共查询到19条相似文献，搜索用时 354 毫秒
1.
北京时间2013年1月29日,哈萨克斯坦发生MS6.1地震,为了提高对地震震源机制解的认识,并进一步了解震源区的应力场特征,利用CAP方法反演了此次地震序列震源机制解.反演结果表明,MS6.1地震节面Ⅰ的参数：走向241°,倾角80°,滑动角7°;节面Ⅱ的参数：走向150°,倾角84°,滑动角170°;P轴方位为196°,倾角2°,T轴方位为105°,倾角12°;矩震级MW为6.1;矩心深度为13km;震源类型是左旋走滑型.此次地震序列破裂优势方向为NEE—SWW,倾角以30°～60°居多,滑动角以60°～120°、-60°～-120°居多;P轴方位的优势取向为近NE—SW向,接近水平的居优;T轴优势取向为近SEE—NWW向,接近垂直的居优;震源机制类型以倾向滑动型为主.反演结果与断层的分布、余震分布及哈萨克斯坦中天山（伊犁盆地西部）NEE—SWW向应力场有很好的一致性. 相似文献
2.
不同资料和方法给出的2019年6月17日四川长宁6.0级地震震源机制解存在较大差异，为了找到1个合适的震源机制解来研究此次地震的发震方式，通过数学方法得到了与现有震源机制解差别最小的中心震源机制解，节面I的走向、倾角、滑动角分别为194.78°、52.68°和139.16°，节面Ⅱ的走向、倾角、滑动角分别为312.44°、58.67°和45.22°，根据本次地震余震分布拟合得到的断层面的走向为312.17°，与中心震源机制的节面Ⅱ走向一致，因而推断节面Ⅱ为本次地震的发震断层面。之后，利用此次地震之前震源区地震的震源机制解，反演了震源区的震前构造应力场。结果表明，长宁6.0级地震的中心震源机制解和震源区震前应力场均为逆冲型为主兼走滑分量的类型，震前应力场压轴为NWW—SEE向，中间轴为NNE—SSW向，两轴倾角接近水平，而张轴较陡，表现为逆冲型的应力场。将反演得到的应力场投影到中心震源机制解给出的与余震分布一致的节面上，发现中心震源机制解的滑动角和应力场预测的滑动角差别仅为13.45°，表明此次地震受背景应力场控制而发生在先存的薄弱面上。 相似文献
3.
本文基于云南地震台网数据，对2021年6月10日云南双柏地震序列进行重新定位，并对序列中4次MS≥3.5地震的震源机制解和震源区构造应力场进行了反演，研究了双柏地震序列时空分布特征和发震构造.地震重定位结果显示，双柏地震序列空间上呈NNE-SSW向优势分布，发震断层较为陡立，震源深度集中分布于5～15 km范围内，震源深度表现为南浅北深的特征.MS5.1地震后余震序列在时空上呈现出不对称的双侧发展模式，MS4.6地震前后余震沿SSW向存在往返迁移现象.反演得到的序列震源机制解类型均为走滑型，都具有与序列优势分布一致的NNE走向、高倾角SEE倾向节面.构造应力场反演表明震源区受到NNW向水平挤压和NEE向水平拉张的构造应力作用.结合重定位结果和序列震源机制分析认为，双柏地震序列与附近的楚雄—建水断裂等无关，其发震构造为一条NNE走向、SEE倾向的高倾角左旋走滑断裂，构造形成受控于川滇菱形块体SSE向整体运动产生的NNW向挤压构造应力作用. 相似文献
4.
利用CAP方法反演了2012年6月30日新源-和静Ms6.6地震序列震源机制解.反演得到Ms6.6地震节面Ⅰ的参数为:走向299°,倾角68°,滑动角164°;节面Ⅱ的参数为:走向35°,倾角75°,滑动角23°;P轴方位角166°,倾角5°,T轴方位角258°,倾角26°;矩震级Mw为6.3;矩心深度为21km.此次地震序列破裂优势方向为NWW,倾角以60°～90°为主,滑动角以±180°±30°为主;P轴方位的优势取向为近NS向,T轴优势取向为近EW向.初步分析表明,主震节面Ⅰ为发震断层,是走向为NWW、近乎直立的左旋走滑断层.此次6.6级地震震源断错性质和主压应力方向以及序列P轴优势方位与震源区周围构造应力场特征基本一致. 相似文献
5.
2021年9月16日,四川省泸州市泸县发生MS6.0地震,是继 2019年6月17日长宁MS6.0 地震后在四川盆地发生的又一次6 级强震.泸县MS 6.0地震震中位于NE走向的华蓥山褶断带内部,极震区烈度达Ⅷ度,共造成3人死亡,159 人受伤.MS6.0主震后余震活动频度低、强度弱,截止到 9月23日,发生的最大余震为 9月16日 4时 55 分MS2.8(ML3.4)地震,与主震震级差3.2,呈现孤立型地震序列特征.利用四川区域地震台网宽频带波形资料,通过CAP波形反演,获取的本次MS6.0地震震源机制解节面Ⅰ走向 286°、倾角 45°、滑动角 103°,节面Ⅱ走向88°、倾角46°、滑动角 77°,显示该地震为逆冲型.P轴方位 187°、俯仰角 1°,反映震源区主压应力呈近 NS向水平推挤特征,与华南地块构造应力场NW-SE向主压应力方向存在显著差异,揭示本次地震应受局部应力场控制.泸县MS6.0地震的矩震级为MW5.36,远低于面波震级;震源矩心深度为 3.5 km,与重新定位后的震源初始破裂深度5.1 km较接近,表明该地震发生在四川盆地上地壳浅部沉积盖层内,符合最近 3 年四川盆地中强地震活动深度分布普遍较浅的特征,也反映本次地震的震源破裂尺度相对较小.其震源机制解两节面走向均与震中附近的华蓥山褶断带西支断裂及附近的已知地表断层几何结构不匹配,结合重新定位的前震和早期余震空间展布近 NWW向优势特征,本文初步判定走向 NWW的节面Ⅰ为同震破裂面,发震断层倾角 45°,推测此次泸县MS6.0 地震为沉积盖层内 NWW向隐伏逆冲断层在近 NS向水平主压应力作用下挤压错动所致. 相似文献
6.
2014年4月20日安徽省霍山发生MS4.3地震,是霍山地区41年以来发生的最大地震. 本文首先基于安徽省及周边省份的地震台站资料,采用Hypo2000、 CAP和PTD方法反演得到该地震的震源深度为8 km; 然后采用Hypo2000和HypoDD方法联合对主震和余震序列进行重新定位,结果显示该地震序列呈北东向分布,绝大部分余震分布在主震的西南侧; 最后分别采用FOCMEC方法和CAP方法反演该地震的震源机制解,获得的反演结果非常接近,节面Ⅰ与节面Ⅱ的走向、 倾角、 滑动角分别为135°/70°/-30°与230°/60°/-160°. 此外该地震的椭圆等烈度线呈北东向展布,结合该地区的历史地震和地震构造,认为该地震与北东向的落儿岭—土地岭断裂活动有关. 已有震源机制解资料表明该地区构造应力场最大主压应力轴的方位角为267°,倾角为5°,最小主压应力轴的方位角为358°,倾角为4°,结合震源机制解和发震构造,认为该地震是在区域应力场作用下,落儿岭—土地岭断裂发生的一次右旋张性地震. 相似文献
7.
2022年1月8日青海省海北州门源县发生MS6.9地震,震后产生了长约22 km的地表破裂带,青海、甘肃和宁夏等多地震感强烈。本文基于区域地震台网资料,通过多阶段定位方法对门源MS6.9地震早期序列（2022年1月8日至12日）进行了重定位,并利用gCAP方法反演了主震和MS≥3.4余震的震源机制和震源矩心深度,计算了现今应力场体系在门源MS6.9地震震源机制两个节面产生的相对剪应力和正应力。结果表明:门源MS6.9地震的初始破裂深度为7.8 km,震源矩心深度为4 km,地震序列的优势初始破裂深度主要介于7—8 km之间,而MS≥3.4余震的震源矩心深度为3—7 km;该地震序列的震源深度剖面显示震后24个小时内的地震序列长度约为25 km,与地表破裂带的长度大体一致,整体地震序列长度约为30 km,其中1月8日MS6.9主震和MS5.1余震位于余震区西段,1月12日MS5.2余震位于余震区东段。2022年1月8日门源MS6.9主震的震源机制解节面Ⅰ为走向290°、倾角81°、滑动角16°,节面Ⅱ为走向197°、倾角74°、滑动角171°,根据余震展布的总体趋势估计断层面走向为290°,表明此次地震为近乎直立断层面上的一次左旋走滑型事件;MS≥3.4余震的震源机制解显示这些地震主要为走滑型地震,P轴走向从余震区西段到东段之间大体呈现NE向到EW向的变化。现今应力场体系在门源MS6.9主震震源机制解节面Ⅰ上产生的相对剪应力为0.638,而在节面Ⅱ上的相对剪应力为0.522,表明这两个节面均非构造应力场的最大释放节面,这与2016年门源MS6.4地震逆冲型震源机制为构造应力场的最优释放节面有着明显差异。结合地质构造、震源机制和余震展布,2022年1月8日门源MS6.9主震的发震构造可能为冷龙岭断裂西段,其地震断层错动方式为左旋走滑。根据重定位结果、震级-破裂关系以及剪应力结果,本文认为门源地区存在一定的应力积累且应力未得到充分释放,该地区仍存在发生强震的危险。 相似文献
8.
2008年5月12日四川汶川8.0级地震与部分余震的震源机制解 总被引：4，自引：0，他引：4
采用区域和远台Pn或Pg初至波初动符号, 利用下半球等面积投影, 求解了2008年5月12日四川汶川8.0级地震和截止到2008年12月10日发生的部分4级以上余震的震源机制解。 汶川8.0级地震的震源机制为: 节面Ⅰ的走向为5°, 倾角为48°, 滑动角为39°; 节面Ⅱ的走向为247°, 倾角为62°, 滑动角为131°。 P轴方位角为309°, 仰角为8°, T轴方位角为208°, 仰角为54 °, B轴方位角为44°, 仰角为35°。 结合地质构造和余震空间分布, 可以确定节面Ⅱ为发震断层面。 根据震源机制解, 引发本次地震的断层活动主要表现为逆冲, 主破裂面为S67°W与该地震所在断层的走向基本一致(断裂总体走向N45°E)[1]; 主压应力轴P轴为N51 °W, 主压应力轴P轴方位与该区域构造应力场方向基本一致。 根据余震震源机制解结果, 龙门山断裂带南段发生的余震与北段发生的余震的震源机制都具有优势分布, 且两者差异明显。 早期发生在南段的余震的破裂是以逆倾滑动为主, 兼有走向滑动; 而随着时间的推移, 余震向北段迁移, 在龙门山构造的北段地震震源的破裂方式以走向滑动为主, 兼有一定的逆倾滑动; 龙门构造带南段震源应力场受主震应力场的控制, 而龙门构造带北段震源应力场不仅受区域应力场的影响, 还受主震应力场的影响。 相似文献
9.
本文利用云南区域地震台网提供的震相报告,采用"多阶段定位"方法,对2021年5月21日云南漾濞Ms6.4地震序列的震源位置进行了重新定位.选取序列中13次具有高信噪比宽频带波形记录的Ms≥4.0地震事件,应用CAP波形反演方法,获取了这些事件的震源机制解和震源矩心深度.结果显示,漾濞地震序列震中距离NE侧的维西—乔后断裂约3～10 km,余震区长轴呈NW-SE向展布,长约22 km,震源优势分布深度为4～8 km,反映本次地震发生在上地壳浅部.地震分布北西窄、南东宽的分段特征明显,北西段地震更浅、更密集,南东段事件更深、更分散且存在向S偏转的现象.余震区不同位置的短轴剖面分析表明,发震构造倾向SW,南东段倾角缓于北西段.北西段还存在规模较小的NE向共轭断裂,长度约5 km.5月18日开始的前震自余震区中段向NW逐级迁移扩展,前震序列密集且存在相互触发,符合前震发生的级联模式.主震位于余震密集区的NW端,表明其具备SE向单侧破裂特征.多数4级以上地震的震源机制解都具有与序列长轴走向一致的NW-SE走向、高倾角SW倾向节面;基于震源机制解反演获得的区域构造应力场显示,发震构造受NNW-SSE向近水平主压应力作用发生右旋走滑运动,揭示主发震断层产状和错动类型与维西—乔后断裂基本一致.因此,可初步判定发震构造为维西—乔后断裂的平行伴生断裂,这一构造的形成可能与川滇块体SE向滑移和滇西南块体的顺时针旋转有关. 相似文献
10.
2018年9月8日,云南省墨江县发生MS5.9地震并伴随一系列余震,探究该地震周围的应力场对于理解该地震的发生机制和后续地震的发展趋势具有着重要的参考意义.本研究收集了震源及其邻区中前人研究和Global CMT所给出的震源机制资料,对该地区进行了构造应力场反演,并同时利用反演得到的应力张量模拟墨江地区的震源机制解表现.结果表明:(1)在应力轴整体分布上,自西向东σ1轴(压轴)从NNE-SSW向逐渐转向NNW-SSE向,σ3轴(张轴)从WWN-EES向逐渐转向WWS-EEN向,张轴呈弧形分布,压轴呈放射状分布.(2)在应力轴倾伏角上,研究区域内的压应力轴和张应力轴倾伏角都比较小,即两轴均接近水平.(3)R值分布大体是在东南部相较于西北部大,结合当地地质背景分析得到,物质逃逸自西北向东南呈逐渐变缓的趋势.(4)利用反演得到的应力张量和应力状态计算墨江地震震源区的相对剪应力和相对正应力大小.由此推测,墨江地震恰好发生在相对剪切应力值和相对正应力正值最大的节面上.从而可以确定墨江地震的发震节面的基本参数:走向216.32°,倾角86.91°,滑动角0.27°,相对剪应力值0.9,相对正应力值0.3.本研究为此次墨江地震的发震背景和地震动力学研究提供了基础性资料. 相似文献
11.
QI Yu-ping ZHANG Zhi-wei LONG Feng XIAO Ben-fu LIANG Ming-jian LU Qian JIANG Peng 《地震地质》2018,40(2):377-395
The Daliangshan sub-block is a boundary region among the Bayan Har block, the Sichuan-Yunnan block and the South China block. It hosts four major fault systems:The southwest to south trending Xianshuihe-Zemuhe Fault zone in the west, the Longmenshan fault zone is the northern boundary, the Zhaotong-Lianfeng fault zone in the south, and the NS-trending Mabian-Yanjin fault zone in the east. This study focused on focal mechanisms and the regional stress field of the Daliangshan sub-block to help understand the earthquake preparation process, tectonic deformation and seismic stress interaction in this area. We collected broadband waveform records from the Sichuan Seismic Network and used multiple 1-D velocity models to determine the focal mechanisms of moderate and large earthquakes(ML ≥ 3.5)in the Daliangshan sub-block by using the CAP method. Results for 276 earthquakes from Jan 2010 to Aug 2016 show that the earthquakes are dominated by strike-slip and trust faulting, very few events have normal faulting and the mixed type. We then derived the regional distribution of the stress field through a damp linear inversion(DRSSI)using the focal mechanisms obtained in this study. Inversion results for the spatial pattern of the stress field in the block suggest that the entire region is predominantly under strike-slip and trust faulting regimes, largely consistent with the focal mechanisms. The direction of maximum compression axes is NW-NWW, and part of the area is slightly rotated, which is consistent with the GPS velocity field. Combining geodynamic background, this work suggests that because the Sichuan-Yunnan block is moving to SE and the Tibetan plateau to SE-E along major strike-slip faults, the stress field of the Daliangshan sub-block and its adjacent regions is controlled jointly by the Bayan Har block, the Sichuan-Yunnan block and the South China block. 相似文献
12.
利用双差定位方法对玉树地震序列2010年4月14日至10月31日间发生的ML≥1.0地震进行双差定位,得到1545个地震的重定位结果.综合分析地震双差定位结果和玉树地震序列中强地震震源机制解,发现玉树MS7.3地震发震构造由北西向和北东东向两条相交断层组成,主震发生在北西走向的甘孜—玉树断裂带上,5月29日的MS5.9余震序列发生在北东东走向的一条隐伏断裂上,两条断裂均接近直立.甘孜—玉树断裂是羌塘地块和巴彦喀拉地块的构造边界,由于羌塘地块和巴颜喀拉地块的差异运动使甘孜—玉树断裂强耦合段应力高度积累,在应变能超过岩石强度时破裂失稳发生了MS7.3地震.主震断层的左旋滑动导致北东东向断层的正应力减小,库伦应力增加,45天后触发了MS5.9余震序列的活动. 相似文献
13.
2013年4月20日发生了四川芦山MS7.0地震,主震中位于青藏地块与华南地块结合部的龙门山断裂带南端.本研究用双差定位法对芦山地震主震及余震序列进行重新定位,得到主震位置为(30.29°N,102.97°E,17.82 km)及4100多次余震重新定位结果.利用GSN/IRIS台网和国家台网及四川省区域台网的波形数据对主震及部分余震进行了震源机制解反演.结果表明,主震为一次逆冲地震,根据余震序列分布确定发震断层面走向为200°,震源机制解断层倾角为45°.基于震源断层面解和断层滑动方向,采用力轴张量计算法得到了研究区域的平均主压应力方向约为N112°E. 相似文献
14.
Based on the digital waveforms of Xinjiang Seismic Network, the Hutubi MS6.2 earthquake sequence (ML ≥ 1.0) was relocated precisely by HypoDD.The best double-couple focal mechanisms of the main shock and aftershocks of ML ≥ 4.0 were determined by the CAP method. We analyzed the characteristics of spatial distribution, focal mechanisms and the seismogenic structure of earthquake sequence. The results show that the main shock is located at 43.775 9°N, 86.363 4°E; the depth of the initial rupture and centriod is about 15.388km and 17km. The earthquake sequence extends unilaterally along NWW direction with an extension length of about 15km and a depth ranging 5~15km. The characteristics of the depth profiles show that the seismogenic fault plane dips northward and the faulting is dominated by thrusting. The nodal planes parameters of the best double-couple focal mechanisms are:strike 292°, dip 62° and rake 80° for nodal plane I, and strike 132°, dip 30° and rake 108° for nodal plane Ⅱ, indicating that the main shock is of thrust faulting. The dip of nodal planeⅠis consistent with the dip of the depth profile, which is inferred to be the fault plane of seismogenic fault of this earthquake. According to the comprehensive analysis of the relocation results, the focal mechanism and geological structure in the source region, it is preliminarily inferred that the seismogenic structure of the Hutubi MS6.2 earthquake may be a backthrust on the deeper concealed thrust slope at the south of Qigu anticline. The earthquake is a "folding" earthquake taking place under the stress field of Tianshan expanding towards the Junggar Basin. 相似文献
15.
2014年2月12日新疆于田发生MS7.3地震,该震前1天曾发生MS5.4前震,震后余震活动频繁.截止到2月20日12时,该地震序列记录到4000多次余震,最大余震为2月12日MS5.7地震,序列类型为前震—主震—余震型.该地震前震的b值明显低于该区域正常活动的b值和余震的b值.这次地震位于西昆仑断裂带与阿尔金断裂带的交汇区域的阿什库勒断裂北段,震源机制解为走滑型.余震区NE向长70 km、宽20 km,分为主余震分布区和次余震分布区,其中ML4.0以上强余震基本位于NE向主余震分布区,N--S向的次余震分布区则以ML3.0左右地震分布为主,显示该部分可能受到主震的触发作用.于田地区曾发生的2008年3月21日MS7.3地震的震源机制解为正断型,距这次地震约100 km;2012年8月12日发生的MS6.2地震的震源机制解为正断型,距这次地震约10 km.该地区的发震构造背景是:在NE向阿尔金断裂带尾端向SW方向延伸过程中,左旋走滑作用逐渐转换为拉张作用,形成多条左旋走滑兼具拉张作用的断裂. 2014年于田MS7.3地震的发震模式表现为:左旋走滑的阿什库勒断裂北段与南段因速率差异而产生的小型构造盆地,在区域拉张作用力下顺时针旋转;2008年MS7.3张性地震后区域的伸展作用增强,导致盆地南侧的苦牙克断裂发生2012年MS6.2张性地震,该地震引起2014年MS5.4前震,两者激发其后在盆地北侧阿什库勒断裂发生了2014年MS7.3主震. 相似文献
16.
本文使用2009年7月9日—12月23日2009年姚安MS6.0地震序列中ML≥1.0地震的震相数据, 采用双差定位法对该序列进行重定位, 共得到643次地震的精定位结果; 利用P波初动和振幅比法获取了20次ML≥3.0地震的震源机制解; 在此基础上采用滑动拟合法得到姚安MS6.0地震序列的震源区应力场． 研究结果表明: ① 2009年姚安MS6.0地震序列的发震断层为NW走向、 NE倾向的高角度右旋走滑断层; ② 该序列的余震条带延伸方向与2000年姚安MS6.5地震序列一致, 两次主震震源机制解一致且两个地震序列均发生在马尾箐断裂上, 2009年姚安MS6.0地震序列是马尾箐断裂向NW方向的延伸; ③ 姚安MS6.0地震震源区的最大主应力方向为NNW--SSE向, 接近水平, 与区域应力场方向一致; ④ 2009年姚安MS6.0地震序列是在区域应力增强的背景下, 位于高低速过渡带高速一侧的震源区应力高度积累, 使得马尾箐断裂向NW方向破裂扩展的结果． 相似文献
17.
STUDY ON THE SEISMOGENIC FAULT AND DYNAMICS PARAME-TERS OF THE 2014 MS6.6 JINGGU EARTHQUAKE IN YUNNAN 
下载免费PDF全文
下载免费PDF全文 On October 17, 2014, a MS6.6 earthquake occurred in Jinggu, Yunnan. The epicenter was located in the western branch of Wuliang Mountain, the northwest extension line of Puwen Fault. There are 2 faults in the surrounding area, one is a sinistral strike-slip and the other is the dextral. Two faults have mutual intersection with conjugate joints property to form a checkerboard faulting structure. The structure of the area of the focal region is complex. The present-day tectonic movement is strong, and the aftershock distribution indicates the faulting surface trending NNW. There is no obvious surface rupture related to the known fault in the epicenter, and there is a certain distance from the surface of the Puwen fault zone. Regional seismic activity is strong. In 1941, there were two over magnitude 7.0 earthquakes in the south of the epicenter of Jinggu County and Mengzhe Town. In 1988, two mainshock-aftershock type earthquakes occurred in Canglan-Gengma Counties, the principal stress axes of the whole seismic area is in the direction of NNE. Geological method can be adopted to clarify the distribution of surficial fracture caused by active faults, and high-precision seismic positioning and spatial distribution characteristics of seismic sequences can contribute to understand deep seismogenic faults and geometric features. Thus, we can better analyze the three-dimensional spatial distribution characteristics of seismotectonics and the deep and shallow tectonic relationship. The focal mechanism reveals the property and faulting process to a certain extent, which can help us understand not only the active property of faults, but also the important basis for deep tectonic stress and seismogenic mechanism. In order to study the fault characteristic of the Jinggu earthquake, the stress field characteristics of the source area and the geometric parameters of the fault plane, this paper firstly uses the 15 days aftershock data of the Jingsuo MS6.6 earthquake, to precisely locate the main shock and aftershock sequences using double-difference location method. The results show that the aftershock sequences have clustering characteristics along the NW direction, with a depth mainly of 5~15km. Based on the precise location, calculations are made to the focal mechanisms of a total of 46 earthquakes including the main shock and aftershocks with ML ≥ 3.0 of the Jinggu earthquake. The double-couple(DC)component of the focal mechanism of the main shock shows that nodal plane Ⅰ:The strike is 239°, the dip 81°, and the rake -22°; nodal plane Ⅱ, the strike is 333°, the dip 68°, and the rake -170.31°. According to focal mechanism solutions, there are 42 earthquakes with a focal mechanism of strike-slip type, accounting for 91.3%. According to the distribution of the aftershock sequence, it can be inferred that the nodal plane Ⅱ is the seismogenic fault. The obtained focal mechanism is used to invert the stress field in the source region. The distribution of horizontal maximum principal stress orienation is concentrated. The main features of the regional tectonic stress field are under the NNE-SSW compression(P axis)and the NW-SE extension(T axis)and are also affected by NNW direction stress fields in the central region of Yunnan, which indicates that Jinggu earthquake fault, like Gengma earthquake, is a new NW-trending fault which is under domination of large-scale tectonic stress and effected by local tectonic stress environment. In order to define more accurately the occurrence of the fault plane of the Jinggu earthquake, with the precise location results and the stress field in the source region, the global optimal solution of the fault plane parameters and its error are obtained by using both global searching simulated annealing algorithm and local searching Gauss-Newton method. Since the parameters of the fault plane fitting process use the stress parameters obtained by the focal mechanism inversion, the data obtained by the fault plane fitting is more representative of the rupture plane, that is, the strike 332.75°, the dip 89.53°, and the rake -167.12°. The buried depth of the rupture plane is 2.746km, indicating that the source fault has not cut through the surface. Based on the stress field characteristics and the inversion results of the fault plane, it is preliminarily believed that the seismogenic structure of the Jinggu earthquake is a newly generated nearly vertical right-lateral strike-slip fault with normal component. The rupture plane length is about 17.2km, which does not extend to the Puwen fault zone. Jinggu earthquake occurred in Simao-Puer seismic region in the south of Sichuan-Yunnan plate. Its focal mechanism solution is similar to that of the three sub-events of the Gengma earthquake in November 1988. The seismogenic structure of both of them is NW-trending and the principal stress is NE-SW. The rupture plane of the Jinggu main shock(NW direction)is significantly different from the known near NS direction Lancang Fault and the near NE direction Jinggu Fault in the study area. It is preliminarily inferred that the seismogenic structure of this earthquake has a neogenetic feature. 相似文献
18.
利用双差定位方法对2018年松原MS5.7地震序列中ML≥1.0地震重新定位，之后使用CAP方法求解松原MS5.7地震序列中强地震的震源机制解，再借助MSATSI软件包反演得到松原地区的区域应力场。综合分析以上研究结果得到如下结论:① 松原MS5.7地震序列发生在NW走向的第二松花江断裂与NE走向的扶余—肇东断裂交会处，将地震精定位结果沿两条断层走向作剖面分析，NW向剖面主轴长度约为5 km，震中分布均匀，NE向剖面主轴长度亦约为5 km，震中呈倾向NE的高倾角分布；② 该序列中的4次ML≥3.7地震的震源机制解具有良好的一致性:节面Ⅰ走向为NE向，节面Ⅱ走向为NW向，均为高倾角走滑断层。中强地震的震源机制节面解与第二松花江断裂性质基本一致，由此推断第二松花江断裂是本次松原地震的发震断层；③ 松原地区的主压应力方位角为N86°E，倾角为7°，主张应力方位角为N24°E，倾角为71°。松原地区的区域应力场既受到大尺度的板块构造运动的控制，又受到区域构造运动的影响。在太平洋板块对北东亚板块向西俯冲作用下，东北地区产生了近EW向的主压应力，受周边地质构造控制，松辽盆地内NE向断裂与NW向断裂交会处易发生走滑型地震，2018年松原MS5.7地震正是在这种构造作用控制下发生的中强地震。 相似文献
19.
RELOCATION OF THE 23 NOVEMBER 2017 WULONG MS5.0 EARTHQUAKE SEQUENCE AND ANALYSIS OF ITS SEISMOGENIC FAULT 下载免费PDF全文
下载免费PDF全文 LI Cui-ping TANG Mao-yun GUO Wei-ying HUANG Shi-yuan WANG Xiao-long GAO Jian 《地震地质》2019,41(3):603-618
The Wulong MS5.0 earthquake on 23 November 2017, located in the Wolong sap between Wenfu, Furong and Mawu faults, is the biggest instrumentally recorded earthquake in the southeastern Chongqing. It occurred unexpectedly in a weak earthquake background with no knowledge of dramatically active faults. The complete earthquake sequences offered a significant source information example for focal mechanism solution, seismotectonics and seismogenic mechanism, which is helpful for the estimation of potential seismic sources and level of the future seismic risk in the region. In this study, we firstly calculated the focal mechanism solutions of the main shock using CAP waveform inversion method and then relocated the main shock and aftershocks by the method of double-difference algorithm. Secondly, we determined the seismogenic fault responsible for the MS5.0 Wulong earthquake based on these calculated results. Finally, we explored the seismogenic mechanism of the Wulong earthquake and future potential seismic risk level of the region.
The results show the parameters of the focal mechanism solution, which are:strike24°, dip 16°, and rake -108° for the nodal plane Ⅰ, and strike223°, dip 75°, and rake -85° for the nodal plane Ⅱ. The calculations are supported by the results of different agencies and other methods. Additionally, the relocated results show that the Wulong MS5.0 earthquake sequence is within a rectangular strip with 4.7km in length and 2.4km in width, which is approximately consistent with the scales by empirical relationship of Wells and Coppersmith(1994). Most of the relocated aftershocks are distributed in the southwest of the mainshock. The NW-SE cross sections show that the predominant focal depth is 5~8km. The earthquake sequences suggest the occurrence features of the fault that dips northwest with dip angle of 63° by the least square method, which is largely consistent with nodal planeⅡof the focal mechanism solution. Coincidentally, the field outcrop survey results show that the Wenfu Fault is a normal fault striking southwest and dipping 60°~73° by previous studies. According to the above data, we infer that the Wenfu Fault is the seismogenic structure responsible for Wulong MS5.0 earthquake.
We also propose two preliminary genetic mechanisms of "local stress adjustment" and "fluid activation effect". The "local stress adjustment" model is that several strong earthquakes in Sichuan, such as M8.0 Wenchuan earthquake, M7.0 Luzhou earthquake and M7.0 Jiuzhaigou earthquake, have changed the stress regime of the eastern margin of the Sichuan Basin by stress transference. Within the changed stress regime, a minor local stress adjustment has the possibility of making a notable earthquake event. In contract, the "fluid activation effect" model is mainly supported by the three evidences as follows:1)the maximum principle stress axial azimuth is against the regional stress field, which reflects NWW-SEE direction thrusting type; 2)the Wujiang River crosscuts the pre-existing Wenfu normal fault and offers the fluid source; and 3)fractures along the Wenfu Fault formed by karst dissolution offer the important fluid flow channels. 相似文献