共查询到19条相似文献，搜索用时 276 毫秒
1.
可可西里盆地位于昆仑山和唐古拉山之间，是青藏高原腹地最大的第三纪沉积盆地，对于研究青藏高原早期隆升和地壳短缩过程具有重要作用，盆地保存的始新世－渐新世早期风火山群和雅西措群主要由碎屑岩和泥岩组成，厚度为5452．8,碎屑岩的物源区分析表明，风火山群主要来自于南部的唐古拉造山带二叠－三叠纪地层，而雅西措群主要来自于南部的唐古拉、白日榨加和黑石山－高山造山带，剥蚀深度加大至石炭－二叠纪地层，它们的同积演化过程是盆地南部造山带老第三纪构造隆升持续加强的结果，表明在雅西措群沉积时期青藏高原北部已经隆升至一定的高度。 相似文献
2.
可可西里盆地早渐新世雅西措群沉积环境分析及古气候意义 总被引：18，自引：3，他引：15
可可西里盆地是青藏高原腹地最大的第三纪沉积盆地,第三纪沉积地层包括早始新世 -早渐新世风火山群、早渐新世雅西措群、早中新世五道梁群。其中,雅西措群为紫红色、砖红色泥岩、含膏泥岩与紫红色粉砂岩、细砂岩韵律互层,夹白色石膏薄层和石膏结核层,沉积厚度为 6 70.0m,沉积环境主要由河流和湖泊环境组成,并以湖泊环境为主,古水流方向反映盆地沉积中心逐渐向东向北迁移。雅西措群中石膏层的突然大量出现发生在底部地层距今约32.0Ma,体现了渐新世最早期的全球变冷变干事件在青藏高原北部的记录。 相似文献
3.
风火山盆地古近纪和新近纪沉积包括下部连续沉积的早始新世—早渐新世风火山群和早渐新世雅西措群,以及不整合其上的早中新世五道梁群。风火山地区的砂岩铜矿全部产于风火山群1岩组的灰(绿)色砂岩层中。采自风火山群1岩组含矿层和非含矿层中的3个磷灰石样品,分别获得了(22.5±2.3)Ma、(33.1±6.0)Ma和(28.0±3.6)Ma的裂变径迹年龄数据。其中33.1～28.0 Ma代表了该地区砂岩铜矿的成矿年龄.22.5 Ma则代表了成矿后构造热事件的年龄。风火山砂岩铜矿的成矿年龄处在其上覆的雅西措群沉积年龄范围内.显示砂岩铜矿是盆地早期沉积物压实脱水流体的产物。 相似文献
4.
青藏高原沱沱河盆地渐新-中新世沉积环境分析 总被引：10，自引：0，他引：10
沱沱河盆地保存着青藏高原内部至今发现最完整的渐新世至中新世连续沉积记录,由渐新世雅西措群(31.3～23.8 Ma)和早中新世五道梁群(23.8～21.8 Ma)组成,总厚度2 393 m.雅西措群主要为紫红色、砖红色砂岩、粉砂岩与泥岩韵律互层,五道梁群为一套内陆湖泊相泥灰岩、内碎屑灰岩和叠层石灰岩沉积.沱沱河盆地渐新-中新世沉积环境经历了3个阶段的演化:(1)早渐新世,以河流环境为主,古水流以北向为主,反映古气候条件比较干燥;(2)中晚渐新世,以湖泊环境为主,古水流以东北向为主,古气候条件相对温暖潮湿;(3)晚渐新世至早中新世,主要为湖泊环境,古水流转为南向,沉积岩性由雅西措群项部的砂泥岩互层为主转变为五道梁群的泥灰岩为主,反映当时的物源区发生重大转变,构造活动趋于稳定,古气候条件由温暖潮湿转为干燥.沱沱河盆地渐新-中新世气候和构造活动历史对于研究青藏高原早期隆升作用和全球气候变化都有重要意义. 相似文献
5.
青藏高原沱沱河盆地渐新-中新世沉积环境分析 总被引：13，自引：0，他引：13
沱沱河盆地保存着青藏高原内部至今发现最完整的渐新世至中新世连续沉积记录,由渐新世雅西措群(31.3～23.8Ma)和早中新世五道梁群(23.8～21.8Ma)组成,总厚度2393m。雅西措群主要为紫红色、砖红色砂岩、粉砂岩与泥岩韵律互层,五道梁群为一套内陆湖泊相泥灰岩、内碎屑灰岩和叠层石灰岩沉积。沱沱河盆地渐新-中新世沉积环境经历了3个阶段的演化:(1)早渐新世,以河流环境为主,古水流以北向为主,反映古气候条件比较干燥;(2)中晚渐新世,以湖泊环境为主,古水流以东北向为主,古气候条件相对温暖潮湿;(3)晚渐新世至早中新世,主要为湖泊环境,古水流转为南向,沉积岩性由雅西措群项部的砂泥岩互层为主转变为五道梁群的泥灰岩为主,反映当时的物源区发生重大转变,构造活动趋于稳定,古气候条件由温暖潮湿转为干燥。沱沱河盆地渐新-中新世气候和构造活动历史对于研究青藏高原早期隆升作用和全球气候变化都有重要意义。 相似文献
6.
唐古拉山地区第三纪地层的划分及命名 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
根据１９８６－１９９０年期间１：２０万区调资料，将唐古拉山地区的第三纪地层，划分为古一始新统、渐新统、中新统及上新统，并分别命名为沱沱河群、雅西措群、查保马群、五道梁群和曲果组。认为中新统查保马群和五道梁群属同期异相，并指出在雅西措群中寻找盐类矿产、五道梁群中寻找锌银铁矿产具有很大的前景。 相似文献
7.
华北盆地三叠纪沉积厚度大,分布广泛,其地层沉积特征很好地记录了周缘造山带或隆起区在该时期的构造演化过程。目前,前人已经对华北各地区三叠纪碎屑物源进行了大量研究,而对于物源区的认识仍存在分歧,对于盆缘地区沉积—构造演化过程的研究也相对较少。通过整理前人对华北各地区三叠纪碎屑物源研究的锆石年龄数据,并结合造山带构造演化过程和地层沉积特征,对华北盆地三叠纪碎屑物源及沉积—构造演化过程进行了整体研究。结果表明:华北北部三叠纪沉积物源均来自北缘的内蒙古隆起,锆石年龄和地层沉积特征记录了源区逐渐增强的岩浆活动和隆升过程。华北南部地区在该时期主要接受来自华北南缘二叠纪沉积盖层和北秦岭造山带的碎屑物质供给,华北南缘伴随着秦岭造山过程可能在中三叠世就已经逆冲隆升并遭受剥蚀,两者的协同演变共同控制着盆地南部沉积演化过程。鄂尔多斯盆地西北部碎屑物源主要来自阿拉善地块和北祁连造山带,西南部地区物源则主要来自盆地西南缘再旋回沉积盖层和北祁连造山带,分别为伸展和挤压状态下的内陆盆地沉积。早—中三叠世,华北盆地为统一的大型内陆沉积盆地,晚三叠世,盆地南、北缘发育沿褶皱逆冲带分布的陆内前陆盆地系统。 相似文献
8.
根据1986～1990年期间1∶20万区调资料,将唐古拉山地区的第三纪地层,划分为古—始新统、渐新统、中新统及上新统,并分别命名为沱沱河群(E_(1-2)tt)、雅西措群(E_3yx)、查保马群(N_1ch)、五道染群(N_1wd)和曲果组(N_2q)。认为中新统查保马群和五道梁群属同期异相,并指出在雅西措群中寻找盐类矿产、五道梁群中寻找锌银铁矿产具有很大的前景。 相似文献
9.
可可西里盆地早渐新世雅西措群爬升沙纹层理及其沉积环境意义 总被引：2，自引：2，他引：0
可可西里盆地早渐新世雅西措群砂岩极其发育爬升沙纹层理,形成于沉积物来源供给太快太多而不能随流体一起迁移,从而产生向上的加积。雅西措群砂岩主要包括迎水坡侵蚀的A型和迎水坡沉积的B1型两种,其中,A型沙纹层理单个层系厚一般约为2cm,爬升角小于7°;B1型沙纹层单个层系厚一般为4cm,爬升角介于10o～20o之间。这两种爬升沙纹层形成于变速流、非稳定流或变速非稳定流,主要归于砂质碎屑流和底流,平均流速在11～60cm/s之间,堆积速度可以达到0.1g/cm2s,发育于浅湖环境的三角洲前缘沉积。雅西措群爬升沙纹层理发育于青藏高原的早渐新世快速隆升作用和全球变冷变干气候条件下。 相似文献
10.
青藏高原南部乌郁盆地渐新世—上新世地层沉积相分析 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
青藏高原南部乌郁盆地是欧亚与印度板块碰撞以来冈底斯山隆升最具代表性的盆地之一,也是青藏高原南部较大的新生代残留盆地之一。沉积盆地中保存着完整的渐新世—早更新世连续沉积记录,自下而上由古新世—始新世林子宗群（典中组、年波组和帕那组）、渐新世—中新世日贡拉组、中新世芒乡组、来庆组、上新世—早更新世乌郁群（乌郁组、达孜组）,总厚度大于4180m。林子宗群为一套中—酸性钙碱性火山岩系,夹紫红色砂岩、砾岩及粉砂岩。日贡拉组主要为紫红色砂岩、砾岩,夹少量火山熔岩及酸性火山凝灰岩,为一套山间盆地沉积。芒乡组为灰色、深灰色泥岩、砂岩,夹煤和油页岩,为湖泊相—前三角洲相—沼泽相。来庆组为一套褐色安山岩、火山碎屑岩。乌郁组是一套碎屑岩,颜色呈灰色、灰褐色,夹煤及油页岩,为山间盆地辫状河—湖泊—沼泽沉积。达孜组是一套黄褐色砾岩、砂砾岩、砂岩,夹少量泥岩,发育铁质结核,为辫状河沉积。沉积相分析表明具有明显的古新世—始新世林子宗群（典中组、年波组和帕那组）、渐新世—中新世日贡拉组—芒乡组、中新世来庆组—上新世乌郁组、上新世—早更新世达孜组四个阶段式隆升—剥蚀过程。从芒乡组的潮湿炎热的气候转变为乌郁组的干燥凉爽,显然与青藏高原隆升密切相关。乌郁盆地渐新世—早更新世沉积相分析对于研究青藏高原隆升和油气等能源均具有重要意义。 相似文献
11.
Facies analysis and depositional systems of Cenozoic sediments in the Hoh Xil basin, northern Tibet 总被引：12，自引：0，他引：12
A sedimentary succession more than 5800 m thick, including the Lower Eocene to Lower Oligocene Fenghuoshan Group, the Lower Oligocene Yaxicuo Group, and the Lower Miocene Wudaoliang Group, is widely distributed in the Hoh Xil piggyback basin, the largest Cenozoic sedimentary basin in the hinterland of the Tibetan plateau. The strata of the Fenghuoshan and Yaxicuo groups have undergone strong deformation, whereas only minor tilting has occurred in the Wudaoliang Group. We analyze their sedimentary facies and depositional systems to help characterize continental collision and early uplift of the Tibetan plateau. The results indicate fluvial, lacustrine, and fan-delta facies for the Fenghuoshan Group, fluvial and lacustrine facies for the Yaxicuo Group, and lacustrine facies for the Wudaoliang Group. Development of the Hoh Xil basin underwent three stages: (1) the Fenghuoshan Group was deposited mainly in the Fenghuoshan-Hantaishan sub-basin between 56.0 and 31.8 Ma ago; (2) the Yaxicuo Group was deposited mainly in the Wudaoliang and Zhuolai Lake sub-basins between 31.8 and 30.0 Ma ago; and (3) the Wudaoliang Group was deposited throughout the entire Hoh Xil basin during the Early Miocene. The Fenghuoshan and Yaxicuo groups were deposited in piggyback basins during the Early Eocene to Early Oligocene, whereas the Wudaoliang Group was deposited in a relatively stable large lake. The Hoh Xil basin underwent two periods of strong north–south shortening, which could have been produced by the collision between India and Asia and the early uplift of the Tibetan plateau. The study suggests the Hoh Xil region could reach a high elevation during the Late Oligocene and the diachronous uplift history for the Tibetan plateau from east to west. 相似文献
12.
《Journal of Asian Earth Sciences》2002,20(3):211-223
The Hoh Xil Basin is the largest Cenozoic sedimentary basin in the hinterland of the Tibetan Plateau. Tertiary sedimentary strata 5.8 km thick, comprising the Fenghuoshan, Yaxicuo and Wudaoliang groups, provide compelling evidence concerning the crustal shortening, erosion and peneplanation of the northern Tibetan Plateau. The basal Fenghuoshan and overlying Yaxicuo groups span the Eocene-Early Oligocene stratigraphically, and have been dated by magnetostratigraphy as 56–30 Ma old. Both groups are composed of terrigenous rocks. Provenance analysis of sandstones and conglomerates demonstrates that Permian and Triassic strata in the Tanggula Orogenic Zone in the south were the source for the Fenghuoshan Group. In contrast, the Carboniferous–Triassic strata in the Tanggula, Bairizhajia, and Heishishan-Gaoshan orogenic zones in the north, were the source for the Yaxicuo Group.During the Late Oligocene, northern Tibet underwent strong north–south crustal shortening (∼43%) and thickening. Extensive erosion, which occurred over the entire plateau surface near the end of the Oligocene, resulted in development of a peneplain surface. The latter is overlain by the Early Miocene Wudaoliang Group, composed of fresh water limestones. These are exposed both on summit surfaces, as well as on the valley floors, showing that a phase of differential uplift occurred after the deposition of the Wudaoliang Group. This post-Miocene differential uplift was due to regional extension, in a region of overall shortening. Even though we have not succeeded in obtaining conclusive data about the exact timing of phases of rapid uplift of the Tibetan Plateau, it is most likely that the major phase of uplift occurred during the Late Oligocene. 相似文献
13.
Shi Zhiqiang Yi Haisheng Lin Jinhui Zhu Lidong Liu Dengzhong Huang Jijun Tao ZhuanWT ”BX 《地学前缘》2000,(Z1)
PROVENANCE OF LOWER TERTIARY REDBEDS IN HOH XIL BASIN AND UPLIFT OF NORTHERN TIBET PLATEAU 相似文献
14.
HOH XIL PIGGYBACK BASINS:IMPLICATIONS FOR PALEOGENE SHORTENING OF THE TIBETAN PLATEAU 相似文献
15.
Paleocurrent indicator data collected in field work were used to study the early Cenozoic regional paleodrainage patterns in the Hob Xil basin in northern Tibetan plateau. The paleocurrent directions of the Eocene Fenghuoshan Group obviously show that the flows were northward with a unidirectional dispersal pattern. This probably reflects the uplift of the Qiangtang terrain during the initial basin deposition period and indicates that the Tanggula Moutains occurred as topographic highlands at least in the Eocene. Paleoflows of the Oligocene Yaxicuo Group were dominantly oriented to the north and then flowed eastwards during its late deposition. This regional variability of paleodrainage patterns of the Yaxicuo Group is interpreted to record the dispersal style of sediments from transverse rivers to longitudinal river systems. It is inferred that the Oligocene uplift of the Kunlun Mountains obstructed by northward paleoflows and created longitudinal river systems parallel to the orogenic belts. The temporal and spatial changes of the paleodrainage patterns suggest that the northern boundary of the Tibetan plateau during the early Cenozoic was situated in the Hoh Xil area and its uplift has progressed northwards through time. 相似文献
16.
THE PALEOCURRENT PATTERN OF EARLY TERTIARY REDBEDS IN THE HOH XIL BASIN,NORTHERN TIBET PLATEAU:IMPLICATIONS FOR AN EARLY UPLIFT AND UNROOFING 相似文献
17.
MASS ACCUMULATION IN THE CENOZOIC HOH XIL BASIN,NORTHERN TIBET1 BarronEJ,WashingtonWM .Theroleofgeographicvariablesinexplainingpaleoclimates:ResultsfromCretaceousclimatemodelsensitivitystudies[J] ..JournalofGeophysicalResearch ,1984 ,89:12 6 7～ 12 79.
2 HayWW ,ShawCA ,WoldCN .Mass balancedpaleogeographicreconstructions[J] ..GeologischeRundschau,1989,78( 1) :2 0 7～ 2 4 2 .
3 LiuZhifei,WangChengshan .FaciesanalysisanddepositionalprocessesofCenozoicsed… 相似文献
18.
MAGNETOSTRATIGRAPHIC DATING:IMPLICATIONS FOR TERTIARY EVOLUTION OF THE HOH XIL BASIN, NORTHERN TIBET 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
MAGNETOSTRATIGRAPHIC DATING:IMPLICATIONS FOR TERTIARY EVOLUTION OF THE HOH XIL BASIN, NORTHERN TIBET1 BGMRQ (BureauofGeologyandMineralResourcesofQinghai) .RegionalgeologyofQinghai(inChinesewithEnglishab stract) [M] .Beijing :ChinaGeolPress,1991.
2 CowardWP ,KiddWSF ,Pang,Y ,etal.Thestructureof1985TibetGeotraverse ,LhasatoGolmud.In:Sino BritishComprehensiveGeologicalExpeditionTeamoftheQinghai TibetPlateau.ThegeologicalevolutionoftheQin… 相似文献
19.
青藏高原北部可可西里盆地第三纪风火山群沉积环境分析 总被引：19，自引：4，他引：19
青藏高原北部的可可西里盆地是高原腹地最大的第三纪沉积盆地,分布着沉积厚度达 4 782.8m的早始新世-早渐新世风火山群灰紫色砂岩、泥岩和砾岩,其沉积环境演化经历了四个阶段,从早期 56.0～ 52.2Ma河流为主的环境,到中期 52.2～ 4 3.1Ma的湖泊环境和 4 3.1～ 3 8.3Ma的河流与扇三角洲环境,演变到晚期 3 8.3～ 3 2.0Ma河流为主的环境。古水流方向也由北东向变为南东向,到晚期又转变为北向为主,反映盆地沉积中心逐渐向东向北迁移。这种沉积环境演化和盆地沉积中心迁移可能受青藏高原早期隆升的影响. 相似文献