共查询到16条相似文献，搜索用时 235 毫秒
1.
利用11个全球海潮模型和中国东海及南海近海潮汐资料,计算了海潮负荷对中国及邻区重力场的影响,进而讨论了用近海潮汐资料修正全球海潮模型对负荷结果的影响. 结果表明, 用近海潮汐资料修正全球海潮模型对沿海地区的负荷计算影响较大, 因此在计算海潮负荷对沿海台站的影响时, 必须顾及近海潮汐效应. 计算M2波海潮负荷时, 选择CSR4.0, FES02, GOT00, NAO99和ORI96海潮模型, 则对于内陆大部分台站负荷的近海效应在0.1times;10-8m/s2量级; 而计算O1波时, 如选择AG95或CSR3.0模型, 则在0.05times;10-8m/s2量级. 这说明模型中的各个潮波在我国沿海的准确性并不是一致的, 因此模型的选择是比较复杂的. 相似文献
2.
《地球物理学进展》2016,(3)
厦门台重力固体潮观测长期受海潮负荷影响.应用重力固体潮观测资料进行地震预报和地球物理研究时,需要对其海潮负荷的影响和改正进行研究.本文应用TSOFT软件对厦门台弹簧重力仪五年的连续观测数据进行预处理,并采用Venedikov调和分析方法获得重力固体潮潮汐参数.基于DTU10、EOT11a、HAMTIDE11a、GOT4.7、FES2004、NAO99b、TPXO7.2和TPXO7.2atlas八个较新的全球海潮模型,结合osu.chinasea.2010和NAO.99Jb两个区域海潮模型,研究了厦门台的重力海潮负荷特征并对其进行海潮负荷改正.数值结果表明,经过区域海潮模型修正后的厦门台海潮负荷为7.3μgal.八个全球海潮模型对主要潮波的负荷改正有效性的差异不大.应用NAO.99Jb区域海潮模型修正的M2波剩余残差值比osu.chinasea.2010小.观测残差负荷改正有效性大致在40%~70%.统计对比O1、K1、M2波的残差平方和结果表明,对厦门台进行海潮负荷改正时,应用经NAO.99Jb区域海潮模型改正的NAO.99b全球海潮模型残差结果最小,经NAO.99Jb区域海潮模型改正的DTU10全球海潮模型次之.这可能与NAO.99Jb模型考虑日本沿岸验潮站资料有关.考虑高精度近海海潮模型的构建和验潮站资料的弥补以及数据预处理方法的改进,可以进一步提高厦门台的海潮负荷的改正效果. 相似文献
3.
利用中国计量科学研究院北京昌平基地iGrav-012超导重力仪最新观测资料,对其作仔细地预处理,根据调和分析方法精密测定了重力潮汐参数,基于负荷理论与卷积积分技术获得了包含HAM11a,DTU10,EOT11a在内的14个全球海潮模型的重力海潮负荷效应,利用近周日频段内潮波振幅因子的共振效应求解了自由核章动(FCN)的本征参数.调和分析结果表明,重力潮汐的观测精度非常高,标准差达到1.184nm·s-2.基于加汉宁窗的快速傅里叶变换方法获得地震频段的地震噪声等级(SNM)为0.206,说明该台站是低背景噪声的.周日主波O1和K1经海潮模型作负荷效应改正的平均有效性分别为83%和85%;使用13个高精度海潮模型进行迭积计算获得的FCN本征周期为430.0(427.8,432.3)恒星日,品质因子Q值为-5137. 相似文献
4.
利用南极中山站LCR-ET21重力仪器与昭和站GWR058仪器获得的重力潮汐观测资料,采用最新的三个全球海潮模型(Dtu10,Eot11A和HAM11A)研究了南极地区的海潮负荷效应和背景噪声.结果表明,由三个海潮模型计算的重力负荷均值改正后,中山站O_1和M_2振幅观测残差分别由13.83%和20.55%下降到5.32%和5.95%,昭和站O_1和M_2振幅观测残差分别由10.84%和21.52%下降到1.91%和3.40%,说明海潮负荷改正的有效性.利用加汉宁窗的FFT变换,获得了地震频段的地震噪声等级(SNM),其值分别为1.574(中山站)和1.289(昭和站).而在潮汐频段,中山站的背景噪声比昭和站高一个数量级,主要由不同观测仪器和台站局部环境所致.本文结果可为进一步利用南极重力资料研究局部环境和全球动力学问题提供有效参考. 相似文献
5.
基于全球超导重力仪观测研究海潮和固体潮模型的适定性 总被引：8，自引：0，他引：8
利用国际地球动力学合作观测网络中20个台站22个高精度重力潮汐观测系列综合研究了目前使用的海潮和固体潮模型的适定性. 对原始观测数据实施仔细的预处理, 利用国际标准算法计算了潮汐重力参数. 基于负荷理论和不同全球海潮模型获得了8个主波的重力负荷矢量, 用二维平面插值技术获得了14个小波的负荷改正值. 顾及不同潮波振幅特征, 提出了计算台站平均观测残差和剩余残差矢量的“非等权均值法”, 分析了海潮负荷改正的有效性和振幅因子与理论模型间的差异, 同时还讨论了仪器标定问题. 获得了经海潮负荷改正后全球各台站平均潮汐重力参数, 结果说明观测与理论模型间的差异小于0.3%, 最大仪器标定误差不超过0.5%. 另外文章还用地表重力实测数据证实了Mathews理论中相对于周日O1波而言, K1波相位滞后略呈正值的结论. 相似文献
6.
利用3台LaCoste-Romberg型弹簧重力仪（G-589、ET-20和ET-21）在南极中山站和长城站的长期重力潮汐观测资料，在武汉国际重力潮汐基准上精密测定了中山站和长城站的重力潮汐参数，其中主波振幅因子的标准偏差优于0.5％．各潮波的观测振幅在中山站比在长城站的小得多，两站周日潮（O1）的观测振幅因子相差约7％，而半日潮（M2）的观测振幅因子相差超过40％，气压和温度等气象因素的变化对观测结果的影响很明显．海潮负荷对两台站潮汐观测的影响非常显著，采用Schwiderski全球海潮模型对观测结果作海潮负荷重力改正．结果表明，经海潮改正后，各潮波的观测残差有较大幅度的减小，但是，由于采用的海潮模型没有顾及台站近区的海潮负荷效应，所以，O1 波的振幅因子对相应理论潮汐模型值之间存在大约4％（中山站）和9％（长城站）的偏差． 相似文献
7.
利用理论和实验重力固体潮模型,充分考虑全球海潮和中国近海潮汐的负荷效应,建立了中国大陆的精密重力潮汐改正模型.结果表明,采用不同的固体潮模型会对重力潮汐结果产生相对变化幅度小于0.06％的差异;在沿海地区海潮负荷的影响约为整个潮汐的4％,而中部地区约为1％,其中中国近海潮汐模型的影响约占整个海潮负荷的10%,内插或外推潮波的负荷约占海潮负荷的3％.通过比较实测的重力数据表明,本文给出的重力潮汐改正模型的精度远远优于0.5×10-8 m·s-2,说明了本文构建的模型的实用性,可为中国大陆高精度重力测量提供有效参考和精密的改正模型. 相似文献
8.
9.
10.
采用武汉台超导重力仪(SG C032)14年多的长期连续观测资料,研究了固体地球对二阶和三阶引潮力的响应特征,精密测定了重力潮汐参数,系统研究了最新的固体潮模型和海潮模型在中国大陆的有效性.采用最新的8个全球海潮模型计算了海潮负荷效应,从武汉台SG C032的观测中成功分离出63个2阶潮汐波群和15个3阶潮汐波群信号,3阶潮波涵盖了周日、半日和1/3日三个频段.重力潮汐观测的精度非常高,标准偏差达到1.116 nm·s-2,系统反映了非流体静力平衡、非弹性地球对2阶和3阶引潮力的响应特征.结果表明,现有的武汉国际重力潮汐基准在半日频段非常精确,但在周日频段存在比较明显的偏差,需要进一步精化.对于中国大陆的大地测量观测,固体潮可以采用Dehant等考虑地球内部介质非弹性和非流体静力平衡建立的固体潮理论模型或Xu 等基于全球SG观测建立的重力潮汐全球实验模型作为参考和改正模型,海潮负荷效应应该采用Nao99作为改正模型. 相似文献
11.
Adaptability of the ocean and earth tidal models based on global observations of the superconducting gravimeters 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
As the gravity field is the most primary and direct physical quantity reflecting the density variation of the Earth’s interior and its geodynamic properties under various environmental changes and as the knowledge of the fine structure of the Earth’s interior and its geo-dynamics has a strong impact on space research, grav-ity observations become more and more important in Earth sciences. Therefore based on a global network of superconducting gravimeters (SGs), the Global Geo-dynamic Proje… 相似文献
12.
本文讨论了海潮对卫星重力测量的影响问题. 首先介绍了海潮对卫星重力测量影响的基本理论；采用FES02和TPXO6海潮模型计算了海潮负荷对卫星重力结果前60阶的影响；并用两个模型之间的差异作为海潮模型精度的估计量，据此计算了海潮模型误差对卫星重力结果的影响. 与GRACE恢复的重力场精度的比较说明：海潮对重力场40阶以下的影响都超过了目前重力场恢复精度；尽管由于卫星测高技术的发展，海潮模型的精度有了很大的提高，但目前的全球海潮模型用于GRACE重力场恢复的前12阶的改正还是不够精确. 另外，我们也利用中国东海和南海潮汐资料以及FES02海潮模型讨论了中国近海潮汐效应对GRACE观测的影响. 结果说明该影响与海潮模型的误差相当. 这反映了当前海潮模型的不确定度，因此通过结合全球验潮站资料有望提高海潮对卫星重力测量的改正精度. 相似文献
13.
Accuracy assessment of ocean tide loading computations for precise geodetic observations 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
The increasing resolution of ground based gravity measurements (e.g. by superconducting gravimeters) as well as satellite based gravity field studies allows to study very small signals, globally as well as local. On the other hand, this requires the correction of such signals to uncover others. To study the Earth’s deep interior and the on-going dynamic processes requires the correction of disturbing signals, and one of these signals is related to ocean tidal loading. Although new ocean tide models are being derived from current satellite missions, there are still uncertainties.In this paper we present an intercomparison ocean tide models to test their fit to world-wide observations. Therefore, three TOPEX/POSEIDON (T/P) satellite derived models (CSR3.0, FES95.2 and TPXO.2) beside the classical SCHW80 model were selected for an accuracy assessment study. The selected models have been subjected to an intercomparison test, tide gauge validation test and comparison to 59 tidal gravity stations.The intercomparison test shows a good agreement between the T/P-based models for the open ocean and remarkable disagreement between the selected models in the coastal regions indicating that such models are still problematic in these regions. The tide gauge validation shows that the T/P derived models fit tide gauges better than SCHW80, with a better fit for the semidiurnal constituents than for the diurnal constituents. Comparing the gravimetric ocean-tide loading computed from the selected models with the residuals from a set of 59 tidal gravity stations shows that there is an improvement of the T/P derived models with respect to the Schwiderski model, especially in M2. However, this improvement is not as significant as the result of the comparison with the pelagic data. The procedure developed for the comparison of T/P derived models with SCHW80 is presented. The results provide not only information and improvement with regard to SCHW80, but also information about the properties of the new models. It is intended to continue this work applying the very recent models to see how they perform compared to this study.With this study we provide boundary conditions for the improvement of new ocean-tide models in order to benefit from the gravity measurements now possible regarding the evaluation of Earth structures and dynamic processes. 相似文献
14.
《Journal of Geodynamics》2007,43(4-5):159-174
The increasing resolution of ground based gravity measurements (e.g. by superconducting gravimeters) as well as satellite based gravity field studies allows to study very small signals, globally as well as local. On the other hand, this requires the correction of such signals to uncover others. To study the Earth’s deep interior and the on-going dynamic processes requires the correction of disturbing signals, and one of these signals is related to ocean tidal loading. Although new ocean tide models are being derived from current satellite missions, there are still uncertainties.In this paper we present an intercomparison ocean tide models to test their fit to world-wide observations. Therefore, three TOPEX/POSEIDON (T/P) satellite derived models (CSR3.0, FES95.2 and TPXO.2) beside the classical SCHW80 model were selected for an accuracy assessment study. The selected models have been subjected to an intercomparison test, tide gauge validation test and comparison to 59 tidal gravity stations.The intercomparison test shows a good agreement between the T/P-based models for the open ocean and remarkable disagreement between the selected models in the coastal regions indicating that such models are still problematic in these regions. The tide gauge validation shows that the T/P derived models fit tide gauges better than SCHW80, with a better fit for the semidiurnal constituents than for the diurnal constituents. Comparing the gravimetric ocean-tide loading computed from the selected models with the residuals from a set of 59 tidal gravity stations shows that there is an improvement of the T/P derived models with respect to the Schwiderski model, especially in M2. However, this improvement is not as significant as the result of the comparison with the pelagic data. The procedure developed for the comparison of T/P derived models with SCHW80 is presented. The results provide not only information and improvement with regard to SCHW80, but also information about the properties of the new models. It is intended to continue this work applying the very recent models to see how they perform compared to this study.With this study we provide boundary conditions for the improvement of new ocean-tide models in order to benefit from the gravity measurements now possible regarding the evaluation of Earth structures and dynamic processes. 相似文献
15.
16.
Tadahiro Sato Yoshiaki Tamura Koji Matsumoto Yuichi Imanishi Herbert McQueen 《Journal of Geodynamics》2004,38(3-5):375
We have estimated the parameters of fluid core resonance (FCR) due to the nearly diurnal free wobble of the Earth's core based on the superconducting gravimeter (SG) data obtained at the following four observation sites; Esashi and Matsushiro in Japan, Canberra in Australia and Membach in Belgium. By fitting the tidal admittances normalized with the O1 wave at each site to a model of the damped harmonic oscillator, we obtained values of 429.66 ± 1.43 sidereal days, 9350–10,835, −4.828E−4 ± 3.4E−6, −3.0E−5 ± 4.5E−6 for the eigenperiod, the Q-value and the real and imaginary parts of the resonance strength, respectively. Our values obtained from only using the gravity data are very consistent with those inferred from the VLBI nutation data. Our study strongly indicates that the systematic difference between two estimations from the gravity and the nutation in particular for the Q-value, which has been shown in previous works, is mainly caused by the inaccurate correction for the ocean tide effects. The error in the ocean tide correction is discussed based on the comparison among four global ocean tide models; Schwiderski model (1980), NAO.99b (Matsumoto et al., 2000), CSR4.0 (Eanes and Bettadpur, 1994) and GOT99.2b (Ray, 1999). 相似文献