首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到18条相似文献,搜索用时 119 毫秒
1.
常规多波联合反演采用Zoeppritz方程的近似式构建正演方程,反演过程中需要假定背景纵横波速度比为常数,其反演精度不高,稳定性不好。本文提出了一种基于精确Zoeppritz方程的多波联合反演方法,结合贝叶斯方法进行广义线性反演。本方法基于精确Zoeppritz方程构建正演方程,避免了近似式反演在大角度时引起的误差;利用贝叶斯方法引入模型参数的先验分布信息,作为反演的正则化项,降低了反演的不适定性;反演目标函数中引入低频软约束,稳定了反演低频结果,提高了反演的鲁棒性;在求解反演目标函数时,利用快速算法,降低了反演的运算量。经过模型试算,证明了该方法的优越性和抗噪性;并在实际资料的应用中证明了该方法的实用性和有效性。  相似文献   

2.
常规AVO三参数反演通常存在密度反演不准确的问题,而密度参数对常规油气藏中的流体识别、流体饱和度计算、孔隙度计算以及非常规油气藏中TOC含量计算、裂缝预测等都至关重要,因此对于研究如何利用大偏移距振幅信息和富含密度信息的PS波地震资料来提高密度反演结果的稳定性和精度显得尤为重要.研究基于贝叶斯反演理论框架,引入三变量Cauchy分布先验约束,利用精确Zoeppritz方程构建了AVO三参数联合反演的目标函数,对目标函数进行Taylor二阶非线性简化,得到模型参数的迭代更新公式,实现了大偏移距地震振幅信息的利用和PP波、PS波联合反演.合成数据和实际地震数据的方法测试结果表明,新方法不仅可以直接反演纵波速度、横波速度和密度,而且还具有很高的精度,尤其是密度反演结果.基于合成数据的PP波、PS波单独反演结果与PP波和PS波联合反演结果对比显示,联合反演稳定性更好,精度更高,抗噪能力更强,验证了该方法的可行性和有效性.与基于Aki-Richards近似公式的反演结果对比表明,该反演方法具有更高的反演精度和更好的抗噪性.  相似文献   

3.
多波地震资料采集和处理技术的发展促进了联合PP波和PS波数据的多波联合AVO反演的应用,常规多波联合反演是线性的,通常基于Zoeppritz方程近似式进行多次迭代,导致其在远炮检距情况下求解得到的纵、横波速度和密度等参数精度不高。多波联合反演存在非线性问题。为此,本文提出了一种基于精确Zoeppritz方程的非线性反演方法。该方法结合改进的贝叶斯推断和最小二乘支持向量机方法来求解非线性反演问题。首先,采用粒子群算法来优化贝叶斯推断的参数初始值。改进的贝叶斯推断是通过最大化超参数的后验概率来获得最小二乘支持向量机的最优参数,提高了最小二乘支持向量机的学习和泛化能力。然后,利用此最优参数建立PP波、PS波反射振幅与弹性参数之间的最优非线性最小二乘支持向量机模型,从而提高了多波联合反演的精度。该方法只需训练一次模型,就可以解决多波联合反演的非线性问题。模型测试表明,利用该方法反演出的弹性参数精度要高于仅用PP波进行贝叶斯线性近似式反演得到的结果。此外加噪模型数据的反演结果表明,该方法具有较好的抗噪性。实际多波资料的应用进一步验证了方法的可行性及其相对于PP波贝叶斯线性近似式反演的优势。  相似文献   

4.
基于贝叶斯理论的叠前多波联合反演弹性模量方法   总被引:8,自引:6,他引:2       下载免费PDF全文
AVO反演可以获得地层岩性和流体信息,而叠前反演问题都是高维的和非适定的,因此获得可靠稳定的解对叠前反演至关重要. 本文给出了一种基于贝叶斯理论的纵波和转换波联合反演密度比和模量比的方法. 鉴于剪切模量比、体积模量比可以更好地指示油气,基于岩石物理中速度比与模量比之间的关系,将此关系式代入Zoeppritz方程的近似形式Aki-Richards公式中,得到与模量比有关的反射系数近似公式. 联合纵波和转换波,利用最小二乘准则构建目标函数,最终反演出密度比、剪切模量比、体积模量比三个参数. 在反演过程中引入贝叶斯理论,假定先验信息服从高斯分布,待求参数服从改进的Cauchy分布,并去除待求参数之间的相关性. 利用模型数据和实际数据对本文方法进行测试,并与常规的单独利用纵波数据来反演方法进行比较,结果表明联合反演稳定性更好、精度更高、抗噪音能力更强,验证了本文方法的可行性和有效性.  相似文献   

5.
基于地震波反射系数近似公式的叠前反演是油气勘探的重要工具.本文在已有研究的基础上,推导了一个改进的射线参数域地震纵波反射系数近似方程.该方程建立了地震纵波反射系数与纵波阻抗和横波阻抗的非线性关系,在中、小角度的范围内较现有的反射系数线性近似公式精度更高.另外,由于该方程仅包含纵波和横波阻抗反射系数项,因此基于新方程的反演能够有效地降低同步反演纵波速度、横波速度、密度三个参数的不适定性.在此基础上,结合广义线性反演法(GLI)理论和贝叶斯理论,相应地发展了一种叠前地震同步反演方法.模型测试和实际资料的应用表明,基于新方程的反演方法能够利用有限角度(偏移距)的数据稳定地反演纵波和横波阻抗,由于在反演过程中,不需要假设纵横波速度为常数,因此该方法还能有效地提高反演结果的精度.  相似文献   

6.
时间域全波场各向异性性参数反演   总被引:2,自引:1,他引:2       下载免费PDF全文
从各向异性弹性波的有限元正演方程出发,导出了反问题中时间域雅可比矩阵求解的计算公式。它具有与时间域有限元正演方程相同的表达形式,故可通过有限元正演计算来获得雅可比矩阵。研究了有限元正演算法的效率和精度、吸收边界条件等的问题,以提高反演系统的效率和精度。在此基础上,实现了叠前全波场各向异性弹性参数反演。计算表明,在初始模型偏离真实模型较大的情况下,层状模型和横向不均匀模型的反演结果均能准确地收敛到真实模型上。  相似文献   

7.
时间域全波场各向异性弹性参数反演   总被引:10,自引:7,他引:10       下载免费PDF全文
从各向异性弹性波的有限元正演方程出发 ,导出了反问题中时间域雅可比矩阵求解的计算公式 .它具有与时间域有限元正演方程相同的表达形式 ,故可通过有限元正演计算来获得雅可比矩阵 .研究了有限元正演算法的效率和精度、吸收边界条件等方面的问题 ,以提高反演系统的效率和精度 .在此基础上 ,实现了叠前全波场各向异性弹性参数反演 .计算表明 ,在初始模型偏离真实模型较大的情况下 ,层状模型和横向不均匀模型的反演结果均能准确地收敛到真实模型上 .  相似文献   

8.
非常规油气资源的勘探开发在能源领域越来越受到重视.针对页岩油气、致密砂岩气储层的脆性指数预测,对突破"甜点区"、指导后续水力压裂等都具有重要的意义.针对常规叠前AVO反演技术预测脆性指数存在的问题:(1)稀疏脉冲反演垂向分辨率不高;(2)基于AVO近似公式的常规叠前反演,需要假设常背景纵横波速度比以及弱弹性参数反射率等条件,会影响到三参数反演的精度;(3)通常需要借助反演获取的纵横密三参数转换为杨氏模量和泊松比,再进一步转换才能获取脆性指数,在参数转换的过程中会将误差累积放大,影响最终的脆性指数预测精度.本文从精确Zoeppritz方程出发,通过对其进行重新推导,将其表达为脆性指数、P波速度和S波速度的函数(BI_Zoeppritz方程),并借助广义线性AVO反演,对基追踪反演获取的高分辨率角度反射系数进行迭代反演,直接提取高分辨率、高精度的脆性指数.通过模型和实际资料验证了该算法相对常规叠前反演获取的脆性指数有了进一步的改善.  相似文献   

9.
基于贝叶斯原理的PP波和PS波AVO联合反演方法研究(英文)   总被引:2,自引:1,他引:1  
基于Aki-Richards公式和贝叶斯原理,本文发展了利用叠前PP波和PS波资料联合反演P波速度比、S波速度比和密度比的方法。该方法假设参数之间满足正态分布,引入参数协方差矩阵来描述反演参数之间的相关性以提高反演过程的稳定性,并同时使反演的参数序列服从Cauchy分布,引入矩阵Q来描述参数序列的稀疏性以提高反演结果的分辨率。采用本文提出的方法对模型数据和实际多波资料进行反演,结果表明:本文方法正确有效;与传统的单一PP波反演相比,PP波和PS波AVO联合反演具有稳定性更好和反演精度更高等优点。  相似文献   

10.
流体指示因子和泊松比作为重要的指标参数在储层含油气性预测中发挥着至关重要的作用,大量学者开展了这两个参数的直接反演研究.然而,现有反演方法主要是以精确Zoeppritz方程的近似公式为正演方程,近似公式诸多的假设条件及较低的计算精度极大地限制了这类方法在复杂储层的应用效果.因此,为了提升储层含油气性预测精度,文中提出了一种新的基于精确Zoeppritz方程的流体因子和泊松比反演方法.首先,借助敏感流体因子定量分析法对现有流体指示因子进行优选,并将传统形式的精确Zoeppritz方程改写为包含该优选流体指示因子和泊松比的新形式.然后,基于新方程构建贝叶斯理论框架下的非线性反演目标函数.同时,为了进一步提升流体因子和泊松比对储层的刻画精度,在假设背景先验模型服从高斯分布的同时引入服从微分拉普拉斯分布的块约束项.最后,借助泰勒级数展开对上述非线性目标函数进行求解.合成数据和油田数据验证结果表明新方法能够稳定合理地估计流体指示因子和泊松比,且精度远高于基于近似公式的传统方法.此外,实际数据测试表明新方法能够有效提升储层含油气性预测精度,降低不确定性.  相似文献   

11.
Cauchy priori distribution-based Bayesian AVO reflectivity inversion may lead to sparse estimates that are sensitive to large reflectivities. For the inversion, the computation of the covariance matrix and regularized terms requires prior estimation of model parameters, which makes the iterative inversion weakly nonlinear. At the same time, the relations among the model parameters are assumed linear. Furthermore, the reflectivities, the results of the inversion, or the elastic parameters with cumulative error recovered by integrating reflectivities are not well suited for detecting hydrocarbons and fuids. In contrast, in Bayesian linear AVO inversion, the elastic parameters can be directly extracted from prestack seismic data without linear assumptions for the model parameters. Considering the advantages of the abovementioned methods, the Bayesian AVO reflectivity inversion process is modified and Cauchy distribution is explored as a prior probability distribution and the time-variant covariance is also considered. Finally, we propose a new method for the weakly nonlinear AVO waveform inversion. Furthermore, the linear assumptions are abandoned and elastic parameters, such as P-wave velocity, S-wave velocity, and density, can be directly recovered from seismic data especially for interfaces with large reflectivities. Numerical analysis demonstrates that all the elastic parameters can be estimated from prestack seismic data even when the signal-to-noise ratio of the seismic data is low.  相似文献   

12.
Conventional joint PP—PS inversion is based on approximations of the Zoeppritz equations and assumes constant VP/VS; therefore, the inversion precision and stability cannot satisfy current exploration requirements. We propose a joint PP—PS inversion method based on the exact Zoeppritz equations that combines Bayesian statistics and generalized linear inversion. A forward model based on the exact Zoeppritz equations is built to minimize the error of the approximations in the large-angle data, the prior distribution of the model parameters is added as a regularization item to decrease the ill-posed nature of the inversion, low-frequency constraints are introduced to stabilize the low-frequency data and improve robustness, and a fast algorithm is used to solve the objective function while minimizing the computational load. The proposed method has superior antinoising properties and well reproduces real data.  相似文献   

13.
Amplitude variation with amplitude or angle (AVO/AVA) inversion has been widely utilized in exploration geophysics to estimate the formation of elastic parameters underground. However, conventional AVO/AVA inversion approaches are based on different approximate equations of Zoeppritz equations under various hypotheses, such as limited incident angles or weak property contrast, which reduces their prediction precision theoretically. This study combines the exact P-wave Zoeppritz equation with a nonlinear direct inversion algorithm to estimate the six parameters imbedded in the exact equation simultaneously. A more direct and explicit expression of the Zoeppritz equation is discussed in the case of P-wave exploration, under which condition the incident longitudinal wave produces the reflected longitudinal (P–P) wave and upgoing converted shear (P–SV) wave. Utilizing this equation as the forward solver, a nonlinear direct inversion method is introduced to implement the direct inversion of the six parameters including P-wave velocities, S-wave velocities, and densities in the upper and lower media around an interface, respectively. This nonlinear algorithm is able to estimate the inverse of the nonlinear function in terms of model parameters directly rather than in a conventional optimization way. Model tests illustrate that the nonlinear direct inversion method shows great potential to estimate multiple parameters with the exact Zoeppritz equation.  相似文献   

14.
Most amplitude versus offset (AVO) analysis and inversion techniques are based on the Zoeppritz equations for plane‐wave reflection coefficients or their approximations. Real seismic surveys use localized sources that produce spherical waves, rather than plane waves. In the far‐field, the AVO response for a spherical wave reflected from a plane interface can be well approximated by a plane‐wave response. However this approximation breaks down in the vicinity of the critical angle. Conventional AVO analysis ignores this problem and always utilizes the plane‐wave response. This approach is sufficiently accurate as long as the angles of incidence are much smaller than the critical angle. Such moderate angles are more than sufficient for the standard estimation of the AVO intercept and gradient. However, when independent estimation of the formation density is required, it may be important to use large incidence angles close to the critical angle, where spherical wave effects become important. For the amplitude of a spherical wave reflected from a plane fluid‐fluid interface, an analytical approximation is known, which provides a correction to the plane‐wave reflection coefficients for all angles. For the amplitude of a spherical wave reflected from a solid/solid interface, we propose a formula that combines this analytical approximation with the linearized plane‐wave AVO equation. The proposed approximation shows reasonable agreement with numerical simulations for a range of frequencies. Using this solution, we constructed a two‐layer three‐parameter least‐squares inversion algorithm. Application of this algorithm to synthetic data for a single plane interface shows an improvement compared to the use of plane‐wave reflection coefficients.  相似文献   

15.
Considering Zoeppritz equations, reflections of PP and PS are only the function of ratios of density and velocity. So the inversion results will be the same if the ratios are the same but values of density, velocities of P-wave and S-wave are different without strict constraint. This paper makes efforts to explore nonlinear simultaneous PP and PS inversion with expectation to reduce the ambiguity of AVO analysis by utilizing the redundancy of multi-component AVO measurements. Accurate estimation of ratio parameters depends on independence of input data. There are only two independent AVO attributes for PP reflectivity (i.e. intercept and gradient) and two for PS reflectivity (i.e. pseudo-intercept and pseudo-gradient or extreme amplitude), respectively. For individual PP and PS inversion, the values of least-squares objective function do not converge around a large neighborhood of chosen true model parameters. Fortunately for joint PP and PS inversion the values of the least-squares objective function show closed contours with single minima. Finally the power function fitting is used to provide a higher precision AVO attributes than traditional polynomial fitting. By using the four independent fitting attributes (two independent attributes for PP and PS respectively), the inversion of four ratio parameters (velocities and densities) would be estimated with less errors than that in traditional method.  相似文献   

16.
基于贝叶斯理论的AVO三参数波形反演   总被引:24,自引:7,他引:24       下载免费PDF全文
在实际的AVO反演问题中,叠前数据体中的噪声或其他因素严重影响了AVO反演问题的适定性,而采用先验地质信息作为AVO反演问题的约束条件是解决AVO反演问题不适定的一种可行方法. 文中的似然函数采用了[WTBX]ι[WTBX]p范数的解,并用Cauchy分布表示先验模型参数的分布. 以此为基础,在反演中建立了测井数据的参数协方差矩阵对反演过程进行约束,并采用了共轭梯度算法实现多参数非线性的反演过程. 同时,为了提高反演精度,避免动校正拉伸及依赖于炮检距的调谐效应对参数估计的影响,反演采用动校前地震数据进行参数估计. 从应用效果分析来看,即使叠前道集的信噪比不高,反演的结果也能较好地与实际情况相匹配,为识别储层流体性质提供了新的手段.  相似文献   

17.
平均入射角道集PP波与PS波联合反演   总被引:1,自引:1,他引:0       下载免费PDF全文
石瑛  芦俊  杨震  杨春 《地球物理学报》2015,58(12):4617-4627
在界面两侧地层的弹性参数弱反差的假设难以成立的情况下,本文提出用平均入射角道集进行PP波与PS波的联合反演.首先,在PP波与PS波AVA(amplitude versus angle,振幅随入射角变化)道集的基础上,分别选择小入射角范围与大入射角范围的AVA道集进行局部加权叠加,以获得由两个角度组成的平均入射角道集,并作为后续反演的输入数据.然后,再通过最小二乘原理建立了PP波与PS波联合反演目标函数,推导了模型修改量的向量公式,建立了平均入射角道集联合反演的流程.模型数据与实际数据的测试结果表明:在信噪比较低、地层弹性参数反差较大、层厚较薄的情况下,该反演方法的精度在很大程度上超过了基于近似反射系数的反演方法,为复杂油气藏勘探提供了新的思路.  相似文献   

18.
非线性AVO反演方法研究   总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2       下载免费PDF全文
与叠后地震数据相比,叠前地震数据包含有更多的反映地下地层特征的信息,利用AVO( Amplitude Versus Offset,振幅随偏移距的变化)信息通过求解Zoeppritz方程的近似公式,叠前反演可直接得到反映地下岩石特征的弹性参数——密度、纵波速度和横波速度.从本质上讲,叠前地震反演是非线性的,但目前多采用线...  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号