首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 792 毫秒
1.
Porphyry Cu (Mo–Au) deposits in the Himalayan–Tibetan orogen formed during the Late Triassic, Early Cretaceous, Eocene, Oligocene, and Miocene and can be classified into different metallogenic belts according to their petrologic features, mineralization ages, and tectonic settings. A close spatial relationship to regional strike–slip faults is evident in all five belts. Porphyry Cu (Mo–Au) deposits exist in a wide range of tectonic environments, including island arc, syn-collision, post-collisional convergence, and continental-transform plate boundaries.

Porphyry Cu deposits cluster in the southernmost part of the Yidun–Zhongdian Belt, along the N–S-trending Gaze River dextral strike–slip fault. Porphyry Cu deposits in the Lijiang–Jinping Belt lie along the Ailaoshan–Red River continental–transform shear zone and the associated strike–slip faults. The Yulong–Malasongduo porphyry belt is controlled by the Cesuo Fault, a NNW-trending regional dextral transcurrent fault that is associated with Palaeogene westward continental oblique subduction along the Jinsha suture. In the Gangdis Belt, Miocene porphyry Cu deposits are localized along N–S-trending normal faults, which were produced by transpression within the regional NW–SE-trending Karakoram–Jiali fault zone (KJFZ). A close spatial relationship between porphyry Cu deposits and strike–slip faults also exists for the Bangong–Nujiang Belt.  相似文献   

2.
We present a review of major gold mineralization events in China and a summary of metallogenic provinces, deposit types, metallogenic epochs and tectonic settings. Over 200 investigated gold deposits are grouped into 16 Au-metallogenic provinces within five tectonic units such as the Central Asian orogenic belt comprising provinces of Northeast China and Tianshan-Altay; North China Craton comprising the northern margin, Jiaodong, and Xiaoqinling; the Qinling-Qilian-Kunlun orogenic belt consisting of the West Qingling, North Qilian, and East Kunlun; the Tibet and Sanjiang orogenic belts consisting of Lhasa, Garzê-Litang, Ailaoshan, and Daduhe-Jinpingshan; and the South China block comprising Youjiang basin, Jiangnan orogenic belt, Middle and Lower Yangtze River, and SE coast. The gold deposits are classified as orogenic, Jiaodong-, porphyry–skarn, Carlin-like, and epithermal-types, among which the first three types are dominant.The orogenic gold deposits formed in various tectonic settings related to oceanic subduction and subsequent crustal extension in the Qinling-Qilian-Kunlun, Tianshan-Altay, northern margin of North China Craton, and Xiaoqinling, and related to the Eocene–Miocene continental collision in the Tibet and Sanjiang orogenic belts. The tectonic periods such as from slab subduction to block amalgamation, from continental soft to hard collision, from intracontinental compression to shearing or extension, are important for the formation of the orogenic gold deposits. The orogenic gold deposits are the products of metamorphic fluids released during regional metamorphism associated with oceanic subduction or continental collision, or related to magma emplacement and associated hydrothermal activity during lithospheric extension after ocean closure. The Jiaodong-type, clustered around Jiaodong, Xiaoqinling, and the northern margin of the North China Craton, is characterized by the involvement of mantle-derived fluids and a temporal link to the remote subduction of the Pacific oceanic plate concomitant with the episodic destruction of North China Craton. The Carlin-like gold metallogenesis is related to the activity of connate fluid, metamorphic fluid, and meteoric water in different degrees in the Youjiang basin and West Qinling; the former Au province is temporally related to the remote subduction of the Tethyan oceanic plate and the later formed in a syn-collision setting. Porphyry–skarn Au deposits are distributed in the Tianshan-Altay, the Middle and Lower Yangtze River region, and Tibet and Sanjiang orogenic belts in both subduction and continental collision settings. The magma for the porphyry–skarn Au deposits commonly formed by melting of a thickened juvenile crust. The epithermal Au deposits, dominated by the low-sulfidation type, plus a few high-sulfidation ones, were produced during the Carboniferous oceaic plate subduction in Tianshan-Altay, during Early Cretaceous and Quaternary oceanic plate subduction in SEt coast of South China Block, and during the Pliocene continental collision in Tibet. The available data of different isotopic systems, especially fluid D–O isotopes and carbonate C–O systems, reveal that the isotopic compositions are largely overlapping for different genetic types and different for the same genetic type in different Au belts. The isotopic compositions are thus not good indicators of various genetic types of gold deposit, perhaps due to overprinting of post-ore alteration or the complex evolution of the fluids.Although gold metallogeny in China was initiated in Cambrian and lasted until Cenozoic, it is mainly concentrated in four main periods. The first is Carboniferous when the Central Asian orogenic belt formed by welding of micro-continental blocks and arcs in Tianshan-Altay, generating a series of porphyry–epithermal–orogenic deposits. The second period is from Triassic to Early Jurassic when the current tectonic mainframe of China started to take shape. In central and southern China, the North China Craton, South China Block and Simao block were amalgamated after the closure of Paleo-Tethys Ocean in Triassic, forming orogenic and Carlin-like gold deposits. The third period is Early Cretaceous when the subduction of the Pacific oceanic plate to the east and that of Neo-Tethyan oceanic plate to the west were taking place. The subduction in eastern China produced the Jiaodong-type deposits in the North China Craton, the skarn-type deposits in the northern margin (Middle to lower reaches of Yangtze River) and the epithermal-type deposits in the southeastern margin in the South China Block. The subduction in western China produced the Carlin-like gold deposits in the Youjiang basin and orogenic ones in the Garzê-Litang orogenic belt. The Cenozoic is the last major phase, during which southwestern China experienced continental collision, generating orogenic and porphyry–skarn gold deposits in the Tibetan and Sanjiang orogenic belts. Due to the spatial overlap of the second and third periods in a single gold province, the Xiaoqinling, West Qinling, and northern margin of the North China Craton have two or more episodes of gold metallogeny.  相似文献   

3.
斑岩铜矿床在东特提斯成矿域中的时空分布特征   总被引:7,自引:1,他引:6  
已有的斑岩铜矿床成矿模型多是建立在环太平洋地区矿床资料的基础上,相对而言,特提斯成矿域中的斑岩铜矿床还有待梳理和总结.本文以特提斯构造演化与成矿为主线,将东特提斯成矿域中的斑岩铜矿床空间上划分为土耳其Pontides、伊朗中部Sahand-Bazman、巴基斯坦Chagai、中国玉龙、中甸、班公湖、冈底斯7条成矿带和中南半岛、土耳其Anatolides地块2个成矿区;时间上分别对应于早三叠世、晚三叠世、白垩纪中期、白垩纪末-古新世初、中始新世、中中新世等6个时段;构造背景分别为古、新特提斯洋盆俯冲或俯冲后的碰撞;讨论认为Sahand-Bazman铜矿带的形成背景与玉龙成矿带可对比.  相似文献   

4.
理论预测与科学找矿--以西藏冈底斯斑岩铜矿为例   总被引:10,自引:0,他引:10  
近年来在西藏冈底斯构造成矿带发现了多个以斑岩铜矿为主的大型和超大型矿床,这些矿床均形成于青藏高原板内隆升过程,主要成矿年龄为17~15 Ma,其矿床类型、矿床规模、成矿部位和成矿时代与作者10 a前的理论预测结果基本吻合.突破板块碰撞造山和板块碰撞成矿模式,按大陆动力学和成矿动力学的新思路,认为冈底斯斑岩铜矿形成于特提斯开合转换、板块碰撞造陆之后的晚新生代构造隆升、下地壳层流、板内造山、地壳增厚、热隆伸展的动力改造成矿过程.加强基础地质研究、倡导创新科学思维、发展地质与成矿理论对于中国西部的找矿勘探具有十分重要的作用.  相似文献   

5.
A DISCUSSION ON THE STRUCTURE AND TECTONIC EVOLUTION OF THE ALTUN OROGENIC ZONE  相似文献   

6.
西藏斑岩铜矿对重大地质事件的响应   总被引:39,自引:1,他引:38  
西藏已有 3个构造岩浆带发现斑岩铜矿 :玉龙成矿带、冈底斯成矿带和班公错成矿带。其中班公错成矿带还少有研究和找矿评价 ,目前仅报导在改则西北发现多不杂斑岩铜金矿 ,但该带的邻国已发现大型斑岩铜矿 ,例如巴基斯坦的赛恩达克 (Saindak)和伊朗的萨尔切什梅 (SaiCheshmeh)等。据青藏高原 70Ma以来的古气候研究 ,在新特提斯洋闭合之后 ,印度板块与亚洲板块陆陆碰撞 ,曾有过 3次加速 :第一次为 4 0~ 35Ma ,与玉龙矿带的成岩成矿年龄相吻合 ;第二次为 1 8~ 1 2Ma ,与冈底斯矿带的成岩成矿年龄相吻合 ;第三次为 3.6Ma以来 ,与羊八井等热泉和铯金锑成矿年龄相吻合。故西藏斑岩铜矿为印度洋扩张和陆陆碰撞“A”型 (Ampferersubduction)俯冲的产物。第一次加速在青藏高原的东缘三江地区产生一系列喜马拉雅期走滑拉分盆地 ,导致幔源斑岩岩浆上侵 ,形成玉龙等一系列斑岩型夕卡岩型铜铜钼铜金矿 ;第二次加速使冈底斯深部挤压而浅部拉张 ,导致幔源斑岩浆岩侵位 ,形成冈底斯一系列斑岩型夕卡岩型浅成热液型铜钼铜金多金属矿 ;第三次加速使青藏高原整体深部挤压而浅部拉张 ,在藏南、冈底斯和藏北等产生一系列热泉型铯金锑矿  相似文献   

7.
长期以来,斑岩型铜矿是研究和勘查的热点。在20世纪70~90年代,对与花岗岩有关锡矿进行了大量深入研究,近几年,锡被列为一种关键金属,锡矿的研究和勘查又成为新的热点之一。锡矿和铜矿是环太平洋地区乃至全球最重要的两种矿床,但两者的成矿物质和成矿过程相差迥异。环太平洋地区的锡矿和铜矿主要形成于晚中生代至新生代,通常认为与太平洋板块俯冲有关,包括古太平洋板块、伊泽奈岐板块、法拉龙板块以及现今太平洋板块。本文主要综述了环太平洋成矿域的斑岩-矽卡岩铜矿和与花岗岩有关锡矿的时空分布特点、成矿岩体、矿床成因以及成矿环境的研究现状。尽管,目前已经取得了诸多重要进展,但仍然存在一些重要的科学问题亟待解决,例如,1)中国东部平行同时代成对出现的三条锡(钨)成矿带与斑岩铜矿成矿带的形成机制? 2)沿欧亚大陆边缘发育长达一万多公里的巨型铜金锡成矿带,而且绝大多数矿产发育于一系列伸展盆地中,其成矿背景是什么?此外,我们认为开展玻利维亚和大兴安岭南段Sn-Ag成矿系统的对比研究,是推动大兴安岭南段及邻区锡矿找矿取得突破的重要途径。  相似文献   

8.
中国钼矿床的时空分布及成矿背景分析   总被引:5,自引:0,他引:5  
我国钼资源十分丰富,目前已发现钼矿床四百余个,它们具有成带分布的特点。本文在钼矿床地质特征基础上,系统总结了钼矿床和含钼矿床的成矿年代(依据辉钼矿Re-Os年龄),结果显示我国钼矿床空间上可分为东秦岭-大别、兴-蒙、长江中下游、华南、青藏和天山-北山六大钼成矿带;成矿时代上,钼成矿作用分为古元古代(1882~1804Ma)、早古生代(480~420Ma)、晚古生代(412~260Ma)、中生代印支期(251~209Ma)、中生代燕山期(194~77Ma)和新生代(65~13Ma)等六个阶段,主要集中于中生代和新生代。元古宙形成的钼矿床分布于东秦岭-大别钼成矿带,古生代钼矿床主要分布于天山-北山钼成矿带,中生代钼矿床在中国东部广泛分布,新生代钼矿床全都分布于青藏钼成矿带。我国古元古代钼矿床(1882~1804Ma)形成于古陆块之间俯冲碰撞背景下的岛弧环境(东秦岭-大别);早古生代钼矿床(480~420Ma)形成于不同构造单元由挤压向伸展转换的岛弧或陆缘弧环境(东秦岭-大别、兴-蒙和华南);晚古生代钼矿床(412~260Ma)形成于古亚洲洋壳俯冲的岛弧环境(兴-蒙);中生代印支期钼矿床(251~209Ma)形成于板块碰撞及后碰撞背景(东秦岭-大别、兴-蒙和天山-北山)或洋壳俯冲的背景(青藏);燕山期钼矿床形成于古太平洋板块俯冲转向及其后伸展体制下岩石圈减薄拆沉环境(东秦岭-大别、兴-蒙、长江中下游和华南),燕山晚期钼矿床(85~77Ma)形成于碰撞后的伸展背景(青藏);新生代(65~13Ma)钼矿床形成于印度板块与欧亚板块陆陆碰撞及其后的伸展背景(青藏)。我国钼成矿作用受到了环太平洋构造带(东秦岭-大别、兴-蒙、长江中下游和华南)、中亚造山带(天山-北山、兴-蒙)和特提斯构造带(青藏)三大构造体制的影响。  相似文献   

9.
以中国西南"三江"(澜沧江-金沙江-怒江)地区西范坪铜矿床、玉龙铜矿床和北衙金矿床为例说明了该地区斑岩型铜或金矿床的次生分带特征,概述了青藏高原、滇川西部高原的隆升,以及新生代构造抬升对地表化学风化的影响;指出西范坪铜矿床、玉龙铜矿床和北衙金矿床等明显经历过表生成矿作用的典型斑岩型矿床均位于青藏高原强烈隆升区的边部或边缘地带,新生代构造抬升对这些地段气候、地形的影响大大促进了地表的化学风化作用;认为新生代强烈隆升可能是导致这些矿床发生强烈次生富集作用的深层次原因.  相似文献   

10.
秦建华 《地质与勘探》2010,46(6):1028-1035
我国西南地区是我国重要的斑岩矿床勘查开发基地,自20世纪60年代以来,相继勘查发现了玉龙、驱龙、普朗、多不杂等特大型斑岩铜矿。初步研究表明,西南地区斑岩矿床的集聚与走滑断裂存在着密切的空间关系。认识并深入研究斑岩矿床与走滑断裂存在着的这种关系,对于斑岩矿床勘查具有重要的意义。在西南地区现有的5个斑岩成矿带开展斑岩矿床勘查时,在沿区域性走滑断裂方向勘查并加强对走滑断层带内或其周围派生的局部引张或挤压地区开展找矿的同时,还应注意开展对鲜水河-小江左旋走滑断裂带及两侧斑岩矿床的勘查。  相似文献   

11.
On the basis of the geological and geochemical studies, including chemical analysis of bulk rocks, rare-earth and trace element studies, fluid inclusion, and S and O isotopic analyses, the authors described the geo-logical background of the deposit in detail and presented significant proofs for the conditions of formation of the Shaxi porphyry copper-gold deposit. Compared with other large and supper-large porphyry copper deposits in China and the adjacent Cu-Au mineralized areas, the ore-forming processes and conditions were analyzed; and the possibil-ity of forming large porphyry copper deposits in the Shaxi area was discussed. The present study indicated that the ore-forming fluid and material were mainly of magmatic origin, while meteoric water played a certain role in the ore-forming processes. Interactions between subducting and overriding plates provided a major driving force for the formation of igneous rocks and the deposition of metal elements in East China since Jurassic. Based on the geo-chemical data of the Shaxi intrusive, it is found that the copper (gold) mineralization is closely related to the genesis of adakite-like intrusive in the Shaxi area. This adakite-like intrusive was formed in the subduction environment as a result of the subduction of the West Pacific plate toward the East China continent, where there is a great potential-ity to form a large porphyry copper deposit.  相似文献   

12.
TECTONIC STYLES IN THE SOUTHWEST QINLING AND RELATIONS WITH DYNAMICS OF QINGHAI—TIBET PLATEAU  相似文献   

13.
杨航  秦克章  吴鹏  王峰  陈福川 《矿床地质》2023,42(1):128-156
斑岩型矿床作为全球Cu、Mo、Au、Re等战略性矿产的主要来源,是国际矿床学界和矿业界长期关注的热点。最新研究表明,斑岩矿床既可以产于俯冲带岩浆弧环境,也可以产于与俯冲无关的非弧环境(主要包括碰撞造山环境、陆内造山环境以及活化克拉通边缘及内部),后者发育于中国大陆。文章在总结全球斑岩矿床时空分布规律的基础上,重点从成矿斑岩成因与成矿动力学机制、成矿金属来源、蚀变-矿化分带等方面,综述了2类斑岩矿床的研究进展,阐释并总结了控制斑岩成矿的主要因素与机制,以及相关研究方法。研究表明,全球斑岩矿床集中产于3大成矿域,形成时代以中、新生代为主。其中,环太平洋成矿域斑岩矿床时空分布不均,集中发育于美洲西海岸,主要形成于白垩纪以来较年轻的几个短暂时期;古亚洲洋成矿域斑岩矿床形成时间跨度于奥陶纪—早白垩世,具有“西Cu-Au东Cu-Mo、早Cu-Au晚Cu-Mo”的成矿特征;特提斯成矿域主要发育三叠纪以来的斑岩矿床,主体沿造山带分布,时间分布不均,同一构造带内发育不同时期的斑岩成矿作用;中国斑岩矿床与3大成矿域既显示出对应性,也有独特性和复杂性。弧环境成矿岩浆、金属Cu(Au)主要来源于交代地幔楔,大...  相似文献   

14.
SPACE-TIME TEXTURE AND TECTONIC EVOLUTION OF QAMDO BLOCK IN EAST TIBET  相似文献   

15.
Many Cenozoic metal deposits have been found during the past decade. Among them, the Fuwan Ag deposit in Guangdong is the largest Ag deposit in China. Besides, the largest Cu deposit of China in Yulong, Tibet, the largest Pb-Zn deposit of China in Jinding, Yunnan, and the largest Au deposit of China in Jinguashi,Taiwan, were also formed in the Cenozoic. Why so many important "present" deposits formed during such a short period of geological history is the key problem. The major reason is that different tectonic settings control different kinds of magmatic activity and mineralization at the same time. In southwestern China, porphyry-type Cu deposits such as Yulong were formed during the early stage of the Himalayan orogeny, sediment-hosted Pb-Zn deposits such as Jinding were formed within intermontane basins related to deep faults, and carbonatite-related deposits such as the Maoniuping REE deposit and alkalic magmatic rock-related deposits such as the Beiya Au deposit originated from the mantle source.  相似文献   

16.
Cenozoic magmatic activity in northern Chile led to the formation of two contrasting porphyry copper belts: (1) a Paleocene-Early Eocene belt comprising small porphyry copper deposits (e.g., Lomas Bayas) of normal calc-alkaline affinity; and (2) a Late Eocene-Early Oligocene belt hosting huge porphyry copper deposits (e.g., Chuquicamata) of adakitic affinity. Although the first belt comprises both volcanic and plutonic rocks (andesitic-basaltic and rhyolitic lavas and tuffs, and associated sub-volcanic porphyries and felsic stocks), the latter only includes intrusions (mostly granodioritic types, including porphyry copper deposits). We suggest that the Late Eocene-Early Oligocene belt formed when fast and oblique convergence between the South America and Farallon plates led to flat subduction and direct melting of the subducting plate, hence giving rise to plutonic rocks of adakitic affinity. The absence of volcanism, under prevailing compressional conditions, prevented the escape of SO2 from the adakitic, sulfur-rich, highly oxidized magmas ("closed porphyry system"), which allowed formation of huge mineral deposits. On the contrary, coeval volcanic activity during formation of the Paleocene-Early Eocene calc-alkaline porphyries allowed development of "open systems", hence to outgassing, and therefore, to small mineral deposits.  相似文献   

17.
青藏高原新生代三阶段造山隆升模式:火成岩岩石学约束   总被引:18,自引:1,他引:17  
赖绍聪 《矿物学报》2000,20(2):182-190
从岩石从地构造学的角度,分析讨论了青藏高原新生代岩浆作用的特点、差异、成对性及其对高魇隆升深部动力学过程的岩石约束,在此基础上是提出青藏高原是以冈底斯-羌塘造山带为核心,通过三次造山幕事件而形成的高原隆升新模式。  相似文献   

18.
THE GLOBAL TECTONIC SYSTEMS AND A LATITUDINAL MOUNTAIN-PLATEAU CHAIN ON THE NORTH HEMISPHERE  相似文献   

19.
徐曦  高顺莉  王兴建  黄俊菠  王博 《地球科学》2015,40(12):1968-1986
下扬子区是中国东部重要的含油气盆地区之一,其新生代伸展构造变形一直是下扬子新生代构造动力学的核心问题.通过对下扬子海陆全区新生代断陷盆地结构与构造格局分析,明确了下扬子区伸展构造变形特征,探讨了变形成因机制及其区域构造意义.区域构造分析表明,下扬子区伸展变形构造由一系列NNE-NE-NEE走向的总体呈弧形展布的正断层构成,表现为受伸展断裂系统控制的断陷结构,具有多向伸展特征,自南向北可分为江南、沿江-苏北-南黄海和南黄海北部3个构造伸展区.有限元数值与构造物理模拟表明,受控于太平洋板块俯冲推挤传递至陆内的侧向构造作用力,下扬子块体南向蠕移,区域上近南北向伸展变形,郯庐断裂右旋走滑,两者共同构成一个"右旋侧向扩展变形"系统.在区域构造上,大兴安岭-太行山-武陵山重力梯度带以东的中国东部新生代伸展变形构造和盆地成因与古太平洋板缘边界条件密切相关.   相似文献   

20.
豫西横穿秦岭造山带的反射地震为主的综合地球物理探测,发现秦岭现今北界存在华北地块南部自北向南向秦岭的巨型陆内俯冲带,深达Moho面以下,与之相伴而生,在中上地壳发育自南向北的逆冲推构造带,千公里东西向延伸,主要发生于晚白垩世100Ma±,成为秦岭与华北地区块间中新生代重要陆内构造,它是秦岭造山带岩石圈现今三维结构的基本要素和组成部分,秦岭造山带岩石圈现今结构具有流变学分层的“立交桥”三维结构框架模型。显然它们具有统一的动力学背景,是秦岭造山带现今处于印度-青藏、太平洋和欧亚板块的西伯利亚地块等三大构造动力学体系复合部位,导致其从深部地幔动力学的最新调整到上部地壳响应所发生的壳幔等圈层相互作用的综合产物,可能是大陆长期保存、演化的主要途径与形式之一,具有重要的大陆动力学意义,对中国大陆构造、灾害、环境研究也具重要意义。  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号