共查询到15条相似文献，搜索用时 156 毫秒
1.
电离层延迟是影响全球卫星导航系统精密定位的主要误差源之一。本文介绍了常用的NeQuick模型和IRI模型,利用两模型进行了中国地区电离层TEC相关计算,将计算值与电离层参考值进行比较,得出了关于区域电离层TEC的有益结论。 相似文献
2.
电离层参量的提取是开展电离层研究的基础,而数据同化技术则是获取电离层参量的一种重要手段。以NeQuick模型的输出作为背景场,Kalman滤波作为同化算法,利用数据同化技术实现区域电离层TEC重构,结果表明,数据同化方法重构的倾斜总电子含量（TEC）和垂直TEC与实测值较为一致。相比NeQuick模型及全球电离层地图（GIM）数据,数据同化方法重构得到的TEC的平均误差和标准差均有明显的降低,实测数据验证了数据同化技术在区域TEC重构中的精度和可靠性。 相似文献
3.
F2层临界频率foF2是高频通信的重要参数,目前获取F2层临界频率(foF2)最有效的手段是电离层测高仪,但磁暴期间电离层自身剧烈变化会造成测高仪foF2数据严重缺失。经验模型如NeQuick虽能给出foF2估计值,但磁暴期精度却不及磁静日水平。本文选取2015年12月19日至2015年12月22日磁暴期中国地壳运动监测网GNSS双频数据进行区域建模并估算出电子总含量(total electron content,TEC),利用实测区域TEC对NeQuick模型有效电离参数Az进行估计,得出NeQuick模型优化后TEC总含量和F2层临界频率foF2,并反演出磁暴期初相,主相及恢复相阶段变化过程。以中国地区台站实测数据作为参考对比,结果表明:GNSS数据优化后的NeQuick模型TEC精度大概提升了20%~40%,foF2的实时精度提升了10%~25%。GNSS优化后NeQuick模型能准确反演出电离层的由正相暴转为负相暴演化过程,而原始模型由于仅依赖于输入的太阳活动水平,只能反映出与磁静日水平相当的日变化趋势值。利用该方法可以有效提高磁暴期TEC和foF2的经验模型的计算精度,特别是弥补磁暴期foF2数据缺失的不足,可以作为磁暴期电离层垂直探测仪的有益补充或者有效参考。 相似文献
4.
电离层总电子含量(TEC)是描述电离层变化特性的关键参量,构建实时电离层TEC模型可为实时导航定位用户提供电离层延迟改正,加快精密单点定位收敛速度,实现对空间天气的精准监测。基于此,论文以构建实时电离层TEC模型为目标,从融合多源电离层数据构建电离层TEC模型和高精度电离层TEC预报模型的构建展开研究,主要研究内容及贡献如下:(1)使用不同方法评估了2002年001天-2018年365天IRI-2016模型、NeQuick2模型与IGS提供的电离层最终产品(IGSG)的精度。 相似文献
5.
研究了NeQuick2算法改进及其实现方法,从不同角度分析了NeQuick2模型在全球区域和中国区域内的性能优势。一个太阳活动周期内,中国区域NeQuick2模型计算的电子总含量（total electron content,TEC）比NeQuick1模型精度有显著提升,改正精度与太阳活动水平具有较强的相关性,低年比高年的改善效果更为显著。以全球电离层数据（global ionosphere maps,GIM）为参考标准,中国中高纬区域太阳活动低年NeQuick2模型TEC的系统年平均偏差减少了76%,年平均均方根（root mean square,RMS）值减少了约72%。太阳活动高年NeQuick2模型TEC的系统年平均偏差减少了38%,平均RMS减少了13%左右,且中高纬区域改正精度优于低纬区域11%~13%。全球区域太阳活动峰值期间NeQuick2模型TEC比NeQuick1模型日平均偏差改善了25%,日平均RMS改善了30%左右。分别用NeQuick1和NeQuick2模型得出F2层顶部区域在太阳活动峰值期电子密度随高度剖面分布,顶部电子密度剖面精度改善近40%。最后分别得出了两个模型中国区域中高纬地区E和F1层区域在100 km、150 km和200 km高度的电子密度分布图,结果显示NeQuick2模型改善了电子密度分布状况,有效避免了NeQuick1在底部区域电子密度梯度不连续以及电离层异常结构的情况。 相似文献
6.
不同NeQuick电离层模型参数的应用精度分析 总被引：3，自引：2，他引：1
Galileo采用NeQuick作为全球广播电离层模型,其实际应用中以有效电离水平因子Az代替太阳活动指数作为NeQuick的输入参数,并利用二次多项式拟合得到广播星历中播发的3个电离层参数。本文在总结和讨论NeQuick模型参数估计方法及其变化特征的基础上,分别以全球电离层格网、GPS基准站及JASON-2测高卫星提供的电离层TEC为参考,分析不同NeQuick模型参数(包括以太阳活动参数F10.7为输入的NeQuick2、以本文解算参数为输入的NeQuickC和以Galileo广播电离层参数为输入的NeQuickG)在全球大陆及海洋地区的应用精度,并与GPS广播的Klobuchar模型对比。结果表明,NeQuickG在全球范围内的修正精度为54.2%~65.8%,NeQuickC的修正精度为71.1%~74.2%,NeQuick2的修正精度与NeQuickG相当,略优于GPS广播星历中播发的Klobuchar模型。 相似文献
7.
8.
伽利略电离层改正模型的精度对比分析 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
针对半经验电离层模型NeQuick模型中NeQuick2模型研究较少的现状,文章介绍了NeQuick2模型的算法,分析了NeQuick2模型与NeQuick1模型的差别:利用低、中、高纬度测站的全球定位系统观测数据获得的斜路径电子总含量作为参考,对NeQuick2模型和NeQuick1模型进行了精度对比分析。结果表明NeQuick2模型的精度显著优于NeQuick1模型,平均改善约4TECU。 相似文献
9.
10.
11.
将CODE以及GPS广播星历提供的8个系数分别作为Klobuchar模型的输入参数,利用Klobuchar模型及NeQuick模型计算得到中国地壳运动观测网15个GPS基准站上2000～2008年的电离层VTEC序列,以欧洲定轨中心CODE提供的事后电离层产品作为参考标准,得到了两个模型在中国地区的精度评估结果。 相似文献
12.
Ionospheric delay is a dominant error source in Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS). Single-frequency GNSS applications require ionospheric correction of signal delay caused by the charged particles in the earth’s ionosphere. The Chinese Beidou system is developing its own ionospheric model for single-frequency users. The number of single-frequency GNSS users and applications is expected to grow fast in the next years in China. Thus, developing an appropriate ionospheric model is crucially important for the Chinese Beidou system and worldwide single-frequency Beidou users. We study the performance of five globally accessible ionospheric models Global Ionospheric Map (GIM), International Reference Ionosphere (IRI), Parameterized Ionospheric Model (PIM), Klobuchar and NeQuick in low- and mid-latitude regions of China under mid-solar activity condition. Generally, all ionospheric models can reproduce the trend of diurnal ionosphere variations. It is found that all the models have better performances in mid-latitude than in low-latitude regions. When all the models are compared to the observed total electron content (TEC) data derived from GIM model, the IRI model (2012 version) has the best agreement with GIM model and the NeQuick has the poorest agreement. The RMS errors of the IRI model using the GIM TEC as reference truth are about 3.0–10.0 TECU in low-latitude regions and 3.0–8.0 TECU in mid-latitude regions, as observed during a period of 1 year with medium level of solar activity. When all the ionospheric models are ingested into single-frequency precise point positioning (PPP) to correct the ionospheric delays in GPS observations, the PIM model performs the best in both low and mid-latitudes in China. In mid-latitude, the daily single-frequency PPP accuracy using PIM model is ~10 cm in horizontal and ~20 cm in up direction. At low-latitude regions, the PPP error using PIM model is 10–20 cm in north, 30–40 cm in east and ~60 cm in up component. The single-frequency PPP solutions indicate that NeQuick model has the lowest accuracy among all the models in both low- and mid-latitude regions of China. This study suggests that the PIM model may be considered for single-frequency GNSS users in China to achieve a good positioning accuracy in both low- and mid-latitude regions. 相似文献
13.
Application of SWACI products as ionospheric correction for single-point positioning: a comparative study 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
In Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) using L-band frequencies, the ionosphere causes signal delays that correspond with link related range errors of up to 100 m. In a first order approximation the range error is proportional to the total electron content (TEC) of the ionosphere. Whereas this first order range error can be corrected in dual-frequency measurements by a linear combination of carrier phase- or code-ranges of both frequencies, single-frequency users need additional information to mitigate the ionospheric error. This information can be provided by TEC maps deduced from corresponding GNSS measurements or by ionospheric models. In this paper we discuss and compare different ionospheric correction methods for single-frequency users. The focus is on the comparison of the positioning quality using dual-frequency measurements, the Klobuchar model, the NeQuick model, the IGS TEC maps, the Neustrelitz TEC Model (NTCM-GL) and the reconstructed NTCM-GL TEC maps both provided via the ionosphere data service SWACI (http://swaciweb.dlr.de) in near real-time. For that purpose, data from different locations covering several days in 2011 and 2012 are investigated, including periods of quiet and disturbed ionospheric conditions. In applying the NTCM-GL based corrections instead of the Klobuchar model, positioning accuracy improvements up to several meters have been found for the European region in dependence on the ionospheric conditions. Further in mid- and low-latitudes the NTCM-GL model provides results comparable to NeQuick during the considered time periods. Moreover, in regions with a dense GNSS ground station network the reconstructed NTCM-GL TEC maps are partly at the same level as the final IGS TEC maps. 相似文献
14.
For GPS single frequency users, the ionospheric contribution to the error budget is estimated by the well-known Klobuchar algorithm. For Galileo, it will be mitigated by a global algorithm based on the NeQuick model. This algorithm relies on the adaptation of the model to slant Total Electron Content (sTEC) measurements. Although the performance specifications of these algorithms are expressed in terms of delay and TEC, the users might be more interested in their impact on positioning. Therefore, we assessed the ability of the algorithms to improve the positioning accuracy using globally distributed permanent stations for the year 2002 marked by a high level of solar activity. We present uncorrected and corrected performances, interpret these and identify potential causes for Galileo correction discrepancies. We show vertical errors dropping by 56–64 % due to the analyzed ionospheric corrections, but horizontal errors decreasing by 27 % at most. By means of a fictitious symmetric satellite distribution, we highlight the role of TEC gradients in residual errors. We describe mechanisms permitted by the Galileo correction, which combine sTEC adaptation and topside mismodeling, and limit the horizontal accuracy. Hence, we support further investigation of potential alternative ionospheric corrections. We also provide an interesting insight into the ionospheric effects possibly experienced during the next solar maximum coinciding with Galileo Initial Operation Capability. 相似文献
15.
A new global TEC model for estimating transionospheric radio wave propagation errors 总被引：4，自引：0，他引：4
Space-based navigation and radar systems operating at single frequencies of <10 GHz require ionospheric corrections of the
signal delay or range error. Because this ionospheric propagation error is proportional to the total electron content of the
ionosphere along the ray path, a user friendly TEC model covering global scale and all levels of solar activity should be
helpful in various applications. Since such a model is not available yet, we present an empirical model approach that allows
determining global TEC very easily. Although the number of model coefficients and parameters is rather small, the model describes
main ionospheric features with good quality. Presented is the empirical approach describing dependencies on local time, geographic/geomagnetic
location and solar irradiance and activity. The non-linear approach needs only 12 coefficients and a few empirically fixed
parameters for describing the broad spectrum of TEC variation at all levels of solar activity. The model approach is applied
on high-quality global TEC data derived by the Center for Orbit Determination in Europe (CODE) at the University of Berne
over more than half a solar cycle (1998–2007). The model fits to these input data with a negative bias of 0.3 TECU and a RMS
deviation of 7.5 TECU. As other empirical models too, the proposed Global Neustrelitz TEC
Model NTCM-GLis climatological, i.e. the model describes the average behaviour under quiet geomagnetic conditions. During severe space
weather events the actual TEC data may deviate from the model values considerably by more than 100%. A preliminary comparison
with independent data sets as TOPEX/Poseidon altimeter data reveals similar results for NeQuick and NTCM-GL with RMS deviations
in the order of 5 and 11 TECU (1 TECU = 1016 electrons/m2) for low and high-solar activity conditions, respectively. The more extended data base of ionosphere information that accumulates
in the coming years will help in further improving the set of coefficients of the model. 相似文献