共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 187 毫秒
1.
2.
前言 1976年8月16日松潘7.2级地震前6天,姑咱水氡出现了引人注目的单点突跳异常,四川省地震局据此对松潘7.2级地震作出了较好的临震预报;因此,姑咱台水氡的观测成果,引起了国内外地震界的关注。不少人以姑咱水氡单点突跳异常为依据发表了文章。笔者经过对原始观测数据的分析处理,认为姑咱水氡单点突跳变化不是地震前的临震前兆异常,而是观测中的一种随机误差。 相似文献
3.
4.
5.
2008年8月30日,攀枝花市与西昌市会理县交界处发生了6.1级地震,在这次地震前,攀枝花川-05井的数字气氡出现了明显的异常变化。综合分析认为,气氡观测存在短期、临震异常的同时,还存在中期趋势异常。本文主要对8月30日地震前,气氡观测资料的异常、机理及有关问题进行了分析和讨论。 相似文献
6.
7.
在对沂水泉成因探讨、沂水水氡正常变化特征和主要影响因素分析的基础上,结合沂水水氡变化的现场分析落实和周围采样点分析结果及构造地质和流动地磁观测结果,对山东沂水水氡自2001年3月28日以来的异常变化从形成机制上进行了分析,认为沂水水氡的下降变化与应力活动增强、构造活动加剧有关。 相似文献
8.
应用气体扩散和氡蜕变理论讨论水氡异常的形成 总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2
应用气体扩散理论,给出水氡异常变民体积应变的近式关系式,式中证明由于气体的扩散效应,水氡异常变化对体积应变量相 放大作用。这有是形成异常的主要原因,同时结合丰水氡异常对其进行了探讨。 相似文献
9.
10.
11.
甘孜地震台水氡观测资料的干扰识别和短临异常分析 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
系统整理了甘孜地震台自有水氡观测以来的数据,分析了观测数据中的各种干扰因素,并研究了在该台200 km范围内的5级以上地震、300 km内的6级以上地震前水氡的短临异常特征.结果表明.1974年以来甘孜水氡多次出现中短期异常变化,异常具有破年变、相关关系改变等特点,水氡异常的产生与水温、流量因素有关,更与岩石应力-应变、地壳构造活动等有关.短临异常出现的时间大多集中在1个月内,异常形态以突升、突降为主,异常变化的幅度在10%以上,异常幅度的大小与地震震级的大小并无明显的相关性. 相似文献
12.
13.
据沂水观测井的构造背景、环境条件和泉的成因结果, 经过前兆异常现场落实和采样分析, 并结合活动断裂、地震活动以及流磁观测结果对山东沂水水氡自2001年以来的异常变化从形成机制上进行了分析研究。结果表明, 沂水观测井位于沂水-汤头断裂与沂水-沂源断裂交汇部位, 系断层上升泉, 具有应力易集中的地质构造环境; 沂水水氡的下降异常变化与沂沭断裂带中南段的应力活动增强和沂水-汤头断裂与沂水-沂源断裂构造活动加剧有关。 相似文献
14.
15.
16.
17.
Alla Skaskevych Jejung Lee Hahn Chul Jung John Bolten John L. David Frederick S. Policelli Ibrahim B. Goni Guillaume Favreau Soma San Charles M. Ichoku 《水文研究》2020,34(4):941-955
The present study is to explore the feasibility of GRACE-based estimation of a groundwater storage change in a data-poor region using a case study of the Ngadda catchment in the Lake Chad Basin. Although the Ngadda catchment has only one set of in situ time series data of groundwater from 2006 to 2009 and a limited number of groundwater measurements in 2005 and 2009, GRACE-based groundwater storage change can be evaluated against the in situ groundwater measurements combined with specific yield data. The cross-correlation analysis in the Ngadda catchment shows that maximum rainfall reached in July and August, whereas both the maximum total water storage anomaly and the maximum groundwater storage anomaly occurred 2months later. Whereas the mean annual amplitude of total water storage anomaly is about 17cm from both the average total water storage anomaly from three mascon products and the one from three spherical harmonic products, the mean annual amplitude of soil moisture storage anomaly is substantially varied from 5.58cm for CLM to about 14cm for NOAH and Mosaic. The goodness-of-fit tests show that CLM soil moisture produces the closest estimation of groundwater storage anomaly to the in situ groundwater measurements. The present study shows that GRACE-based estimation for groundwater storage anomaly can be a cost-effective and alternative tool to observe how groundwater changes in a basin scale under the limitation of modelling and in situ data availability. 相似文献
18.
嘉峪关气氡映震情况讨论及玉门地震前水氡(嘉峪关,酒泉)异常特征 总被引:7,自引:2,他引:5
分析了1990年以来在祁连山断裂带上发生的7次地震前,嘉峪关气氡观测点和酒泉水氡的变化情况,发现在1990年10月20日天祝6.2级地震、1992年1月12日嘉峪关5.4级地震、1995年7月22日永登5.8级地震和2002年12月14日玉门5.9级地震前,嘉峪关气氡观测点均记录到短期的破年变异常,而酒泉水氡在玉门地震前为明显的突变型中期异常。 相似文献
19.
20.
Radon Changes Associated with the Earthquake Sequence in June 2000 in the South Iceland Seismic Zone 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
Páll Einarsson Páll Theodórsson Ásta Rut Hjartardóttir Guðón I Guðjónsson 《Pure and Applied Geophysics》2008,165(1):63-74
An earthquake sequence at the transform plate boundary in South Iceland, that included two magnitude 6.5 earthquakes in June
2000, was anticipated on the basis of a centuries-long seismicity pattern in the area. A program of radon monitoring in geothermal
water from drill holes, initiated in 1999, rendered distinct and consistent variations in radon in association with these
events. All seven sampling stations in a 50 × 30 km zone covering the epicentral area showed a consistent pattern. Four types
of change could be identified: 1) Preseismic decrease of radon. Anomalously low values were measured 101–167 days before the
earthquakes. 2) Preseismic increase. Spikes appear in the time series at six stations 40–144 days prior to the earthquakes.
These anomalies were large and unusual if compared to a 17-years history of radon monitoring in this area. 3) Coseismic step,
most likely related to the coseismic change in groundwater pressure observed over the entire area. 4) Postseismic return of
the radon values to the preseismic level about three months later, also concurrent with groundwater pressure changes. 相似文献