共查询到10条相似文献，搜索用时 78 毫秒
1.
Ali A. Nowroozi 《Pure and Applied Geophysics》2010,167(12):1459-1474
The active faults near Tehran are capable of producing Mw magnitudes of 6.62?C7.23; at epicentral distances of 25?km from the active faults, and Mw?=?7.23, the peak ground horizontal acceleration, PGH, is between 386 and 730?cm/s2 and peak ground vertical acceleration, PGV, is between 192 and 261?cm/s2; the historic earthquake of the fourth century BC, Mw?=?7.16 produced the highest estimated PGH acceleration in Tehran, between 254 and 479?cm/s2 and PGV acceleration between 127 and 173?cm/s2. Earthquakes from 1909 to 2008, within 300?km from Tehran, are used for calculation of magnitude frequency relation, and results are applied to estimate PGH and PGV accelerations as a function of magnitudes for a set of fixed epicentral distance and site conditions; also as a function of epicentral distances for a set of fixed magnitudes and site conditions. Poisson??s distribution is used for probability calculation of PGH and PGV accelerations for several exposure times, site conditions and epicentral distances; accelerations with very high probability, near 1, are presented. At an epicentral distance of 10?km and exposure time of 450?years, in the northern part of Tehran, close to Mosha and the Northern Tehran faults, PGH acceleration is 800?C420?cm/s2 and PGV is 400?C220?cm/s2 with high probability. At an epicentral distance of 25?km and 1,000?years exposure time, PGH is 610?C320?cm/s2 and PGV is 310?C160?cm/s2 with high probability, where larger values are for soft soil and smaller values are for hard rock. 相似文献
2.
江西数字地震台网近震震级偏差与量规函数关系的研究 总被引：6，自引：0，他引：6
采用江西数字地震台网数字地震记录资料,选取自2007年10月正式运行至2009年12月所记录的138次ML≥1.5的地震事件,计算了各台站单台震级与台网平均震级的偏差、平均偏差和标准偏差,从震级偏差频次分布、量规函数、平均周期等因素对单台震级的影响上作了定量统计和分析。结果表明:①除九江、赣州、石城、都昌、高安5个台的震级与台网的平均震级偏差比较大外,其余台站均比较小;②目前所用量规函数在震中距小于40 km时偏小,大于330 km时偏大,给出了量规函数校正值,③平均周期小于0.17 s时,变得极不稳定,离散程度明显增大,这种情况应该是由于单台震中距超过300 km的样本数太少所导致的。 相似文献
3.
4.
使用震中距320 km范围内40个台站的波形记录, 大致还原了2013年4月20日芦山MS7.0地震的自动速报震级测定过程． 结果表明, 在中国地震局对外发布自动速报参数的时间点上, 震级还处于快速上升段, 此时测得的标准震级为M5.8, 与对外公布的标准震级M5.9比较一致, 却远小于之后人工修订的震级M7.0． 分析芦山地震自动速报震级偏差较大的原因: ① 使用限幅记录, 造成震级低估; ② 地震参数发布过于强调快而忽略了准, 参数发布时有些台站的S波(或Lg波)未到达或未完全到达, 造成计算的平均震级偏小． 通过选择合适的震中距范围, 减小限幅记录的影响并适当延时, 在震后137 s得到震级为M6.8． 另外, 应用MWP震级测定方法, 在震后77 s获得矩震级为MW6.8, 显示该方法在测定矩震级时具有快速稳定的优势． 基于上述研究结果, 本文提出改进自动测定震级的措施和方法: ① 对于M＜7.0的地震, 在使用ML震级测定方法确定震级时, 需在未限幅台站占绝对优势的震中距范围内使用未限幅记录, 并延时到最远台站的S波(或Lg波)最大振幅到达后测定ML; ② 应用MWP震级测定方法测定大地震的矩震级． 相似文献
5.
Specially designed arrays of strong-motion seismographs near to the earthquake source are required for seismological and engineering studies of the generation and near-field properties of seismic waves. The first such large digital array, called SMART 1 (with radius 2 km and 37 accelerometers), to record substantial ground motion (up to 0·24g horizontal acceleration) became operational in late 1980 in a highly seismic region of Taiwan. During the first 6 months of operation, SMART 1 recorded nine earthquakes with magnitudes ranging from ML 3·8 to 6·9. Three were located directly below the array at focal depths of 59 to 76 km. The remaining six had shallow depths and epicentral distances from 7 to 193 km. Digital records from 27 three-component accelerographs were obtained from a magnitude 6·9 (ML) local earthquake on 29 January 1981. Representative measurements are described of seismic wave coherency and power spectrum as a function of wave number, frequency, azimuth of propagation and wave type. Acceleration waveforms varied significantly across the array for each event. On average, peak acceleration of horizontal components was about three times that of the vertical component. Relative spectral changes from earthquake to earthquake were large. 相似文献
6.
作者根据位错模型导出了震级不仅与震中烈度和震源深度有关,而且与极震区面积有关。震中烈度通过应力降和震级联系起来,而极震区面积则通过位错面的面积或震源体积和震级联系起来,使震级与烈度的物理联系更加明确。 用我国的61个浅源地震资料,用逐步回归方法计算出震级M与震中烈度I0、极震区面积（面积单位为平方公里）A0的关系为: M=3.53+0.039I02+0.0178（Ig A0）3,还分别计算出震级与6-8度区面积A6、A7、A8的关系为: M=3.63+0.72 Ig A6, M=5.34+0.718（Ig A7）·（IgIg A7）, M=5.92+0.104（Ig A8）2。并外推出震级与5度区面积A5的关系为: M=3.03+0.72 Ig A5。 利用这些关系式来确定历史地震震级比仅考虑震中烈度来确定有较好的效果。 相似文献
7.
8.
大地震前体应变临震异常现象 总被引：5，自引：2，他引：3
本文对2011年1月至2014年4月间全球发生的80次MS≥7级地震前,二张营台和天堂河台Sacks体应变临震异常现象进行了研究,针对复杂震例提出了异常识别的前提条件。统计结果显示,体应变观测对震中距为8000km范围内的MS≥7级地震映震和前兆异常反映较好。同时,对异常现象进行了分类和描述,划分了三种异常类型:即固体潮畸变型、突变型和慢地震型,并对各种类型作了统计分析,初步探讨了力学性质。结果发现,体应变异常信息对未来大地震的发生具有一定的预示意义。 相似文献
9.
内蒙古地区地方性震级的量规函数研究 总被引：2，自引：1，他引：1
选取2008年1月~2015年11月内蒙古测震台网81个台站所记录的6342次地震事件,基于震级残差统计方法,计算了81个台站单台震级与台网平均震级的偏差、平均偏差和标准偏差。分析认为,BHS等6个台站震级偏差较大的原因可能是台站场地响应放大、台基风化等。台基校正前、后单台震级平均偏差值ΔMLi随震中距的变化曲线显示,曲线形态基本未有大的改变,台基校正后较之前震级平均偏差绝对值降低0.01,表明台基对地方性震级偏差的影响不大。同时,进行了81个台站的台基校正获得了内蒙古新量规函数,结果表明,全国量规函数除了震中距为0~120km时适合于内蒙古地区以外,其余情况下均偏高,不符合内蒙古地区的特征。因此,本文修定了全国量规函数,得到了校正后的内蒙古地区量规函数。 相似文献