共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 171 毫秒
1.
针对平面不规则结构在水平地震作用下的振动特性,通过调整隔震层隔震支座的布置,得到3种不同工况的隔震层刚心与上部结构质心、刚心相对位置关系,分别以楼层位移和层间位移为指标的扭转位移比,作为平面不规则基础隔震结构扭转响应指标,利用弹塑性时程分析方法,通过对3种不同工况的扭转指标对比分析研究,提出适用于平面不规则基础隔震结构的抗扭设计方法。结果表明：对于平面不规则结构,应在保证隔震层扭转位移比小于1.2的基础上,使隔震层的刚心和上部结构的刚心分别位于上部结构质心的两侧,可有效控制上部结构的扭转。 相似文献
2.
高层隔震结构扭转分析 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
为研究高层隔震结构在地震作用下的扭转效应,用Etabs软件建立1个高层抗震结构和4个具有不同扭转特性的高层隔震结构的空间模型进行地震响应分析,以验证此原则上部结构质量中心与隔震层刚度中心的重合与否对结构扭转效应的影响程度,而后考察偏心高层隔震结构在偶然偏心地震作用下结构的扭转效应。结果表明:由于地震作用的减小,扭转效应要远小于原抗震结构,且隔震本身对于结构扭转效应的抑制效果要好于上述原则;扭转效应的减震率大于平动效应的减震率。布置在隔震层平面外围的铅芯橡胶隔震支座对隔震层的扭转有一定的控制作用。 相似文献
3.
4.
在地震来临时,一般假设建筑结构同时受到两个正交水平方向分量与一个竖向分量的地震动作用。双向水平地震效应组合方法用于估计两个正交水平分量地震动同时作用时结构的内力效应。本文主要对我国与美国抗震设计规范中规定使用的平方和开平方根（SRSS）方法与百分比组合方法的有效性进行了评估。首先,对比了我国与美国规范在考虑双向水平地震效应时的适用情况及相关规定上的异同。以一4层中心支撑-框架结构为工程案例,考虑两国规范在适用情况上的规定,设置了三个结构布置方案。对三个结构布置方案建立有限元模型,选取22组地震动,开展了动力时程分析。提出了针对SRSS方法与百分比组合方法的评估指标,基于时程分析结果,发展了双向水平地震效应组合的概率性评估方法。评估结果表明:SRSS方法与百分比组合方法用于平面扭转不规则结构的设计较为保守。在简化组合规则的适用条件上,美国规范对平面扭转不规则结构不进行考虑有一定的合理性。建议我国规范对中心支撑-框架结构中含双向受压柱的设计要求考虑双向水平地震效应组合。 相似文献
5.
使用偏心支撑减小不规则高层建筑的扭转振动效应 总被引：7，自引：0，他引：7
郭仕群 《地震工程与工程振动》2005,25(3):76-80
文章对比分析了一个不规则高层钢筋混凝土框-剪结构和在原结构基础上增设偏心支撑后的新结构的抗震性能,比较了它们的自振特性以及层间位移等地震作用效应。针对不规则高层建筑在地震作用下不可避免的扭转振动问题,提出在结构中适当地增设偏心支撑来减小结构的扭转振动效应及其它结构地震反应这种简单可行、经济适用的方法。 相似文献
6.
扭转不规则结构水平侧向力分布模式与pushover分析 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
水平侧向力分布模式的施加问题是合理进行pushover分析的关键环节。对于可以简化为平面模型的结构,传统的水平侧向力分布模式表现出较好的适用性,但对于因扭转不规则而导致必须采用空间模型的结构则并不适用。为此,针对扭转不规则结构的水平侧向力分布模式问题,并基于该类结构的地震响应特征,通过引入水平侧向力调整系数和水平侧向力分配系数,提出了扭转不规则结构改进的水平侧向力分布模式。对一具有典型扭转不规则特性的空间钢框架结构分别进行改进分布模式下的pushover分析和IV类场地典型地震动作用下的弹塑性时程分析,计算结果显示:改进分布模式下的pushover分析体现出扭转效应对结构反应的影响,并在一定程度上反映出更多的结构抗震信息,验证了所提出模式的可行性,说明pushover分析法也同样适用于扭转不规则结构。 相似文献
7.
为更好保护会善寺大雄宝殿,对会善寺大雄宝殿进行了现场调研,结合点云技术建立并验证其数值分析模型,研究了大雄宝殿的动力特性及在多遇地震作用下的动力响应。结果表明:结构基本自振周期为1.82s,体现石木结构长周期特性;在纵向多遇地震作用下,前檐木柱变形大于后檐石柱,结构除平动外还存在扭转;在横向多遇地震作用下,明间与次间木屋架有较大横向位移差,连接明间与次间木屋架的檩条和枋等纵向构件可能出现较大滑移并导致屋盖错位;在双向地震作用下,结构纵向和横向最大位移是单向地震作用下的1.1~1.2倍,扭转效应比单向地震作用下大。研究结果可为会善寺大雄宝殿及同类建筑的维修加固提供理论支持。 相似文献
8.
地铁换乘站不规则结构对其地震响应的影响 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
地铁换乘站由于功能要求,多为复杂的不规则结构.本文通过对一具有实际工程背景的地铁换乘站进行地震响应弹塑件时程分析,着重从结构的位移响应、侧向变形以及结构柱的内力响应等方面考察了不规则结构对其地震响应的影响.结果表明:周围土体的约束作用有利于减轻地下不规则结构的扭转效应;结构的竖向不规则性对地震响应产生的影响不仅与结构竖... 相似文献
9.
10.
有些体形复杂的高层建筑,构件斜交,刚度不对称,地震作用的最不利方向与结构主轴成某一角度,扭转振动强烈。当建筑物平面尺寸较长或楼板刚度较小时,楼盖变形的影响也不容忽视。本文针对以上特点,提出刚性楼盖和弹性楼盖两种结构类型高层建筑的力学模型,建立其在多分量地面运动作用下的三维平面运动方程,并运用反应谱理论给出空间结构在双向地面平动分量作用下的地震内力计算方法。 相似文献
11.
Seismic building codes include design provisions to account for the torsional effects arising in torsionally unbalanced (asymmetric) buildings. These provisions are based on two alternative analytical procedures for determining the design load for the individual resisting structural elements. A previous study has shown that the linear elastic modal analysis procedure may not lead to conservative designs, even for multistorey buildings with regular asymmetry, when such structures are excited well into the inelastic range of response. The equivalent static force procedure as recommended by codes may also be deficient in accounting for additional ductility demand in the critical stiff-edge elements. This paper addresses the non-conservatism of existing static torsional provisions and examines aspects of element strength distribution and its influence on inelastic torsional effects. A recommendation is made for improving the effectiveness of the code-type static force procedure for torsionally unbalanced multistorey frame buildings with regular asymmetry, leading to a design approach which estimates conservatively the peak ductility demand of edge elements on both sides of the building. The modified approach also retains the simplicity of existing code provisions and results in acceptable levels of additional lateral design strength. It has recently been adopted by the new Australian earthquake code, which is due to be implemented early in 1993. 相似文献
12.
A study is presented of the influence of stiffness and strength eccentricities on the inelastic torsional response of buildings under the action of two simultaneous orthogonal horizontal ground motion components. Asymmetric buildings were obtained from their respective symmetric systems and were characterized by their stiffness and strength torsional eccentricities in both orthogonal directions. Based on the results of inelastic response of both building types (symmetric and asymmetric), the seismic reliability functions are determined for each system, and their forms of variation with different global system parameters are evaluated. Illustrative examples are presented about the use of this information for the formulation of seismic design criteria for in‐plan asymmetric multistory systems, in order to attain the same reliability levels implicit for symmetric systems designed in accordance with current seismic design codes. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 相似文献
13.
The elastic and inelastic seismic response of plan‐asymmetric regular multi‐storey steel‐frame buildings has been investigated under bi‐directional horizontal ground motions. Symmetric variants of these buildings were designed according to Eurocodes 3 and 8. Asymmetric buildings were created by assuming a mass eccentricity in each of the two principal directions. The torsional response in the elastic and inelastic range is qualitatively similar with the exception of the stiff edge in the strong direction of torsionally stiff buildings and the stiff edge in the weak direction of torsionally flexible buildings. The response is influenced by the intensity of ground motion, i.e. by the magnitude of plastic deformation. In the limiting case of very strong ground motion, the behaviour of initially torsionally stiff and initially torsionally flexible buildings may become qualitatively similar. A decrease in stiffness due to plastic deformations in one direction may substantially influence the behaviour in the orthogonal direction. The response strongly depends on the detailed characteristics of the ground motion. On average, torsional effects are reduced with increasing plastic deformations, unless the plastic deformations are small. Taking into account also the dispersion of results which is generally larger in the inelastic range than in the elastic one, it can be concluded that (a) the amplification of displacements determined by the elastic analysis can be used as a rough estimate also in the inelastic range and (b) any favourable torsional effect on the stiff side of torsionally stiff buildings, which may arise from elastic analysis, may disappear in the inelastic range. The conclusions are limited to fairly regular buildings and subject to further investigations. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 相似文献
14.
The elastic torsional stiffness of a structure has important influence on the seismic response of an asymmetric structure, both in the elastic and inelastic range. For elastic structures it is immaterial whether the stiffness is provided solely by structural elements in planes parallel to the direction of earthquake or by a combination of such elements in parallel and orthogonal planes. The issue of how the relative contribution of structural elements in orthogonal planes affects the torsional response of inelastic structures has been the subject of continuing study. Several researchers have noted that structural elements in orthogonal planes reduce the ductility demands in both the flexible and stiff edge elements parallel to the earthquake. Some have noted that the beneficial effect of structural elements in orthogonal planes is more pronounced when such elements remain elastic. These issues are further examined in this paper through analytical studies on the torsional response of single-storey building models. It is shown that, contrary to the findings of some previous studies, the torsional response of inelastic structures is affected primarily by the total torsional stiffness in the elastic range, and not so much by whether such stiffness is contributed solely by structural elements in parallel planes or by such elements in both parallel and orthogonal planes. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 相似文献
15.
Using a single mass monosymmetric model, this paper examines the additional seismic inelastic deformations and displacement caused by structural asymmetry of the model. Stiffness eccentricity and resistance eccentricity are used as measures of asymmetry in the elastic and inelastic range respectively. Seven ways of specifying strength distribution among resisting elements are considered, including code provisions from Canada, Mexico, New Zealand and the United States. These specifications are related t o the model resistance eccentricity. It is shown that when torsional shears are included in the strength design of the elements, the structure in general will have small resistance eccentricity, even if it has large stiffness eccentricity in the elastic range. For structures which are designed with allowance for torsional shears, the ductility demands on the elements are similar to those when the structure is symmetrical. However, the edge displacements can be up to three times that if the system is symmetrical. This finding has significant implications in evaluating adequate separation between buildings to avoid the pounding problem during earthquakes. 相似文献
16.
Based on an asymmetric multistorey frame building model, this paper investigates the influence of a building's higher vibration modes on its inelastic torsional response and evaluates the adequacy of the provisions of current seismic building codes and the modal analysis procedure in accounting for increased ductility demand in frames situated at or near the stiff edge of such buildings. It is concluded that the influence of higher vibration modes on the response of the upper-storey columns of stiff-edge frames increases significantly with the building's fundamental uncoupled lateral period and the magnitude of the stiffness eccentricity. The application of the equivalent static torsional provisions of certain building codes may lead to non-conservative estimates of the peak ductility demand, particularly for structures with large stiffness eccentricity. In these cases, the critical elements are vulnerable to excessive additional ductility demand and, hence, may be subject to significantly more severe structural damage than in corresponding symmetric buildings. It is found that regularly asymmetric buildings excited well into the inelastic range may not be conservatively designed using linear elastic modal analysis theory. Particular caution is required when applying this method to the design of stiff-edge frame elements in highly asymmetric structures. 相似文献
17.
The study of the torsional response of buildings in the inelastic range of behaviour is of great interest since the ability of structures to resist strong earthquakes mainly relies on their ductility and capacity for energy dissipation. Furthermore, an examination of the performance of structures during past earthquakes demonstrates that plan-asymmetric buildings suffered greater damage due to torsional response. The paper deals with this subject by analysing a model which idealizes a one-storey building with resisting elements oriented along two perpendicular directions. In addition to the parameters of the elastic behaviour, the inelastic system response depends on full yield capacity and plan-wise strength distribution. The influence of the criterion adopted for the design of resisting elements on local ductility demand and damage has been evaluated by parametric analysis. In particular, a comparison has been carried out between systems with equal design levels for all elements and systems with design levels dependent on the element location. For a given elastic behaviour and total capacity, the strength distributions in plan have been defined which minimize ductility demand and structural damage. Finally, based on these findings, responses from models designed according to several seismic codes have been compared. 相似文献
18.
Inelastic seismic response of torsionally unbalanced systems designed using elastic dynamic analysis
This paper evaluates the inelastic seismic response of torsionally unbalanced structural systems with strength distributed using elastic response spectrum analysis. The structural model is a single mass torsionally unbalanced system with lateral load resisting elements spanning in two principal directions. The element strength is distributed based on elastic response spectrum analysis and three different approaches to incorporate accidental torsion are considered: (a) without incorporating accidental torsion; (b) by applying static floor torques; (c) by shifting the location of the centre of mass. The seismic input is bidirectionally applied at the base of the model. It is shown that the inelastic responses depend strongly on the torsional stiffness of the system. For a torsionally stiff system, the torsional response leads to a decrease in the stiff edge displacement; however, for a torsionally flexible system, it tends to increase the stiff edge displacement. Using response spectrum analysis without including accidental torsion may lead to excessive additional ductility demand on the stiff edge element. With accidental torsion effect incorporated, the response spectrum analysis will give a strength distribution such that there will be no excessive additional ductility demands on the lateral load resisting elements. 相似文献
19.
Uneven distribution of seismic demand in asymmetric-plan structures is a critical concern in earthquake-resistant design. Contemporary seismic design strategies that are based on linear elastic response, single load reduction factor, and uniform ductility demand throughout an asymmetric system generally lead to unsatisfactory performance in terms of realized ductilities and nonuniform damage distribution due to strong torsional coupling associated with asymmetric-plan systems. In many cases, actual nonlinear behavior of the structure displays significant deviation from what is estimated by a linear elastic, force-based seismic design approach. This study investigates the prediction of seismic demand distribution among structural members of a single-story, torsionally stiff asymmetric-plan system. The focus is on the effect of inherent unbalanced overstrength, resulting from current force-based design practices, on the seismic response of code-designed single-story asymmetric structures. The results obtained are utilized to compile unsymmetrical response spectra and uniform ductility spectra, which are proposed as assessment and preliminary design tools for estimating the seismic performance of multistory asymmetric structures. A simple design strategy is further suggested for improving the inelastic torsional performance of asymmetric systems. Providing additional strength to stiff edge members over their nominal design strength demands leads to a more balanced ductility distribution. Finally, seismic responses of several asymmetric case study structures designed with the aid of the proposed strategy are assessed for validating their improved performance. 相似文献
20.
A. M. Chandler
G. L. Hutchinson
W. Jiang 《Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering》1991,10(8):429-439This study aims to determine the influence of torsional coupling on the inelastic response of a series of models representing typical structural configurations in real buildings. The lake bed (SCT) east-west component of the 1985 Mexico City earthquake was employed in the analysis, and is representative of a severe ground motion known to have induced large inelastic structural deformations in a high proportion of those buildings having asymmetrical distributions of stiffness and/or strength. Material non-linearity in lateral load-resisting elements has been defined using a hysteretic Ramberg-Osgood model. Structural eccentricities have been introduced into the building models by (i) asymmetrical distributions of stiffness and/or strength, (ii) asymmetrical configuration of lateral load-resisting elements, or (iii) varying post-elastic material behaviour in the resisting elements. The dynamic inelastic response of these models has been obtained by a numerical integration of the relevant equations of motion, expressed in a non-dimensional incremental form.
In the elastic range, the results correlate well with those of previous studies. In the inelastic range, it is concluded that the peak ductility demand of the worst-affected element increases with the ground excitation level across the range of building periods considered, and that the influence of torsional coupling on the key response parameters is model dependent. Most significantly, the strength eccentricity relative to the centre of mass has been shown to influence the peak edge displacement response more than conventionally employed stiffness eccentricity. 相似文献