共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
Seismic Passive Earth Pressure Behind Non-vertical Retaining Wall Using Pseudo-dynamic Analysis 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
Priyanka Ghosh 《Geotechnical and Geological Engineering》2007,25(6):693-703
This paper shows a detailed study on the seismic passive earth pressure behind a non-vertical cantilever retaining wall using
pseudo-dynamic analysis. A planar failure surface has been considered behind the retaining wall. The effects of soil friction
angle, wall inclination, wall friction angle, horizontal and vertical earthquake acceleration on the passive earth pressure
have been explored. Unlike the Mononobe–Okabe method, which incorporates pseudo-static analysis, the present analysis predicts
a nonlinear variation of passive earth pressure along the wall. The results have been thoroughly compared with the existing
values in the literature. 相似文献
2.
This note shows a study on the seismic passive earth pressure behind a non-vertical cantilever retaining wall using pseudo-dynamic
approach. A composite failure surface comprising of an arc of the logarithmic spiral near the wall and a straight line in
the planar shear zone near the ground, has been considered behind the retaining wall. The effects of soil friction angle,
wall inclination, wall friction angle, amplification of vibration, horizontal and vertical earthquake acceleration on the
passive earth pressure have been explored in this study. The results available in the literature for passive pressure, on
the basis of pseudo-static analysis are found to predict the passive resistance on the conservative side and the assumption
of a planar failure surface is found to overestimate the passive resistance for higher wall friction. An attempt has been
made in the present study to overcome both the limitations simultaneously. The present results are compared with the existing
values in the literature and found a reasonable match among the values. 相似文献
3.
Deepankar Choudhury Sanjay S. Nimbalkar 《Geotechnical and Geological Engineering》2006,24(5):1103-1113
Knowledge of seismic active earth pressure behind rigid retaining wall is very important in the design of retaining wall in
earthquake prone region. Commonly used Mononobe-Okabe method considers pseudo-static approach, which gives the linear distribution
of seismic earth pressure in an approximate way. In this paper, the pseudo-dynamic method is used to compute the distribution
of seismic active earth pressure on a rigid retaining wall supporting cohesionless backfill in more realistic manner by considering
time and phase difference within the backfill. Planar rupture surface is considered in the analysis. Effects of a wide range
of parameters like wall friction angle, soil friction angle, shear wave velocity, primary wave velocity and horizontal and
vertical seismic accelerations on seismic active earth pressure have been studied. Results are provided in tabular and graphical
non-dimensional form with a comparison to pseudo-static method to highlight the realistic non-linearity of seismic active
earth pressures distribution. 相似文献
4.
Seismic active earth pressure on walls with bilinear backface using pseudo-dynamic approach 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
This paper presents a study on the seismic active earth pressure behind a rigid cantilever retaining wall with bilinear backface using pseudo-dynamic approach. The wall has sudden change in inclination along its depth and a planar failure surface has been considered behind the retaining wall. The effects of a wide range of parameters like soil friction angle, wall inclination, wall friction angle, amplification of vibration, variation of shear modulus, and horizontal and vertical seismic accelerations on the active earth pressure have been explored in the present study. Unlike the Mononobe-Okabe method, which incorporates pseudo-static analysis, the present analysis predicts a nonlinear variation of active earth pressure along the wall. The results have been compared with the existing values in the literature. 相似文献
5.
《Geomechanics and Geoengineering》2013,8(2):115-121
The study presents a rational analytical approach to obtain the seismic passive response of an inclined retaining wall backfilled with horizontal c-Φ soil. Pseudo-dynamic analysis is carried out to obtain the seismic passive response. Here in this analysis, the critical wedge angle is a single one irrespective of weight, surcharge and cohesion and this fact satisfies the field situation in a more realistic manner. A planer failure surface is considered in the analysis. The effect of soil and wall friction angle, wall inclination, horizontal and vertical earthquake acceleration on the passive resistance and the variation of passive earth pressure along the height of the wall have been explored. A comparison to pseudo-static and other available methods have been made to highlight the non-linearity of seismic passive earth pressure distribution. 相似文献
6.
为考虑挡墙位移效应对地震土压力的影响,依据前人试验研究的结论,将摩擦角表示为与挡墙位移量和位置高度相关的函数,然后基于拟动力法和水平层分析法,推导得出RT位移模式下的地震非极限主动土压力和合力作用点的计算表达式。计算模型可描述摩擦角沿着墙高逐渐发展的不同非极限位移状态工况,并建立了挡墙位移、地震动荷载和土压力之间的相互联系。参数分析讨论了振动时间、挡土墙位移状态、地震加速度参数和土体摩擦角对地震主动土压力分布、合力大小以及合力作用点高度的影响。相比于传统的极限状态地震土压力理论,所提方法更合理地描述了地震土压力随挡墙位移的发展过程,对发展非极限土压力理论和改进边坡工程中的抗震计算方法具有一定的参考意义。 相似文献
7.
地震作用下挡土墙主动土压力及转动位移分析 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
分析地震引起的挡土墙位移及墙后土压力,对于评估挡土墙可靠性具有重要意义。基于拟动力法,考虑时效、地震波传播的相位差、超载、墙背摩擦角、填土黏聚力以及填土开裂等影响,建立地震作用下挡土墙主动土压力计算模型,获得挡土墙绕墙趾转动模式下主动土压力大小、分布形式及作用点高度。同时,考虑挡土墙本身受地震荷载作用的影响,求出挡土墙绕墙趾的转动位移。通过与Mononobe-Okabe法对比可知,文中获得的主动土压力值与Mononobe-Okabe法接近,但Mononobe-Okabe法低估了主动土压力作用点高度,表明采用Mononobe-Okabe法设计存在风险。通过算例分析了地震系数、墙背摩擦系数、超载大小、时间、填土黏聚力和内摩擦角对挡土墙转动位移的影响。 相似文献
8.
Sunil M. Rangari Deepankar Choudhury D. M. Dewaikar 《Geotechnical and Geological Engineering》2013,31(2):569-580
In this paper, the limit equilibrium method is used to compute seismic passive earth pressure coefficients and the vertical uplift capacity of horizontal strip anchors in presence of both horizontal and vertical pseudo-static earthquake forces. By considering a simple planar failure surface, distribution of soil reaction is obtained through the use of Kötter’s equation. Presence of pseudo-static seismic forces induces a considerable reduction in the seismic passive earth pressure coefficients. The reduction in seismic passive earth pressure coefficients increases with increase in magnitude of the earthquake accelerations in both horizontal and vertical directions and with increase in wall friction angle. The vertical uplift capacity of horizontal strip anchor is obtained for various values of soil friction angle, embedment ratio and seismic acceleration coefficients in both horizontal and vertical directions by using rigorous computational optimization. Proper justification for selected value of wall friction angle is established. Results are presented in the form of non-dimensional breakout factor for anchor. A significant reduction in breakout factor is observed in presence of both the seismic acceleration coefficients whereas breakout factor increases with increase in soil friction angle and embedment ratio even under the seismic condition. Angles of failure planes keep changing with change in seismic acceleration coefficients and failure zone shifts towards the critical direction of seismic acceleration coefficients. Present results are compared and found in good agreement with some specific available results in literature. 相似文献
9.
By using pseudo-dynamic approach, a method has been proposed in this paper to compute the seismic passive earth pressure behind
a rigid cantilever retaining wall with bilinear backface. The wall has sudden change in inclination along its depth and a
planar failure surface has been considered behind the retaining wall. The effects of a wide range of parameters like soil
friction angle, wall inclination, wall friction angle, amplification of vibration, variation of shear modulus and horizontal
and vertical seismic accelerations on the passive earth pressure have been explored in the present study. For the sake of
illustration, the computations have been exclusively carried out for constant wall friction through out the depth. Unlike
the Mononobe-Okabe method, which incorporates pseudo-static analysis, the present analysis predicts a nonlinear variation
of passive earth pressure along the wall. 相似文献
10.
有地下水时刚性挡土墙的动主动土压力 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
基于Mononobe-Okabe假定,在合理考虑土体孔隙中受限水含量的基础上,利用水平层分析法推导了填土中有地下水时刚性挡土墙平移模式下的动主动土压力强度的一阶微分方程,并求得非线性分布解;探讨了地下水位、受限水含量、填土的内摩擦角、墙背的摩擦角和地震系数等参数对土压力强度分布、合力作用点高度以及倾覆力矩的影响。所提出的方法可考虑填土的孔隙率、渗透性和地震动周期的影响。 相似文献
11.
地震条件下黏性土挡土墙土压力分析 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
Mononobe-Okabe理论是现阶段计算地震土压力的常用方法,但Mononobe-Okabe理论的诸多假设使其具有一定的局限性。针对Mononobe-Okabe理论的不足,考虑到地震作用下挡土墙偏转对土压力的影响,采用斜向条分法推导了复杂条件下黏性土地震土压力强度分布、土压力合力及其作用点位置公式,并利用图解法给出了临界破裂角的解析解。研究表明：填土黏聚力和地震系数对土压力影响显著;忽略黏性填土表面开裂与地震作用对均布超载及开裂填土等效超载的影响将使主动土压力计算结果偏小,其误差随着填土黏聚力和均布超载的增大而增大;在不同水平地震系数下土压力沿墙高呈非线性分布;所提公式适用范围更广,有效完善了Mononobe-Okabe理论。 相似文献
12.
在挡土墙稳定性计算基本原理基础上, 引入《核电厂抗震设计规范》(GB 50267-97) 关于地震系数的规定, 重新建立了安全相关边坡挡土墙土压力和地震角计算公式, 并应用到实际工程中。对比分析显示, 挡土墙按核安全边坡和一般边坡进行抗震验算时, 地震系数、地震角的取值相差较大; 由于按核安全边坡计算时地震力远大于一般边坡, 因此稳定系数远小于一般边坡。 相似文献
13.
已有的刚性挡土墙上三维被动土压力的研究主要基于挡土墙平移模式(T位移模式)下开展的，而对挡土墙绕顶转动模式(RT位移模式)下三维被动土压力的研究尚不充分。因此，该文采用数值方法系统地研究了RT位移模式下三维被动土压力及三维空间滑裂面性状。针对无黏性土体，得到了挡土墙宽度与深度比值、土体摩擦角大小和墙土接触面摩擦角比值对三维被动土压力系数及墙后土体滑裂面的影响，并与T位移模式下的三维被动土压力系数和墙后土体的空间滑裂面形态进行了定量的比较。研究结果表明:RT位移模式下的三维被动土压力系数和空间滑裂面形态均受土体内摩擦角及墙土接触面摩擦角比值的影响，且两者之间存在相互联系。RT位移模式下的三维被动土压力系数和空间滑裂面形态与T位移模式下有显著的区别；RT位移模式下的三维被动土压力系数及空间滑裂面相比于T位移模式下较小。研究成果可为RT位移模式下三维被动土压力的进一步研究和相关工程设计提供参考。 相似文献
14.
15.
首先,介绍了基于OpenSees独立开发的一套用于挡土墙-土地震反应相互作用有限元分析计算软件RW_2DPS.据此建立了俯斜式混凝土重力挡土墙-土强震相互作用有限元模型.模型中,引入非线性有限元计算方法,选用多屈服面弹塑性本构模型模拟砂土的动力属性,应用零长度接触单元模拟墙与土体之间的接触特性,且采用一致耗能阻尼边界与速度边界条件.最后,输入随机地震动,进行挡土墙-土强震反应分析,并重点探讨墙背地震土压力和水平地震惯性力沿挡土墙高度分布规律.结果表明,墙背动土压力峰值出现在距挡土墙底约1/3墙高处;挡土墙背加速度具有放大效应,加速度峰值出现在挡土墙顶部;不同地震动作用下,加速度放大系数沿墙高分布规律不同,动土压力沿墙高变化规律基本一致. 相似文献
16.
采用旋转挡土墙计算模型的变换法,将在地震和拟静力法条件下主动土压力的求解问题转化为在静力条件下主动土压力的求解问题。根据在静力条件下水平层分析法的主动土压力推导结果,直接获得在地震条件下主动土压力强度分布、土压力合力及其作用点位置的表达式,并运用图解法得到了临界破裂角的解析解。公式可考虑水平和垂直地震加速度、不同墙背倾角、墙背和坡面倾角与填料存在黏结力和外摩擦角、存在均布超载等诸多因素的影响,公式可以适用于在常用边界和地震条件下黏性土的主动土压力计算。旋转地震角法是将在地震和拟静力法条件下挡土墙计算模型旋转为在静力条件下挡土墙计算模型,但旋转挡土墙计算模型并不改变挡土墙和墙后填土的应力状态,按在静力条件下挡土墙主动土压力求解方法求解在地震和拟静力法条件下主动土压力,该方法大大简化了在地震和拟静力法条件下的主动土压力计算公式推导过程,统一了在拟静力法条件下的地震土压力求解,理论更加完善。 相似文献
17.
基于拟静力法,结合塑性极限分析上限定理和强度折减技术,推导了桩板式挡墙与二级锚杆挡墙支护高边坡地震作用下的水平屈服加速度系数的上限解,分别计算了多级支护结构总高度、边坡平台宽度、土的抗剪强度折减系数、桩板墙桩侧土压力分布经验系数、锚杆挡墙倾角、锚杆轴力及倾角等因素下,多级支护边坡的水平屈服加速度系数的临界极限值。根据正交分析法,给出了地震条件下基覆边坡水平屈服加速度系数影响因素的敏感性顺序。研究表明,多级支挡结构高度和锚杆轴力敏感性较大,而锚杆倾角、桩侧土压力分布经验系数和边坡平台宽度的敏感性较小。锚杆倾角、锚杆挡墙倾角、边坡平台宽度、桩板墙抗力及桩侧土压力分布形式的选择等,对水平屈服加速度系数的影响较小。土的抗剪强度参数中,黏聚力对水平屈服加速度系数的影响较小,而内摩擦角的影响较大。 相似文献
18.
以基坑施工过程中柔性挡墙墙后主动土压力为研究对象,假定柔性围护结构最大变形位于开挖面处,墙后滑面为通过墙趾的平面,推导出考虑基坑开挖及支护的墙后滑面倾角一般表达式。采用水平层析法,研究墙体内凸型变形时的主动土压力分布、主动土压力合力及其作用点。研究表明,理论结果与实测结果规律一致,大小相近;随着基坑开挖深度的增加,滑面倾角减小,基坑开挖对周边环境的影响范围增大,土压力合力增大,对合力作用点位置的影响较小;当基坑开挖深度减小时土体内摩擦角和墙土间摩擦角增大时主动土压力非线性分布更加明显,主动土压力合力减小,合力作用点距墙趾的距离增大。 相似文献
19.
Knowledge of seismic active earth pressure behind rigid retaining wall is very important. In this paper, the pseudo-dynamic
approach, which considers the effect of both compression and shear wave propagation, is adopted to calculate the seismic active
force supporting c-Φ backfill. Considering a planar rupture surface, the effect of wide range of parameters like inclination of retaining wall,
wall friction and soil friction angle, shear wave and compression wave velocity, horizontal and vertical seismic coefficients
are taken into account to evaluate the seismic active force. Results are presented in terms of seismic coefficients in tabular
form and variation of pressure with depth. 相似文献
20.
基于库仑土压力理论的基本假定和拟动力法的分析思路,以无黏性填土的刚性挡土墙为研究对象,考虑填土中存在竖向稳定渗流的两种工况,推导了地震主动土压力和修正土压力系数的计算表达式。通过程序求解问题并进行参数讨论,分析结果表明,主动土压力随水平地震加速度的增大而明显增大,竖向地震加速度对土压力影响较小,可以忽略不计。墙土摩擦角较小时,土压力随填土摩擦角的增大而单调减小,但当墙土摩擦角增大后,土压力随填土摩擦角的增大出现先减小后增大的情况。渗流方向向下时,土压力随水力梯度的增大而减小;渗流方向向上时,变化规律则相反。与已有的理论方法对比,计算结果基本吻合,验证了该理论方法的正确性。 相似文献