首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到17条相似文献,搜索用时 421 毫秒
1.
地震动瞬时能量谱与结构位移响应关系研究   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
本文通过HHT变换得到瞬时能量谱,并以HHT对地震动作用下的结构位移响应进行分析,发现长周期结构动力响应的显著特点:最大结构位移响应总是滞后于地震动激励的最大能量谱值时间.滞后的时间主要取决于结构的动力特性参数(特别是自振周期),也与地震动的类型有关.仿真计算的结果表明:长周期结构的破环与倒塌并不发生在地震动强度最大的时刻,而多数是在地震动末期,甚至在地震动完全消失之后.有益的结论为结构控制设计与安全提供科学依据.  相似文献   

2.
研究长周期地震动对广州塔TMD体系的影响及结构响应的时频分布规律。对国内现行规范反应谱长周期段进行延长,选取7条地震动时程记录,并补充7条长周期地震动时程记录作为输入样本,研究不同周期的强震激励对超高耸结构TMD体系的影响。研究表明,长周期成分的地震激励显著增加了超高耸结构的响应,卓越周期在2.341 s至6.425 s的长周期地震动输入,比卓越周期低于1 s的短周期地震动输入,平均使结构桅杆顶的位移峰值与均方根值分别放大125.49%和91.63%;最优参数设计的TMD对短周期、长周期地震响应均起减震控制作用,对8度长周期大震下主塔顶和桅杆顶的位移峰值控制降幅分别达到28.61%和42.69%,对相应的位移时程响应均方根值的控制降幅分别达到32.56%和44.20%, TMD体系的减震控制性能对地震动卓越周期具有一定鲁棒性;对结构弱轴向的地震响应时程进行数值小波功率谱分析,结果表明:由于一般长周期地震动的卓越周期更接近广州塔结构弱轴向的二阶周期(2.888 s),不仅增加了一阶振型的响应,更显著加剧了以二阶振型为主的桅杆鞭梢效应, TMD对该效应一定程度上起了抑制作用;建议对周期大于6 s的超高耸结构TMD体系,在按规范反应谱选取地震动之外,应注意考虑长周期地震动的影响,以更全面评估结构性能。  相似文献   

3.
合理的地震动强度指标是预测和评价结构抗震响应的重要基础。选取24个周期点的单自由度体系和一个高层框架核心筒长周期结构,基于不同震源机制的100条地震动记录时程分析结果,研究16种地震动强度指标与结构地震响应的相关性,并提出考虑高阶振型影响的改进反应谱相关型地震动强度指标。研究表明:(1)不同地震动强度指标与结构地震响应的相关性差别较大,随着单自由度体系自振周期的增大,地震动强度指标与单自由度体系地震响应的相关性大致呈减小的趋势;(2)对于高层长周期结构,综合对比分析各地震动强度指标分别与顶点最大位移、最大基底剪力、最大层间位移的相关性,从工程实用角度出发,推荐地面运动峰值速度为最佳地震动强度指标;(3)由于高层长周期结构受高阶振型影响显著,采用含有高阶振型因素的反应谱强度指标可提高与结构地震响应的相关性。  相似文献   

4.
海上风电工程基础结构抗震性能研究   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
为了探讨海上风电工程基础与结构体系的抗震性能,采用ANSYS程序建立了三种基础型式的风电塔架结构数值模型,先采用振型分解反应谱法计算了结构的地震响应,进而分别将传统地震动和最不利地震动作为输入地震动,分析了三种基础结构体系的最大地震响应。结果显示:风电结构属典型的长周期结构,基础型式对结构的振动周期影响明显,单立柱桩式结构振动周期最长,八桩承台结构振动周期最短。地震作用下,单立柱桩结构的顶端位移响应也最大;振型反应谱法与传统地震动作用下结构的响应满足现行建筑抗震规范的要求,但最不利地震作用下结构的位移响应偏大,不满足规范对位移的相关规定;组合三桩结构底部基础与结构连接处是应力集中区。海上风电工程结构抗震设计的重要性应引起充分重视。  相似文献   

5.
研究了在加速度反应谱与峰值位移不变的条件下,输入地震动峰值速度对单自由度体系动力反应、尤其是弹塑性反应的影响。首先,利用在时域内叠加窄带时程的方法合成加速度反应谱和峰值位移相同,但峰值速度相差1倍的两组人工地震动时程。其次,按照《建筑抗震设计规范》的要求,将合成的输入地震动标定为不同设防烈度区下多遇地震的加速度峰值,进行结构弹性计算,结果表明:输入地震动峰值速度的变化对结构弹性反应基本无影响。然后,将输入地震动标定为相应烈度区下罕遇地震的加速度峰值,并以上述多遇地震下弹性反应的最大变形作为罕遇地震作用下结构弹塑性分析的屈服变形,进而分析输入地震动峰值速度变化对结构弹塑性反应的影响规律。其结果表明,峰值速度的增大将会明显增大中长周期结构弹塑性位移反应和速度反应,且这种放大效应对位移反应尤为显著。这种规律在不同烈度区基本具有一致性,随着烈度增大,输入地震动峰值速度的增大引起的大部分中长周期结构弹塑性位移及速度反应的放大效应减小。因此,在进行结构动力分析时,应充分考虑输入地震动峰值速度变化对计算结果的影响。  相似文献   

6.
隔震结构具有较长自振周期,且容易受地震动长周期特性的影响,因此其在长周期地震动作用下的抗震性能值得研究。以某基于规范设计的基础隔震结构为例,通过对该结构在规范规定地震作用和远场长周期地震作用下的地震响应进行分析和对比,研究长周期地震动对结构地震响应的影响;通过对钢筋和混凝土的损伤状态进行定义和标识,探讨长周期地震作用下基础隔震结构的损伤分布规律。研究结果表明,长周期地震动作用下隔震结构发生破坏的概率远大于具有相同峰值地面加速度的普通地震动,其中长周期地震动反应谱的谱峰值"后移"被认为是造成这种情况的主要原因,且长周期地震动作用下隔震结构的损伤分布并不均匀,其主要集中在结构的底层。  相似文献   

7.
作为一种特殊的地震动,长周期地震动对结构的危害已引起国内外学者的关注。选取10条KiK-net、K-NET台网中典型的长周期地震动,以及10条国内外的短周期地震动,对比分析两者时程特征和反应谱特征的差异。将所选长、短周期地震动输入钢框架结构模型;通过非线性时程分析,研究钢框架结构在长、短周期地震动作用下的响应差异。结果表明:短周期地震动的平均地面峰值加速度是长周期地震动的3.26倍,而平均地面峰值位移比长周期地震动低10.89%;短周期地震动作用下,钢框架结构顶点加速度响应平均值是长周期地震动的5.16倍,结构顶点位移响应平均值仅比长周期地震动多0.91%;长周期地震动作用下,钢框架结构层间位移角响应较大,结构底部受影响范围更广。对于长周期地震动隐患地区的高层钢框架结构,应对长、短周期震害分别进行考虑;对于中、长周期钢框架结构,建议选用峰值位移作为抗震分析指标。  相似文献   

8.
目前用于结构抗震设计的反应谱仅能反映峰值反应,无法体现反应值随时间的变化。文中提出一种弹性能量半径演化谱,可反映线性单自由度体系弹性能量(即动能与弹性势能之和)随地震持时的变化,且其峰值近似等于结构峰值位移。文中给出了利用地震动演化功率谱得到该演化谱的方法并进一步发展了一种计算线性多自由度体系地震位移反应的新方法。通过两座框架结构的地震反应计算,将新方法与传统振型组合法及时程分析法的计算结果进行对比,发现对于振型稀疏结构,新方法计算结果与SRSS法接近;而对于振型密集结构,新方法计算结果较CQC法更精确,且避免了CQC法相关系数的复杂计算。  相似文献   

9.
本文详细探讨了建筑结构罕遇地震响应与地震动位移谱之间的关系。通过算例分析,对比了大震弹性与大震弹塑性响应的差异,并通过地震动位移谱解释了差异原因。本文比较了人工地震动与包括汶川地震在内的天然地震动位移谱差异,指出了这种差异将导致罕遇地震作用下长周期结构的人工波计算结果普遍大于天然波计算结果。本文依据地震动位移谱给出了罕遇地震分析时的地震动选取原则。  相似文献   

10.
周媛  赵凤新  霍新  张郁山 《中国地震》2006,22(4):418-424
根据同一加速度反应谱拟合了加速度峰值相同、速度峰值相同、位移峰值不同的两组地震动时程。以大跨斜拉桥的三维模型为例,在以上两组时程的激励下,应用有限元立法,对斜拉桥的地震反应进行了分析。计算结果表明:在弹性阶段,地震动位移峰值时斜拉桥的动力响应影响不明显;但当结构进入弹塑性阶段时,在位移峰值较大的一组地震动激励下,桥梁的墩底弯矩和塔顶位移会有更大的响应。  相似文献   

11.
有限持时的实例提示我们结构的最大位移可能出现时滞现象,且工程结构的自振周期与出现结构最大位移的时间密切相关,特别在长周期结构中,位移主要受瞬态振动的控制。本文通过小波分解、振幅调整、线性叠加3步骤实现了地震动瞬态反应与稳态反应的分离,通过小波分量瞬态反应与反应谱研究,证实了长周期结构的最大位移不仅可能发生在共振情况下,也可能发生在外载激励已经消失,但结构的瞬态振动仍有较大余幅的情况下。瞬态振动对长周期结构位移反应的影响与持时呈密切的关系。  相似文献   

12.
Long-period structures(e.g. Isolated structures) tend to produce pseudo-resonance with low frequency components of long-period ground motions, resulting in the increase in damage. Stiffness mutation occurs due to the setback in the upper body of the large chassis structure. In the parts with stiffness mutation, the torsion effect caused by the tower is far greater than that of the chassis itself. In this study, a total of 273 ground motions are collected and then filtered into four types, including the near-field ordinary, near-field pulse, far-field ordinary, and farfield harmonic. An 8-degree(0.2 g) fortified large chassis base-isolated structure is established. Furthermore,ETABS program software is used to conduct nonlinear time history analysis on the isolation and seismic model under bi-directional earthquake ground motions. The comparison results show that the seismic isolation effect of the base-isolated structure under long-period ground motions is worse than that associated with ordinary ground motions when the seismic response reduction rate of the large base floor significantly decreases compared with that of the tower. When the inter-story displacement angle and the displacement of isolation layer of the chassis exceeds the limit of Code for Seismic Design of Buildings(GB 50011-2010), it is recommended to adopt composite seismic isolation technology or add limit devices. Under the condition of long-period ground motions, the baseisolated structure reduces the lateral-torsional coupling effect of the large chassis structure, while the torsion response of large chassis' top layer increases. Under long-period ground motions with the same acceleration peak,the response of the base-isolated structure increases much more than that of the seismic structure and the consideration of this impact is suggested to be added to the Code.  相似文献   

13.
This paper presents the results of a parametric study of self-centering seismic retrofit schemes for reinforced concrete (RC) frame buildings. The self-centering retrofit system features flag-shaped hysteresis and minimal residual deformation. For comparison purpose,an alternate seismic retrofit scheme that uses a bilinear-hysteresis retrofit system such as buckling-restrained braces (BRB) is also considered in this paper. The parametric study was carried out in a single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) system framework since a multi-story building structure may be idealized as an equivalent SDOF system and investigation of the performance of this equivalent SDOF system can provide insight into the seismic response of the multi-story building. A peak-oriented hysteresis model which can consider the strength and stiffness degradation is used to describe the hysteretic behavior of RC structures. The parametric study involves two key parameters -the strength ratio and elastic stiffness ratio between the seismic retrofit system and the original RC frame. An ensemble of 172 earthquake ground motion records scaled to the design basis earthquake in California with a probability of exceedance of 10% in 50 years was constructed for the simulation-based parametric study. The effectiveness of the two seismic retrofit schemes considered in this study is evaluated in terms of peak displacement ratio,peak acceleration ratio,energy dissipation demand ratio and residual displacement ratio between the SDOF systems with and without retrofit. It is found from this parametric study that RC structures retrofitted with the self-centering retrofit scheme (SCRS) can achieve a seismic performance level comparable to the bilinear-hysteresis retrofit scheme (BHRS) in terms of peak displacement and energy dissipation demand ratio while having negligible residual displacement after earthquake.  相似文献   

14.
从Chi-Chi地震动数据中选取20条近场长周期地震记录和20条远场长周期地震记录,再从汶川地震渭河地震动数据中选取20条远场长周期地震记录作为输入,研究各个地震动记录相对应的地震动强度参数及其之间的相关性,筛选出了适合于长周期地震动的地震动强度指标,采用Pearson相关系数对筛选出的地震动强度指标与隔震体系的隔震层位移响应之间的相关性进行分析。结果表明:①在近、远场长周期地震动作用下,中长周期隔震结构的隔震层位移响应与频谱特征参数的相关性比较好,在进行中长周期隔震结构的抗震性能研究时,PGD、Sdavg及DSI与隔震结构的相关性较好,地震动强度指标在集集近场建议选取PGD和Sdavg,集集远场建议选取DSI和D/V,渭河远场建议选取Sdavg和DSI;②在强相关范围内考虑相关性的高低,近场和远场的长周期地震动强度指标建议分别选取PGD和DSI。  相似文献   

15.
弦支穹顶结构动力反应分析   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
以天津开发区商务中心大堂的弦支穹顶为研究对象,分析了弦支穹顶结构体系的自振特性,分别运用随机模拟风振分析方法和时间历程分析方法,对其进行了风振和地震反应分析,得到了结构在动力荷载作用下的响应时程,并对分析结果进行了频谱分析和统计分析。研究发现弦支穹顶结构的自振频率呈密集型分布,且振型复杂;结构的风振响应基本以受迫振动为主,没有出现明显的峰值共振现象;结构的地震响应在前几阶基频处出现了较为明显的峰值共振现象;从振动的幅值角度看,风荷载的动力作用效应相对于地震荷载要显著。  相似文献   

16.
The development of a scientific framework for performance-based seismic engineering requires, among other steps, the evaluation of ground motion intensity measures at a site and the characterization of their relationship with suitable engineering demand parameters (EDPs) which describe the performance of a structure. In order to be able to predict the damage resulting from earthquake ground motions in a structural system, it is first necessary to properly identify ground motion parameters that are well correlated with structural response and, in turn, with damage. Since structural damage during an earthquake ground motion may be due to excessive deformation or to cumulative cyclic damage, reliable methods for estimating displacement demands on structures are needed. Even though the seismic performance is directly related to the global and local deformations of the structure, energy-based methodologies appear more helpful in concept, as they permit a rational assessment of the energy absorption and dissipation mechanisms that can be effectively accomplished to balance the energy imparted to the structure. Moreover, energy-based parameters are directly related to cycles of response of the structure and, therefore, they can implicitly capture the effect of ground motion duration, which is ignored by conventional spectral parameters. Therefore, the identification of reliable relationships between energy and displacement demands represents a fundamental issue in both the development of more reliable seismic code provisions and the evaluation of seismic vulnerability aimed at the upgrading of existing hazardous facilities. As these two aspects could become consistently integrated within a performance-based seismic design methodology, understanding how input and dissipated energy are correlated with displacement demands emerges as a decisive prerequisite. The aim of the present study is the establishment of functional relationships between input and dissipated energy (that can be considered as parameters representative of the amplitude, frequency content and duration of earthquake ground motions) and displacement-based response measures that are well correlated to structural and non-structural damage. For the purpose of quantifying the EDPs to be related to the energy measures, for comprehensive range of ground motion and structural characteristics, both simplified and more accurate numerical models will be used in this study for the estimation of local and global displacement and energy demands. Parametric linear and nonlinear time-history analyses will be performed on elastic and inelastic SDOF and MDOF systems, in order to assume information on the seismic response of a wide range of current structures. Hysteretic models typical of frame force/displacement behavior will be assumed for the local inelastic cyclic response of the systems. A wide range of vibration periods will be taken into account so as to define displacement, interstory drift and energy spectra for MDOF systems. Various scalar measures related to the deformation demand will be used in this research. These include the spectral displacements, the peak roof drift ratio, and the peak interstory drift ratio. A total of about 900 recorded ground motions covering a broad variety of condition in terms of frequency content, duration and amplitude will be used as input in the dynamic analyses. The records are obtained from 40 earthquakes and grouped as a function of magnitude of the event, source-to-site condition and site soil condition. In addition, in the data-set of records a considerable number of near-fault signals is included, in recognition of the particular significance of pulse-like time histories in causing large seismic demands to the structures.  相似文献   

17.
利用小波多分辨率分析将地震动加速度分解为多频段小波分量,并运用复模态方法推导其计算层间隔震体系在地震作用下的动力响应公式,讨论各频段地震信号及结构响应的能量分配。同时利用小波时频工具分析地震动能量在时频域内的分布对层间隔震结构响应的影响,进而为考察地震动非平稳性对层间隔震结构非线性分析的影响提供方法。利用小波分析的以上优势,对一典型层间隔震结构分别进行弹性和弹塑性分析,结果表明弹性体系在地震作用下的响应可由该地震波各小波分量的响应叠加而得,地震动能量在时间上的集中会对层间隔震结构响应产生不利影响。  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号