories, preliminary reference and information values as well as their uncertainties at the 95% confidence level were determined for H, O, Li, B, Si, Ca, Sr, Nd, Hf, Pb, Th and U isotopes using the recommendations of the International Association of Geoanalysts for certification of reference materials. Our results indicate that GSD‐1G and the MPI‐DING glasses are suitable reference materials for microanalytical and bulk analytical purposes. 相似文献
7.
松花江哈尔滨段水系沉积物中无机元素环境标准样品的研制 总被引：2，自引：2，他引：0
介绍了松花江哈尔滨段水系沉积物环境标准样品的研制方法,对其中21个无机元素进行定值。采集的水系沉积物样品经自然阴干、研磨、筛分、混匀、装瓶和灭菌等加工处理后,分层随机抽取18瓶样品,在0.25 g样品取样量条件下,以铜、铅、锌、砷、汞、铁和铝为代表元素进行均匀性研究,结果表明样品均匀性良好。在室温避光保存条件下,以铜、铅、锌、砷和汞为代表元素,采用线性模型进行稳定性研究,在15个月研制期间样品未观察到不稳定性。由11家协作实验室对水系沉积物标准样品中的21个无机元素进行定值研究,经统计检验分析评定出20个元素的标准值和不确定度,1个元素给出参考值。研制成的标准样品已应用于土壤或水系沉积物样品中无机元素的监测。 相似文献
8.
The Canadian Certified Reference Materials Project reports recommended values of lead-210 activity in four uranium reference materials previously certified for uranium and radium-226. Eleven laboratories participated in the interlaboratory program for DL-1a, BL-4a, DH-1a and BL-5; three measurement techniques were applied. Procedural and instrumental calibrations were performed with a certified lead solution from Amersham International Corp., thereby establishing traceability of the recommended values for lead-210. Activity ratios for uranium-238. radium-226 and lead-210 demonstrate these uranium reference materials to be in secular equilibrium, within experimental uncertainties. 相似文献
9.
The International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO) has published many guides, or technical standards, of great value to analytical geochemists. Two of particular importance are Guide 33 (Uses of Certified Reference Materials) and Guide 35 (Certification of Reference Materials). Both were first developed in the 1980s and undergo regular review and updating by the Reference Materials Committee (REMCO) that operates within ISO. Recent revisions have focused on adding statistical rigour to both guides. Although this offers significant advantages for use by professional metrologists, there are consequent issues of comprehension by the analytical chemists who in fact have the greatest need of them. A major focus of Guide 35 is the development of reference material uncertainties that are in full compliance with the Guide on Measurement Uncertainty (GUM), jointly issued by ISO, IUPAC and others. Guide 35 details handling of uncertainty due to (1) degradation on the shelf and in transport, (2) sample heterogeneity and (3) inter‐method and inter‐laboratory bias, as well as within‐laboratory repeatability. The International Association of Geoanalysts has developed a protocol for reference material certification that applies Guide 35 to the specific needs of the geoanalytical community. The approach being taken by the IAG in developing GUM‐compliant uncertainties for its certified values is presented. Recommendations made in Guide 33 for how a laboratory should compare its own results with certified values in assessing laboratory accuracy are outlined. Additionally, the subject of misusing reference materials is discussed. The apparent misuse occurs because so few CRMs exist that meet critical measurement needs of geoanalytical laboratories and that also meet the rigorous metrological demands of the latest editions of the ISO Guides. All of the focus of the IAG certification programme has been to undertake certifications that would fill gaps in CRM availability and thus serve to limit this misuse. 相似文献
10.
One or two gram aliquots of twelve reference materials with low platinum-group element (PGE) abundances (Ir concentrations ranging from 30 to 510 pg g-1 ) were analysed by isotope dilution ICP-MS using an on-line chromatographic matrix separation after acid digestion in a high pressure asher (HPA-S) to determine the concentrations of Ru, Pd, Re, Ir and Pt. Osmium concentrations were determined via ID-ICP-MS but as volatile OsO4 , whereas Rh concentrations were calculated by comparing the peak areas of the chromatographic peak with that of a standard solution. Validation of the method was performed and the concepts of traceability and measurement uncertainty were applied to assure comparability. The reference materials BCR-2, BHVO-1, BHVO-2, BIR-1, DNC-1, EN026 10D-3, MAG-1, RGM-1, SCo-1, SDO-1, TDB-1 and W-2 were investigated to test for their usefulness for certification. The use of TDB-1 is highly recommended because it is homogeneous at the two gram level and many values based on several different analytical procedures have been published. It is recommended that our efforts should focus on the certification of this reference material to reduce the uncertainties of its currently certified values (Pd and Pt only) and to assign certified values to the other PGE and Re. It is necessary to have at least one well-characterised RM for validation of methods applied to the analysis of PGE and Re in low abundance samples, although the matrix of TDB-1 might not completely match those of many samples. 相似文献
11.
12.
13.
Henry F. STEGER 《Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research》1981,5(2):189-193
The Canadian Certified Reference Materials Project has amended its procedure in interla-boratory certification programs. The reasons for reducing to one from two the number of bottles of a candidate reference materials submitted to each participating laboratory are discussed. The effect of the smaller number of results of the one-bottle approach to be expected on the certified value and 95% confidence interval is shown to be minor. 相似文献
14.
Jean S. Kane Bombor Batjargal Dorj Erdenetsetseg 《Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research》2009,33(3):295-308
A report is presented on the recertification of two certified reference materials (CRMs) initially prepared and certified by the Central Geological Laboratory of Mongolia (CGL), namely serpentinite GAS and alkaline granite OShBO. Subsequent work done in collaboration with the International Association of Geoanalysts (IAG) followed the International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO) guidelines for certification (ISO Guide 35, 2006) more closely than had been possible originally. The certification protocol followed was that of the International Association of Geoanalysts (IAG). The recertification added to the number of elements that were certified for OShBO (from 21 to 30), but not for GAS (decreased from 15 to 12) because of the greater analytical difficulties posed by that sample matrix in meeting the more stringent metrological requirements for recertification. Further, the uncertainties for these values were established in accordance with the Guide to Measurement Uncertainty ; individual contributions of heterogeneity and bias are reported as appropriate for each of the certified constituents. Traceability of the certified values was demonstrated to the greatest possible extent, based on concurrent analyses of the matrix-matched existing CRMs, SW and GM, by all participating laboratories. The materials are now available from the CGL for use by laboratories in controlling data quality when analysing materials of similar matrices. 相似文献
15.
16.
A Review of the IAG GeoPT™ and Certification Programmes,their Protocols,and the Differences between the Original and Potential Modifications to the Certification Protocol 
下载免费PDF全文
下载免费PDF全文 Jean S. Kane 《Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research》2015,39(4):419-432
The IAG conducts two programmes, the GeoPT ? proficiency test and a certification programme that are closely interconnected. Both support the quality control/quality assurance activities of geochemical laboratories. Each derives an estimate of ‘true value’ for a number of samples, but arrives at that estimate, and its uncertainty, differently. This review discusses the history of the two programmes and compares the ‘true values’ and their uncertainties obtained through each. It then considers ‘fitness‐for‐purpose’ issues related to both GeoPT ? and certification uncertainties. Issues related to potential modification of the IAG protocol for certification are also considered. 相似文献
17.
Jean S. Kane 《Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research》2004,28(1):53-80
The International Association of Geoanalysts (IAG) has certified a slate sample, OU-6, for twelve major and minor constituents, as well as thirty-five trace elements through an interlaboratory programme conducted in close compliance with the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) Guide 35 (1989). Laboratories were qualified for participation in the certification programme, based on their performance in the prior analysis of OU-6 as a proficiency test material. Thirty laboratories provided data for the certification, though not for each constituent that was certified. Certification criteria included a means of establishing traceability for the certification data, generally through concurrent analysis of the existing Geological Survey of Japan reference material JSl-1, agreement of results between laboratories and methods, and a minimum of data rejection (4% rejection rate for OU-6 data and 6% for JSl-1 data), preferably for well-understood technical reasons only. Information values are provided for an additional eight constituents where certification criteria were not met. Uncertainties developed in accordance with the "Guide on Uncertainty in Measurement" (Eurachem 2000) and representing the 95% confidence interval of the certified and information values are reported for all fifty five constituents. The material is currently available in 40 g units for distribution by the IAG. Supply is anticipated to last about ten years. 相似文献
18.
通常样品的87Sr/86Sr和143Nd/144Nd同位素比值分析采用SRM987、JNdi-1作为标准物质,它们分别是纯的碳酸盐和氧化物,适用于监控质谱测试过程。中国现有的钐-钕地质和铷-锶年龄标准物质,分别为玄武岩和钾长石,它们与很多地质样品的基质存在差别。仅有这两种基质的标准物质不能有效地监控不同地质样品Rb-Sr、Sm-Nd同位素分析过程,因此研制不同岩性的Rb-Sr、Sm-Nd同位素标准物质具有重要现实意义。本文采集中国典型地区的橄榄岩、榴辉岩和花岗岩作为候选物,严格按照《一级标准物质技术规范》(JJF 1006-1994)和《标准物质定值的通用原则及统计学原理》(JJF 1343-2012)等相关标准物质国家计量技术规范和国家标准,研制了橄榄岩、榴辉岩和花岗岩铷-锶、钐-钕同位素标准物质(编号为GBW04139、GBW04140、GBW04141),其中橄榄岩标准物质适用于高Mg、Fe,低Rb、Nd含量样品的分析,榴辉岩和花岗岩标准物质适用于含有难溶副矿物的岩石样品的分析。每个标准物质具有6个特性量值,Rb、Sr、Sm和Nd含量分布分别为0.16~64μg/g、12~560μg/g、0.1~3.2μg/g和0.3~15.3μg/g,87Sr/86Sr比值分布为0.70446~0.71309,143Nd/144Nd比值分布为0.51115~0.51267,同位素比值精度达到或优于同类标准物质。这些特性量值更接近实际样品,使用时将更加有效和方便。该系列标准物质可用于校准仪器和评价方法,并能有效监控实验室此类样品的铷-锶、钐-钕同位素分析过程。 相似文献
19.
Molan Tang Bolun Fan Lingyang Yao Zhengyu Bao Huan Tian Zhenzhen Ma Ziyi An Ming Ma Hongyu Zhang Zhongbiao Fu 《Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research》2020,44(2):375-384
The preparation and characterisation of certified reference materials of four selenium‐rich rocks (GBW07397 to GBW07400) are described in this paper. The raw materials were derived from selenium‐rich rocks in two famous seleniferous regions, Enshi Prefecture, Hubei Province and Ziyang County, Shaanxi Province, China. Sample homogeneity and stability were tested by inductively coupled plasma‐mass spectrometry and atomic fluorescence spectrometry. The determined element mass fractions included selenium, arsenic, copper, zinc, molybdenum, cadmium, lead, vanadium and silver. Except for silver, the results of analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the relative standard deviations of the element mass fractions showed that the four materials exhibited good homogeneity and stability. Ten laboratories were involved in an interlaboratory comparison scheme for certification. Eight element mass fractions in the selenium‐rich rocks were assigned as certified values, while only indicative values were obtained for Ag mass fractions. The certified values and expanded uncertainties for the selenium mass fractions in GBW07397–GBW07400 are 0.96 ± 0.05, 1.03 ± 0.05, 49 ± 4 and 38.5 ± 1.9 μg g?1, respectively. 相似文献
20.
Standard reference material of fluorite FM, consisting chiefly of fluorite, quartz and baryte, was prepared by the Institute of Mineral Raw Materials in Kutná Hora (Czechoslovakia). The homogeneity of the pulverised SRM was checked by X-ray fluorescence spectrometry from counts corresponding to the amounts of iron, copper, barium, strontium and titanium. The SRM was considered homogeneous if the "between bottles" variance was not significantly greater than the "within bottles" variance and further, if the error caused by heterogeneity of the SRM was less than one third of the error of an analytical determination carried out in a routine manner. Analytical results from 26 laboratories were processed following the recommended procedure of CMEA-countries which includes: Testing the normality of results, eliminating out-lying results and computing the arithmetic means, estimates of standard deviations and the confidence intervals of the means. Attested values for 17 components and non-attested values for 30 components and/or elements are reported. 相似文献