共查询到18条相似文献，搜索用时 171 毫秒
1.
基于EGM96模型的GPS水准拟合方法 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
用GPS测量的方法来获得一点的正高或正常高，需要知识一点的大地水准面差距或高程异常。采用的大地水准面差距或高程异常的精度，决定了GPS水准的精度。本文利用EGM96模型计算高程异常。在利用巳知水准点上的高程异常拟合区域大地水准面模型时，首先移去用EGM96模型计算得到的部分，然后对剩余的高程异常进行拟合和内插，在内插点上再利用EGM96模型把移去的部分恢复，得到该点的高程异常。通过对某线路GPS水准的计算表明，引入EGM96模型拟合高程的精度改进不大。但对于大范围测量，这种方法有望能改进GPS水准的拟合精度。 相似文献
2.
基于EGM2008重力场模型和GPS水准数据,采用“移去－恢复”方法拟合不同地域、不同面积区域似大地水准面,对该方法能够达到的精度情况进行分析,得出在没有似大地水准面精化的区域,且保证高程异常控制点精度及合理分布的情况下,采用基于EGM2008重力场模型的“移去－恢复”的方法可以实现厘米级的GPS点正常高转换。 相似文献
3.
陆海交界区域厘米级精度似大地水准面的确定 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
为了得到我国某陆海交界区厘米级精度的区域（似）大地水准面,利用43个高精度GPS／水准点和1045个实测重力点数据对EGM96,WDM94和GFZ计算的局部重力（似）大地水准面进行了比较与评价。结果表明,在该测区用移去．恢复法确定重力（似）大地水准面时,EGM96应该是首选参考重力场模型。该测区处在陆海交界处,海域无GPS／水准数据。经比较发现,采用距离倒数加权平均法将该区重力似大地水准面拟合于GPS／水准数据比在大范围使用的多项式法效果更好。采用该方法计算的测区（似）大地水准面精度优于3cm。 相似文献
4.
为了得到我国某陆海交界区厘米级精度的区域(似)大地水准面,利用43个高精度GPS/水准点和1 045个实测重力点数据对EGM96,WDM94和GFZ计算的局部重力(似)大地水准面进行了比较与评价。结果表明,在该测区用移去-恢复法确定重力(似)大地水准面时,EGM96应该是首选参考重力场模型。该测区处在陆海交界处,海域无GPS/水准数据。经比较发现,采用距离倒数加权平均法将该区重力似大地水准面拟合于GPS/水准数据比在大范围使用的多项式法效果更好。采用该方法计算的测区(似)大地水准面精度优于3cm。 相似文献
5.
本文利用全球重力位模型、胶州市地面重力观测数据、胶州市GPS水准数据和数字地面模型(DTM),采用组合法应用移去-恢复技术计算剩余大地水准面,并与地球位模型计算的高程异常进行拟合,得到该地区重力似大地水准面,再和布测、计算得到的GPS/水准所构成的几何大地水准面拟合,利用多项式拟合完成系统改正,获得最终的大地水准面结果及相关的精度信息。 相似文献
6.
本文利用全球重力位模型、胶州市地面重力观测数据、胶州市GPS水准数据和数字地面模型(DTM),采用组合法应用移去-恢复技术计算剩余大地水准面,并与地球位模型计算的高程异常进行拟合,得到该地区重力似大地水准面,再和布测、计算得到的GPS/水准所构成的几何大地水准面拟合,利用多项式拟合完成系统改正,获得最终的大地水准面结果及相关的精度信息。 相似文献
7.
以松原灌区GPS控制网为例,采用高程异常直接拟合和插值法,以及基于EGM2008重力场模型和移去-计算-恢复技术的残差二次曲面拟合和插值法,精化了测区大地水准面。首先简要介绍了研究区数据,进而探讨了高程异常的获取,在此基础上,详细介绍了二次曲面拟合的大地水准面精化和空间插值法大地水准面精化方法,结果表明,EGM2008重力场模型精度较高,对精化局域和国家大地水准面具有重要意义。 相似文献
8.
目前,城市、平原地区的似大地水准面建立精度已经达到厘米级,但在矿区进行高程拟合时,由于地面高低起伏没有规则,其似大地水准面的拟合精度并不理想。针对此问题,本文提出利用遗传算法优化Elman神经网络的方法精化似大地水准面,采用移去-恢复法对残差进行建模,使用EGM 2008地球重力场模型和地形起伏信息来精化求解似大地水准面和参考椭球面之间的高程异常,同时着重分析了地球重力场模型以及地形变化信息对高程异常求解的重要性,并使用某矿区实测数据(GPS、水准)对所提方法进行验证,实验结果表明:文中所提方法的精度要优于二次曲面拟合模型和单一Elman模型,其外符合精度达到了1.14 cm,可以代替四等水准测量。 相似文献
9.
选用沿海山区GNSS水准点的实测高程异常,分别对近几年国际上公布的EGM2008、EIGEN-6C2、EIGEN-6C3stat、GECO、XGM2019e、SGG-UGM-2这6个高阶重力场模型计算的高程异常进行精度检验,分析不同模型、不同截断阶次模型高程异常精度与阶次的关系,采用基于Kd-Tree算法的二次曲面拟合方法进行山区水准面移去—拟合—恢复。结果表明,利用基于Kd-Tree算法高阶重力场模型进行山区水准拟合精度提高明显,具有较好的适应性。 相似文献
10.
《地理空间信息》2017,(2)
在地形起伏变化大的山区,基于GNSS技术实测的大地高和高精度几何水准实测的正常高数据,将线状拟合、平面拟合、曲面拟合等多种GNSS高程转换数学模型分别应用到GNSS/水准拟合法和EGM2008模型的"移去-恢复"法中,讨论了各模型方法在山区的高程转换应用情况及转换精度。利用Alltrans EGM2008 Calculator计算得到的地球重力场模型高程异常值,由于综合考虑了高程异常的几何和物理特性,使EGM2008模型的解算精度高于GNSS/水准拟合法精度。并通过实例证明,EGM2008"移去-恢复"法的曲面拟合模型适用于大高差山区cm级GNSS测高。 相似文献
11.
12.
基于EGM96模型的神经网络BP算法在GPS高程转换中的应用 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0
在一个测区内,从水准联测点上移走EGM96含有的高精度中长波部分后,把余下的高程异常通过BP神经网络进行模拟,最后再对数据进行恢复,使实验达到良好的结果. 相似文献
13.
Ellipsoidal geoid computation 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0
Modern geoid computation uses a global gravity model, such as EGM96, as a third component in a remove–restore process. The classical approach uses only two: the reference ellipsoid and a geometrical model representing the topography. The rationale for all three components is reviewed, drawing attention to the much smaller precision now needed when transforming residual gravity anomalies. It is shown that all ellipsoidal effects needed for geoid computation with millimetric accuracy are automatically included provided that the free air anomaly and geoid are calculated correctly from the global model. Both must be consistent with an ellipsoidal Earth and with the treatment of observed gravity data. Further ellipsoidal corrections are then negligible. Precise formulae are developed for the geoid height and the free air anomaly using a global gravity model, given as spherical harmonic coefficients. Although only linear in the anomalous potential, these formulae are otherwise exact for an ellipsoidal reference Earth—they involve closed analytical functions of the eccentricity (and the Earths spin rate), rather than a truncated power series in e2. They are evaluated using EGM96 and give ellipsoidal corrections to the conventional free air anomaly ranging from –0.84 to +1.14 mGal, both extremes occurring in Tibet. The geoid error corresponding to these differences is dominated by longer wavelengths, so extrema occur elsewhere, rising to +766 mm south of India and falling to –594 mm over New Guinea. At short wavelengths, the difference between ellipsoidal corrections based only on EGM96 and those derived from detailed local gravity data for the North Sea geoid GEONZ97 has a standard deviation of only 3.3 mm. However, the long-wavelength components missed by the local computation reach 300 mm and have a significant slope. In Australia, for example, such a slope would amount to a 600-mm rise from Perth to Cairns. 相似文献
14.
A. Ellmann 《Journal of Geodesy》2005,79(1-3):11-23
In regional gravimetric geoid determination, it is customary to use the modified Stokes formula that combines local terrestrial data with a global geopotential model. This study compares two deterministic and three stochastic modification methods for computing a regional geoid over the Baltic countries. The final selection of the best modification method is made by means of two accuracy estimates: the expected global mean square error of the geoid estimator, and the statistics of the post-fit residuals between the computed geoid models and precise GPS-levelling data. Numerical results show that the modification methods tested do not provide substantially different results, although the stochastic approaches appear formally better in the selected study area. The 2.8–5.3 cm (RMS) post-fit residuals to the GPS-levelling points indicate the suitability of the new geoid model for many practical applications. Moreover, the numerical comparisons reveal a one-dimensional offset between the regional vertical datum and the geoid models based upon the new GRACE-only geopotential model GGM01s. This gives an impression of a greater reliability of the new model compared to the earlier, EGM96-based and somewhat tilted regional geoid models for the same study area. 相似文献
15.
ZHOU Xuhua WU Bin PENG Bibo XU Houze 《地球空间信息科学学报》2006,9(4):250-254
IntroductionSince the launch of man-made satellite early in1957 ,the research for satellite gravity has beentaken a wide attentioninfield of geodesy .Early ,the ground-based satellite tracking has providedan observational data set which has been used tode… 相似文献
16.
基于卫星动力学理论,采用德国地球科学中心GFZ提供的CHAMP精密轨道数据和星载加速度计数据,反演了36阶地球重力场模型CDS01S。用不同模型之间的位系数差比较模型CDS01S、EIGEN3P、EIGEN1S及EGM96,表明CDS01S模型的位系数最接近于EIGEN3P;比较上述几种模型的位系数精度,表明CDS01S模型的位系数精度高于EGM96;用CDS01S和GGM01C的前30阶位系数分别计算全球2°×2°网格的大地水准面起伏,两者之间的标准偏差为4.7 cm。 相似文献
17.
The earth gravity field model CDS01S of degree and order 36 has been recovered from the post processed Science Orbits and on-board accelerometer data of GFZ's CHAMP satellite. The model resolves the geoid with an accuracy of better than 4 cm at a resolution of 700 km half-wavelength. By using the degree difference variances of geopotential coefficients to compare the model CDS01S with EIGEN3P, EIGEN1S and EGM96, the result indicates that the coefficients of CDS01S are most close to those of EIGEN3P. The result of the comparison between the accuracies of geopotential coefficients in the above models, indicates that the accuracy of coefficients in CDS01S is higher than that in EGM96. The geoid undulations of CDS01S and GGM01C up to 30 degrees are calculated and the standard deviation is 4. 7 cm between them. 相似文献
18.
One of the aims of the Earth Explorer Gravity Field and Steady-State Ocean Circulation (GOCE) mission is to provide global
and regional models of the Earth's gravity field and of the geoid with high spatial resolution and accuracy. Using the GOCE
error model, simulation studies were performed in order to estimate the accuracy of datum transfer in different areas of the
Earth. The results showed that with the GOCE error model, the standard deviation of the height anomaly differences is about
one order of magnitude better than the corresponding value with the EGM96 error model. As an example, the accuracy of the
vertical datum transfer from the tide gauge of Amsterdam to New York was estimated equal to 57 cm when the EGM96 error model
was used, while in the case of GOCE error model this accuracy was increased to 6 cm. The geoid undulation difference between
the two places is about 76.5 m. Scaling the GOCE errors to the local gravity variance, the estimated accuracy varied between
3 and 7 cm, depending on the scaling model.
Received: 1 March 2000 / Accepted: 21 February 2001 相似文献