共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 203 毫秒
1.
黄淮海平原河道基本环境需水研究 总被引：30，自引：3，他引：27
针对我国北方地区水环境中最突出的污染问题,以满足河流最基本的稀释自净功能为目的,提出了一种计算河道基本环境需水量的方法,即月(年)保证率设定法,并以黄淮海平原为例,进行实证分析。结果是黄淮海平原总的河道环境需水最小为2176亿m3,约占多年平均径流量的15%,其中海河流域309亿m3、黄河下游52亿m3、淮河流域片1347亿m3。通过Tennant法验证,说明计算结果可靠。本文的研究不仅丰富了生态(环境)需水的理论内涵,为河道生态(环境)需水的进一步研究打下了良好的基础,同时为研究区水资源规划、水环境保护提供了有力的依据 相似文献
2.
考虑水文变异的黄河干流河道内生态需水研究 总被引：6，自引：0，他引：6
气候变化及人类活动导致水文变异,变异前后样本总体分布显著不同,即改变了当地生态系统的水文状况,打破生态平衡。本文使用滑动秩和检验(Mann-Whitney U检验) 分析水文变异,并对水文变异成因做了系统的分析。在此基础上,对变异前各月平均流量序列用线性矩法推求GEV分布参数,求出概率密度最大流量,并将其视为相应月河道内生态流量。本文用该法计算黄河干流7 站各月河道内生态流量,即得河道内生态需水情况。分析表明,考虑水文变异的河道内生态需水计算方法是可行的;水文变异后,黄河流域干流各水文站满足生态需水的频率大大降低,汛期降低幅度比非汛期大;黄河生态系统水环境恶化的主要原因是人类活动。 相似文献
3.
利用黄河源区1977-2006年土地覆盖数据集,分析了土地利用覆盖变化格局。根据高寒草地生态系统的特点,改进了生态功能服务价值系数计算方法,把土地利用的生态效益转化为简单易懂的货币形式,为决策者提供直观的生态信息。同时利用基于案例推理的CA模型模拟黄河源区2018年的土地覆盖情景,并得到其生态服务价值。研究表明:1977-2006年生态系统服务价值由460亿元降至418亿元,其中林地、高覆盖草地与湿地的生态服务价值分别减少10亿元、30亿元和20亿元,中、低覆盖草地生态服务价值提高20亿元,水体与沙(裸)地等变化不大。2006-2018年草地覆盖度将逐步上升,高、中覆盖度草地面积逐渐扩大,低覆盖度草地面积减小,生态服务价值得到较大幅度提升。 相似文献
4.
农业不仅具有经济价值,同时还具有非经济价值,而估算农业的非经济价值成为学术界研究的热点。本文把农业的价值分为生产产品价值和生态价值,并采用具有权威性的生态价值测算思想,即Costanza等于1997年提出的方法作为估算农业生态价值的方法依据,同时,由于该项研究也受到了不少严厉的批评,如由于某些数据存在着较大偏差,导致对耕地生态价值的估计过低,对湿地的生态价值估计又偏高等。因此,进一步借鉴谢高地等于2003年针对Costanza等的不足,在参考其可靠的部分成果的同时,基于对我国200位生态学者的问卷调查,制定出我国生态系统生态服务价值的当量因子表。以此表为基础,结合天津市实际形成适用的生态价值测算方法,采用官方统计数据实际测算了天津市农业生态价值。结果发现2012年天津市农业生态价值的现实值为1112.01亿元,是当年农业经济价值375.60亿元的3倍。 相似文献
5.
2015年中国生态系统生态破坏损失核算研究 总被引：2，自引：2，他引：0
利用遥感影像数据,结合第八次全国森林资源清查和第二次全国湿地资源调查以及草地监测报告,对中国2015年森林、草地和湿地三大生态系统因人类不合理利用导致的生态破坏损失进行核算。核算结果显示：① 2015年中国生态破坏损失约为2.38万亿元,占GDP比重的3.3%。其中,森林生态破坏损失约为2 437.5亿元,占全部生态破坏损失的10.2%;草地生态破坏损失约为3 112.1亿元,占比为13.1%;湿地生态破坏损失约为18 269.6亿元,占比76.7%。② 中国生态破坏损失主要分布在西部地区,区域空间差异大,青海、湖南、四川、黑龙江、内蒙古、江苏等省份的生态破坏损失都大于1 000亿元。③ 中国生态破坏损失主要来自气候调节和水流动调节服务损失。2015年中国气候调节服务损失量为17 451.8亿元,占全部生态破坏损失的73.3%;水流动调节服务损失量为4 234.6亿元,占比为17.8%。 相似文献
6.
生态服务功能价值空间转移评价——以渭干河流域为例 总被引：5，自引：0，他引：5
生态服务功能价值的空间转移(流转)是生态学和生态经济学研究的一个热点,同时也是国家制定生态补偿政策的基础,对其进行定量计算是难点。对生态服务功能转移特征进行分类并构建了价值转移评价方法,以新疆渭干河流域为例,根据引力场及场强作用原理,构建流转评价模型,结合ArcGIS 9.2的缓冲区分析功能和叠加分析功能,计算出流域上下游各县可转移的生态服务功能价值。结果表明,1985—2007年,流域生态服务功能价值呈现出递增的趋势,上游拜城县可转移的生态服务功能价值高于下游三县; 上游拜城县生态服务功能价值对下游各县的平均流转强度在不断增加,对新和县的转移强度最大,其次是库车,沙雅县最小,与三县距拜城距离成反比。2007年上游共转移生态服务功能价值24.83亿元,向库车、沙雅和新和转移价值分别为2.81亿元、6.42亿元和15.6亿元。研究可为生态服务功能价值空间转移定量分析提供一种方法,也可为流域生态补偿标准的制定提供依据。 相似文献
7.
南海珊瑚礁经济价值评估 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
根据已有的基础数据、国外文献资料及野外调查资料,利用生产效益法和数值转移法估算南海珊瑚礁的经济价值（包括渔业经济价值、海岸保护价值、旅游休闲价值、生物多样性价值）以及由于过度捕捞、破坏性捕捞和陆源沉积物污染而造成其经济价值的损失。结果显示：南海珊瑚礁年经济价值为156.5亿元,其中渔业价值占90%,为140.4亿元;其次是海岸保护价值,占5.5%,为8.7亿元;而旅游休闲价值和生物多样性价值分别为5.3亿元和2.1亿元。珊瑚礁如果维持可持续利用的状态,并考虑10%的贴现率,未来20 a珊瑚礁总的经济价值为1 370亿元。由于南海珊瑚礁面临最大的威胁是人类不合理的利用,其对今后20 a珊瑚礁带来的经济损失是258.8亿元,其中因破坏性捕捞造成的损失为249.6亿元,占总经济价值损失的96.4%,而因过度性捕捞和陆源沉积物造成的经济损失分别是3.3亿元和5.9亿元。人类干扰对今后20 a南海珊瑚礁造成的经济价值损失占未来20 a南海珊瑚礁总经济价值的18.98%。 相似文献
8.
流域水资源开发阈值模型及其在黄河流域的应用 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
流域水资源开发阈值是流域水资源合理利用的基础和流域生态系统健康的保证。随着水资源短缺引起的 问题日益突出, 人们对水资源开发阈值的认识也在不断加深, 从最初的“水资源总量”、“可利用量”和“可供水量” 等, 到考虑生态需水和水质保护的水资源可利用量。本文在这些理念的基础上, 提出一种新的流域水资源开发阈值 及其计算模型, 即考虑水资源量、不可利用的洪水量、被污染水量、生态需水量及重复计算水量, 综合计算流域水资 源开发阈值。黄河流域作为我国水资源严重短缺地区, 水资源开发面临严峻挑战。以黄河流域为例, 运用该阈值模 型对黄河流域水资源开发阈值进行初步计算, 得到开发阈值多年平均约为238 亿m3, 占黄河天然径流量的40%左 右, 符合国际公认的流域水资源开发标准。 相似文献
9.
生态保护的成本是生态补偿标准的核心组成部分,一般由直接成本、机会成本和发展成本构成。本文以羌塘自然保护区涉及的那曲地区为例,采用恢复成本法和机会成本法对牧民参与野生动物保护的直接成本和机会成本进行了核算。研究过程中,借用中国草地承载力评估中的标准羊单位,把草地生态系统、草食性野生动物和价值评估有机地联系起来,为草原地区野生动物保护的生态补偿提供了一个有效的评估工具。评估结果表明,那曲地区牧民参与野生动物保护的成本是每年5.69亿元,其中直接成本是1.19亿元,机会成本是4.5亿元,机会成本占总成本的79%。机会成本是由于草食性野生动物的啃食与踩踏导致草场必须禁牧致使牧民放弃的经济收入。显然,羌塘自然保护区草食性野生动物对草场的损害构成了生态补偿的主体。如果按照那曲地区中度以上退化草地的面积计算,则牧民保护野生动物的单位面积成本是每年57元,按照那曲地区人口计算,参与野生动物保护的人均成本是每年1482元。这一结果并不等于生态补偿标准,但可以作为补偿标准的低限。 相似文献
10.
昆仑山北麓克里雅绿洲生态服务价值对土地利用变化的响应 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
基于1991、2002与2008年卫星遥感资料,采用中国陆地生态系统的服务价值测算方法,分析克里雅绿洲土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值与结构的影响。研究表明:①研究区生态服务价值从1991年的144 224.8万元降到2008年的128 716.3万元,生态服务价值损失10.8%,每年净损失生态服务价值达24.2元/hm2。生态服务总价值的减少主要是由湿地、水域总面积的减少而导致的;②研究区各生态服务功能对区域总生态服务价值贡献率由高到低依次为:废物处理、土壤形成、生物多样性保护、水源涵养、气候调价、气体调价、食物生产、娱乐休闲和原材料;③研究区生态服务价值对生态服务功能指数缺乏弹性。 相似文献
11.
The Yangtze River is the third largest river in the world and the longest and largest river in China.China has adopted a national strategy to protect the Yangtze River.A better understanding of the ecosystem services value along the Yangtze River would provide support for the Yangtze River protection strategy.Using Costanza’s method to estimate the ecosystem services value,the value of 10 ecosystem services was estimated within 1 km and 2 km from the Yangtze River in 2017.These 10 services were derived from the four established groupings of provisioning,regulating,supporting,and cultural services.This study compared and analyzed the changes in the ecosystem services value in the upper,middle,and lower reaches of the river,and in provinces,cities,and villages along the Yangtze River.The total ecosystem services value within 1 km and 2 km from the river was 37.208 and 43.769 billion yuan,respectively.Within 1 km,the ecosystem services value in the middle reaches was 12.93 billion yuan,while the next highest value was in the upper reaches at 12.45 billion yuan,and the downstream area had the smallest value of 11.855 billion yuan.Within 2 km,the value of upstream ecosystem services was the highest at 16.31 billion yuan,while the second highest value was in the middle reaches at 14.376 billion yuan,and the smallest value was in the downstream area at 13.083 billion yuan.In the Yangtze River Basin,regulating services played a leading role,accounting for 81.6%and 78.9%of the ecosystem services value within 1 km and 2 km from the river,respectively.Among the 10 ecosystem services,hydrological regulation was the most important,while the value of raw material production made the smallest contribution.Among the provinces and cities along the Yangtze River,the highest ecosystem services value was in Hubei Province,while the lowest values were in Shanghai and the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau.If villages within 1 km and 2 km from the river were to be relocated,the total regional ecological value would increase by 527 and 975 million yuan,respectively. 相似文献
12.
Analysis of the contribution of multiple factors to the recent decrease in discharge and sediment yield in the Yellow River Basin,China 总被引：5，自引：1，他引：4
The Yellow River basin is well known for its high sediment yield. However, this sediment yield has clearly decreased since the 1980s, especially after the year 2000. The annual average sediment yield was 1.2 billion tons before 2000, but has significantly decreased to 0.3 billion tons over the last 10 years. Changes in discharge and sediment yield for the Yellow River have attracted the attention of both the Central Government and local communities. This study aimed to identify the individual contributions of changes in precipitation and human activities (e.g. water conservancy projects, terracing, silt dams, socio-economic and needs, and soil and water conservation measures) to the decrease in discharge and sediment yield of the Yellow River. The study used both improved the hydrological method and the soil and water conservation method. The study focused on discharge analysis for the upper reaches and the investigation of sediments for the middle reaches of the river. The results showed that discharge and sediment yield have both presented significant decreasing trends over the past 50 years. Precipitation showed an insignificant decreasing trend over the same period. The annual average discharge decreased by 5.68 billion m3 above Lanzhou reach of the Yellow River from 2000 to 2012; human activities (e.g. socio-economic water use) contributed 43.4% of the total reduction, whereas natural factors (e.g. evaporation from lakes, wetlands and reservoirs) accounted for 56.6%. The decrease in annual discharge and sediment yield of the section between Hekouzhen station and Tongguan station were 12.4 billion m3 and 1.24 billion tons, respectively. Human activities contributed 76.5% and 72.2% of the total reduction in discharge and sediment yield, respectively, and were therefore the dominant factors in the changes in discharge and sediment yield of the Yellow River. 相似文献
13.
14.
《地理学报(英文版)》2016,(9)
The Yellow River basin is well known for its high sediment yield. However, this sediment yield has clearly decreased since the 1980 s, especially after the year 2000. The annual average sediment yield was 1.2 billion tons before 2000, but has significantly decreased to 0.3 billion tons over the last 10 years. Changes in discharge and sediment yield for the Yellow River have attracted the attention of both the Central Government and local communities. This study aimed to identify the individual contributions of changes in precipitation and human activities(e.g. water conservancy projects, terracing, silt dams, socio-economic and needs, and soil and water conservation measures) to the decrease in discharge and sediment yield of the Yellow River. The study used both improved the hydrological method and the soil and water conservation method. The study focused on discharge analysis for the upper reaches and the investigation of sediments for the middle reaches of the river. The results showed that discharge and sediment yield have both presented significant decreasing trends over the past 50 years. Precipitation showed an insignificant decreasing trend over the same period. The annual average discharge decreased by 5.68 billion m3 above Lanzhou reach of the Yellow River from 2000 to 2012; human activities(e.g. socio-economic water use) contributed 43.4% of the total reduction, whereas natural factors(e.g. evaporation from lakes, wetlands and reservoirs) accounted for 56.6%. The decrease in annual discharge and sediment yield of the section between Hekouzhen station and Tongguan station were 12.4 billion m3 and 1.24 billion tons, respectively. Human activities contributed 76.5% and 72.2% of the total reduction in discharge and sediment yield, respectively, and were therefore the dominant factors in the changes in discharge and sediment yield of the Yellow River. 相似文献
15.
黄河流域产水产沙、输移和沉积系统的划分 总被引：4，自引：1，他引：4
根据Schumm提出的河流系统的理论对黄河流域地貌系统进行了划分。结果表明 ,整个黄河流域地貌系统可以很明确地分为产水产沙系统、输移系统和沉积系统 ,其模式与Schumm的理想流域模式非常吻合 ,同时又表现出其特殊性。以河口镇为界 ,黄河流域上游和中下游两部分分别具有对应的产水系统、产沙系统和河道输移系统 ,各子系统处于动态变化过程中 ,存在一种强耦合关系 ,这种特点主要是由黄河流域的历史发育过程决定的。 相似文献
16.
CHANGXING SHI LUAN ZHANG JIAQIANG XU LIPENG GUO 《Geografiska Annaler: Series A, Physical Geography》2010,92(3):297-309
The Yellow River is one of the largest riverine sediment routing system in the world. Like many other rivers, the sediment load of the Yellow River can not be regarded as constant in its long history due to changes in climate and human activities. This study determined sediment storage on the floodplains of the lower Yellow River in five historical periods after the year 602 bc mainly based on data of 93 boreholes, 182 radiocarbon dates in the Huang‐Huai‐Hai Plain and maps of historical changes of the lower Yellow River channel. Furthermore, the mean annual sediment outputs from the upper and middle reaches of the Yellow River were calculated in the five periods through investigating the sediment delivery ratio of the lower Yellow River under different conditions of artificial levees. Our findings suggest that the sediment output from the upper and middle Yellow River increased slowly before the year around 1128, but was lower than half of the current value on average. It has been in the past about 1000 years that the sediment output from the upper and middle Yellow River escalated. The Loess Plateau is the principal sediment source of the Yellow River. The comparison of historical changes in sediment load of the lower Yellow River with those in the natural conditions and in human activities on the plateau reveals that the changes in sediment yield from the plateau could be attributed mainly to the variations of population, cultivating area, and climate changes on the plateau. 相似文献
17.
南水北调工程是实现中国水资源南北调配、东西互济,形成水资源合理配置格局的战略性工程。南水北调西线一期工程已初步确定先行从长江上游的雅砻江调水40亿m3至黄河上游的洮河,经洮河至刘家峡水库后入黄河干流。本研究从南水北调西线调水新增水资源量入手,结合新提出的黄河干流甘肃段的新型水土格局（即“弦弧”两支主要输水路线下）,重点对新增水资源量的利用进行思考,并分析了新型水土格局下新增调水对黄河干流甘肃段、西北内陆区石羊河流域、内蒙古阿拉善地区和宁蒙灌区等受水区的影响。研究结果有利于水资源稀缺地区输调水资源可持续合理利用,可为黄河流域上游生态保护与高质量发展的战略规划实施提供参考。 相似文献
18.
石羊河流域生态系统服务价值的空间异质性及其计量 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
生态系统服务价值评估是当前生态学和生态经济学研究的一个热点,生态服务功能的空间异质性是影响生态系统服务价值的重要因素,也是国家制定生态补偿政策的基础,但不易对其进行定量计算。本文以石羊河流域为例,遵循资源稀缺性原理,依生态区位（自然和社会）差异条件对石羊河各流域生态服务功能空间异质性进行测算。在此基础上,利用2009年石羊河流域各地区基础数据建立计量模型,对其流域内植被系统生态系统服务价值进行测算;并利用ArcGIS9.3对石羊河流域单位面积生态系统服务价值进行可视化处理。结果表明:（1）石羊河流域同一生态系统在不同流域存在巨大差异,其中以耕地最为明显,其下游是上游单位生态系统服务价值的13.99倍;（2）上游地区为典型的生态“输出”型地区,而中游与下游为典型的“输入”型地区;（3）耕地已经成为石羊河流域中游与下游重要的生态系统,其生态系统服务价值分别为334 343.516万元和125 179.201万元;（4）石羊河流域植被系统生态系统服务价值为1 277 691.282万元,占石羊河流域国内生产总值的32.53%。 相似文献
19.
以黄河流域35个城市为研究对象,分别构建产业绿色化与生态环境绿色化指标体系,基于熵值法测度两系统综合指数,并通过耦合协调度模型和空间自相关法对2009—2018年两系统耦合协调度的时空特征及空间集聚性进行分析。结果表明：（1）黄河流域产业绿色化与生态环境绿色化综合指数总体呈上升趋势且具有趋同性,上游地区生态环境绿色化水平高于产业绿色化水平,中下游地区相反;（2）时空维度上,黄河流域产业绿色化与生态环境绿色化的耦合协调度总体呈上升趋势,上中下游地区呈现“凹”字型发展特征且稳定程度不同;（3）空间集聚上,黄河流域产业绿色化与生态环境绿色化耦合协调度呈显著正相关性,存在明显聚集性,高-高聚集主要集中于上游地区,低-低聚集由中游地区向中下游地区扩展。 相似文献
20.
Sedimentation in the lower reaches of the Yellow River is a major problem requiring implementation of large-scale control measures in the upper and middle drainage basin. For maximum benefit, major sediment generation areas must be delimited. For this purpose, the upper and middle drainage basin of the Yellow River has been divided into four major sediment and water source areas. A series of databases of runoff and sediment yields from these source areas and for the corresponding quantities of sedimentation in the lower Yellow River channel have been established. On this basis, a set of multiple-regression equations has been established that define the relationships between sedimentation in the lower Yellow River and the yearly or event-based runoff and sediment yields from the four source areas or subsystems. Based on the regression equations obtained, the contribution of the four major source areas to the sedimentation in the lower Yellow River channel can be estimated. The results obtained indicate that, given other factors, for each ton of sediment reduced from the coarse-sediment producing area (CSA), the sediment deposited in the lower Yellow River would be reduced by 0.455 ton; for each ton of sediment reduced from the fine-sediment producing area (FSA), the sediment deposited in the lower Yellow River would be reduced by 0.154 ton only. Therefore, if limited erosion control measures are applied to the coarse-sediment producing area, the benefits for sedimentation reduction in the lower Yellow River will be much larger than if similar resources are applied to the fine-sediment producing area. 相似文献