共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 171 毫秒
1.
基于有限断层模型反演方法,利用区域宽频带数据反演了2022年1月青海门源MS6.9地震的震源破裂过程,并结合地质构造与地震重定位结果判断发震断层走向.综合反演结果表明:此次地震的发震断层走向为WNW向,主要以走滑为主;破裂主要发生在震源两侧,可能存在着双侧破裂,在震后2 s和9 s出现破裂极大值,最大错动量约为1.5 m,位于深度约6km处,发生明显破裂的深度约为16 km,地表破裂长度约20 km;此次地震释放的标量地震矩为1.23×1019N·m,相当于矩震级MW6.7,地震能量主要在前15 s释放;发震断层面的倾角为84.6°,接近于垂直,由于破裂范围较大,所以发生明显错动分布的地表投影也长达34 km. 相似文献
2.
为了深入认识2016年4月15日日本熊本地震破裂的复杂性,利用远场体波资料和同震InSAR资料联合反演了此次地震的震源破裂时空过程. 联合反演结果表明:熊本地震的震源破裂持续时间约为25 s,整个破裂过程释放的总标量矩为6.03×1019 N·m,对应于矩震级MW7.1;同震滑动主要集中分布于浅部,破裂以右旋走滑为主,但在沿倾向0—5 km范围内,破裂呈较强的正断特征;此次地震破裂的最大同震滑动量约为4.9 m,且最大同震位错区位于背离断层走向上、距离起始破裂点约5—10 km的区域;破裂前期（0—7 s）,在倾向上向浅表发生破裂,在走向上向东北和西南两侧扩展;大约7 s后,破裂背离断层走向主要向东北方向扩展. 根据有限断层联合反演结果推测,此次熊本地震破裂可能出露至地表. 相似文献
3.
利用中国数字地震台网记录的区域宽频带波形,通过频率域和时间域多步反演,研究了2014年云南盈江Ms6.1地震基于点源模型的震源机制解和有限断层模型.考虑到使用不同的波形资料类型和简化的一维速度模型等因素对震源参数反演结果的影响,进行了大量的测试比较.结果表明,使用近震波形和本区域简化一维速度模型M1,波形拟合误差最小.基于点源模型的震源机制解显示此次地震发震断层面参数分别为:走向176°/倾角84°/滑动角-173°,表现为一次右旋走滑错动为主的事件.矩心在水平方向上位于震中(24.99°N,97.84.E)北东向约7km,最佳波形拟合矩心深度7km.平均总标量地震矩M0为7.56×1017N·m,计算成矩震级为Mw5.8.进一步模拟高达0.5Hz的高频波形,获得了盈江地震的有限断层模型,结果显示此次地震未表现出明显的破裂方向性.破裂半径约10km,整个破裂面积为267.2km2,平均滑动量约0.05m,破裂在5 s内释放了大多数能量.震后0～2s内,破裂以孕震点为中心向四周同时扩展,在深度7～ 17km内释放了部分能量.2s后,破裂朝断层面顶部和沿走向两侧进一步延伸,约5s后破裂基本停止. 相似文献
4.
基于青海和甘肃区域地震台网记录的宽频带地震波形和震相观测数据,利用近震全波形反演方法和双差定位方法分别对2022年1月23日青海德令哈MS5.8地震进行全矩张量反演和地震序列重定位研究。矩张量反演结果表明主震为一次典型走滑型地震,最佳断层面节面Ⅰ走向78°、倾角88°、滑动角－22°,节面Ⅱ走向169°、倾角68°、滑动角－177°,矩心深度为9 km,矩震级为MW＝5.5。定位结果显示余震优势展布方向为NNW－SSE,长度约16 km,余震震源深度优势分布在7～12 km之间。综合分析表明,节面Ⅱ与余震精定位所勾勒出的断层面走向和倾向较为一致,推断NNW走向的断层面为可能发震断层面,认为德令哈地震是发生在祁连山断裂带的向W倾、倾角约为68°的右旋走滑断裂上。在印度板块向欧亚板块俯冲挤压作用下,青藏高原东北部构造块体应力不断积累,造成祁连山断裂带内断层失稳而发生此次青海德令哈MS5.8地震。 相似文献
5.
烈度与余震分布显示2014年云南鲁甸MW6.1(MS6.5)地震的发震构造较复杂.为深入了解鲁甸地震的发震断层与破裂特征,本文考虑了单一断层破裂和共轭断层破裂的情况,对震中距250km范围内的近震资料(宽频带资料和强震资料)和远震体波资料进行了反演,得到了鲁甸地震的破裂过程,探讨了滑动分布与余震分布之间的关系.根据反演得到的滑动分布、震源时间函数和波形拟合,认为鲁甸地震是一次在北西向主压应力与北东向主张应力的统一应力场下发生的两条共轭断层先后破裂的一次复杂地震事件.在破裂开始后0~2s,破裂主要发生在ENE—WSW向(近东西向)的断层上,随后NNW—SSE向(近南北向)断层开始破裂,释放了大部分的地震矩.由于近南北向断层南段(即震中以南)的破裂规模较大,且以左旋走滑为主,对近东西向断层的西段起到了一定程度的解锁作用,可能是震中以西无明显主震破裂但存在密集余震分布的主要原因. 相似文献
6.
基于有限断层模型反演方法,我们利用区域宽频带数据反演得到了2014年8月3日鲁甸MS6.5级地震的震源破裂过程.反演结果显示：此次地震的发震断层走向为北北西向,破裂主要以左旋走滑为主,位移主要发生在震源左上方,最大滑动量为0.7 m,模型显示断层破裂可能接近地表,破裂长度约10 km.此次地震释放的标量地震矩为1.97×1018 N·m,相当于矩震级为Mw 6.1,地震能量主要在前15 s释放.鲁甸地震有四个显著的特点：（1）位移主要集中在浅部,从11 km起破点开始迅速向上传播,大部分位于10 km以上且最大位移位于深度3 km处,从模型来看,破裂可能接近地表,因此地表震动较为强烈;（2）应力降比较大,计算显示释放的同震静态应力降约为2.8 MPa;（3）破裂速度较快,在地表附近超过了2.5 km·s-1;（4）主震可能发生在一个共轭断层系上.这四个特点可能是导致此次地震造成如此重大人员伤亡和财产损失的最重要的原因. 相似文献
7.
根据中国和全球地震台网记录的波形记录,采用W震相矩张量反演、反投影分析及有限断层模型反演方法,研究了2016年3月2日印尼7.8级地震破裂过程,分析讨论印尼地震震源运动学特征.结果表明：此地震为一次对称的双侧破裂走滑型事件,北北东─南南西向的断层节面（走向5°/倾角85°）为发震断层面.标量地震矩约6.19×1020 Nm,矩震级为7.79,最大的滑动量约11 m,位于破裂起始点北东,沿着断层走向约30 km处.破裂平均速度2.0~2.2 km·s-1,破裂持续时间35 s,破裂在5~25 s内释放的能量,约占总能量的97%.最终形成了总长度90 km左右的断层.印尼地震具有破裂持续时间短、破裂速度慢、高滑动能量带相对集中等显著特点.本研究对进一步增进海洋岩石圈地震的震源特性认识有重要参考意义. 相似文献
8.
2014年8月3日云南鲁甸（MW6.1,MS6.5）地震是一次规模不大、但灾害严重的走滑型地震事件.受走滑型地震辐射图型的影响,远震地震资料在特定方位上信噪比不高,给此次地震发震断层面的确定造成了一些干扰.本文概述了鲁甸地震发生后2.4小时发布的作为地震应急响应的破裂过程快速反演工作,以及随后对反演结果的修订工作.修订结果中,两个双力偶节面的反演都显示破裂方向朝地表和走向方向扩展.结合现有的烈度分布和余震精确定位结果,根据破裂方向和烈度与余震分布的优势方向的一致性,确定鲁甸地震是发生在走向162°,倾角86°的近乎垂直于地面的以左旋走滑为主的断层面上的一次破裂事件.根据破裂过程反演得到的震源时间函数,大部分地震矩在破裂开始后2~5 s内集中释放. 比较集中的地震矩释放过程可能是此次地震面波震级明显高于矩震级,且造成严重地震灾害的原因之一. 相似文献
9.
10.
11.
2014年3月10日13时18分(北京时间)美国加利福尼亚州西北岸发生Mw6.9级地震,震中位于戈尔达板块内部.本文利用国际地震学研究联合会(IRIS)地震数据中心提供的远场体波数据,通过波形反演的方法来研究此次地震的震源破裂过程,并分析未造成重大人员伤亡及诱发海啸的原因,为该地区地球动力学的研究提供依据.选取19个方位角覆盖均匀的远场P波垂向波形记录和13个近场P波初动符号进行约束,基于剪切位错点源模型确定此次地震的震源机制解.结合地质构造背景资料,确定断层破裂面的走向.在考虑海水层多次反射效应的影响下,采用18个远场P波垂向波形数据和21个远场SH波切向波形数据,利用有限断层模型,将断层面剖分为17×9块子断层单元来模拟破裂面上滑动的时空分布,通过波形反演的方法获得此次地震的震源破裂过程.利用海水层地壳模型,剪切位错点源模型的反演结果为:走向323°,倾角86.1°,滑动角-180°,震源深度为10.6km.有限断层模型的反演结果表明,此次地震的破裂过程相对简单,主要滑动量集中于震源上方35km×9km的区域内,破裂时间持续19s左右,平均破裂传播速度约为2.7km·s-1,较大滑动量均沿着走向分布,最大滑动量为249cm.此次地震为发生在戈尔达板块内部的一次Mw6.9级的陡倾角走滑型地震.此次地震为单纯的走滑型地震,断层面接近竖直方向,且发生在洋壳底部,因此破坏力不大,不会对沿岸城市造成重大损失.陡倾角断层在走滑错动的过程中不会使海底地形发生大幅度变化,不会引起大面积水体的突然升降,因此不会诱发大规模海啸. 相似文献
12.
2020年6月23日15时29分04秒（UTC）,在墨西哥南部瓦哈卡州发生了一次震级为MW7.4的地震,我们利用全球地震台网（GSN）和国际数字地震台网联盟（FDSN）台网的长周期和宽频带P波数据反演分析了这次地震的震源机制、震源时间函数以及时空破裂过程.根据反演结果,这次地震的矩心震中位于15.96°N,95.89°W,矩心深度约为22 km;地震持续15 s左右,释放地震矩1.24×1020 N·m,相当于矩震级MW7.4;破裂过程比较简单,仅有一个走向和倾向方向尺度相当的凹凸体错动,最大位错达8.1 m,位于21 km深处.凹凸体破裂主要沿断层的滑动方向呈双侧破裂,两个优势破裂方向在地表投影的方位分别位于60°和270°左右.综合构造背景、震源位置、余震分布、震源机制以及时空破裂过程,我们相信这次地震是发生在北美大陆板块和太平洋海底板块相互作用的结果.海底板块朝着大约60°左右的方位运动,以大约22°的倾角插入大陆板块,造成一个凹凸体错动,形成了这次地震. 相似文献
13.
THE SOURCE PARAMETERS AND RUPTURE PROCESS OF THE MW7.0 EARTHQUAKE IN ALASKA,USA ON DECEMBER 1, 2018 
下载免费PDF全文
下载免费PDF全文 XU Zhi-guo ZHANG Huai ZHOU Yuan-ze LIANG Shan-shan SU Zhe SHI Jian-yu ZHAO-Bo 《地震地质》2019,41(5):1223-1238
A magnitude MW7.0 earthquake struck north of Anchorage, Alaska, USA on 1 December 2018. This earthquake occurred in the Alaska-Aleutian subduction zone, on a fault within the subducting Pacific slab rather than on the shallower boundary between the Pacific and North American plates. In order to better understand the earthquake source characteristics and slip distribution of source rupture process as well as to explore the effect of tectonic environment on dynamic triggering of earthquake, the faulting geometry, slip distribution, seismic moment, source time function are estimated from broadband waveforms downloaded from IRIS Data Management Center. We use the regional broadband waveforms to infer the source parameters with ISOLA package and the teleseismic body wave recorded by stations of the Global Seismic Network is employed to conduct slip distribution inversion with iterative deconvolution method. The focal mechanism solution indicates that the Alaska earthquake occurred as the result of tensile-type normal faulting, the estimated centroid depth from waveform inversion shows that the earthquake occurred at the depth of 56.5km, and the centroid location is 10km far away in northeast direction relative to the location of initial epicenter. We use the aftershock distribution to constrain the fault-plane strike of a normal fault to set up the finite fault model, the finite fault inversion shows that the earthquake slip distribution is concentrated mainly on a rectangular area with 30km×20km, and the maximum slip is up to 3.6m. In addition, the slip distribution shows an asymmetrical distribution and the range of possible rupture direction, the direction of rupture extends to the northeast direction, which is same as that of aftershock distribution for a period of ten days after the mainshock. It is interesting to note that a seismic gap appears in the southwest of the seismogenic fault, we initially determined that the earthquake was a typical normal fault-type earthquake that occurred in the back-arc extensional environment of the subduction collision zone between the Pacific plate and the North American plate, this earthquake was not related to tectonic movement of faults near the Earth's surface. Due to the influence of high temperature and pressure during the subduction of the Pacific plate toward to the north, the subduction angle of the Pacific plate becomes steep, causing consequently the backward bending deformation, thus forming to a tensile environment at the trailing edge of the collision zone and generating the MW7.0 earthquake in Alaska. 相似文献
14.
Based on digital teleseismic P-wave seismograms recorded by 28 long-period seismograph stations of the global seismic network,
source process of the November 14, 2001 western Kunlun Mountain M
S=8.1 (M
W=7.8) earthquake is estimated by a new inversion method. The result shows that the earthquake is a very complex rupture event.
The source rupture initiated at the hypocenter (35.95°N, 90.54°E, focal depth 10 km, by USGS NEIC), and propagated to the
west at first. Then, in several minutes to a hundred minutes and over a large spatial range, several rupture growth points
emerged in succession at the eastern end and in the central part of the finite fault. And then the source rupture propagated
from these rupture growth points successively and, finally, stopped in the area within 50 km to the east of the centroid position
(35.80°N, 92.91°E, focal depth 15 km, by Harvard CMT). The entire rupture lasted for 142 s, and the source process could be
roughly separated into three stages: The first stage started at the 0 s and ended at the 52 s, lasting for 52 s and releasing
approximately 24.4% of the total moment; The second stage started at the 55 s and ended at the 113 s, lasting for 58 s and
releasing approximately 56.5% of the total moment; The third stage started at the 122 s and ended at the 142 s, lasting for
20 s and releasing approximately 19.1% of the total moment. The length of the ruptured fault plane is about 490 km. The maximum
width of the ruptured fault plane is about 45 km. The rupture mainly occurred within 30 km in depth under the surface of the
Earth. The average static slip in the underground rocky crust is about 1.2 m with the maximum static slip 3.6 m. The average
static stress drop is about 5 MPa with the maximum static stress drop 18 MPa. The maximum static slip and the maximum stress
drop occurred in an area within 50 km to the east of the centroid position.
Foundation item: Joint Seismological Science Foundation of China (103066) and Foundation of the Seismic Pattern and Digital Seismic Data
Application Research Office of Institute of Earthquake Science of the China Earthquake Administration. 相似文献
15.
2013年7月22日,在甘肃岷县漳县交界处发生MS6.6地震,地震震中位置靠近临潭—宕昌断裂.本文通过构建有限断层模型,利用国家强震动台网中心提供的12条强地面运动三分量资料,通过波形反演方法来研究这次地震的震源破裂过程.结果显示这次地震是发生在甘东南地区岷县—宕昌断裂带东段附近的一次MW6.1级逆冲兼具左旋走滑破裂事件,最大滑动量约为80cm.发震断层走向及滑动性质与岷县—宕昌断裂吻合,推断本次地震与东昆仑断裂向北的扩展和推挤密切相关,是岷县—宕昌断裂进一步活动的结果. 相似文献
16.
The Akto M_S6. 7 earthquake occurred near the western end of the Muji fault basin in the top of the Pamir syntaxis. The main shock of this earthquake is complicated and the focal mechanism solutions based on the seismic wave inversions are different. Based on the Sentinel-1 SAR data,the coseismal deformation field of the earthquake is obtained by In SAR technique. Based on the elastic half-space dislocation model,the geometrical parameters and the slip distribution model are determined by nonlinear and linear inversion algorithms. The results show that the distributed slip model can well explain the coseismic deformation field. The earthquake includes at least two rupture events,which are located at 7 km(74. 11°E,39. 25°N)and 33 km(74. 49°E,39. 16°N)east from the epicenter according to the CENC. The deformation field caused by the earthquake shows a symmetry distribution,with the maximum LOS deformation of 20 cm. The main seismic slip is concentrated in the 0-20 km depth,and the maximum slip is 0. 84 m. The seismic fault is the Muji fault,and this earthquake indicates that the northeastward push of the Indian plate is enhanced. 相似文献
17.
Based on digital teleseismic P-wave seismograms recorded by 28 long-period seismograph stations of the global seismic network, source process of the November 14, 2001 western Kunlun Mountain M S=8.1 (M W=7.8) earthquake is estimated by a new inversion method. The result shows that the earthquake is a very complex rupture event. The source rupture initiated at the hypocenter (35.95°N, 90.54°E, focal depth 10 km, by USGS NEIC), and propagated to the west at first. Then, in several minutes to a hundred minutes and over a large spatial range, several rupture growth points emerged in succession at the eastern end and in the central part of the finite fault. And then the source rupture propagated from these rupture growth points successively and, finally, stopped in the area within 50 km to the east of the centroid position (35.80°N, 92.91°E, focal depth 15 km, by Harvard CMT). The entire rupture lasted for 142 s, and the source process could be roughly separated into three stages: The first stage started at the 0 s and ended at the 52 s, lasting for 52 s and releasing approximately 24.4% of the total moment; The second stage started at the 55 s and ended at the 113 s, lasting for 58 s and releasing approximately 56.5% of the total moment; The third stage started at the 122 s and ended at the 142 s, lasting for 20 s and releasing approximately 19.1% of the total moment. The length of the ruptured fault plane is about 490 km. The maximum width of the ruptured fault plane is about 45 km. The rupture mainly occurred within 30 km in depth under the surface of the Earth. The average static slip in the underground rocky crust is about 1.2 m with the maximum static slip 3.6 m. The average static stress drop is about 5 MPa with the maximum static stress drop 18 MPa. The maximum static slip and the maximum stress drop occurred in an area within 50 km to the east of the centroid position. 相似文献
18.
The source parameters, such as moment tensor, focal mechanism, source time function (STF) and temporal-spatial rupture process,
were obtained for the January 26, 2001, India, M
S=7.8 earthquake by inverting waveform data of 27 GDSN stations with epicentral distances less than 90°. Firstly, combining
the moment tensor inversion, the spatial distribution of intensity, disaster and aftershocks and the orientation of the fault
where the earthquake lies, the strike, dip and rake of the seismogenic fault were determined to be 92°, 58° and 62°, respectively.
That is, this earthquake was a mainly thrust faulting with the strike of near west-east and the dipping direction to south.
The seismic moment released was 3.5×1020 Nm, accordingly, the moment magnitude M
W was calculated to be 7.6. And then, 27 P-STFs, 22 S-STFs and the averaged STFs of them were determined respectively using
the technique of spectra division in frequency domain and the synthetic seismogram as Green’s functions. The analysis of the
STFs suggested that the earthquake was a continuous event with the duration time of 19 s, starting rapidly and ending slowly.
Finally, the temporal-spatial distribution of the slip on the fault plane was imaged from the obtained P-STFs and S-STFs using
an time domain inversion technique. The maximum slip amplitude on the fault plane was about 7 m. The maximum stress drop was
30 MPa, and the average one over the whole rupture area was 7 MPa. The rupture area was about 85 km long in the strike direction
and about 60 km wide in the down-dip direction, which, equally, was 51 km deep in the depth direction. The rupture propagated
50 km eastwards and 35 km westwards. The main portion of the rupture area, which has the slip amplitude greater than 0.5 m,
was of the shape of an ellipse, its major axis oriented in the slip direction of the fault, which indicated that the rupture
propagation direction was in accordance with the fault slip direction. This phenomenon is popular for strike-slip faulting,
but rather rare for thrust faulting. The eastern portion of the rupture area above the initiation point was larger than the
western portion below the initiation point, which was indicative of the asymmetrical rupture. In other words, the rupturing
was kind of unilateral from west to east and from down to up. From the snapshots of the slip-rate variation with time and
space, the slip rate reached the largest at the 4th second, that was 0.2 m/s, and the rupture in this period occurred only
around the initiation point. At the 6th second, the rupture around the initiation point nearly stopped, and started moving
outwards. The velocity of the westward rupture was smaller than that of the eastward rupture. Such rupture behavior like a
circle mostly stopped near the 15th second. After the 16th second, only some patches of rupture distributed in the outer region.
From the snapshots of the slip variation with time and space, the rupture started at the initiation point and propagated outwards.
The main rupture on the area with the slip amplitude greater than 5 m extended unilaterally from west to east and from down
to up between the 6th and the 10th seconds, and the western segment extended a bit westwards and downwards between the 11th
and the 13th seconds. The whole process lasted about 19 s. The rupture velocity over the whole rupture process was estimated
to be 3.3 km/s.
Foundation item: 973 Project (G1998040705) from Ministry of Science and Technology, P. R. China, and the National Science Foundation of China
under grant No.49904004.
Contribution No. 02FE2026, Institute of Geophysics, China Seismological Bureau. 相似文献
19.
北京时间2019年4月24日04∶15,西藏自治区林芝市墨脱县发生了MS6.3地震,该地震位于印度板块与欧亚板块俯冲碰撞的东北犄角地区,构造背景十分复杂.本研究基于我们在东喜马拉雅构造结地区架设的宽频带地震台站记录的近震波形数据,结合中国和国际地震台网的波形和到时资料,对该地震的震源位置、震源机制解和破裂过程进行了重新确定.结果显示,此次墨脱6.3级地震发生在（94.56±0.01°E,28.41±0.01°N）,震源深度为地表以下13.3±1.6（或海平面以下11.5±1.6）km.震源机制解走向/倾角/滑移角分别为202°/17°/20°,震源破裂较大的位置主要集中在初始破裂点NNE侧约5 km附近.结合其他地球物理和地质学资料,我们推测该地震位于主喜马拉雅逆冲断裂发生近90°突然偏转的大拐弯地区,桑构造结相对于其西侧南迦巴瓦构造结的西向俯冲和北向推挤是该地震发生的主要构造背景. 相似文献
20.
本文应用ISOLA近震全波形方法,以2017年1月4日西藏仲巴4.7级地震为例,反演稀疏台网记录的中小地震震源机制解。该地震反演所得最佳双偶机制参数为：节面Ⅰ的走向109°/倾角85°/滑动角-177°,节面Ⅱ的走向19°/倾角88°/滑动角-4°,最佳矩心位置为30.590°N、83.784°E,最佳质心深度为6km,矩震级MW4.6。震源机制反演结果表明此次地震是一次走滑型为主的事件,其与震源区域附近历史地震震源机制解具有相同性质。本文还应用CSPS初动扫描法,利用P波初动资料和近震波形联合约束反演此次地震的震源机制,并与ISOLA近震全波形反演结果进行比较,结果表明,联合少量台站的的三分量波形数据,能够定量地判断最佳震源机制解,降低了P波初动反演结果的非唯一性,同时也约束了由于少量台站参与全波形反演引起的解的不稳定性。本文研究为中小地震震源参数测定提供了一种简单有效的方法,具有较高的稳定性和可靠性。 相似文献