共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
本文通过对地层命名法的基本精神和原则－－以发表（或出版）为基础的优先权法则的学习心得叙述,回顾尹赞勋院士当年在制定中国地层命名法时,坚持一个新名建立必须在公开发行的出版物上发表这一符合全世界生物地学界共识的地层命名法的哲学精神方面所做的重要贡献和意义。作者对比全国地层委员会今天对优先权采用双重标准,从而干扰地层命名法的基本精神执行,显示尹公制定地层命名法所持的基本精神明智,正确和意义重大。文章通过“龙马页岩”改为“龙马溪页岩”这一正确订正,解决了其与“龙马石灰岩”的同名关系事例,感受到尹公治学的高尚道德风范。 相似文献
2.
International Subcommission on Stratigraphic Classification [Report No. 7a; editor H. D. Hedberg]: Introduction to an International Guide to Stratigraphic Classification, Terminology, and Usage. Boreas, Vol 1, pp. 199–211. Oslo, 1st September, 1972. [Co-published with Lethaia, Vol. 5, pp. 283–295]. The International Subcommission on Stratigraphic Classification (ISSC), a subcommission of the IUGS Commission on Stratigraphy, has been working for the last 15–20 years towards the preparation of an International Guide to Stratigraphic Classification, Terminology, and Usage. The purpose of the Guide is to promote international agreement on principles of stratigraphic classification and to establish internationally acceptable stratigraphic terminology and rules of stratigraphic procedure. The Introduction explains the background of its preparation. 相似文献
3.
A different understanding of the stratigraphic science methodology is considered. The classical geohistorical content of stratigraphy is set against the latest formal classification approach recorded in the International Stratigraphic Guide. Some provisions of the Stratigraphic Code of Russia and the International Stratigraphic Guide are studied. The described confrontation between the two concepts can be expressed by a formula: stratotype or limitotype. 相似文献
4.
AbstractIn Australian stratigraphic nomenclature, the concept of granitic rock suites has been in formal use for over a decade. The basis for this suite classification of granitic rocks is inconsistent and, in eastern Australian usage, unsound on several levels. We also note that the approach used in Western Australia is different. Granitic intrusions are probably not truly amenable to any strict, comprehensive, lithostratigraphic classification. If these rocks are integrated into such a scheme, group- and supergroup-level units (i.e. formal suites and supersuites) should not be incorporated. For the present, mappable units should be recognised at the levels of formation and member. The use of granite suites and supersuites in formal stratigraphic hierarchies is not recommended. Instead, granitic bodies could be grouped into individual plutons, which may or may not form parts of larger batholiths.
- KEY POINTS
The suite-based classification of granitic bodies, as currently used in the Australian Stratigraphic Units Database, is based on unsound principles, and is not employed in a consistent manner.
Granitic intrusive rocks probably cannot be grouped using lithostratigraphic principles that are consistent with either the local or international codes.
Granitic bodies can be grouped into batholiths, plutons and members, but the names of these units should, for the moment, remain informal.
5.
International Subcommission on Stratigraphic Classification [Report No. 7b; editor H. D. Hedberg]: Summary of an International Guide to Stratigraphic Classification, Terminology, and Usage. Boreas, Vol. 1, pp. 213–239. Oslo, 1st September, 1972. [Co-published with Lethaia, Vol. 5, pp. 297–323]. Six published reports (and some 40 circulars) of the International Subcommission on Stratigraphic Classification (ISSC) constitute the principal bases for the initial edition of an International Guide to Stratigraphic Classification, Terminology, and Usage. The published reports on Lithostratigraphic Units, Biostratigraphic Units, Chronostratigraphic Units, and Stratotypes are advance chapters of the Guide. The following Summary, which with the preceding Introduction will form the first chapter of the completed Guide, provides a concise and condensed statement of principles, definitions, and proposed rules, which are elaborated in more detail in the published reports and individual chapters of the Guide. 相似文献
6.
近10年内,中国地层学史上发生过两件大事:一是“历史优先律事件”,表现为全国地层委员会具体组织并由其副主任程裕淇主编的《中国地层典》,对优先权法则不执行以出版为基础的“出版优先律”而执行不论发表与否仅以“尊重原始命名者”为基础的“历史优先律”;二是“优先律双重标准事件”,在全国地层委员会颁布的《中国地层指南》(修订版)内对优先律搞双重标准。这两个事件均表现对“优先权法则”国际共识内涵的偏离,偏离了以出版为基础的“出版优先律”。尤其不应该的是,当人们对“历史优先律”提出异议后,全国地层委员会不但不及时纠正“历史优先律”的片面观点,相反地却在修订中国地层命名法时,为了给“历史优先律”合法化创造条件,竟然在《中国地层指南》(修订版)内,对优先权搞双重标准。“历史优先律事件”和“优先律双重标准事件”破坏了地层命名法的标准性,颠倒了中国地层命名史,干扰了中国地层名称的管理,是全国地层委员会的失误。 相似文献
7.
安徽省第四纪岩石地层序列 总被引：4，自引：0，他引：4
依据《国际地层指南》（1979）和《中国地层指南及中国地层指南说明书》（2001,修订版）,总结多年的研究成果,按照多重地层划分原则,厘定安徽省第四纪地层序列,并结合年代地层和气候地层研究,试与最新的国际地层表（2004）和中国区域年代地层（地质年代）表（2002）对比。安徽省第四纪地层主要发育于淮北平原、江淮波状平原和沿江丘陵平原。平原与山麓、河谷与波状平原、河谷与垅状平原,分别平行地发育两套地层,其沉积环境不同,在剖面上相互交错;而且绝大部分岩石地层单位是穿时的 相似文献
8.
9.
安徽省华北型石炭—二叠纪地层的划分与对比一直存在着不同的观点。在《中国地层指南及中国地层指南说明书》（2001）思想框架下,采用多重地层分类原则,对区内岩石地层、生物地层、年代地层和层序地层进行划分对比研究。岩石地层可划分为本溪组、太原组、山西组、下石盒子组、上石盒子组和孙家沟组,其中山西组和上石盒子组为主要含煤地层;在生物地层方面,建立2个组合带和5个植物组合带;区内石炭纪地层仅发育上石炭统,二叠纪地层齐全;区内石炭二叠系含煤地层划分为6个三级层序。通过多重地层划分与对比,突出了不同地层单位的属性特征,优化了区域等时地层格架,有助于煤炭资源的预测与评价。 相似文献
10.
山东省白垩纪岩石地层序列与火山岩系地层划分 总被引：23，自引：0，他引：23
由于陆相地层 ,尤其火山岩系的复杂性 ,研究者众多且多局限一隅 ,以往建立起的地层序列常只适用于某一地区 ,并且出现同物异名或异物同名现象。正确理解和运用《国际地层指南》、《中国地层指南》,是准确划分中生代陆相火山岩盆地地层的理论依据。借鉴层序地层学的方法 ,对划分山东省白垩纪岩石地层层序与火山岩盆地地层序列有了新的认识 :南、北莱阳群虽在岩性组合上有较大差异 ,但仍可归于同一岩石地层单位 ;大盛群与青山群既不是严格的上下关系 ,也不是完全的同期相变 ,二者呈交叉对应关系 ,大盛群的底界稍高 ;王氏群的林家庄组和辛格庄组应修订为寺前村组和孟疃组 ,置于大盛群中。 相似文献
11.
本文作者曾在尹赞勋教授指导和关怀下工作２７年,深受老师的谆谆教诲和支持信任,在先生逝世１０周年之际,著文缅怀前辈,以寄托崇敬和感激之情。文章联系中国第四纪研究,通过《地层规范草案及地层规范草案说明书》和《中国地层指南及中国地层指南说明书》的产生,以及工具书的编纂和《中国地层典(七)石炭系》的创编工作,回顾了尹赞勋教授对中国地层学理论和实践所做划时代的卓越贡献,认为他是当之无愧的理论地层学先驱和中国地层学的领路人。 相似文献
12.
对《成因地层分析的思路和方法》一文论述的成因地层单位划分、含义、地层对比和分析流程等问题提出了不同见解,指出了地层单位术语的基本特征和应用,并强调了穿时普遍性原理及侧向堆积原理在地层研究中的重要性。 相似文献
13.
14.
《Sedimentology》1977,24(4):597-599
Book Reviewed in this article:
International Stratigraphic Guide: A Guide to Stratigraphy, Terminology and Procedure , by International Subcommission on Stratigraphic Classification of IUGS Commission on Stratigraphy, Edited by Hollis D. Hedberg
Marine Sediment Transport and Environmental Management . Edited by D. J. Stanley & D. J. P. Swift. 相似文献
International Stratigraphic Guide: A Guide to Stratigraphy, Terminology and Procedure , by International Subcommission on Stratigraphic Classification of IUGS Commission on Stratigraphy, Edited by Hollis D. Hedberg
Marine Sediment Transport and Environmental Management . Edited by D. J. Stanley & D. J. P. Swift. 相似文献
15.
中原邙山黄土地层划分的讨论 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0
地层时代和地层划分研究一直是基础性、先导性工作,随着科学研究的深入和材料的丰富,地层划分不断被重新认识。黄土地层时代和划分主要依靠OSL、14C、古地磁和磁化率的对比。中原邙山因发育巨厚的马兰黄土而闻名中外,但地层划分却出现了不同的认识。早期对赵下峪剖面的研究认为L1层厚98 m,并发育L1SS1弱古土壤层;剖面底部出露最老地层为S10层。后来的观点把早期的L1层划分为L1、S1、L2层,剖面底部出露最老地层为S11层。通过对B/M界线进行详细的古地磁研究,剖面上部补充年代测试样品,结合已有测年结果,分析认为早期对L1的划分和对剖面最老地层的确认是正确的,但B/M界线位置划分有误;而后期的研究对B/M界线位置的划分是正确的,但把底部最老地层划分为S11是不当的,同时把马兰黄土中弱古土壤层L1SS1划分为S1也是不合适的。地层对比表明,邙山黄土发育了S0—S10黄土—古土壤序列,B/M界线位于L8下部。 相似文献
16.
A practical system of defining deeply weathered rock horizons is proposed, using the concept of a profile, defined as the vertical extent of a weathered rock sequence from the initiating land surface or originating surface down to unweathered parent rock. Advantages inherent in this system lie in the strict stratigraphic approach, its applicability to field mapping, and its broad accordance with accepted principles and concepts of the Australian Code of Stratigraphic Nomenclature. Establishment of a reference (type) section for each profile, with formal registration by a central authority, together with validation through publication, are recommended. Profile names, which carry some genetic implications, are distinguished from lithostrati‐graphic units through the use of distinctive map symbols and inclusion of the word profile within profile names. Three weathered rock units (Morney profile, Canaway profile and Curalle silcrete profile), and one altered rock unit (Haddon silcrete) which is believed to be a product of subsurface silicification, are formally defined. Parent rocks of these profiles (Winton and Eyre Formations) are described to demonstrate the nature of weathering and substantiate the recognition of a particular profile. Combinations of parent rock and weathered profile relationships are given to explain regional continuity of these profiles throughout southwest Queensland. 相似文献
17.
文章列数了《中国地层典》5个方面的重要失误:不是中国地层名称全览性的工具书,急于采用处于争议中的术语,大量地层单位名称的出处因考证不到位而形成张冠李戴,采用的历史优先律不是国际共识,在编撰过程中建立新名称。文章用选出的泰山杂岩、滹沱系、秦岭片岩和仑山石灰岩4个名称为例说明《中国地层典》对其出处的考证不到位,进而论证《中国地层典》的诸多解释可信度低。文章严肃地指出“历史优先律”给中国地层学造成的不良后果:它破坏了地层命名法的标准性,颠倒了中国地层命名史,干扰了中国地层名称的管理。 相似文献
18.
《Russian Geology and Geophysics》2015,56(4):511-523
The history of the development of the General Stratigraphic Scale (GSS), its significance, purpose, and difference from the International Stratigraphic Chart (ISC) are briefly reported. The most global achievements in the GSS refinement based on the Proceedings of the All-Russian conference at the Geological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences (May 2013) are considered. The main problems related to the GSS improvement are formulated: the structure of the Precambrian and Quaternary stratigraphic scales, the location of the Vendian System in the GSS, formal substantiation of the “Russian” stages of the Cambrian, Carboniferous, and Permian Systems, and the significance of the regional limitotypes of the ISC subdivisions. 相似文献
19.
评“河南西峡盆地产恐龙蛋地层研究新进展” 总被引：11，自引：0，他引：11
＂河南西峡盆地产恐龙蛋地层研究新进展＂一文主张用＂走马岗组＂、＂赵营组＂和＂六爷庙组＂来替代正式命名的一套地层名称,这样做既不符合地层命名原则,又易引起新的不必要的混乱。在晚白垩世时西峡、淅川两盆地在岩性组合特征上是相似的,浙川盆地并不是＂岩性特征简单＂,西峡盆地也不是＂岩性复杂＂。西峡盆地晚白垩世＂红层＂应采用＂高沟组、马家村组和寺沟组＂这套地层名称。 相似文献
20.
YAO Jianxin BO Jingfang HOU Hongfei WANG Zejiu MA Xiulan LIU Fengshan HU Guangxiao JI Zhansheng WU Guichun WU Zhenjie LI Suping GUO Caiqing LI Ya 《《地质学报》英文版》2016,90(4):1069-1081
Scientific research and productive practice for earth history are inseparable from the accurate stratigraphic framework and time framework. Establishing the globally unified, precise and reliable chronostratigraphic series and geological time series is the major goal of the International Commission on Stratigraphy(ICS). Under the leadership of the ICS, the countries around the world have carried out research on the Global Standard Stratotype-section and Points(GSSPs) for the boundaries of chronostratigraphic systems. In the current International Chronostratigraphic Chart(ICC), 65 GSSPs have been erected in the Phanerozoic Eonothem, and one has yet been erected in the Precambrian Eonothem. Based on the progress of research on stratigraphy especially that from its subcommissions, the ICS is constantly revising the ICC, and will publish a new International Stratigraphic Guide in 2020. After continual efforts and broad international cooperation of Chinese stratigraphers, 10 GSSPs within the Phanerozoic Eonothem have been approved and ratified to erect in China by the ICS and IUGS. To establish the standards for stratigraphic division and correlation of China, with the support from the Ministry of Science and Technology, the National Natural Science Foundation of China and the China Geological Survey, Chinese stratigraphers have carried out research on the establishment of Stages in China. A total of 102 stages have been defined in the "Regional Chronostratigraphic Chart of China(geologic time)", in which 59 stages were studied in depth. In 2014, the "Stratigraphic Chart of China" was compiled, with the essential contents as follows: the correlation between international chronostratigraphy and regional chronostratigraphy of China(geologic time), the distributive status of lithostratigraphy, the characteristics of geological ages, the biostratigraphic sequence, the magnetostratigraphy, the geological events and eustatic sea-level change during every geological stage. The "Stratigraphical Guide of China and its Explanation(2014)" was also published. Chinese stratigraphers have paid much attention to stratigraphic research in south China, northeast China, north China and northwest China and they have made great achievements in special research on stratigraphy, based on the 1:1000000, 1:250000, 1:200000 and 1:50000 regional geological survey projects. Manifold new stratigraphic units were discovered and established by the regional geological surveys, which are helpful to improve the regional chronostratigraphic series of China. On the strength of the investigation in coastal and offshore areas, the status of marine strata in China has been expounded. According to the developing situation of international stratigraphy and the characteristics of Chinese stratigraphic work, the contrast relation between regional stratigraphic units of China and GSSPs will be established in the future, which will improve the application value of GSSPs and the standard of regional stratigraphic division and correlation. In addition, the study of stratigraphy of the Precambrian, terrestrial basins and orogenic belts will be strengthened, the Stratigraphic Chart of China will be improved, the typical stratigraphic sections in China will be protected and the applied study of stratigraphy in the fields of oil and gas, solid minerals, etc. will be promoted. On the ground of these actions, stratigraphic research will continue to play a great role in the social and economic development of China. 相似文献