共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 686 毫秒
1.
根据华北地区的地震目录,建立了4个空间光滑的地震活动性模型,并以这些模型为空间分布函数,将华北地震区每个地震带的地震年发生率分配到空间格点中,计算这一地区的地震危险性．结果表明,采用仪器记录地震计算得到的地震活动性模型和地震危险性结果能够反映华北地区现今的地震活动水平和地震危险性水平,符合人们对现今华北地区地震危险性的认识;采用历史破坏性地震（Mge;4.7）计算的地震活动性模型和地震危险性结果,较好地反映了华北地区中强地震活动区的地震危险性水平;以地震应变计算地震活动率,并根据点椭圆模型和线椭圆模型计算得到的地震活动性模型,能够较好地反映大地震的活动水平和空间构造特征．将根据4个模型计算得到的50年超越概率10%峰值加速度（PGA）分布加权平均,得到综合的华北地区PGA分布,并将该PGA分布与根据《中国地震动参数区划图》中综合潜源方案计算得到的50年超越概率10%的PGA分布做了比较,发现二者无本质差别,均能反映华北地震区的地震危险性水平．当然,二者也具有一定的差异:前者计算得到的符合PGAge;100 cm/s2条件的区域面积明显要比后者的大,而符合PGAge;250 cm/s2条件的区域面积则比后者的要小. 这主要是由于潜在震源区类型和空间分布函数不同造成的． 相似文献
2.
川东南地区地震视应力时空分布特征 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0
利用四川数字地震台网记录资料,计算2008年汶川地震后,川东南地区ML 3.0以上地震的震源动力学参数特征,分别得到视应力、应力降与震级之间、震级和地震矩之间,以及地震矩和视应力之间的定标关系。通过扣除震级影响,计算归准化视应力值的时空变化特征。得到结果如下:1从时间分布图来看,研究区4级以上地震频发时段刚好对应视应力涨落较明显时段,而该时段当地工业采矿注水活动强烈,故该区域视应力水平或许反映了工业活动对区域应力场的影响;2从空间分布图来看,自贡隆昌一带震级偏大,视应力反而偏小的现象可能与该区域应力释放不充分、构造应力水平偏低有关,未来要关注该区域发生中强地震的可能。 相似文献
3.
4.
Morishita播散指数在地震空间分布丛集分析中的应用 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
本文以汾渭地震丛集分布研究为例探讨了Ｍｏｒｉｓｈｉｔａ播散指数在地震空间分布分析中的应用，并与地震空间中度Ｃ值统计方法进行了比较。结果表明，这种方法无需对资料中特定分布作任何假定，能够直接表述地震的空间分布集中程度，且计算方法简单，可靠。震例分析，，５左右中强地震前几年，地震形成小的丛集团块，地震活动以小震为主，前一年左右地震成团块结构，尺度约为几十公里，但并不伴随明显的震群活动，这种不同时期的地 相似文献
5.
6.
加卸载响应比理论已在地震预测中得到广泛应用，但也面临挑战。本对加卸载响应比理论及方法进行了分析，并提出该理论几个可能的研究方面：(1)根据固体潮应力变化值给定每个小地震Benio盯应变在加卸载响应比计算中的权重；(2)考虑地震之前应力空间分布，确定加卸载响应比可能升高的区域形状，进而确定加卸载响应比计算中小震资料的选取范围；(3)将实测的小震震源机制与假定小震震源机制都相同时的加卸载响应比计算结果进行比较，研究测定的小震震源机制对加卸载响应比方法的改善情况；(4)研究加卸载响应比方法对不同震源机制类型地震的适用情况。 相似文献
7.
8.
地震构造的能量积累和释放特征与新疆天山部分地区地震危险性分析 总被引：7，自引：0，他引：7
通过对活动断裂定量资料和地震活动性的分析对比，认为完整地震轮回包括特征地震和特征地震之间的次级地震；次级地震的震级与上次特征地震的离逝时间、断裂滑动速率有关；断裂的位移分为产生特征地震的大粘滑和产生次级地震的小粘滑；完整地震轮回中震级一频度关系依然成立；完整地震轮回的能量积累大致分为4个阶段，各阶段的地震活动性不同；特征地震的最大位移与平均位移之间的关系也反映了特征地震与次级地震之间的变形分配。基于上述认识，建立了相应的数学关系，用于定量估计地震构造的潜在震级和危险性；并将其初步运用于天山部分地震构造的地震危险性分析。 相似文献
9.
10.
针对巨大地震前经常出现的环形现象展开了系统研究，分析了我国及边界地区16次巨大地震前与部分强震前的环形分布特征，对其普适性、规则性及预测意义进行了讨论．结果表明: 巨大地震前数十年至上百年，在其周围经常出现中等以上地震形成的环形分布现象，这个图象具有很强的普适性，不仅无一例外地出现在巨大地震前，而且出现在7级多地震以前．活动环一般出现在巨大地震周围数百公里至上千公里范围（依震级而定）；环内地震活动具有特征不同的三个基本阶段: Ⅰ阶段活动水平较低，分布较散，主震震源区表现为空区；Ⅱ阶段活动性增强，频度、强度、集中度、应变释放率、分布面积率等均增加，空区缩小或消失；Ⅲ阶段活动整体较前期有所减弱，空区再度出现；活动环包围的主震源区在震前数十年可能出现1～3期活动（称为早期、中期与晚期震源活动）；活动环包围的空区长度经历大——小——大的变化过程等．根据活动环出现的区域、长度及环内地震活动状态的分析，可以估计巨大地震的发生地区、震级及地震孕育所处的阶段．这对巨大地震的长期预测是有价值的．本文还对震前活动环的形成机制进行了初步讨论． 相似文献
11.
大同—阳高6.1级地震活动背景 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
本文从较大时空范围研究了１９８９年大同－阳高６．１级地震的地震活动性背景，认为大同－阳高地震不是一次孤立的地震事件，是大同盆地历史６级以上地震活动的继续和必然。在时间进程中它们受华北地震区和山西地震带强震活动周期的制约，空间上与北三省交汇区中强地震成丛活动密切相关。大同－阳高６．１级、５．８级地震以及此期间的侯马４．９级、析州５．１级地震是山西地震带中强地震即将活跃的一个迹象，也是华北区域应力场增 相似文献
12.
为了解加州中部沿海的地震活动特征,本文利用了C值方法分析了过去36年的加州中部沿海地区地震资料,并与b值和地震频度结果进行了对比。分析了36年地震活动的基本情况。华北和加州中部沿海地区的C值资料分析表明,地震的空间分布不是随机的也不服从泊松分布。C值、b值和地震频度这三个定量的参数能够描述过去36年里加州中部沿海地区的地震活动的基本特征。 相似文献
13.
利用日本海区丰富的震史资料,研究了该区强震活动时—空变化的某些特征,并以此为据,将1900年以来的地震活动划分了三个地震轮回,同时还分析了各轮回的强震地区分布及其持续时间。分析了中国东北地区深震(mb≥6.0)及浅震(MS≥5.0)的成组性活动特征,研究了日本海西部深震与中国东北地区浅震的相关性。这些结果可作为研究日本海区强震高潮到来和结束的标志以及为判断未来主体活动区等强震预测问题提供线索。 相似文献
14.
利用日本海区丰富的震史资料，研究了该区强震活动时一空变化的某些特征。并以此为据，将１９００年以来的地震活动划分了三个地震轮回。文中讨论了各幕的持续时间及其强震的频度分布，同时还分析了各轮回的强震地区分布，探讨了每个强震高潮主体活动区形成特点，这些结果可作为研究日本海区强震高潮到来和结束的标志以及为判断未来主体活动区等强震预测问题提供线索。此外，本文还分析了我国大陆强震高潮与日本海沟地震的相关关系。 相似文献
15.
16.
云南地区处于印度板块与欧亚板块中国大陆碰撞带的东缘,地壳运动剧烈,活动块体特征明显,中强以上地震频发,是研究大震活动规律的理想场所。通过过去一个世纪的6.7级以上地震活动的时空分布以及地震动力分析认为,云南地区存在的4个具东西交替活动特征的地震活跃期,可能是东、西部各自地震活跃与平静过程叠加的结果,100a左右可能出现1次东、西部同时爆发大震的时段;云南地区地震活动与外围地区存在较好的呼应关系,安达曼-缅甸弧形带的巨震活动对云南地区地震活跃期的启动有一定的指示意义,而云南东部强震也与四川西部大震密切相关,四川大震活动往往滞后于云南地区;中强地震连发—平静—首发大震可能是云南以东部为活动主体的地震活跃期的启动模式。这些认识对云南地区大震预测、地震机理以及板缘动力学研究会有所帮助 相似文献
17.
Pakistan and the western Himalaya is a region of high seismic activity located at the triple junction between the Arabian, Eurasian and Indian plates. Four devastating earthquakes have resulted in significant numbers of fatalities in Pakistan and the surrounding region in the past century (Quetta, 1935; Makran, 1945; Pattan, 1974 and the recent 2005 Kashmir earthquake). It is therefore necessary to develop an understanding of the spatial distribution of seismicity and the potential seismogenic sources across the region. This forms an important basis for the calculation of seismic hazard; a crucial input in seismic design codes needed to begin to effectively mitigate the high earthquake risk in Pakistan. The development of seismogenic source zones for seismic hazard analysis is driven by both geological and seismotectonic inputs. Despite the many developments in seismic hazard in recent decades, the manner in which seismotectonic information feeds the definition of the seismic source can, in many parts of the world including Pakistan and the surrounding regions, remain a subjective process driven primarily by expert judgment. Whilst much research is ongoing to map and characterise active faults in Pakistan, knowledge of the seismogenic properties of the active faults is still incomplete in much of the region. Consequently, seismicity, both historical and instrumental, remains a primary guide to the seismogenic sources of Pakistan. This study utilises a cluster analysis approach for the purposes of identifying spatial differences in seismicity, which can be utilised to form a basis for delineating seismogenic source regions. An effort is made to examine seismicity partitioning for Pakistan with respect to earthquake database, seismic cluster analysis and seismic partitions in a seismic hazard context. A magnitude homogenous earthquake catalogue has been compiled using various available earthquake data. The earthquake catalogue covers a time span from 1930 to 2007 and an area from 23.00° to 39.00°N and 59.00° to 80.00°E. A threshold magnitude of 5.2 is considered for K-means cluster analysis. The current study uses the traditional metrics of cluster quality, in addition to a seismic hazard contextual metric to attempt to constrain the preferred number of clusters found in the data. The spatial distribution of earthquakes from the catalogue was used to define the seismic clusters for Pakistan, which can be used further in the process of defining seismogenic sources and corresponding earthquake recurrence models for estimates of seismic hazard and risk in Pakistan. Consideration of the different approaches to cluster validation in a seismic hazard context suggests that Pakistan may be divided into K?=?19 seismic clusters, including some portions of the neighbouring countries of Afghanistan, Tajikistan and India. 相似文献
18.
A. V. Klyuchevskii 《Izvestiya Physics of the Solid Earth》2010,46(4):306-316
Variations in annual numbers of earthquakes (the earthquake occurrence rate) that hit the Baikal region and Mongolia during
the period from 1964 through 2001 are studied in this work. Correlation analysis of the different-length series of annual
numbers N of earthquakes of representative energy classes makes it possible to reveal the effects of synchronous changes in the earthquake
occurrence rate in seven regions and eleven areas in the Mongolia-Baikal region, located far apart. The analysis of the shock
occurrence rate revealed episodes of short-period synchronization of seismic processes in the Mongolia-Baikal region at the
end of the 1960s, early in the 1980s, and in the middle of the 1990s. The episode of synchronization in the earthquake occurrence
rate in the early 1980s is observed in all the territories under study, but the episode at the end of the 1960s is less distinctly
seen in Mongolia and is revealed mainly in the data series with a length of three years. The synchronization in the seismicity
in Mongolia and in the southern PreBaikal region in 1995 requires further investigations, involving the dynamic parameters
of the earthquake sources. The observed synchronism in the annual number of earthquakes indicates that the seismic processes
become active nearly simultaneously over the huge territory of the Mongolia-Baikal region and produce a short-term coherent
change in the shock occurrence rate in the spatial-temporal distribution of the seismicity. The observed spatial and temporal
correlation in the seismicity is a sign of the seismogenic link between the Baikal region and Mongolia. 相似文献
19.
We select the Xiluodu-Wudongde reservoir area in the downstream of Jinsha River as the research area, and use the CAP and GPAT method to obtain focal mechanisms of ML ≥ 2.0 earthquakes from 2016 to 2017 in this region. Then, we analyze the spatial distribution characteristics of focal mechanism solutions in each local region and investigate the relationship between seismicity and regional structures. According to 414 focal mechanism solutions we get following conclusions:1)The Xiluodu dam began to impound water on May 4, 2013, and seismicity increased significantly after impoundment. We get 49 focal mechanisms in the Xiluodu dam and its adjacent area which are dominated by thrust faulting and next by strike-slip faulting, which are mainly distributed near the middle section of the Ebian-Jinyang fault zone. The distribution of nodal planes striking in NNW to NE direction is consistent with that of regional faults, and some large earthquakes are controlled by regional structures. 2)There are 39 and 24 focal mechanisms obtained in the unimpounded Baihetan and Wudongde dams and adjacent areas, and the spatial distribution of focal mechanism solutions are relatively consistent, dominated by strike-slip faulting with a small amount of thrust and normal faulting. The sinistral strike-slip earthquakes are consistent with the activity of Xiaojiang fault zone and Puduhe-Xishan Fault. The strikes of the nodal planes are distributed discretely, and many groups of faults intersect with each other in the area, suggesting that the seismogenic environment is relatively complex. 3)The seismicity in Ludian continues to be active after the Ludian M6.5 earthquake. By the end of 2017, we got 260 focal mechanism solutions in the aftershock area of the Ludian MS6.5 earthquake of Aug 3rd, 2014, which show an "L-shape" in distribution and are dominated by thrust and strike-slip faulting. The long axis is distributed in EW direction, and the short axis is distributed in near NNW direction. The strikes of nodal planes are mainly near EW and near NE, and the nodal planes in the NW direction are less. According to characteristics of a large number of focal mechanism solutions, we deduce that there may exist a buried structure in the EW direction, the seismicity is controlled by different types of faults and the seismogenic structure is very complex. 4)The centroid depth in each region is concentrated in the range of 5~15km, indicating that the seismogenic layer in the study area is 5~15km deep in the middle and upper crust. 相似文献
20.
地震前异常的阶段性及其空间分布特征 总被引：21，自引：5，他引：21
将岩石变形曲线到达强度点以前比拟为地震前异常的中长期阶段，强度点至失稳点之间定义为短临阶段。在中长期阶段异常是由驱动力的增强或区域应力场的调整引起，前者引起的应力扰动场与原来的方向一致，强烈扰动区与原来的应力集中区一致，后者引起的应力扰动场应力方向可以发生变化，应力扰动对平均应力影响较大，强烈扰动区位于断层错列部位。二者的强烈扰动场均与未来的震源区无必然联系。在短临阶段异常是由局部断层扩展或弱化引起，与之相伴的是平均应力扰动场的四象限分布和最大剪应力扰动场的八瓣式分布 相似文献