共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
Deepankar Choudhury Sanjay S. Nimbalkar 《Geotechnical and Geological Engineering》2006,24(5):1103-1113
Knowledge of seismic active earth pressure behind rigid retaining wall is very important in the design of retaining wall in
earthquake prone region. Commonly used Mononobe-Okabe method considers pseudo-static approach, which gives the linear distribution
of seismic earth pressure in an approximate way. In this paper, the pseudo-dynamic method is used to compute the distribution
of seismic active earth pressure on a rigid retaining wall supporting cohesionless backfill in more realistic manner by considering
time and phase difference within the backfill. Planar rupture surface is considered in the analysis. Effects of a wide range
of parameters like wall friction angle, soil friction angle, shear wave velocity, primary wave velocity and horizontal and
vertical seismic accelerations on seismic active earth pressure have been studied. Results are provided in tabular and graphical
non-dimensional form with a comparison to pseudo-static method to highlight the realistic non-linearity of seismic active
earth pressures distribution. 相似文献
2.
Seismic active earth pressure on walls with bilinear backface using pseudo-dynamic approach 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
This paper presents a study on the seismic active earth pressure behind a rigid cantilever retaining wall with bilinear backface using pseudo-dynamic approach. The wall has sudden change in inclination along its depth and a planar failure surface has been considered behind the retaining wall. The effects of a wide range of parameters like soil friction angle, wall inclination, wall friction angle, amplification of vibration, variation of shear modulus, and horizontal and vertical seismic accelerations on the active earth pressure have been explored in the present study. Unlike the Mononobe-Okabe method, which incorporates pseudo-static analysis, the present analysis predicts a nonlinear variation of active earth pressure along the wall. The results have been compared with the existing values in the literature. 相似文献
3.
By using pseudo-dynamic approach, a method has been proposed in this paper to compute the seismic passive earth pressure behind
a rigid cantilever retaining wall with bilinear backface. The wall has sudden change in inclination along its depth and a
planar failure surface has been considered behind the retaining wall. The effects of a wide range of parameters like soil
friction angle, wall inclination, wall friction angle, amplification of vibration, variation of shear modulus and horizontal
and vertical seismic accelerations on the passive earth pressure have been explored in the present study. For the sake of
illustration, the computations have been exclusively carried out for constant wall friction through out the depth. Unlike
the Mononobe-Okabe method, which incorporates pseudo-static analysis, the present analysis predicts a nonlinear variation
of passive earth pressure along the wall. 相似文献
4.
Seismic Passive Earth Thrust on Retaining Walls with Cohesive Backfills Using Pseudo-Dynamic Approach 总被引：2，自引：1，他引：1
A. H. Shafiee A. Eskandarinejad M. Jahanandish 《Geotechnical and Geological Engineering》2010,28(4):525-531
In this paper, the pseudo-dynamic approach is used to estimate seismic passive earth thrust on retaining walls with cohesive-frictional
backfills. The time-dependent pseudo-dynamic approach considers the influence of dynamic parameters such as the velocity of
primary and shear waves, the period of lateral shaking, and the phase and amplitude variations of horizontal and vertical
earthquake accelerations with depth. The failure plane behind the wall is assumed to be planar. The analysis is based on the
equilibrium of forces which act within the failure wedge. The obtained results show that the backfill cohesion increases both
the seismic passive earth thrust and the failure plane inclination angle with the horizontal plane. It is also observed that
both horizontal and vertical seismic accelerations have decreasing effect on seismic passive earth thrust as well as failure
plane inclination angle. The results of present pseudo-dynamic analysis propose a lower solution for seismic passive earth
thrust compared to earlier pseudo-static solution available in the literature. 相似文献
5.
Seismic Passive Earth Pressure Behind Non-vertical Retaining Wall Using Pseudo-dynamic Analysis 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
Priyanka Ghosh 《Geotechnical and Geological Engineering》2007,25(6):693-703
This paper shows a detailed study on the seismic passive earth pressure behind a non-vertical cantilever retaining wall using
pseudo-dynamic analysis. A planar failure surface has been considered behind the retaining wall. The effects of soil friction
angle, wall inclination, wall friction angle, horizontal and vertical earthquake acceleration on the passive earth pressure
have been explored. Unlike the Mononobe–Okabe method, which incorporates pseudo-static analysis, the present analysis predicts
a nonlinear variation of passive earth pressure along the wall. The results have been thoroughly compared with the existing
values in the literature. 相似文献
6.
Knowledge of seismic active earth pressure behind rigid retaining wall is very important. In this paper, the pseudo-dynamic
approach, which considers the effect of both compression and shear wave propagation, is adopted to calculate the seismic active
force supporting c-Φ backfill. Considering a planar rupture surface, the effect of wide range of parameters like inclination of retaining wall,
wall friction and soil friction angle, shear wave and compression wave velocity, horizontal and vertical seismic coefficients
are taken into account to evaluate the seismic active force. Results are presented in terms of seismic coefficients in tabular
form and variation of pressure with depth. 相似文献
7.
采用旋转挡土墙计算模型的变换法,将在地震和拟静力法条件下主动土压力的求解问题转化为在静力条件下主动土压力的求解问题。根据在静力条件下水平层分析法的主动土压力推导结果,直接获得在地震条件下主动土压力强度分布、土压力合力及其作用点位置的表达式,并运用图解法得到了临界破裂角的解析解。公式可考虑水平和垂直地震加速度、不同墙背倾角、墙背和坡面倾角与填料存在黏结力和外摩擦角、存在均布超载等诸多因素的影响,公式可以适用于在常用边界和地震条件下黏性土的主动土压力计算。旋转地震角法是将在地震和拟静力法条件下挡土墙计算模型旋转为在静力条件下挡土墙计算模型,但旋转挡土墙计算模型并不改变挡土墙和墙后填土的应力状态,按在静力条件下挡土墙主动土压力求解方法求解在地震和拟静力法条件下主动土压力,该方法大大简化了在地震和拟静力法条件下的主动土压力计算公式推导过程,统一了在拟静力法条件下的地震土压力求解,理论更加完善。 相似文献
8.
To estimate static and seismic active earth pressure (Pad) on a rigid retaining wall, numerical analyses using different step sizes have been carried out in this paper, based on the
modified Culmann line method by considering Coulomb’s planar rupture surface. Equivalent pseudo-static seismic forces are
considered in the analysis. A new concept of modified unit weight by considering ground surcharge is introduced under static
and seismic conditions. By numerical analysis, area of soil (A) has been estimated to obtain the ratio of A/A0 where A0 is θh2, θ is the angle between retaining structure and ground surface and h is the vertical height of the wall. This ratio remains constant for a particular type of soil and has been used to estimate
the maximum active earth pressure using force diagram. Results are provided in tabular form for easy calculation of the coefficient
of static and seismic active earth pressure. Present results by considering the new technique, compares well with the results
obtained by earlier researchers. 相似文献
9.
This note shows a study on the seismic passive earth pressure behind a non-vertical cantilever retaining wall using pseudo-dynamic
approach. A composite failure surface comprising of an arc of the logarithmic spiral near the wall and a straight line in
the planar shear zone near the ground, has been considered behind the retaining wall. The effects of soil friction angle,
wall inclination, wall friction angle, amplification of vibration, horizontal and vertical earthquake acceleration on the
passive earth pressure have been explored in this study. The results available in the literature for passive pressure, on
the basis of pseudo-static analysis are found to predict the passive resistance on the conservative side and the assumption
of a planar failure surface is found to overestimate the passive resistance for higher wall friction. An attempt has been
made in the present study to overcome both the limitations simultaneously. The present results are compared with the existing
values in the literature and found a reasonable match among the values. 相似文献
10.
为考虑挡墙位移效应对地震土压力的影响,依据前人试验研究的结论,将摩擦角表示为与挡墙位移量和位置高度相关的函数,然后基于拟动力法和水平层分析法,推导得出RT位移模式下的地震非极限主动土压力和合力作用点的计算表达式。计算模型可描述摩擦角沿着墙高逐渐发展的不同非极限位移状态工况,并建立了挡墙位移、地震动荷载和土压力之间的相互联系。参数分析讨论了振动时间、挡土墙位移状态、地震加速度参数和土体摩擦角对地震主动土压力分布、合力大小以及合力作用点高度的影响。相比于传统的极限状态地震土压力理论,所提方法更合理地描述了地震土压力随挡墙位移的发展过程,对发展非极限土压力理论和改进边坡工程中的抗震计算方法具有一定的参考意义。 相似文献
11.
多级组合支挡结构形式在高边坡防护工程中得到了广泛采用,但现有研究却较少涉及这种支挡结构形式的地震土压力计算问题。应用拟静力法和塑性极限分析上限定理,并且基于强度折减技术,推导了重力式挡墙与两级锚杆挡墙组合支挡结构形式的地震主动土压力及其系数的上限解。该上限解考虑了水平和竖向地震系数、墙背倾角、坡面形式及多级支护方式、土体黏聚力、土体与墙背的黏附力等诸多因素。二级锚杆挡墙实例分析表明：静力条件下主动土压力计算值与现有相关方法的计算结果一致,土的抗剪强度折减系数、上挡墙锚杆轴力等参数,对下挡墙地震主动土压力影响显著。二级组合支挡结构地震主动土压力影响参数敏感性分析表明：水平地震系数以及重力式挡墙墙高和倾角的敏感性较大,上挡墙锚杆的轴力和倾角等参数的敏感性相对较小 相似文献
12.
墙背土压力分布和挡土墙变位模式、位移大小密切相关。考虑位移影响的土压力分析方法是在已知挡土墙位移大小的情况下,方可计算墙背土压力分布。对于绕墙趾向外转动的刚性挡土墙,从满足倾覆稳定性和基底压应力偏心距要求的角度,提出了确定主动平衡状态时墙顶位移大小和墙背土压力分布的方法,并分析挡土墙宽度和墙背摩擦系数对墙背土压力分布的影响。分析结果表明：主动平衡状态时,墙背土压力均大于库仑主动土压力,墙背土压力产生绕墙趾的倾覆弯矩同样大于由库仑主动土压力计算的倾覆弯矩;挡土墙宽度越大,墙背土压力越接近静止土压力;随着宽度的减小,墙背土压力由静止土压力分布向库仑主动土压力逐渐过渡;摩擦系数主要影响倾覆弯矩,对于墙背光滑的挡土墙,满足倾覆稳定性要求的墙宽显著提高 相似文献
13.
改进的主动土压力计算方法 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
墙背土压力分布与挡土墙的位移大小和转动模式密切相关。针对绕墙底向外转动的刚性挡土墙,基于土压力形成机制的分析及已有的研究成果,建立挡土墙位移与墙背土体内摩擦角发挥值之间的关系式,反映了墙背土体内摩擦角随着挡土墙位移的增加而渐进发挥的过程。在此基础上,提出一种改进的考虑位移影响的主动土压力计算方法。计算结果表明,随着挡土墙位移的增大,墙背土压力由静止土压力逐步减小。当挡土墙位移达到临界值后,相应的墙背土压力均收敛于库仑主动土压力。墙底背面土压力也是随着挡土墙位移的增长而逐步收敛于库仑主动土压力。与模型试验结果对比表明,理论计算值与试验实测值基本吻合。 相似文献
14.
地震易发地区的锚固岩石边坡,需要研究其地震稳定性。对于锚固典型岩石边坡,在考虑水平与竖向地震力、张裂缝积水深度、坡顶超载、锚索倾角、锚索位置、锚索拉力及静水与动水压力等的条件下,运用拟静力和拟动力方法分别推导了不同工况条件下其抗滑和抗倾覆地震安全系数。分析表明,竖向向上地震力有利于锚固岩石边坡的抗滑稳定,而竖向下的地震力有利于锚固岩石边坡的抗倾覆稳定;在相同工况条件下,当岩体放大系数等于1.0时,拟动力与拟静力方法所得锚固岩石边坡地震安全系数相差无几,但是,当岩体放大系数逐渐增大时,拟动力方法所得地震安全系数越来越明显地小于拟静力方法所得地震安全系数。因此,在抗震设计当中适当的考虑岩体放大系数,将会有利于锚固岩石边坡的安全设计。 相似文献
15.
A New Pseudo-dynamic Approach for Seismic Active Soil Thrust 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
Ivo Bellezza 《Geotechnical and Geological Engineering》2014,32(2):561-576
A critical review of the existing pseudo-dynamic approach is provided and a new pseudo-dynamic approach is proposed based on a visco-elastic behavior of backfill overlying rigid bedrock subjected to harmonic horizontal acceleration. Considering a planar failure surface, closed form expressions for seismic active soil thrust, soil pressure distribution and overturning moment are obtained. The results of this study indicate that the existing pseudo-dynamic method can strongly underestimate the soil active thrust especially close to the fundamental frequency of the backfill, where the soil response is more sensitive to the damping ratio. The acting point of the total seismic active thrust is always found to be higher than that predicted by the traditional pseudo-dynamic approach. The effect of the shear resistance angle and wall friction angle on the acting point increases as the amplitude of the base acceleration increases, whereas their effect is generally small far from the natural frequencies of the backfill. 相似文献
16.
地震作用下挡土墙主动土压力及转动位移分析 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
分析地震引起的挡土墙位移及墙后土压力,对于评估挡土墙可靠性具有重要意义。基于拟动力法,考虑时效、地震波传播的相位差、超载、墙背摩擦角、填土黏聚力以及填土开裂等影响,建立地震作用下挡土墙主动土压力计算模型,获得挡土墙绕墙趾转动模式下主动土压力大小、分布形式及作用点高度。同时,考虑挡土墙本身受地震荷载作用的影响,求出挡土墙绕墙趾的转动位移。通过与Mononobe-Okabe法对比可知,文中获得的主动土压力值与Mononobe-Okabe法接近,但Mononobe-Okabe法低估了主动土压力作用点高度,表明采用Mononobe-Okabe法设计存在风险。通过算例分析了地震系数、墙背摩擦系数、超载大小、时间、填土黏聚力和内摩擦角对挡土墙转动位移的影响。 相似文献
17.
18.
To understand the serviceability aspects of seawalls, it is essential to study the permanent displacements of seawalls that occur during the earthquakes. Studies in the existing literature have concentrated on displacements of retaining walls with dry backfills; to the authors’ observation there is no specific analytical investigation devoted to the earthquake-induced displacements of retaining walls with submerged backfills. This paper focuses on sliding displacements of gravity type seawall retaining a submerged backfill under active earth pressure condition during the earthquakes. The threshold seismic acceleration coefficients required for initiation of sliding and the amount of sliding displacement due to seismic loading are calculated by adopting Newmark’s sliding block method. One of the prime features of the study is the estimation of seismic inertia forces in the submerged soil and wall applying the modified pseudo-dynamic method. The comparison of the results obtained using the proposed analytical formulation with the existing literature found to be in good agreement. A comprehensive parametric study has been conducted to understand the effects of different parameters such as seismic horizontal and vertical acceleration coefficients, soil and wall friction angles, width of the wall, wall inclination and excess pore water pressure ratio.
相似文献19.
Sunil M. Rangari Deepankar Choudhury D. M. Dewaikar 《Geotechnical and Geological Engineering》2013,31(2):569-580
In this paper, the limit equilibrium method is used to compute seismic passive earth pressure coefficients and the vertical uplift capacity of horizontal strip anchors in presence of both horizontal and vertical pseudo-static earthquake forces. By considering a simple planar failure surface, distribution of soil reaction is obtained through the use of Kötter’s equation. Presence of pseudo-static seismic forces induces a considerable reduction in the seismic passive earth pressure coefficients. The reduction in seismic passive earth pressure coefficients increases with increase in magnitude of the earthquake accelerations in both horizontal and vertical directions and with increase in wall friction angle. The vertical uplift capacity of horizontal strip anchor is obtained for various values of soil friction angle, embedment ratio and seismic acceleration coefficients in both horizontal and vertical directions by using rigorous computational optimization. Proper justification for selected value of wall friction angle is established. Results are presented in the form of non-dimensional breakout factor for anchor. A significant reduction in breakout factor is observed in presence of both the seismic acceleration coefficients whereas breakout factor increases with increase in soil friction angle and embedment ratio even under the seismic condition. Angles of failure planes keep changing with change in seismic acceleration coefficients and failure zone shifts towards the critical direction of seismic acceleration coefficients. Present results are compared and found in good agreement with some specific available results in literature. 相似文献
20.
《Geomechanics and Geoengineering》2013,8(3):218-229
ABSTRACTThe present study deals with the determination of passive earth pressure under seismic condition by following the lower bound finite elements limit analysis and modified pseudo-dynamic methodology. In accordance with the lower bound finite elements formulation, the stress field was modelled using a three-noded triangular elements, while the passive pressure was determined via linear optimisation. The parametric study was performed, for a vertical rigid retaining wall, by varying the magnitude of seismic acceleration in horizontal direction (kh) between 0 and 0.3, while the vertical seismic acceleration (kv) was kept equal to 0 or 0.5 kh. Furthermore, the damping coefficient for dry cohesionless backfill was kept ξ = 10%. The obtained results in various cases were found to be in good agreement with those found in the literature. It is expected that this method can be further used for solving other important geotechnical stability problems. 相似文献