共查询到19条相似文献，搜索用时 234 毫秒
1.
GPS精密卫星钟差估计与分析 总被引：6，自引：1，他引：5
探讨了GPS精密卫星钟差的估计方法,并分析了伪距与相位观测值对估计精度的影响。基于PAN-DA软件,采用全球均匀分布的40个IGS跟踪站的实测数据,对GPS精密钟差进行估计与分析。试验结果表明,目前采用PANDA软件估计的GPS精密卫星钟差与IGS事后精密卫星钟差比较,互差优于0.2 ns,与国际IGS各分析中心估计的卫星钟差精度相当。 相似文献
2.
联合地面和星载数据精密确定GPS卫星轨道 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
给出了联合定轨的数学模型,从6个试验的结果说明低轨卫星的星载GPS观测值对GPS卫星精密定轨的贡献。单天解的结果表明,相对于仅使用43个地面跟踪站的定轨结果,增加3颗低轨卫星的观测数据可以使GPS卫星的轨道准确度平均提高40%,即使仅用21个地面站和3颗低轨卫星也可以使GPS卫星的轨道与IGS最终轨道之差的RMS在5cm左右。 相似文献
3.
由星载GPS双差相位数据进行CHAMP卫星动力学定轨 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
为了确定CHAMP卫星的轨道，由星载GPS数据和IGS跟踪站的GPS数据构造星地相位双差观测量，利用EOP、SGO、时间等数据，对GPS数据进行预处理，包括钟差改正、模糊度解算和周跳探测、卫星姿态改正、天线偏差和相位中心改正等，采用CHAMP卫星受力摄动模型，根据动力学原理，对CHAMP卫星进行实际定轨。与德国GFZ定轨结果PSO相比，本方法定轨结果径向精度为0．2857m。对于1d的重叠轨道，径向轨道差异的RMS为0．0958m。对于轨道端点比较，径向轨道差异平均为0．0666m。 相似文献
4.
针对GPS卫星钟差及观测数据间隔对LEO卫星运动学和约化动力学定轨的影响问题进行了分析,并使用CODE（the Center for Orbit Determination in Europe）30 s、5 s间隔GPS卫星钟差分别进行了30 s和10 s间隔观测数据的LEO卫星定轨实验。结果表明,使用5 s间隔卫星钟差（10 s间隔观测数据）相比30 s间隔卫星钟差（30 s间隔观测数据）进行GRACE卫星精密定轨,约化动力学定轨精度提高了16%,运动学定轨精度提高了8.8%;使用30 s间隔卫星钟差和10 s间隔观测数据的定轨精度最低;对于30 s间隔观测数据,使用30 s或5 s间隔卫星钟差的定轨精度基本一致。 相似文献
5.
6.
GIOVE-A卫星精密定轨仿真研究 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
基于GPS系统的实测数据,在极为类似的条件下,仿真研究了GIOVE-A卫星的精密定轨问题.以IGS提供的GPS精密星历为时空基准,利用12个全球分布的跟踪站数据,在精确确定地面站坐标、精密时间同步以及确定对流层参数的基础上,进一步利用单颗GPS卫星仿真GIOVE-A卫星实施了精密轨道确定.结果显示,采用本文方法计算的单颗导航卫星轨道的三维位置精度优于50 cm,径向精度达到了10 cm. 相似文献
7.
为提升区域地面监测站条件下北斗卫星定轨精度,面向日益丰富的北斗星载数据和即将实现的星间链路技术,提出了联合运用地面监测站数据、低轨卫星星载数据与星间链路数据的北斗卫星精密定轨方法。讨论了低轨卫星星载数据与星间链路数据增强对于导航卫星精密定轨的影响,重点从低轨卫星数量、轨位分布及星间链路等方面进行了仿真分析。结果表明:加入少量低轨卫星与区域监测站联合定轨即可显著提高导航卫星定轨精度约73%,钟差解算精度略有改进但不明显;同等数量且均匀分布的低轨星座,其轨位分布对联合定轨精度影响不大;加入星间链路数据可大幅提升导航卫星定轨精度,且改进效率高于低轨卫星。 相似文献
8.
基于GPS系统的实测数据,在极为类似的条件下,仿真研究了GIOVE—A卫星的精密定轨问题。以IGS提供的GPS精密星历为时空基准,利用12个全球分布的跟踪站数据,在精确确定地面站坐标、精密时间同步以及确定对流层参数的基础上,进一步利用单颗GPS卫星仿真GIOVE-A卫星实施了精密轨道确定。结果显示,采用本文方法计算的单颗导航卫星轨道的三维位置精度优于50cm,径向精度达到了10cm。 相似文献
9.
为解决卫星精密定轨过程中的观测资料加权问题，本文在卫星精密定轨过程中引入方差分量估计。文章采用Lageos2卫星1996年1月至2000年12月的全球SLR实测数据进行了卫星精密定轨计算，计算结果表明这种加权方法能较好地平衡观测资料对定轨结果的贡献，卫星轨道精度可以得到明显的提高。 相似文献
10.
地球静止轨道GEO卫星定轨是精密定轨领域的难点.依托我国区域范围地面跟踪网实际,提出了转发式测距数据支持下的GEO导航卫星精密定轨方案.从定轨精度、设备时延和伪距站对GEO轨道精度影响等方面进行了深入分析.试验结果证明:1 ns的时延误差引进的GEO轨道径向和位置误差分别为0.121 m和3.505 m.在多个转发式测距跟踪站约束的条件下伪距对定轨精度贡献非常有限,但通过星地钟差的估计可以实现时间同步,同步精度优于1 ns.这为时间同步提供了一种新的方法.当转发式测距跟踪站有限时伪距对GEO定轨的贡献非常明显,1CC(转发式跟踪站)+7L(伪距站)联合定轨条件下的轨道精度优于5 m.从而解决了GEO卫星精密定轨问题,同时实现了星地和站间时间同步以及卫星轨道与钟差参数的自洽. 相似文献
11.
12.
Short-term analysis of GNSS clocks 总被引：6，自引：6，他引：0
A characterization of the short-term stability of the atomic frequency standards onboard GNSS satellites is presented. Clock performance is evaluated using two different methods. The first method derives the temporal variation of the satellite’s clock from a polynomial fit through 1-way carrier-phase measurements from a receiver directly connected to a high-precision atomic frequency standard. Alternatively, three-way measurements using inter-station single differences of a second satellite from a neighboring station are used if the receiver’s clock stability at the station tracking the satellite of interest is not sufficient. The second method is a Kalman-filter-based clock estimation based on dual-frequency pseudorange and carrier-phase measurements from a small global or regional tracking network. Both methods are introduced and their respective advantages and disadvantages are discussed. The analysis section presents a characterization of GPS, GLONASS, GIOVE, Galileo IOV, QZSS, and COMPASS clocks based on these two methods. Special focus has been set on the frequency standards of new generation satellites like GPS Block IIF, QZSS, and IOV as well as the Chinese COMPASS/BeiDou-2 system. The analysis shows results for the Allan deviation covering averaging intervals from 1 to 1,000 s, which is of special interest for real-time PPP and other high-rate applications like processing of radio-occultation measurements. The clock interpolation errors for different sampling rates are evaluated for different types of clocks and their effect on PPP is discussed. 相似文献
13.
基于高斯过程的精密卫星钟差加密 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
将高斯过程方法应用到精密卫星钟差加密中,通过选择合适的核函数,将5 min间隔的钟差数据插值到30 s间隔。将结果与IGS提供的30 s精密钟差数据和四阶多项式拟合插值方法得到的结果进行比较,结果表明,高斯过程方法具有较高的加密精度,适用于GPS所有在轨卫星的原子钟钟差的加密,达到厘米级精度。 相似文献
14.
15.
Marek Ziebart Paul Cross Antony Sibthorpe Peter Arrowsmith Washington Ochieng Shaojun Feng Umar Bhatti Peter Niemann 《GPS Solutions》2007,11(4):227-237
The Galileo integrity chain depends on a number of key factors, one of which is contamination of the signal-in-space errors
with residual errors other than imperfect modelling of satellite orbits and clocks. A potential consequence of this is that
the user protection limit is driven not by the errors associated with the imperfect orbit and clock modelling, but by the
distortions induced by noise and bias in the integrity chain. These distortions increase the minimum bias the integrity chain
can guarantee to detect, which is reflected in the user protection limit. A contributor to this distortion is the inaccuracy
associated with the estimation of the offset between the Galileo sensor station (GSS) receiver clocks and the Galileo system
time (GST). This offset is termed the receiver clock synchronization error (CSE). This paper describes the research carried
out to determine both the CSE and its associated error using GPS data as captured with the Galileo System Test Bed Version
1 (GSTB-V1). In the study we simulate open access to a time datum using IGS data. Two methods are compared for determining
CSE and the corresponding uncertainty (noise) across a global network of tracking stations. The single-epoch single-station
method is an ‘averaging’ technique that uses a single epoch of data, and is carried out at individual sensor stations, without
recourse to the data from other stations. The global network solution method is also single epoch based, but uses the inversion
of a linearised model of the global system to solve for the CSE simultaneously at all GSS along with a number of other parameters
that would otherwise be absorbed into the CSE estimate in the averaging technique. To test the effectiveness of various configurations
in the two methods the estimated synchronisation errors across the GSS network (comprising 25 stations) are compared to the
same values as estimated by the International GPS Service (IGS) using a global tracking network of around 150 stations, as
well as precise orbit and satellite clock models determined by a combination of global analysis centres. The results show
that the averaging technique is vulnerable to unmodelled errors in the satellite clock offsets from system time, leading to
receiver CSE errors in the region of 12 ns (3.7 m), this value being largely driven by the satellite CSE errors. The global
network approach is capable of delivering CSE errors at the level of 1.5 ns (46 cm) depending on the number of parameters
in the linearised model. The International GNSS Service (IGS) receiver clock estimates were used as a truth model for comparative
assessment. 相似文献
16.
Realtime kinematic precise point positioning (PPP) requires 1 Hz GPS satellite clock corrections. An efficient clock estimation
approach is presented. It applies a combined dual-thread algorithm consisting of an undifferenced (UD) and epoch-differenced
(ED) engine. The UD engine produces absolute clock values every 5 s, and the ED engine produces relative clock values between
neighboring epochs at 1-s interval. A final 1-Hz satellite clock can be generated by combining the UD absolute clock and ED
relative clock efficiently and accurately. Forty stations from a global tracking network are used to estimate the realtime
1-Hz clock with the proposed method. Both the efficiency and accuracy of the resultant clock corrections are validated. Efficiency
test shows that the UD processing thread requires an average time of 1.88 s on a 1-GHz CPU PC for one epoch of data, while
ED processing requires only 0.25 s. Accuracy validation test shows that the estimated 1-Hz clock agrees with IGS final clock
accurately. The RMS values of all the available GPS satellite clock bias are less than 0.2 ns (6 cm), and most of them are
less than 0.1 ns (3 cm). All the RMS values of Signal in Space Range Error (SISRE) are at centimeter level. Applying the accurate
and realtime clock to realtime PPP, an accuracy of 10 cm in the horizontal and 20 cm in the vertical is achieved after a short
period of initialization. 相似文献
17.
在基于精密单点定位(PPP)的授时方法中,卫星钟差产品的高精度时间基准至关重要. 针对实时卫星钟差产品时间基准不够稳定的问题,本文采用一组具有原子钟外部输入的国际全球卫星导航系统(GNSS)服务(IGS)跟踪站建立了顾及原子钟变化特性的基准精化方法. 该方法首先采用阿伦方差对不同的IGS跟踪站外接原子钟进行稳定度分析,挑选出一组稳定度高的原子钟用以精化时间基准. 在此基础上,利用阿伦方差分析各台原子钟的噪声参数特征,并确定不同原子钟之间的权比关系. 最终,建立时间基准改正量的随机模型,并计算出精化后的时间基准. 通过实例验证表明:与IGS事后精密钟差产品定义的时间基准比较,改正后的实时钟差基准单天内的标准差(STD)优于0.1 ns,相比于改正前最高提升了93％. 同时,基准改正后的天内万秒稳达到10-15量级,实现了一个量级的提高. 此外,通过相对钟差精度的分析,表明钟差基准修正不影响PPP的定位精度. 相似文献
18.
An algorithm for very accurate absolute positioning through Global Positioning System (GPS) satellite clock estimation has
been developed. Using International GPS Service (IGS) precise orbits and measurements, GPS clock errors were estimated at
30-s intervals. Compared to values determined by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, the agreement was at the level of about 0.1 ns
(3 cm). The clock error estimates were then applied to an absolute positioning algorithm in both static and kinematic modes.
For the static case, an IGS station was selected and the coordinates were estimated every 30 s. The estimated absolute position
coordinates and the known values had a mean difference of up to 18 cm with standard deviation less than 2 cm. For the kinematic
case, data obtained every second from a GPS buoy were tested and the result from the absolute positioning was compared to
a differential GPS (DGPS) solution. The mean differences between the coordinates estimated by the two methods are less than
40 cm and the standard deviations are less than 25 cm. It was verified that this poorer standard deviation on 1-s position
results is due to the clock error interpolation from 30-s estimates with Selective Availability (SA). After SA was turned
off, higher-rate clock error estimates (such as 1 s) could be obtained by a simple interpolation with negligible corruption.
Therefore, the proposed absolute positioning technique can be used to within a few centimeters' precision at any rate by estimating
30-s satellite clock errors and interpolating them.
Received: 16 May 2000 / Accepted: 23 October 2000 相似文献
19.
卫星钟差解算及其星间单差模糊度固定 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
整数相位模糊度解算可以显著提高GNSS精密单点定位（PPP）的精度。本文提出一种解算卫星钟差的方法,通过固定星间单差模糊度恢复出能够支持单台接收机进行整数模糊度解算的卫星钟差,即所谓的“整数”钟差。为了实现星间单差模糊度固定,分别通过卫星端宽巷FCB解算和模糊度基准的选择与固定恢复出宽巷和窄巷模糊度的整数性质。为了证明本文方法的可行性,采用IGS测站的GPS数据进行卫星钟差解算试验。结果表明,在解算钟差时,星间单差模糊度固定的平均成功率为73%。得到的卫星钟差与IGS最终钟差产品相比,平均的RMS和STD分别为0.170和0.012 ns。448个IGS测站的星间单差宽巷和窄巷模糊度小数部分的分布表明本文得到的卫星钟差和FCB产品具备支持PPP用户进行模糊度固定的能力。基于以上产品开展了模拟动态PPP定位试验,结果表明模糊度固定之后,N、E、U和3D的定位精度（RMS）分别达到0.009、0.010、0.023和0.027 m,与不固定模糊度或采用IGS钟差的结果相比,分别提高了30.8%、61.5%、23.3%和37.2%。 相似文献