共查询到19条相似文献，搜索用时 93 毫秒
1.
古深断裂活化与燕山期陆内造山运动——以川南—滇东和中扬子褶皱-冲断系为例 总被引：18，自引：1，他引：18
吴根耀 《大地构造与成矿学》2001,25(3):246-253
基于花岗岩侵入、构造变形和磨拉石建造(或长期隆起)提出川南—滇东和中扬子地区侏罗-白垩纪时发生造山事件。分析了造山带的内部结构、范围和动力机制,发现川南—滇东褶皱-冲断系为北东向及近南北向断裂控制发育,其西以滇中古陆块与燕山期消减型造山带相隔;中扬子褶皱-冲断系为北西向断裂控制发育,向南西扩展时止于黄陵古陆核。两者均属印支运动后出现的中国—东南亚次大陆外侧的新特提斯洋消减,及嗣后的碰撞激活拼合大陆内的古深断裂活化而发生的燕山期陆内造山运动,构成中国大地构造演化的一个显著特色。 相似文献
2.
上扬子地区褶皱-冲断带的运动学特征一直缺乏系统研究。在前人基础上,结合野外认识、地震地质剖面解释、构造活动定年等相关成果分析认为,上扬子地区印支期以来至少存在着3组不同方向的区域挤压应力。其中,NW-SE向挤压应力具印支期、燕山期与喜马拉雅期多期活动特点,近SN向挤压应力主要在燕山晚期,NE-SW向挤压作用主要发生在喜马拉雅期。由此所形成的造山带至前陆褶皱-冲断带的运动学结构模式存在较大差异,即龙门山造山带发育了较为典型的根带、中带、锋带与外缘带等复杂的逆冲推覆构造系统,米仓山与南大巴山造山带缺乏中带变形的特征,雪峰山陆内前陆盆地系统则表现为逆冲的锋带在倾向上传播距离长、在走向上影响范围大等特点。上扬子地区褶皱-冲断带的运动学特征控制了不同时期油气的运移方向及聚集场所。 相似文献
3.
鄱阳盆地的前白垩系基底岩系因区域构造位置而异,长山隆起为元古界变质岩,北鄱阳坳陷为呈冲断岩片展布的震旦系志留系,南鄱阳坳陷主体部位为呈冲断结构的石炭系侏罗系,南冲的前峰带因剥蚀严重而出现双桥山群变质岩系。盆地的前白垩纪基底是一个在燕山运动时再度活化的印支期陆内造山带,因而构造线方向与印支期陆内造山带的走向相同(总体呈北东东向),冲断的方向则由燕山期的造山极性控制(自北西向南东),冲断活动发生在晚侏罗世和早白垩世早期。 相似文献
4.
内蒙古大青山地区中生代造山运动及构造演化 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
大青山地区是燕山—阴山板内造山带西段的重要组成部分 ,区内主体的构造格局和构造样式是由中生代地壳多期、多阶段构造变形的结果。印支期地壳以南北向挤压作用为主 ,是一次强烈褶皱造山运动 ,并伴随有强烈的岩浆活动。燕山早期阶段地壳仍然以挤压变形为主 ,形成了大青山逆冲推覆体系 ,同时控制了前缘断陷盆地沉积和演化。燕山中期由于区域构造背景的转变和重力作用 ,区域内发生了向南的伸展变形作用 ,形成了早白垩纪呼包盆地。燕山晚期地壳以挤压逆冲变形为主 ,不仅形成了楔冲式推覆构造 ,也使上白垩统与下白垩统为角度不整合接触。 相似文献
5.
大别山侏罗纪变形及其构造意义 总被引：31，自引：3，他引：31
大别山造山带作为三叠纪华北与扬子大陆碰撞成因并形成超高压变质岩石已经没有异议。然而,对侏罗纪的变形性质和大地构造背景的认识还未取得一致意见。通过前陆早侏罗世地层褶皱,前陆深部反射地震探测,造山带内 SE 角闪岩相线理变形以及160～120Ma 岩浆岩记录和同位素年代学研究等新的研究成果,证实中侏罗世大别山曾发生强烈的造山运动。这次造山运动相当于“燕山运动”,由于扬子与华北陆块在三叠纪已经拼合成一个大陆,所以侏罗纪变形属于陆内造山性质。将侏罗纪变形事件从大别山碰撞造山过程中分离出来可以合理地解释大别山超高压岩石第二次折返(从壳幔边界到地壳浅部)机理,150Ma 的混合岩化作用和广泛的130～120Ma 花岗岩-火山岩成因,以及大别山前陆 MOHO 错断等现象。 相似文献
6.
南天山晚新生代褶皱冲断带位于南天山南麓,是南天山陆内造山作用过程中,南天山造山楔向塔里木盆地推进的结果.褶皱冲断带的构造变形以挤压冲断构造为主,伴生有挤压走滑构造和盐相关构造.以盖层滑脱冲断为特征,伴生有基底卷入型冲断构造.褶皱冲断带的主滑脱冲断层由造山带向盆地方向逐渐抬升,而且,"厚皮"构造向造山带方向越来越发育,"薄皮"构造向盆地方向越来越发育.整个褶皱冲断带从东到西冲断作用发生的时间基本一致,起始于中新世中-晚期并一直持续到现今;冲断高峰发生于新近纪晚期-第四纪.褶皱冲断带的形成过程为前展式,由南天山向塔里木盆地推进.受地层剖面结构、沉积建造、基底起伏、所处的构造部位等因素控制,南天山褶皱冲断带的构造变形特征沿走向具有明显的分段性,从东到西划分出4个次级褶皱冲断带:库车、乌什、柯坪和喀什北褶皱冲断带.每个次级褶皱冲断带在共性的基础上,都有自己独特的构造变形特点. 相似文献
7.
研究区内的中元古代魏家沟岩群原岩为一套碳酸盐岩、陆缘碎屑岩及火山岩建造,形成于大陆裂谷-活动大陆边缘阶段,并于1036 Ma左右遭受变质变形.通过岩浆岩形成构造环境的判别,研究区中元古代岩浆活动贯穿于板块碰撞前、同碰撞及碰撞后.伴随着造山带的演化,本区中元古代经历了3期韧性变形,分别形成于大陆裂谷、活动大陆边缘及碰撞造山阶段.通过上述研究,确定了本区中元古代造山带的存在,并经历了大陆裂谷-被动大陆边缘-活动大陆边缘-碰撞造山的地质演化过程,证实了格林维尔造山运动在华北板块北缘的存在和对中元古代末期Rodinia超大陆拼合的响应. 相似文献
8.
天山南麓库车晚新生代褶皱-冲断带 总被引：2，自引：1，他引：1
库车褶皱冲断带位于天山南麓,由近东西走向的多条构造带组成。三叠系暗色泥岩、侏罗系煤层、古近系库姆格列木组膏盐层和新近系吉迪克组膏盐层构成库车褶皱冲断带的区域性主滑脱面。褶皱冲断带底面由北向南逐渐抬高。褶皱冲断带主体发育盖层滑脱-冲断构造(薄皮构造),基底卷入型冲断构造(厚皮构造)见于北缘的根带。新生界膏盐层之上构造变形以滑脱褶皱为特色,之下以冲断构造为特色。库车褶皱冲断带是印度-亚洲碰撞远程效应下,(南)天山晚新生代造山过程的产物。褶皱冲断带构造变形的动力来源主要是造山楔向塔里木盆地推进所形成的挤压构造应力。褶皱冲断带构造变形的起始时间为约23Ma,构造变形具有阶段式加速的特点,已经识别出约23Ma、约10Ma、5~2Ma和1~0Ma共4个变形加速期。褶皱冲断带的演化过程为前展式,褶皱冲断带前锋向南推进的同时,后缘持续变形。 相似文献
9.
提要：美国东部阿巴拉契亚造山带北端缅因州Rangeley地区志留—泥盆纪中温低压片岩测得的面理弯切轴与褶皱轴面数据有很好的对应关系。西部科迪勒拉造山带落基山脉南端科罗拉多州阿肯色河地区Texas Creek 以东高温低压前寒武纪堇青石片岩中测得的褶皱轴面方向和片理走向数据与该地区堇青石、斜长石变斑晶内测得的5期面理弯切轴也表现出很好的一致性。而在Rangeley北东200 km的佛蒙特州Chester Dome地区奥陶—泥盆纪中温中压片麻岩中测得的类似褶皱轴面数据却只反映了该地区5期面理弯切轴中较晚的北北西-南南东走向和北北东-南南西走向的两期面理弯切轴,未测得与其余3期面理弯切轴对应的褶皱轴面数据。通过对变质峰期温度相近、压力不同的两个造山带内3个典型变质岩区面理弯切轴、褶皱轴面方向和片理走向数据的对比分析认为,造山作用发生的地壳深度差异是早期褶皱经历多期造山运动后能否保存下来的主要影响因素。重力形成的去褶皱作用使得早期形成的规模较小褶皱经历复杂造山过程后难以保存。区域内早期形成的规模较大褶皱和造山过程晚期形成的褶皱由于受到重力塌陷作用影响较小,所以能够较好保存下来。 相似文献
10.
南大巴山前陆冲断带构造样式及变形机制分析 总被引：26，自引：9，他引：26
大巴山构造带位于秦岭造山带和四川盆地的过渡部位,形成于印支-燕山期,定型于喜山期。按照构造变形样式及其组合特征,从北东向南西可依次划分为北大巴山逆冲推覆构造带、南大巴山前陆褶皱-冲断带(又包括叠瓦断层带、断层-褶皱带和滑脱褶皱带等3个亚带)和四川盆地东北部低缓构造区等3个构造带(区)。南大巴山冲断带地表构造以类侏罗山式褶皱为显著特征,主要发育叠瓦断层系、断层相关褶皱、被动顶板双重构造、反冲断层系和冲起构造等变形样式。北东-南西向挤压应力和滑脱层是控制南大巴山及其前缘构造变形的主要因素,结合区域地质研究成果,建立了南大巴山及其前缘地区依次从震旦系-下寒武统-志留系-中下三叠统逐渐抬高的多层次滑脱前展模式。 相似文献
11.
WU Genyao Institute of Geology Geophysics Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing E-mail: dzkx@mail.igcas.ac.cn 《《地质学报》英文版》2005,79(4):507-518
The Tan-Lu Fault was once a transform fault in the Paleotethys, west of which was the Qinling-Dabie Ocean separating the Yangtze Craton from the North China Craton, and east of which was the Su-Lu Ocean separating the Su-Wan Block from the Jiao-Liao Craton. The Qinling-Dabie Ocean closed in the Indosinian orogeny, which created the China-Southeast Asia Subcontinent, with the Tan-Lu Fault becoming a marginal shear zone along the newly-formed amalgamated subcontinent. The Su-Lu Ocean subducted partly in the Indosinian.orogeny, but not closed. In the Jurassic and Early Cretaceous, the Su-Wan Block drifted northwards with subduction of the Su-Lu Ocean and moved westwards to converge the subcontinent by sinistral sheafing of the ENE-striking fractures. The Su-Lu Ocean finally closed and the Su-Wan Block collided with the Jiao-Liao Craton in the Early Cretaceous, which constituted a part of the magnificent interplate Yanshanides. The interplate orogeny rejuvenated the fossil sutures and deep fractures, as well as the Indosinian orogen, and the intraplate （intracontinental） Yanshanian orogeny occurred in the subcontinent. The East Asia Yanshanides, consisting of the interplate orogens in the outer side and the intraplate orogens in the inner side, collapsed quickly in the latest Early Cretaceous and Late Cretaceous. The eastern China area entered a tensile period from the Eogene, and the tectonic differentiation between the central and eastern China areas since the Jurassic was further strengthened. 相似文献
12.
Rejuvenation of Fossil Sutures and Related Mesozoic Intracontinental Orogenies in South China 总被引：4，自引：0，他引：4
The Huanan (South China) subcontinent was created by amalgamation of the Yangtze, Xianggan, Ca-thaysia and Zhemin microcontinents by the Guangxi orogeny in the Early Palaeozoic. The closure of the Tethyan Ocean and subsequent collision event outside the amalgamated continent reactivated fossil sutures and resulted in in-tracontinental (ensialic) orogenies in the Mesozoic. Based on evidence from deformation, molasse and granitoids, the Sichuan-Guizhou-Hunan-southern Hubei and Hunan-Jiangxi-Fujian Yanshanian fold-thrust systems and the Lower Yangtze-northwestern Fujian Indosinian fold-thrust system are thought to be intracontinental orogens. Their main features are as follows: intracontinental orogenies occurred areally, thrusting propagated towards the interior of the continental, they extend parallelly to the strikes of the fossil sutures, and the details of the temporal-spatial evolution of the orogens depend on subduction-collision events. 相似文献
13.
Jurassic Tectonic Revolution in China and New Interpretation of the “Yanshan Movement” 总被引：53，自引：0，他引：53
DONG Shuwen ZHANG Yueqiao LONG Changxing YANG Zhenyu JI Qiang WANG Tao HU Jianming CHEN Xuanhua 《《地质学报》英文版》2008,82(2):334-347
With acquisition and accumulation of new data of structural geological investigations and high-resolution isotopic dating data, we have greatly improved our understanding of the tectonic events occurring in eastern China during the period from the Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous and may give a new interpretation of the nature, timing and geodynamic settings of the “Yanshan Movement”. During the Mid-Late Jurassic （165±5 Ma）, great readjustment of plate amalgamation kinematics took place in East Asia and the tectonic regime underwent great transformation, thus initiating a new tectonic regime in which the North China Block was the center and different plates converged toward it from the north, east and southwest and forming the “East Asia convergent” tectonic system characterized by intracontinental subduction and orogeny. As a consequence, the crustal lithosphere of the East Asian continent thickened considerably during the Late Jurassic, followed immediately by Early Cretaceous substantial lithospheric thinning and craton destruction featured by drastic lithospheric extension and widespread volcano-magmatic activities, resulting in a major biotic turnover from the Yanliao biota to Jehol Biota. Such a tremendous tectonic event that took place in the continent of China and East Asia is the basic connotation of the “Yanshan Movement”. In the paper, according to the deformation patterns, geodynamic settings and deep processes, the “Yanshan Movement” is redefined as the Late Jurassic East Asian multi-directional plate convergent tectonic regime and its associated extensive intracontinental orogeny and great tectonic change that started at -165±5 Ma. The substantial lithospheric attenuation in East China is considered the post-effect of the Yanshanian intracontinental orogeny and deformation. 相似文献
14.
晚侏罗世东亚多向汇聚构造体系的形成与变形特征 总被引：37，自引：2，他引：35
板块构造研究成果与同位素精确定年数据的积累,使我们对发生在中国东部的晚侏罗世-早白垩世东亚多向汇聚作用有了深刻的认识.全球三大洋在晚侏罗世(165±5)Ma近乎同时的开启,以及东亚周边占太平洋、新特提斯洋和蒙古-鄂霍茨克洋的俯冲消亡,在中国中东部和东亚地区形成了多向挤压汇聚的燕山期构造体系,即东业多向汇聚构造体系(简称东亚汇聚).东亚汇聚启动了经典的燕山运动,发育了独特的构造变形特征.东亚汇聚构造体系具有两个近乎稳定的刚性陆核,即鄂尔多斯地块和四川(盆地)地块,在它们的周缘形成了晚侏罗世-早白垩世陆内多向挤压变形和似前陆盆地,如大巴山晚侏罗世前陆.此外,东亚多向汇聚构造体系影响了东亚和中亚大部分地区的板内变形作用,在中国大陆及其周边形成了反映南北向挤压的蒙古弧共轭走滑断裂系统、燕山-阴山陆内造山带、大别山-大巴山侏罗纪陆内造山带等典型的燕山期构造带.东亚汇聚具有深刻的全球构造背景与动力来源,是重要的科学研究问题. 相似文献
15.
晚中生代东亚多板块汇聚与大陆构造体系的发展 总被引：4，自引：4，他引：0
东亚大陆原型形成于三叠纪印支造山运动旋回,其周邻环绕的三大洋（古太平洋、蒙古-鄂霍茨克洋、中特提斯洋）于早侏罗世初期几乎同时向东亚大陆俯冲,开启了东亚多板块汇聚历史。文章通过总结东亚大陆晚中生代构造变形和构造岩浆事件的新近研究成果,简述了东亚多板块汇聚产生的三个陆缘汇聚构造系统（北部蒙古-鄂霍次克碰撞造山带、东部与俯冲有关的增生造山系统、西南部班公湖-怒江缝合构造带）、陆内汇聚构造变形体系和大陆伸展构造体系。在此基础上,重新构建了东亚多板块汇聚大陆构造-岩浆演化的时间框架,将其划分为三个阶段:早侏罗世（200~170 Ma）周邻大洋板块初始俯冲阶段和陆缘裂解事件,中晚侏罗世-早白垩世早期（170~135 Ma）周邻陆缘碰撞造山或俯冲增生造山作用、陆内再生造山作用和汇聚构造体系的形成;中晚白垩世（135~80 Ma）大陆岩石圈的减薄作用和大陆伸展构造体系的发育。研究认为,晚中生代东亚多板块汇聚在时空上的有序演化和深浅构造的复合叠加,不仅产生了东亚大陆复杂的陆缘和陆内构造体系,同时控制了中国东部燕山期爆发式岩浆-成矿作用,也使东亚构造地貌发生东西翘变,早期陆缘汇聚产生的东部高原因晚期大陆岩石圈的减薄和伸展而垮塌。东亚大陆构造体系的形成和演化与联合古大陆的裂解同步,晚中生代东亚多板块汇聚完成了从东亚到欧亚大陆的演替,以东亚大陆为核心的多板块汇聚格局一直延续至新生代,可能成为未来超大陆形成的起点。 相似文献
16.
苏皖地块构造演化、苏鲁造山带形成及其耦合的盆地发育 总被引：34，自引：2，他引：34
郯庐断裂带一度是古特提斯洋域中的转换断层,其东的苏皖地块和胶辽克拉通分别是曾经独立于扬子克拉通和华北克拉通之外的构造单元。苏皖地块原属中朝构造域,因中元古代时苏鲁洋的张开而向南漂移,震旦纪起归入华南构造域。受北东东-近东西向的江南断裂和江绍断裂右行走滑活动控制,苏皖地块及怀玉地块在石炭纪末-三叠纪时脱离华南构造域,成为古特提斯洋域中的中间地块。中国东部地区东亚燕山期山系的形成受两个地球动力学系统制约:一是苏鲁洋的消减及闭合后苏皖地块与胶辽克拉通的碰撞,二是江南断裂和江绍断裂的先剪后压,苏皖地块与拼合了的扬子-华北克拉通间发生斜向会聚和剪切造山,怀玉地块仰冲超叠在苏皖地块上。分5个阶段(印支期消减,早-中侏罗世斜向会聚,晚侏罗-早白垩世消减,早白垩世碰撞和燕山造山带坍塌)叙述了中生代造山作用的表现和特点,探讨了与各阶段造山作用耦合的盆地类型和时空分布。因燕山造山带的坍塌而燕山运动构建的“盆”“山”关系解脱,中国东部第三纪的伸展盆地直接叠加在燕山造山带的坍塌裂谷上。 相似文献
17.
Gondwanaland origin, dispersion, and accretion of East and Southeast Asian continental terranes 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
East and Southeast Asia is a complex assembly of allochthonous continental terranes, island arcs, accretionary complexes and small ocean basins. The boundaries between continental terranes are marked by major fault zones or by sutures recognized by the presence of ophiolites, mélanges and accretionary complexes. Stratigraphical, sedimentological, paleobiogeographical and paleomagnetic data suggest that all of the East and Southeast Asian continental terranes were derived directly or indirectly from the Iran-Himalaya-Australia margin of Gondwanaland. The evolution of the terranes is one of rifting from Gondwanaland, northwards drift and amalgamation/accretion to form present day East Asia. Three continental silvers were rifted from the northeast margin of Gondwanaland in the Silurian-Early Devonian (North China, South China, Indochina/East Malaya, Qamdo-Simao and Tarim terranes), Early-Middle Permian (Sibumasu, Lhasa and Qiangtang terranes) and Late Jurassic (West Burma terrane, Woyla terranes). The northwards drift of these terranes was effected by the opening and closing of three successive Tethys oceans, the Paleo-Tethys, Meso-Tethys and Ceno-Tethys. Terrane assembly took place between the Late Paleozoic and Cenozoic, but the precise timings of amalgamation and accretion are still contentious. Amalgamation of South China and Indochina/East Malaya occurred during the Early Carboniferous along the Song Ma Suture to form “Cathaysialand”. Cathaysialand, together with North China, formed a large continental region within the Paleotethys during the Late Carboniferous and Permian. Paleomagnetic data indicate that this continental region was in equatorial to low northern paleolatitudes which is consistent with the tropical Cathaysian flora developed on these terranes. The Tarim terrane (together with the Kunlun, Qaidam and Ala Shan terranes) accreted to Kazakhstan/Siberia in the Permian. This was followed by the suturing of Sibumasu and Qiangtang to Cathaysialand in the Late Permian-Early Triassic, largely closing the Paleo-Tethys. North and South China were amalgamated in the Late Triassic-Early Jurassic and finally welded to Laurasia around the same time. The Lhasa terrane accreted to the Sibumasu-Qiangtang terrane in the Late Jurassic and the Kurosegawa terrane of Japan, interpreted to be derived from Australian Gondwanaland, accreted to Japanese Eurasia, also in the Late Jurassic. The West Burma and Woyla terranes drifted northwards during the Late Jurassic and Early Cretaceous as the Ceno-Tethys opened and the Meso-Tethys was destroyed by subduction beneath Eurasia and were accreted to proto-Southeast Asia in the Early to Late Cretaceous. The Southwest Borneo and Semitau terranes amalgamated to each other and accreted to Indochina/East Malaya in the Late Cretaceous and the Hainanese terranes probably accreted to South China sometime in the Cretaceous. 相似文献
18.
Many equiaxial dome-like structures developed in the north segment of the Xuefengshan orocline, Central China are obviously inconcordant with the NE-trending linear structures in this area, which contain important records for understanding the structural framework and evolution of this belt. In this paper, taking one of the typical dome-like structures in the Xuefengshan orcline (e.g. Moping dome-like structure) as an example, based on its structural framework interpratatoin, superposed deformation analysis and paleo-stress fields reconstruction, we propose the Moping dome-like structure is composed of two populations of different-striking thrust-fold structures, ～E-trending and NE-striking structures, indicative of two-stages shortening, ～N- and NW-striking, respectively. Together with the geochronological analysis, we suggest the first stage of shortening occurred in Late Triassic to Early Jurassic, due to the Indosinian intercollisional orogeny of the Yangtze Block and the North China Block. The second occurred during Late Jurassic Early Cretaceous owing to Yanshanian intracontinental orogeny, leading to the intensive superposition of the NE-trending structures onto the ～E-trending structures, and the final ocurrence of the Moping dome. Thus, our study indicates the Xuefengshan arc-shape belt also experienced two-phase deformation, and resulted from the superposition of NE SW structures onto ～E-W structures in Late Jurassic Early Cretaceous, which could provide new structural evidence for probing the Mesozoic tectonic framework and evolution of the Xuefengshan orocline. 相似文献
19.
试论郯城—庐江断裂带的形成、演化及其性质 总被引：36，自引：13，他引：36
郯(城-)庐(江)断裂带由前白垩纪的3条重要的边界断裂连接而成:古郯庐断裂曾是连接秦岭—大别洋与苏鲁洋的转换断层,辽渤断裂是华北克拉通与胶辽克拉通之间的分界,敦化—密山断裂则是西伯利亚次大陆与一系列拼贴的外来(移置)地体间的分界。早白垩世,随亚洲大陆雏形的出现,郯庐断裂带形成并扩大其规模(如包括了依兰—伊通断裂)。江西的赣江断裂和鄂东南湘东北的团(风-)麻(城)断裂白垩纪时与郯庐断裂有相同的活动方式,可视为郯庐断裂带的南延。从本质上说,郯庐断裂带是一条斜向(左行)汇聚—剪切造山带,这一造山作用在中生代里是一个连续的分阶段进行的过程,左行走滑活动始自三叠纪,至早白垩世造山带形成,始于早白垩世晚期并于晚白垩世达到全盛的张裂活动则是造山带坍塌的反映。新生代起东亚地区进入新的地史阶段,郯庐断裂带进入消亡期,更新世时已明显解体为活动方式各不相同的若干段。文章还简要讨论了古郯庐断裂的形成时代、印支期走滑活动的性质和东亚大陆边缘地区的构造格架等问题。 相似文献