共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
We reply to Gwilym Eades’s (2010) criticisms by emphasizing the dangers of predestined readings and restating three key points that we made in our previous article (Kingsbury and Jones, 2009): first, that Apollo and Dionysus are mutually affirming rather than oppositional; second, that Walter Benjamin provides valuable theoretical resources to consider the uncertainties and possibilities of technology; and third, that one cannot simply read politics off technology. 相似文献
13.
14.
Dualite has been found at Mount Alluaiv, the Lovozero Pluton, the Kola Peninsula in peralkaline pegmatoid as sporadic, irregularly
shaped grains up to 0.3–0.5 mm across. K-Na feldspar, nepheline, sodalite, cancrinite, aegirine, alkaline amphibole, eudialyte,
lovozerite, lomonosovite, vuonnemite, lamprophyllite, sphalerite, and villiaumite are associated minerals. Dualite is yellow,
transparent or translucent, with conchoidal fracture. The new mineral is brittle, with vitreous luster and white streaks.
The Mohs hardness is 5. The measured density is 2.84(3) g/cm3 (volumetric method); the calculated density is 2.814 g/cm3. Dualite dissolves and gelates in acid at room temperature. It is nonfluorescent. The new mineral is optically uniaxial and
positive; ω = 1.610(1), ɛ = 1.613(1). Dualite is trigonal, space group R3m. The unit cell dimensions are a = 14.153(9), c = 60.72(5) ?, V = 10533(22) ?, Z = 3. The strongest reflections in the X-ray powder pattern [d, ? (I,%)(hkl)] are as follows: 7.11(40)(110), 4.31(50)(0.2.10), 2.964(100)(1.3.10), 2.839(90)(048), 2.159(60)(2.4.10, 0.4.20), 1.770(60)(2.4.22,
4.0.28, 440), 1362(50)(5.5.12, 3.0.42). The chemical composition (electron microprobe, H2O calculated from X-ray diffraction data) is as follows, wt %: 17.74 Na2O, 0.08 K2O, 8.03 CaO, 1.37 SrO, 0.29 BaO, 2.58 MnO, 1.04 FeO, 0.79 La2O3, 1.84 C2O3, 0.88 Nd2O3, 0.20 Al2O3, 51.26 SiO2, 4.40 TiO2, 5.39 ZrO2, 1.94 Nb2O5, 0.58 Cl, 1.39 H2O,-O = 0.13 Cl2; they total is 99.67. The empirical formula calculated on the basis of 106 cations as determined by crystal structure is
(Na29.79Ba0.1K0.10)Σ30(Ca8.55Na1.39REE1.27Sr0.79)Σ12 · (Na3.01Mn1.35Fe0.872+Ti0.77)Σ6(Zr2.61Nb0.39)Σ3 (Ti2.52Nb0.48)Σ3(Mn0.82Si0.18)Σ1(Si50.77Al0.23)Σ51 O144[(OH)6.54(H2O)1.34·Cl0.98]Σ8.86). The simplified formula is Na30(Ca,Na,Ce,Sr)12(Na,Mn,Fe,Ti)6Zr3Ti3 MnSi51O144 (OH,H2O,Cl)9). The name dualite is derived from Latin dualis (dual) alluding to the dual taxonomic membership of this mineral, which is at the same time zirconosilicate and titanosilicate.
The crystal structure is characterized by two module types (alluivite-like and eudialyte-like) alternating along a threefold
axis with a doubled c period relative to eudialyte and close chemical affinity to rastsvetaevite (Khomyakov et al., 2006a) and labyrynthite (Khomyakov
et al., 2006b). According to the authors’ crystal chemical taxonomy of the eudialyte group, the new mineral belongs to one
of three subgroups characterized by a 24-layered structural framework. Dualite is a mineral formed during the final stages
of peralkaline pegmatite formation. The type material of dualite is deposited at the Fersman Mineralogical Museum, Russian
Academy of Sciences, Moscow.
Original Russian Text ? A.P. Khomyakov, G.N. Nechelyustov, R.K. Rastsvetaeva, 2007, published in Zapiski Rossiiskogo Mineralogicheskogo
Obshchestva, 2007, Pt CXXXVI, No. 4, pp. 68–73.
Approved by the Commission on New Minerals and Mineral Names, International Mineralogical Association, July 8, 2005. 相似文献
15.
I. V. Pekov N. V. Chukanov I. M. Kulikova D. I. Belakovsky 《Geology of Ore Deposits》2007,49(7):530-536
Phosphoinnelite, an analogue of innelite with P > S, has been found in a peralkaline pegmatite vein crosscutting calcite carbonatite
at the phlogopite deposit, Kovdor pluton, Kola Peninsula. Cancrinite (partly replaced with thomsonite-Ca), orthoclase, aegirine-augite,
pectolite, magnesioarfvedsonite, golyshevite, and fluorapatite are associated minerals. Phosphoinnelite occurs as lath-shaped
crystals up to 0.2 × 1 × 6 mm in size, which are combined typically in bunch-, sheaf-, and rosettelike segregations. The color
is yellow-brown, with vitreous luster on crystal faces and greasy luster on broken surfaces. The mineral is transparent. The
streak is pale yellowish. Phosphoinnelite is brittle, with perfect cleavage parallel to the {010} and good cleavage parallel
to the {100}; the fracture is stepped. The Mohs hardness is 4.5 to 5. Density is 3.82 g/cm3 (meas.) and 3.92 g/cm3 (calc.). Phosphoinnelite is biaxial (+), α = 1.730, β = 1.745, and γ = 1.764, 2V (meas.) is close to 90°. Optical orientation
is Z^c ∼ 5°. Chemical composition determined by electron microprobe is as follows (wt %): 6.06 Na2O, 0.04 K2O, 0.15 CaO, 0.99 SrO, 41.60 BaO, 0.64 MgO, 1.07 MnO, 1.55 Fe2O3, 0.27 Al2O3, 17.83 SiO2, 16.88 TiO2, 0.74 Nb2O5, 5.93 P2O5, 5.29 SO3, 0.14 F, −O=F2 = −0.06, total is 99.12. The empirical formula calculated on the basis of (Si,Al)4O14 is (Ba3.59Sr0.13K0.01)Σ3.73(Na2.59Mg0.21Ca0.04)Σ3.04(Ti2.80Fe
0.26
3+
Nb0.07)Σ3.13[(Si3.93Al0.07)Σ4O14(P1.11S0.87)Σ1.98O7.96](O2.975F0.10)Σ3.075. The simplified formula is Ba4Na3Ti3Si4O14(PO4,SO4)2(O,F)3. The mineral is triclinic, space group P
or P1. The unit cell dimensions are a = 5.38, b = 7.10, c = 14.76 ?; α = 99.00°, β = 94.94°, γ = 90.14°; and V = 555 ?3, Z = 1. The strongest lines of the X-ray powder pattern [d, ? in (I)(hkl)] are: 14.5(100)(001), 3.455(40)(103), 3.382(35)(0
2), 2.921(35)(005), 2.810(40)(1
4), 2.683(90)(200,
01), 2.133(80)(
2), 2.059(40)(204, 1
3, 221), 1.772(30)(0
1, 1
7, 2
2, 2
3). The infrared spectrum is demonstrated. An admixture of P substituting S has been detected in the innelite samples from
the Inagli pluton (South Yakutia, Russia). An innelite-phosphoinnelite series with a variable S/P ratio has been discovered.
The type material of phosphoinnelite has been deposited at the Fersman Mineralogical Museum, Russian Academy of Sciences,
Moscow.
Original Russian Text ? I.V. Pekov, N.V. Chukanov, I.M. Kulikova, D.I. Belakovsky, 2006, published in Zapiski Rossiiskogo
Mineralogicheskogo Obshchestva, 2006, No. 3, pp. 52–60.
Considered and recommended by the Commission on New Minerals and Mineral Names, Russian Mineralogical Society, May 9, 2005.
Approved by the Commission on New Minerals and Mineral Names, International Mineralogical Association, July 4, 2005 (proposal
2005-022). 相似文献
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.