共查询到18条相似文献，搜索用时 125 毫秒
1.
现阶段北斗卫星导航系统（BeiDou navigation satellite system,BDS）的同步地球轨道（geostationary orbits,GEO）卫星、中倾斜地球同步轨道（inclined geo-synchronous orbits,IGSO）卫星和中圆地球轨道（medium earth orbit,MEO）卫星均存在伪距偏差,该伪距偏差的存在对精密定位的研究及其应用产生了较大的影响。根据北斗IGSO和MEO卫星的伪距偏差与高度角和频率相关的误差特性,本文分析了测站数目及分布,以及观测时长对建模的影响,选择18个测站2015年全年的数据作为MEO卫星的建模数据,其中可以连续观测到全弧段IGSO卫星的4个测站用于IGSO卫星的建模,采用加权分段线性拟合联合抗差估计的方法建立了北斗卫星伪距偏差改正模型。模型改正后,北斗IGSO和MEO卫星的伪距偏差得到明显的削弱,相比于传统的伪距偏差改正模型,精密单点定位（precise point positioning,PPP）的定位精度和收敛时间均得到提升。 相似文献
2.
在北斗导航卫星伪距码偏差特性分析的基础上,建立了倾斜地球同步轨道卫星（IGSO）和中轨卫星（MEO）的伪距码偏差多项式改正模型;并利用星间单差宽巷小数周一致性,分析建立北斗地球同步轨道卫星（GEO）卫星伪距码偏差改正模型。采用武汉大学北斗试验网、中国陆态网络和MGEX网不同位置、不同类型接收机观测数据进行分析验证,结果表明,北斗卫星伪距码偏差特性与观测值频率、卫星类型相关,所有GEO和IGSO卫星变化规律相同,所有MEO卫星变化规律相同,与接收机类型、测站位置和观测时间无关,偏差值大小随卫星高度角变化,其变化规律稳定,可以采用建立的两类改正模型（GEO/IGSO和MEO）进行修正。通过偏差修正后的伪距无电离层组合的残差、双频SPP以及单频PPP三个方面验证了伪距码偏差改正模型的正确性。 相似文献
3.
北斗倾斜地球同步轨道（inclined geosynchronous orbit,IGSO）卫星和中轨（medium earth orbit,MEO）卫星的伪距码观测值存在系统性偏差,针对该偏差的现有建模方法（两步法）包含模糊度消除策略的误差,提出了一种基于历元间差分的一步建模方法,建立了同类型卫星整体的伪距码偏差三次多项式改正模型,并与现有的离散点改正模型进行对比。同时,针对每颗IGSO/MEO卫星的独特性,利用一步法逐卫星建模并评估其改正效果。结果表明,相对于现有的离散点改正模型,精化模型将IGSO/MEO卫星的Melbourne-Wübbena（MW）值的稳定性平均提高了23.88%,C08卫星的提高幅度最大,约为32.26%。 相似文献
4.
北斗伪距观测值存在特有的多路径系统性偏差,偏差的数量级达到几个分米到米。该系统偏差可分为两类:一类是IGSO/MEO卫星随高度角变化的伪距系统性偏差;另一类是GEO卫星(高度角仅微小变化)明显的伪距系统性偏差。系统性的伪距偏差导致GEO卫星MP序列的标准偏差较大,本文针对GEO卫星伪距偏差问题提出了一种基于卡尔曼滤波的修正方法,修正后的GEO卫星MP序列的标准偏差下降了10%~16%。基于伪距相位组合的单频PPP技术的伪距权重较大,会受到北斗伪距偏差的影响,分析表明该系统性偏差将导致单频PPP定位结果高程方向产生约1m的偏差。对GEO伪距偏差采用提出的卡尔曼滤波修正方法进行修正,并应用Wanninger和Beer的高度角模型消除IGSO/MEO观测值伪距偏差,本文对修正后的单频精密单点定位精度进行了分析。4个multi-GNSS experiment(MGEX)站10d观测数据的分析结果表明:仅改正和卫星多路径误差,高程方向定位结果精度可改善65%左右;采用本文方法对GEO卫星的多路径修正后,该方向定位结果精度改善比例将进一步提高至75%左右。 相似文献
5.
北斗二代系统伪距码中存在与高度角相关的系统性偏差,该偏差会影响高精度的数据处理。基于Melbourne-Wübbena（MW）组合,分别利用现有的伪距码偏差改正模型和实测基线的双差宽巷模糊度残差,分析了伪距码偏差对基线解算的影响。理论分析表明,随着基线长度的增加,伪距码偏差对MW组合确定双差宽巷模糊度的影响越来越大,对300 km基线的影响可达0.36周。实际算例表明,无论基线长短,地球同步轨道（geostationary earth orbit,GEO）卫星的双差宽巷模糊度残差中始终存在偏差;而对于倾斜地球同步轨道（inclined geostationary orbit,IGSO）和中轨（medium earth orbit,MEO）卫星而言,当基线小于300 km时,双差基本可以消除伪距码偏差,其双差宽巷模糊度固定率基本和GPS一致,但当基线超过300 km时,部分卫星的双差宽巷模糊度残差就会存在明显偏差,其双差宽巷模糊度固定率也较低,此时需考虑伪距码偏差的影响。 相似文献
6.
北斗星座包含3类卫星,即GEO、IGSO和MEO,GEO卫星高度角变化微小,伪距多路径观测序列系统偏差较明显;IGSO、MEO卫星随多路径序列系统偏差随卫星高度角变化,多路径误差对单个接收机定位结果影响较大.本文针对GEO卫星伪距观测值偏差问题提出了一种基于卡尔曼滤波的修正方法,利用3 d的多路径效应误差观测序列进行拟合后,利用拟合值修正,修正后的GEO卫星多路径观测序列标准差下降了31％. 相似文献
7.
小数周偏差可用于精密单点定位的模糊度固定,其时变特性对于FCB的播发间隔、数据总量有着重要影响。当前北斗应用进入成熟期,对北斗FCB时变特性及其变化进行研究,有利于推广北斗PPP模糊度固定应用。本文基于单差FCB的生成方法,对2017年和2019年的北斗FCB时变特性展开研究,并改进了IGSO卫星窄巷FCB的播发间隔,通过已知测站固定解PPP解算,验证了改进后的北斗FCB产品。试验表明：2019年北斗FCB的稳定性相比2017年大幅提高;IGSO卫星可每天播发一组窄巷FCB,相比原有播发间隔减小73.4%的数据总量;改进后FCB可有效应用于北斗固定解PPP,收敛速度相比浮点解提升43.1%。 相似文献
8.
北斗卫星伪距观测值存在一类与卫星相关的系统误差，称为星源伪距偏差，MEO和IGSO卫星可以通过其与高度角的关系建立改正模型，而GEO卫星由于其静止特性难以建立基于高度角的改正模型。据此，本文在分析GEO卫星伪距偏差特性的基础上，提出了一种基于奇异谱分析（SSA）的修正方法，并通过双频无电离层组合伪距单点定位（SPP）对比试验来验证修正效果。结果表明：修正后GEO卫星伪距观测值基本上消除了伪距偏差，MP观测值精度在B1、B2、B3频率上分别提高了39.9%、17.9%、29.4%，MW观测值精度提高了41.3%；传统改正模型修正IGSO和MEO卫星伪距偏差对SPP影响很小，而奇异谱分析方法修正GEO卫星伪距偏差使SPP的精度在平面、高程方向上分别提高了11.1%、21.1%。 相似文献
9.
对北斗二代卫星的双频观测数据进行了质量分析,包括伪距多路径误差和信噪比两个方面。大量实测数据测试表明:北斗GEO、IGSO和MEO三类卫星的多路径误差逐渐增大,且B1频点小于B2频点,GPS与北斗MEO卫星的伪距多路径误差相差不大;另外,北斗三类卫星均表现出载波B2的信噪比略大于B1,而GPS卫星则表现出L1载波信噪比要大于L2。 相似文献
10.
《测绘科学》2020,(7)
针对北斗第二代导航卫星系统的伪距观测值中存在与卫星相关的系统性伪距偏差的问题,该文提出采用加权分段曲线建模方法建立北斗IGSO/MEO卫星观测数据三频改正模型。试验表明,改正后IGSO与MEO卫星的伪距偏差明显削弱。针对GEO卫星伪距偏差问题,提出了一种基于Tikhonov正则化的建模方法;修正后的GEO卫星MP序列的RMS在B1、B2、B3频率上分别下降了35.9%、29.6%、35.8%。为了验证策略的可行性,设计了3套单频PPP定位方案,结果表明:通过改正IGSO/MEO卫星伪距偏差,N、E方向定位精度平均提高了20.2%和13.4%,U方向定位精度平均提高了62.8%;同时改正GEO/IGSO/MEO卫星的伪距偏差时,U方向的定位精度将进一步提高至70%左右。因此本研究提出的BDS-2卫星伪距观测值的修正模型,能有效减弱这些伪距偏差的影响。 相似文献
11.
Xin Li Xingxing Li Gege Liu Guolong Feng Fei Guo Yongqiang Yuan Keke Zhang 《GPS Solutions》2018,22(4):123
GPS precise point positioning (PPP) ambiguity resolution (AR) can improve the positioning accuracy and shorten the convergence time. However, for the BeiDou Satellite Navigation System (BDS), the problems of satellite-induced code bias, imperfections in the error models and the inadequate accuracy of orbit products limit the applications of the BDS PPP AR system, which requires more than 6 h to achieve the first ambiguity-fixed solution. In this study, the accuracy of a wide-lane (WL) uncalibrated phase delay (UPD) is improved after careful consideration of the code bias and multipath. Meanwhile, the accuracy of the BDS float ambiguity is also improved by multi-GNSS fusion and improved precise orbit and clock products, which are critical for high-quality narrow-lane (NL) UPD estimations. With three tracking networks of different scales, including Hong Kong, the Crustal Movement Observation Network of China (CMONOC) and the multi-GNSS experiment (MGEX) networks, the spatial–temporal characteristics of WL and NL UPDs for BDS GEO/IGSO/MEO satellites are analyzed, and the PPP AR is performed. Numerous results show that WL and NL UPDs with a standard deviation (STD) of less than 0.15 cycles can be achieved for BDS GEO satellites, while a STD of less than 0.1 cycles can be obtained for IGSO and MEO satellites. With the precise UPD estimation, for the first time, the BDS PPP rapid ambiguity resolution for GEO/IGSO/MEO satellites is achieved. We found that the average time to first fix (TTFF) of the BDS PPP AR is shortened significantly, to approximately 40 min for Hong Kong and the CMONOC, while the TTFF was 57.4 min for the MGEX networks. With ambiguity resolution, the accuracy of the daily BDS PPP in the east, north and vertical directions improves from 1.74 cm, 1.08 cm, and 5.52 cm to 0.72 cm, 0.54 cm, and 3.21 cm for the Hong Kong network, 2.24 cm, 2.31 cm, and 5.64 cm to 1.18 cm, 0.79 cm, and 3.30 cm for the CMONOC, and 2.71 cm, 1.80 cm, and 6.00 cm to 1.58 cm, 1.15 cm, and 4.33 cm for the MGEX networks. Significant improvement is also achieved for kinematic PPP, with improvements of 40.41%, 34.33% and 37.17% in the east, north and vertical directions for the MGEX networks, respectively. 相似文献
12.
Xingxing Li Xin Li Yongqiang Yuan Keke Zhang Xiaohong Zhang Jens Wickert 《Journal of Geodesy》2018,92(6):579-608
This paper focuses on the precise point positioning (PPP) ambiguity resolution (AR) using the observations acquired from four systems: GPS, BDS, GLONASS, and Galileo (GCRE). A GCRE four-system uncalibrated phase delay (UPD) estimation model and multi-GNSS undifferenced PPP AR method were developed in order to utilize the observations from all systems. For UPD estimation, the GCRE-combined PPP solutions of the globally distributed MGEX and IGS stations are performed to obtain four-system float ambiguities and then UPDs of GCRE satellites can be precisely estimated from these ambiguities. The quality of UPD products in terms of temporal stability and residual distributions is investigated for GPS, BDS, GLONASS, and Galileo satellites, respectively. The BDS satellite-induced code biases were corrected for GEO, IGSO, and MEO satellites before the UPD estimation. The UPD results of global and regional networks were also evaluated for Galileo and BDS, respectively. As a result of the frequency-division multiple-access strategy of GLONASS, the UPD estimation was performed using a network of homogeneous receivers including three commonly used GNSS receivers (TRIMBLE NETR9, JAVAD TRE_G3TH DELTA, and LEICA). Data recorded from 140 MGEX and IGS stations for a 30-day period in January in 2017 were used to validate the proposed GCRE UPD estimation and multi-GNSS dual-frequency PPP AR. Our results show that GCRE four-system PPP AR enables the fastest time to first fix (TTFF) solutions and the highest accuracy for all three coordinate components compared to the single and dual system. An average TTFF of 9.21 min with \(7{^{\circ }}\) cutoff elevation angle can be achieved for GCRE PPP AR, which is much shorter than that of GPS (18.07 min), GR (12.10 min), GE (15.36 min) and GC (13.21 min). With observations length of 10 min, the positioning accuracy of the GCRE fixed solution is 1.84, 1.11, and 1.53 cm, while the GPS-only result is 2.25, 1.29, and 9.73 cm for the east, north, and vertical components, respectively. When the cutoff elevation angle is increased to \(30{^{\circ }}\), the GPS-only PPP AR results are very unreliable, while 13.44 min of TTFF is still achievable for GCRE four-system solutions. 相似文献
13.
14.
不同卫星天线参数对BDS定轨定位精度的影响 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
论证了BDS精密单点定位时卫星天线参数与卫星轨道、钟差产品保持一致的必要性。基于4组不同卫星天线参数BDS精密定轨RTN 3方向内符合精度，GEO卫星均在9.3、18.6、11.5 cm左右，IGSO卫星均在1.7、4.2、2.7 cm左右，MEO卫星均在2.1、5.1、4.8 cm左右，在R方向的差异小于5 mm，在TN方向的差异最大为2.4 cm；定轨结果与GFZ的事后精密产品比较，RTN 3方向外符合精度差异较明显，排除GEO卫星因定轨策略与GFZ差异较大的因素，IGSO和MEO外符合精度ESA和WHU相近，RTN 3方向均在10 cm以内，各分量上优于IGS和EST 1~10 cm，其中TN方向差异最显著。在保持BDS PPP使用的卫星天线参数与卫星轨道、钟差产品一致的前提下，4组卫星天线参数定位精度相近，其中静态定位最后一个历元水平和高程方向坐标偏差均在5 cm以内，动态定位收敛后坐标偏差RMS水平方向在10 cm以内、高程方向在15 cm以内；使用ESA和WHU天线参数动态定位平均收敛时间在46 min左右，IGS和EST天线参数动态定位平均收敛时间在56 min左右，略差于基于GFZ事后产品的收敛时间，其平均收敛时间在34 min左右。 相似文献
15.
Ambiguity resolved precise point positioning with GPS and BeiDou 总被引：2，自引：1，他引：1
This paper focuses on the contribution of the global positioning system (GPS) and BeiDou navigation satellite system (BDS) observations to precise point positioning (PPP) ambiguity resolution (AR). A GPS + BDS fractional cycle bias (FCB) estimation method and a PPP AR model were developed using integrated GPS and BDS observations. For FCB estimation, the GPS + BDS combined PPP float solutions of the globally distributed IGS MGEX were first performed. When integrating GPS observations, the BDS ambiguities can be precisely estimated with less than four tracked BDS satellites. The FCBs of both GPS and BDS satellites can then be estimated from these precise ambiguities. For the GPS + BDS combined AR, one GPS and one BDS IGSO or MEO satellite were first chosen as the reference satellite for GPS and BDS, respectively, to form inner-system single-differenced ambiguities. The single-differenced GPS and BDS ambiguities were then fused by partial ambiguity resolution to increase the possibility of fixing a subset of decorrelated ambiguities with high confidence. To verify the correctness of the FCB estimation and the effectiveness of the GPS + BDS PPP AR, data recorded from about 75 IGS MGEX stations during the period of DOY 123-151 (May 3 to May 31) in 2015 were used for validation. Data were processed with three strategies: BDS-only AR, GPS-only AR and GPS + BDS AR. Numerous experimental results show that the time to first fix (TTFF) is longer than 6 h for the BDS AR in general and that the fixing rate is usually less than 35 % for both static and kinematic PPP. An average TTFF of 21.7 min and 33.6 min together with a fixing rate of 98.6 and 97.0 % in static and kinematic PPP, respectively, can be achieved for GPS-only ambiguity fixing. For the combined GPS + BDS AR, the average TTFF can be shortened to 16.9 min and 24.6 min and the fixing rate can be increased to 99.5 and 99.0 % in static and kinematic PPP, respectively. Results also show that GPS + BDS PPP AR outperforms single-system PPP AR in terms of convergence time and position accuracy. 相似文献
16.
The main challenge of ambiguity resolution in precise point positioning (PPP) is that it requires 30 min or more to succeed in the first fixing of ambiguities. With the full operation of the BeiDou (BDS) satellite system in East Asia, it is worthwhile to investigate the performance of GPS + BDS PPP ambiguity resolution, especially the improvements of the initial fixing time and ambiguity-fixing rate compared to GPS-only solutions. We estimated the wide- and narrow-lane fractional-cycle biases (FCBs) for BDS with a regional network, and PPP ambiguity resolution was carried out at each station to assess the contribution of BDS. The across-satellite single-difference (ASSD) GPS + BDS combined ambiguity-fixed PPP model was used, in which the ASSD is applied within each system. We used a two-day data set from 48 stations. For kinematic PPP, the percentage of fixing within 10 min for GPS only (Model A) is 17.6 %, when adding IGSO and MEO of BDS (Model B), the percentage improves significantly to 42.8 %, whereas it is only 23.2 % if GEO is added (Model C) due to the low precision of GEO orbits. For static PPP, the fixing percentage is 32.9, 53.3 and 28.0 % for Model A, B and C, respectively. In order to overcome the limitation of the poor precision of GEO satellites, we also used a small network of 10 stations to analyze the contribution of GEO satellites to kinematic PPP. We took advantage of the fact that for stations of a small network the GEO satellites appear at almost the same direction, such that the GEO orbit error can be absorbed by its FCB estimates. The results show that the percentage of fixing improves from 39.5 to 57.7 % by adding GEO satellites. 相似文献
17.
星蚀期北斗卫星轨道性能分析——SLR检核结果 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
星蚀期北斗卫星的轨道性能是北斗卫星导航系统性能分析的重要部分。了解北斗卫星导航系统星历中星蚀期轨道的精度,不仅可为系统服务性能评估提供支持,还有助于了解星蚀期精密定轨中相关模型可能存在的问题,进而为精密定轨函数模型改进提供参考。本文基于2014年1月至2015年7月的卫星激光测距资料,重点分析了星蚀期对北斗不同类型卫星轨道的影响,同时也对北斗广播星历和精密星历中整体轨道径向精度进行检核。结果表明:星蚀期内(尤其是偏航机动期间),IGSO/MEO卫星的广播星历和精密星历轨道均存在明显的精度下降;广播星历轨道径向误差达1.5~2.0m,精密星历轨道径向误差超过10.0cm。但仅从轨道径向残差序列中难以发现星蚀期对GEO卫星轨道是否有显著影响。非星蚀期间,IGSO/MEO卫星和GEO卫星的广播星历轨道径向精度分别优于0.5 m和0.9 m。IGSO/MEO卫星的精密星历轨道径向精度优于10.0cm,GEO卫星的轨道径向精度约50.0cm,且存在40.0cm左右的系统性偏差。 相似文献
18.
针对系统地评估我国北斗卫星导航系统广播星历精度与保障实时导航定位服务的需求,对BDS广播星历提供的卫星轨道、钟差以及用户测距误差(URE)的精度性能进行分析,统计了2015年连续4周全部BDS在轨健康卫星的广播星历各项精度指标值。分析结果表明:BDS的MEO和IGSO卫星轨道精度优于GEO卫星结果,且径向精度优于法向和切向精度;BDS搭载的国产星载铷钟卫星钟差序列相对比较稳定,其均方根误差优于4ns;GEO/IGSO卫星的用户距离误差(URE)在6m以内,MEO的URE优于20m。研究结果对北斗系统的建设、后期的发展和用户市场的拓展,都具有重要的参考价值。 相似文献