共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 78 毫秒
1.
Based on our previous works regarding solar eruptions, we focus on the relationships among different eruptive phenomena, such
as solar flares, eruptive prominences and coronal mass ejections (CMEs). The three processes show clear correlations under
certain circumstances. The correlation between a CME and solar flare depends the energy that stored in the relevant magnetic
structure, which is available to drive the eruption: the more energy that is stored, the better the correlation is; otherwise,
the correlation is poor. The correlation between a CME and eruptive prominence, on the other hand, depends on the plasma mass
concentration in the configuration prior to the eruption: if the mass concentration is significant, a CME starts with an eruptive
prominence, otherwise, a CME develops an without an apparent associated eruptive prominence. These results confirm that solar
flares, eruptive prominences and CMEs are different significances of a single physical process that is related to the energy
release in a disrupted coronal magnetic field. The impact of gravity on CME propagation and the above correlations is also
investigated. Our calculations indicate that the effect of gravity is not significant unless the strength of the background
field in the disrupted magnetic configuration becomes weak, say weaker than 30 G. 相似文献
2.
太阳是与地球关系最为密切的天体.发生在日面上的剧烈爆发性活动可能对人类的生存环境产生巨大影响甚至是灾难性后果.包含太阳耀斑、暗条爆发和日冕物质抛射在内的太阳爆发活动是同一物理过程的不同表现形式,其能量来源于爆发前储存在日冕中的磁场自由能.因此,了解日冕磁场的3维结构是理解太阳爆发的触发机制以及活动区的稳定性等现象的前提.由于观测技术限制,目前尚无法对日冕磁场进行常规观测,因此发展了多种利用可常规观测的光球磁场来重建日冕磁场的方法.主要评述近10 yr来各种日冕磁场重建方法在研究太阳爆发活动中的应用. 相似文献
3.
Solar coronal mass ejections (CMEs) observed in 1980 with the HAO Coronagraph/Polarimeter on the Solar Maximum Mission (SMM) satellite are compared with other forms of solar activity that might be physically related to the ejections. The solar phenomena checked and the method of association used were intentionally patterned after those of Munro et al.'s (1979) analysis of mass ejections observed with the Skylab coronagraph to facilitate comparison of the two epochs. Comparison of the results reveals that the types and degree of CME associations are similar near solar activity minimum and at maximum. For both epochs, most CMEs with associations had associated eruptive prominences and the proportions of association of all types of activity were similar. We also found a high percentage of association between SMM CMEs and X-ray long duration events (LDEs), in agreement with Skylab results. We conclude that most CMEs are the result of the destabilization and eruption of a prominence and its overlying coronal structure, or of a magnetic structure capable of supporting a prominence.Much of this work was performed as a Visiting Scientist at the High Altitude Observatory/NCAR.The National Center for Atmospheric Research is sponsored by the National Science Foundation. 相似文献
4.
Jun Lin 《中国天文和天体物理学报》2007,7(4):457-476
Large-scale magnetic structures are the main carrier of major eruptions in the solar atmosphere. These structures are rooted in the photosphere and are driven by the unceas-ing motion of the photospheric material through a series of equilibrium configurations. The motion brings energy into the coronal magnetic field until the system ceases to be in equilib-rium. The catastrophe theory for solar eruptions indicates that loss of mechanical equilibrium constitutes the main trigger mechanism of major eruptions, usually shown up as solar flares, eruptive prominences, and coronal mass ejections (CMEs). Magnetic reconnection which takes place at the very beginning of the eruption as a result of plasma instabilities/turbulence inside the current sheet, converts magnetic energy into heating and kinetic energy that are responsible for solar flares, and for accelerating both plasma ejecta (flows and CMEs) and energetic particles. Various manifestations are thus related to one another, and the physics behind these relationships is catastrophe and magnetic reconnection. This work reports on re- cent progress in both theoretical research and observations on eruptive phenomena showing the above manifestations. We start by displaying the properties of large-scale structures in the corona and the related magnetic fields prior to an eruption, and show various morphological features of the disrupting magnetic fields. Then, in the framework of the catastrophe theory, we look into the physics behind those features investigated in a succession of previous works, and discuss the approaches they used. 相似文献
5.
《Chinese Astronomy and Astrophysics》2019,43(3):305-326
The Sun is the celestial body in the sky with the closest relationship with the Earth. The violent eruptive activities happening on the Sun can greatly impact the human living environment and lead to disastrous consequences. It is well accepted that solar eruptions including the solar flare, prominence eruption and coronal mass ejection are the different manifestations of a single physical process powered by the magnetic free energy gradually stored in the corona prior to eruptions. Therefore, mapping the three-dimensional structure of coronal magnetic field is a prerequisite to understand the initiation mechanism of solar eruptions. Due to the technological and methodological difficulties, routine observations of the coronal magnetic field are still unavailable. Therefore, a number of methods have been developed to reconstruct the coronal magnetic field. This paper mainly reviews the applications of various reconstruction methods to the studies of the solar eruptions in the recent ten years. 相似文献
6.
日珥上升运动和日冕物质抛射的关系 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
本文基于观测日珥上升运动与日冕物质抛射（CME）之间的紧密联系和我们对日珥动力学特征的理解，探讨了在背景场作用下，日珥上升时其上方盔状冕流的动力学演化规律；分析了1980年8月18日爆发日珥与对应的CME事件之间的内在关系．结果表明：（1）缓慢上升的日珥只引起盔状冕流缓慢演化；（2）加速上升日珥的加速度和末速度的大小决定形成CME事件的激烈程度；（3）CME事件的能量可能来源于爆发日环释放的磁能．理论分析与观测结果基本一致． 相似文献
7.
W. T. Thompson 《Solar physics》2013,283(2):489-504
Triangulation measurements using observations from the two Solar Terrestrial Relations Observatory (STEREO) spacecraft, combined with observations from the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO), are used to characterize the behavior of a prominence involved in two successive coronal mass ejections 6?–?7 December 2010. The STEREO separation at the time was 171.6°, which was functionally equivalent to a separation of 8.4°, and thus very favorable for feature co-identification above the limb. The first eruption at ≈?14:16 UT on 6 December of the middle branch of the prominence starts off a series of magnetic reconfigurations in the right branch, which itself erupts at ≈?2:06 UT the next day, about 12 hours after the first eruption. The cool prominence material seen at 304?Å drains back down to the surface, but a flux-rope-like magnetic structure is seen to erupt in both 195?Å by the STEREO/Extreme Ultraviolet Imager (EUVI), and in white light by the STEREO/COR1 inner coronagraph. In between the two eruptions, two different signs of helicity are seen in the measured twist of the right branch. This is interpreted to be caused by the overall prominence channel being composed of different segments with alternating helicity signs. The erupting parts on 6 and 7 December both show positive twist, but negative twist is seen in between these positive sections. Negative twist is consistent with the dextral chirality signs seen in the He ii line at 304?Å prior to both eruptions. However, during the period between the eruptions, a region of positive twist grows and replaces the region of negative twist, and finally erupts. We interpret these observations in the light of models that predict that helicity cancellation can be an important factor in the triggering of flares and coronal mass ejections. 相似文献
8.
《天文和天体物理学研究(英文版)》2020,(10)
Magnetic flux ropes are characterized by coherently twisted magnetic field lines, which are ubiquitous in magnetized plasmas. As the core structure of various eruptive phenomena in the solar atmosphere, flux ropes hold the key to understanding the physical mechanisms of solar eruptions,which impact the heliosphere and planetary atmospheres. The strongest disturbances in the Earth's space environments are often associated with large-scale flux ropes from the Sun colliding with the Earth's magnetosphere, leading to adverse, sometimes catastrophic, space-weather effects. However, it remains elusive as to how a flux rope forms and evolves toward eruption, and how it is structured and embedded in the ambient field. The present paper addresses these important questions by reviewing current understandings of coronal flux ropes from an observer's perspective, with an emphasis on their structures and nascent evolution toward solar eruptions, as achieved by combining observations of both remote sensing and in-situ detection with modeling and simulation. This paper highlights an initiation mechanism for coronal mass ejections(CMEs) in which plasmoids in current sheets coalesce into a 'seed' flux rope whose subsequent evolution into a CME is consistent with the standard model, thereby bridging the gap between microscale and macroscale dynamics. 相似文献
9.
日冕物质抛射(ChIEs)经常被观测到和其他日面活动相伴生，太阳耀斑、日珥爆发、盔状冕流等许多太阳现象，都与它有直接或间接的关系。射电观测是研究CMEs的一种重要的补充工具。多频率的射电成像观测能很好地研究CMEs的初始阶段，而且可以得到关于CMEs触发机制特征的更多信息。概括了CMEs与低频射电的关系，介绍了低频射电的观测仪器，分析了CMEs低频射电所表现出来的特征，考虑了CMEs的初发机制，总结了尚待解决的问题，表明了CMEs研究是基于多类数据和全电磁辐射波段的。 相似文献
10.
Tilaye Tadesse T. Wiegelmann P. J. MacNeice B. Inhester K. Olson A. Pevtsov 《Solar physics》2014,289(3):831-845
Measurements of magnetic fields and electric currents in the pre-eruptive corona are crucial to the study of solar eruptive phenomena, like flares and coronal mass ejections (CMEs). However, spectro-polarimetric measurements of certain photospheric lines permit a determination of the vector magnetic field only at the photosphere. Therefore, there is considerable interest in accurate modeling of the solar coronal magnetic field using photospheric vector magnetograms as boundary data. In this work, we model the coronal magnetic field above multiple active regions with the help of a potential field and a nonlinear force-free field (NLFFF) extrapolation code over the full solar disk using Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (SDO/HMI) data as boundary conditions. We compare projections of the resulting magnetic field lines with full-disk coronal images from the Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (SDO/AIA) for both models. This study has found that the NLFFF model reconstructs the magnetic configuration closer to observation than the potential field model for full-disk magnetic field extrapolation. We conclude that many of the trans-equatorial loops connecting the two solar hemispheres are current-free. 相似文献
11.
Syed Salman Ali Wahab Uddin Ramesh Chandra D. L. Mary Bojan Vršnak 《Solar physics》2007,240(1):89-105
The eruption of limb prominence on 21 April 2001 associated with two coronal mass ejections (CMEs) is investigated. Hα images reveal two large-scale eruptions (a prominence body and a southern foot-point arch), both showing helical internal
structure. These two eruptions are found to be spatially and temporally associated with the corresponding CMEs. The kinematics
and the study of geometrical parameters of the prominence show that the eruption was quite impulsive (with peak acceleration
≈470 m s−2) and has taken place for relatively low pitch angle of helical threads, not exceeding tan θ≈1.2. The stability criteria of the prominence are revisited in the light of the model of Vršnak (1990, Solar Phys.
129, 295) and the analysis shows that the eruption violates the instability criteria of that model. Finally, the energy stored
in the prominence circuit and the energies (kinetic, potential, and magnetic) of the associated CMEs are estimated and it
is found that there was enough energy stored in the prominence to drive the two CMEs.
S.S. Ali is on leave from Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, 202 002, India. 相似文献
12.
A large arcade associated with a long-duration soft X-ray emission was observed on May 19, 1992 by the Yohkoh soft X-ray telescope. This large arcade was formed along the inversion line and a filament eruption was observed as part of this event. Also associated with this event were solar energetic particles and an interplanetary shock observed near Earth. This event supports the idea that coronal mass ejections are large-scale eruptions along an inversion line, or a heliospheric current sheet. However, this event implies that present models on eruptions are not sufficient. 相似文献
13.
Syed Salman Ali Wahab Uddin Ramesh Chandra 《Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy》2006,27(2-3):347-352
Here we present a preliminary analysis of a helical eruptive prominence at the east limb of the Sun on 21 April 2001. Unusually
this eruption is associated with a double CME. We have tried to study the morphology of the event, energy budget of the prominence
and associated CMEs. Our analysis shows that the prominence and first CME started simultaneously from the limb and prominence
carries sufficient energy to feed both the CMEs. Moreover, it is also concluded that CMEs are magnetically driven and internally
powered. 相似文献
14.
The spectacular prominence eruption and CME of 31 August 2007 are analyzed stereoscopically using data from NASA??s twin Solar Terrestrial Relations Observatory (STEREO) spacecraft. The technique of tie pointing and triangulation (T&T) is used to reconstruct the prominence (or filament when seen on the disk) before and during the eruption. For the first time, a filament barb is reconstructed in three-dimensions, confirming that the barb connects the filament spine to the solar surface. The chirality of the filament system is determined from the barb and magnetogram and confirmed by the skew of the loops of the post-eruptive arcade relative to the polarity reversal boundary below. The T&T analysis shows that the filament rotates as it erupts in the direction expected for a filament system of the given chirality. While the prominence begins to rotate in the slow-rise phase, most of the rotation occurs during the fast-rise phase, after formation of the CME begins. The stereoscopic analysis also allows us to analyze the spatial relationships among various features of the eruption including the pre-eruptive filament, the flare ribbons, the erupting prominence, and the cavity of the coronal mass ejection (CME). We find that erupting prominence strands and the CME have different (non-radial) trajectories; we relate the trajectories to the structure of the coronal magnetic fields. The possible cause of the eruption is also discussed. 相似文献
15.
An eruptive prominence and coronal transient of 19 December, 1973 comprised one of the best-observed coronal mass ejection events during the skylab period (May, 1973–January, 1974). EUV observations show that the pre-eruptive quiescent prominence was (at 8000 K) not appreciably hotter than other quiescent prominences, but EUV radiation from it and its prominence-corona interface was unusually faint. The prominence material was distributed in helical threads which decreased in pitch angle during the early phases of eruption. No region of the prominence was markedly different from any other just prior to and during the eruption. For the first time, the temperature and density of rising prominence material were determined at great heights in the corona. At 3R
, the prominence material was still confined in threads whose temperature and total hydrogen density were 2 × 104 K and 1.5 × 109 cm–3, respectively. Shortly after this observation ( 7hr after the start of the eruption), the prominence material expanded dramatically. A small portion (1%) of the prominence material was observed draining downward near the solar surface late in the event, and we infer that only a small fraction (10%) of the pre-eruptive prominence mass was expelled from the Sun. The remainder of the prominence apparently lay outside the instruments' fields of view. The bulk of the material expelled did not originate in the prominence. Both coronal and prominence material accelerated outward during the period of observations. A pre-existing streamer was disrupted by the outflowing material.The National Center for Atmospheric Research is sponsored by the National Science Foundation. 相似文献
16.
Nowadays the primordial importance of the magnetic field for coronal plasma physics is well known. However, its determination is only made in cool regions, mainly the photosphere and prominences. The extrapolation to the corona gives some indications of the magnetic structure but is not presently sufficiently reliable. So it is important to consider all the other observable physical effects of the magnetic field.In this puzzle, eruptive prominences may play a key role because the cool plasma is forced to move along field lines, which can then be visualized. In the strongest field regions, flares also give such information, while coronal mass ejections (CME) play such a role at larger scales. The magnetic field, which is at the base of the physical processes, is a common link between these different events.Observed properties of solar prominence eruptions are reviewed, then their relationships with CMEs and flares are discussed, with the help of present models. We emphasize the importance of magnetic measurements in future coordinated observations.Invited paper presented at the IAU Commission 10 Meeting on Dynamics and Structure of Prominences in Buenos Aires. 相似文献
17.
B. Vršnak 《Solar physics》1990,127(1):129-137
The kinematics and the development of the internal structure in the eruptive prominence of August 16, 1988 are described. The prominence exposed helical structure, and the pitch of the fine structure filaments was measured. The evolution of the pitch was measured in the legs of the prominence and at its summit from the pre-eruptive phase up to the late phases of the eruption. The pitch angle was decreasing in the legs as well as at the summit. However, the observations indicate that the integral twist remained constant. The prominence was twisted more at the summit where it was wider than in the legs. The effective twist at the prominence summit was approximately 20 and in the legs it amounted to about 8 . Such a ratio did not change during the eruption, i.e., no redistribution of the twist was observed within the accuracy of measurements. The nature of the instability causing the eruption is discussed and the energetics of the process is considered. 相似文献
18.
We have observed an eruptive prominence at the east solar limb on 25 January 1991 which started earlier than 0623 UT and was associated with a limb flare (S16 E90) of class 1B/ X10.0. We have recorded a huge mass ejection in the corona by the limb flare associated eruptive prominence. The eruptive prominence ejected a part of the loop in the corona with maximum speed of about 1280 km/sec. The ejected material attain height upto 150,000 km in the corona and finally faded/disappeared in the corona. During the ascending phase of the prominence material in the corona there was a unscrewing of the loop system associated with the eruptive prominence. The type II, III, and IV radio bursts were also reported by a number of Radio Observatories during observation of the eruptive prominence. The high flux of sudden ionospheric disturbances and the solar radio emissions on fixed frequencies (245–80000 MHz) were also recorded. The eruptive prominence associated with limb flare also shows increased proton flux (>10 MeV) during its occurence. The flare was classified as X10.0 flare. In this paper we have analysed the observed data and compared it with the theoretical model of the solar flare.On leave from his original Institute 相似文献
19.
The cyclical behaviors of sunspots,flares and coronal mass ejections(CMEs) for 54 months from 2008 November to 2013 April after the onset of Solar Cycle(SC) 24 are compared,for the first time,with those of SC 23 from 1996 November to 2001 April.The results are summarized below.(i) During the maximum phase,the number of sunspots in SC 24 is significantly smaller than that for SC 23 and the number of flares in SC 24 is comparable to that of SC 23.(ii) The number of CMEs in SC 24 is larger than that in SC 23 and the speed of CMEs in SC 24 is smaller than that of SC 23 during the maximum phase.We individually survey all the CMEs(1647 CMEs) from 2010 June to 2011 June.A total of 161 CMEs associated with solar surface activity events can be identified.About 45%of CMEs are associated with quiescent prominence eruptions,27%of CMEs only with solar flares,19%of CMEs with both active-region prominence eruptions and solar flares,and 9%of CMEs only with active-region prominence eruptions.Comparing the association of the CMEs and their source regions in SC 24 with that in SC 23,we notice that the characteristics of source regions for CMEs during SC 24 may be different from those of SC 23. 相似文献
20.
Louise K. Harra Nancy U. Crooker Cristina H. Mandrini Lidia van Driel-Gesztelyi Sergio Dasso Jingxiu Wang Heather Elliott Gemma Attrill Bernard V. Jackson Mario M. Bisi 《Solar physics》2007,244(1-2):95-114
We describe the interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs) that occurred as a result of a series of solar flares and eruptions
from 4 to 8 November 2004. Two ICMEs/magnetic clouds occurring from these events had opposite magnetic orientations. This
was despite the fact that the major flares related to these events occurred within the same active region that maintained
the same magnetic configuration. The solar events include a wide array of activities: flares, trans-equatorial coronal loop
disappearance and reformation, trans-equatorial filament eruption, and coronal hole interaction. The first major ICME/magnetic
cloud was predominantly related to the active region 10696 eruption. The second major ICME/magnetic cloud was found to be
consistent with the magnetic orientation of an erupting trans-equatorial filament or else a rotation of 160° of a flux rope
in the active region. We discuss these possibilities and emphasize the importance of understanding the magnetic evolution
of the solar source region before we can begin to predict geoeffective events with any accuracy. 相似文献