共查询到19条相似文献，搜索用时 140 毫秒
1.
《测绘科学技术学报》2013,(2)
阐述了天线相位中心改正的数学模型和天线相位中心变化的数字模型,对实测的GPS控制网进行了数据处理,通过加上/不加天线相位中心变化的改正来考察对基线解算结果的影响。试验表明,卫星天线相位中心变化对长基线有影响,对短基线没有影响。接收机天线相位中心变化对基线解的影响与基线两端接收机天线型号是否相同有关:型号相同时没有影响;型号不同时有影响,影响量大约为0.02 ppm。 相似文献
2.
3.
4.
5.
由于天线本身的特性及机械加工等原因,GPS卫星和接收机天线相位中心与其几何中心不重合,从而产生相位中心偏差。某些类型的天线该偏差甚至可达数cm,直接影响高精度GPS测量的精确可靠性。IGS改正模型文件中给出的是每隔5°方位角和天顶角时的天线相位中心变化改正值,本文用VS程序设计通过线性内插算法获得任意方位角和天顶角下的相位中心变化改正值。 相似文献
6.
GPS卫星和接收机天线绝对PCO、PCV对高精度基线解算的影响分析 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
在高精度GPS卫星导航数据处理中,卫星和接收机天线的PCO和PCV作为重要的误差来源之一,必须予以改正。本文从高精度基线解算入手,分析了卫星和接收机天线PCO和PCV中各项对高精度基线解算结果的影响。试验结果表明,接收机天线PCO、PCV对长基线或超长基线在各分量方向或长度上的影响最大可达到101 mm。卫星天线PCO、PCV对长基线在各分量方向或长度上的影响在毫米水平,最大不超过4 mm;对超长基线在各分量方向或长度上的影响最大可达到40 mm。 相似文献
7.
针对天线相位中心改正影响GPS数据解算以及处理软件不能识别接收机天线类型的问题,该文提出了利用近似型号的天线进行数据处理的方法。首先利用IGS站精确确定天线相位中心改正对数据解算造成的影响,再利用IGMAS站验证方法的可靠性。该文选取部分IGS、IGMAS站的数据,利用GAMIT软件进行试验并分析。结果表明,当不使用天线相位改正模型时,增大了单天基线解的NRM_S值,并增加15.5%的基线误差,对精密定位能带来平均2cm的影响;当将处理软件不识别的天线换成近似能识别的天线时,基线解效果要比不使用天线改正效果好,水平和垂向的定位精度均在3.9mm左右,比使用原装能识别天线的定位精度稍差。该方法既保证了精度,也较为简单快捷。 相似文献
8.
9.
10.
11.
Generation of a consistent absolute phase-center correction model for GPS receiver and satellite antennas 总被引：26，自引：16，他引：10
Ralf Schmid Peter Steigenberger Gerd Gendt Maorong Ge Markus Rothacher 《Journal of Geodesy》2007,81(12):781-798
The development and numerical values of the new absolute phase-center correction model for GPS receiver and satellite antennas, as adopted by the International GNSS (global navigation satellite systems) Service, are presented. Fixing absolute receiver antenna phase-center corrections to robot-based calibrations, the GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam (GFZ) and the Technische Universität München reprocessed more than 10 years of GPS data in order to generate a consistent set of nadir-dependent phase-center variations (PCVs) and offsets in the z-direction pointing toward the Earth for all GPS satellites in orbit during that period. The agreement between the two solutions estimated by independent software packages is better than 1 mm for the PCVs and about 4 cm for the z-offsets. In addition, the long time-series facilitates the study of correlations of the satellite antenna corrections with several other parameters such as the global terrestrial scale or the orientation of the orbital planes with respect to the Sun. Finally, completely reprocessed GPS solutions using different phase-center correction models demonstrate the benefits from switching from relative to absolute antenna phase-center corrections. For example, tropospheric zenith delay biases between GPS and very long baseline interferometry (VLBI), as well as the drift of the terrestrial scale, are reduced and the GPS orbit consistency is improved. 相似文献
12.
对于高精度的GNSS数据处理,特别是当多种品牌的GNSS接收机共同作业时,对天线进行相位中心改正是非常有必要的。当采用TBC处理非天宝类型GNSS接收机数据时,在导入数据时,有时会出现不识别接收机和天线类型的错误或警告。通过修改Rinex格式文件头的接收机及天线类型,使其与TBC软件中接收机及天线配置文件中信息一致,问题得到解决。本文还对此类问题做了一些引申,结语给出了若干条建议。 相似文献
13.
Phase center modeling for LEO GPS receiver antennas and its impact on precise orbit determination 总被引：7，自引：5，他引：7
Adrian Jäggi R. Dach O. Montenbruck U. Hugentobler H. Bock G. Beutler 《Journal of Geodesy》2009,83(12):1145-1162
Most satellites in a low-Earth orbit (LEO) with demanding requirements on precise orbit determination (POD) are equipped with
on-board receivers to collect the observations from Global Navigation Satellite systems (GNSS), such as the Global Positioning
System (GPS). Limiting factors for LEO POD are nowadays mainly encountered with the modeling of the carrier phase observations,
where a precise knowledge of the phase center location of the GNSS antennas is a prerequisite for high-precision orbit analyses.
Since 5 November 2006 (GPS week 1400), absolute instead of relative values for the phase center location of GNSS receiver
and transmitter antennas are adopted in the processing standards of the International GNSS Service (IGS). The absolute phase
center modeling is based on robot calibrations for a number of terrestrial receiver antennas, whereas compatible antenna models
were subsequently derived for the remaining terrestrial receiver antennas by conversion (from relative corrections), and for
the GNSS transmitter antennas by estimation. However, consistent receiver antenna models for space missions such as GRACE
and TerraSAR-X, which are equipped with non-geodetic receiver antennas, are only available since a short time from robot calibrations.
We use GPS data of the aforementioned LEOs of the year 2007 together with the absolute antenna modeling to assess the presently
achieved accuracy from state-of-the-art reduced-dynamic LEO POD strategies for absolute and relative navigation. Near-field
multipath and cross-talk with active GPS occultation antennas turn out to be important and significant sources for systematic
carrier phase measurement errors that are encountered in the actual spacecraft environments. We assess different methodologies
for the in-flight determination of empirical phase pattern corrections for LEO receiver antennas and discuss their impact
on POD. By means of independent K-band measurements, we show that zero-difference GRACE orbits can be significantly improved
from about 10 to 6 mm K-band standard deviation when taking empirical phase corrections into account, and assess the impact
of the corrections on precise baseline estimates and further applications such as gravity field recovery from kinematic LEO
positions. 相似文献
14.
GPS接收机天线相位中心与其几何中心不重合性构成了GPS接收机天线相位中心误差,如何减少相位中心偏移是天线设计和GPS数据处理中的重要问题。本文在分析GPS接收机天线相位中心在垂直方向上偏差的检测原理的基础上,讨论GPS天线相位中心垂直分量偏差对GPS高程精度的影响,应用实例得出一些有益的结论。 相似文献
15.
16.
Improved antenna phase center models for GLONASS 总被引：6，自引：2，他引：4
Rolf Dach Ralf Schmid Martin Schmitz Daniela Thaller Stefan Schaer Simon Lutz Peter Steigenberger Gerhard Wübbena Gerhard Beutler 《GPS Solutions》2011,15(1):49-65
Thanks to the increasing number of active GLONASS satellites and the increasing number of multi-GNSS tracking stations in
the network of the International GNSS Service (IGS), the quality of the GLONASS orbits has become significantly better over
the last few years. By the end of 2008, the orbit RMS error had reached a level of 3–4 cm. Nevertheless, the strategy to process
GLONASS observations still has deficiencies: one simplification, as applied within the IGS today, is the use of phase center
models for receiver antennas for the GLONASS observations, which were derived from GPS measurements only, by ignoring the
different frequency range. Geo++ GmbH calibrates GNSS receiver antennas using a robot in the field. This procedure yields
now separate corrections for the receiver antenna phase centers for each navigation satellite system, provided its constellation
is sufficiently populated. With a limited set of GLONASS calibrations, it is possible to assess the impact of GNSS-specific
receiver antenna corrections that are ignored within the IGS so far. The antenna phase center model for the GLONASS satellites
was derived in early 2006, when the multi-GNSS tracking network of the IGS was much sparser than it is today. Furthermore,
many satellites of the constellation at that time have in the meantime been replaced by the latest generation of GLONASS-M
satellites. For that reason, this paper also provides an update and extension of the presently used correction tables for
the GLONASS satellite antenna phase centers for the current constellation of GLONASS satellites. The updated GLONASS antenna
phase center model helps to improve the orbit quality. 相似文献
17.
Estimation of elevation-dependent satellite antenna phase center variations of GPS satellites 总被引：16，自引：7，他引：9
A method for the estimation of the phase center variations of GPS satellite antennas using global GPS data is presented. First estimations have shown an encouraging repeatability from day to day and between satellites of the same block. Thus, two different satellite antenna patterns for Block II/IIA and for Block IIR with a range of about 4 cm and an accuracy of less than 1 mm could be found. The present approach allows the creation of a consistent set of receiver and satellite antenna patterns and phase center offsets. Thereby, it is possible to switch from relative to absolute phase center variations without a scale problem in global networks. This changeover has an influence on troposphere parameters, reduces systematic effects due to uncorrect antenna modeling and should diminish the elevation dependence of GPS results.
AcknowledgmentsThe authors thank Prof. G. Seeber (University of Hannover) and Dr. G. Wübbena (Geo++ GmbH) and their groups for their kindness in making available the absolute field calibration results derived from robot measurements. 相似文献
18.
吴继忠 《武汉大学学报(信息科学版)》2012,37(5):617-620
分析了GPS天线积雪对载波信号场强、功率的影响,推导了载波信号传播延迟的简化计算公式,利用精密单点定位(PPP)计算了测站在GPS天线积雪产生和消除前后的单日解。结果显示,天线积雪使得天线相位中心产生偏移,对平面和高程方向的影响为数个cm,甚至更大。 相似文献
19.
GPS接收机天线相位中心偏差的三维检定研究 总被引：11，自引：1，他引：11
根据GPS接收机天线相位中心的几何关系，在超短基线相对定位法的基础上，利用旋转天线，结合精密水准测量，给出了一种天线相位中心偏差三雏检验的方法。实例表明，该方法具有较高的精度和可靠性，适合于在野外对GPS接收机天线相位中心偏差进行实际检定。 相似文献