共查询到17条相似文献，搜索用时 191 毫秒
1.
在两组人工样品自由表面以中心点为基准对称布设3条辐射状测线,对样品实施单轴应力加载和卸载后,利用电阻率层析成像方法构建了相应的视电阻率相对变化图像,并计算和绘制了表征裂隙产生和发展速率的视电阻率各向异性系数λ*以及表征裂隙产生和发展方位的各向异性主轴方位角α随应力和深度的变化曲线.结果表明:所有测线所对应的RRC图像均随着应力的变化呈现出相同的变化趋势,即在加载阶段,随着应力的增加,视电阻率相对变化图像中电阻率降低区域逐渐收缩,而电阻率升高区域逐渐扩张,在卸载阶段,随着应力的减小,电阻率降低区域继续收缩,电阻率升高区域继续扩张;样品中的高阻体对其所在部位及附近区域的电阻率增幅有较大影响,而对横越高阻体测线的视电阻率相对变化图像的趋势性变化无影响;对于原始电性为各向异性的样品,随着应力的增加,其各向异性程度降低;裂隙主要在岩样的浅部产生和发展,而在较深部位的裂隙产生和发展的速率相对较低.上述结果有助于解释和理解地震、火山活动和大型地质构造运动引起的视电阻率及其各向异性的变化特征,电阻率层析成像方法可能成为目前地震电阻率观测方法的有益补充. 相似文献
2.
在3种非含岩成分造成的岩石原始电阻率各向异性标本(在采集和加工过程中，标本完整性遭 到破坏的标本)，和一种由含岩成分形成的 岩石原始电阻率各向异性标本上，布设多个电极，并将标本用水饱和. 然后用多电极组合法 ，将己布电极组合成不同方向、不同极距的电阻率各向异性测线. 采用单轴压缩、低围压 三 轴压缩和剪切3种加载方式，对标本进行动态电阻率变化实验. 观测标本电阻率随承载力的 变化. 实验结果表明∶对于岩石原始电阻率各向异性标本，在电阻率变化各向异性方面，与 岩石 原始电阻率各向同性标本相似，即∶裂隙和破碎带通过区域的测点，视电阻率变化各向异性 结果好，４种组合求得的４个各向异性主轴方向趋向一致，且与破碎带方向基本吻合；裂隙 和破碎带不经过区域的测点，４个视电阻率变化各向异性主轴方向不一致，或者根本求不出 各向异性解. 这后一种情况，在裂隙面平行测量面时，表现最为明显. 相似文献
3.
单轴压力下有补给水岩石电阻率变化各向异性研究 总被引：18，自引：1，他引：18
将两种规格的长方体水饱和花岗岩标本，以标本一个面的中心点为中心，对称布置成互成４５°角的４条对称四极法电阻率测线。标本电极面和相邻面的一小部分用防水环氧胶密封，使标本在装有水的承压水箱中，沿标本长轴方向受压，观测标本视电阻率随压力的变化。实验结果为：（１）有补给水实验与无补给水实验，电阻率变化整体形态相似，即电阻率随压力的变化先上升，后下降，但有补给水实验的电阻率下降幅度要大一些。（２）电阻率变化出现明显的方向性，可以用电阻率变化最大的各向异性主轴方向表示；实验中，用４条测线、４种组合（每３条测线组合可以确定１个视电阻率变化各向异性主轴方向）方法确定的４个电阻率变化各向异性主轴方向基本一致。（３）加压期间，电阻率各向异性主轴方向随压力增加发生变化，这种变化不是渐变和乱变，而是有规律的跃变，即整个实验过程，多数标本只跃变１—３次，每次跃变形成一个主方向，在主方向内，角度变化不大。（４）有补给水岩石电阻率变化整体形态与美国Ｂｒａｃｅ等（１９６８）所作的围压和孔隙压的岩石电阻率变化形态相似。 相似文献
4.
用归一化月速率方法处理了６次强震前近震中区11个台的地电阻率数据，得到在孕震中短期至短临阶段，与主压应力方向正交（或近于正交）测向的地电阻率下降变化的速率大于平行（或近于平行）主应力方向的变化速率．产生变化速率各向异性的原因可能是:在孕震后期的扩容阶段，裂隙走向沿主压应力方向优势排列，导电流体活动产生真电阻率变化速率的各向异性，表现为地表视电阻率变化速率的各向异性．本文为视电阻率各向异性的实验结果提供了震例支持，物理解释比较清晰，可能成为研究某些强震孕育晚期震源区及其附近地壳应力状态的参考依据． 相似文献
5.
将不同规格的长方体花岗岩标本,按事先设计的图案布设多个电极,并用抽真空的方法将标本进行水饱和．然后将标本电极面和相邻面的一小部分（包括棱）用防水绝缘胶密封．用多电极组合法,将己布电极组合成不同方向、不同极距的电阻率各向异性测线和电测剖面、电测深测线．使标本在装有水的承压水箱中,沿标本长轴方向受压,观测标本电阻率随压力的变化．在实验中,一些标本被压坏,出现宏观裂隙;一些标本没有被压坏,没有被压坏的标本通常压到电阻率出现明显破裂前兆为止．然后,将未压坏的标本测量面显微照相,从照片上寻找裂隙的优势方向,和被压坏标本的宏观裂隙一起,与电阻率各向异性计算结果进行对比,实验结果表明:① 裂隙和破碎带通过区域的测点,视电阻率变化各向异性结果好,4种组合求得的4个各向异性主轴方向趋于一致,且与破碎带方向基本吻合;裂隙和破碎带不经过区域的测点,或者4个视电阻率变化各向异性主轴方向不一致,或者根本求不出各向异性解．这后一种情况,在裂隙面平行测量面时,表现最为明显;② 显微照相显示的微观裂隙或破碎带的优势方向与电阻率变化最大的各向异性主轴方向基本一致;③ 电测剖面的结果,能较好地反映裂隙的位置和区域． 相似文献
6.
从电阻率的角度研究岩石裂隙介质的各向异性特征是一种方便而有效的方法,但多限于空间单个点上的测量数据分析.通过在砂岩岩样上的饱水与排水实验以及同步进行的高密度电阻率成像监测,探讨了应用高密度电阻率成像法获得图像研究岩石各向异性特征的可能性,分析了饱水与排水过程中岩石电阻率在不同方向上的响应特性.结果表明,电阻率成像法在分析岩石裂隙介质的各向异性方面具有多方向成像和动态监测的优点,可以通过对不同方向上获得的电阻率图像的分析,提取出岩石沉积结构的空间分布模式,清晰地反映出岩石在饱水和排水过程中电阻率变化空间分布模式的各向异性特征. 相似文献
7.
从横向均匀介质满足的基本方程出发,得到视电阻率核函数的一阶非线性微分方程,通过方程求解,并利用滤波系数法容易得到电阻率随深度任意变化的视电阻率问题。当各层介质电性结构随深度呈指数变化时,还可得到各层之间核函数的递推关系,这对实际介质的正反演问题都有重要意义和应用价值。 相似文献
8.
实验采用高密度电阻率方法探测滑坡体的电性结构, 用电阻率变化各向异性方法监测滑坡体的主破裂扩展方向和速率. 实验结果为: ① 电性结构探测实验, 验证了部分原勘测的滑坡体的蠕变体边界和地下水层的深度和厚度, 以及上层介质的性质. 证明滑动带富含地下水层; ② 用电阻率变化各向异性监测实验确定的测点主破裂扩展方向, 与滑坡体GPS位移推断的破裂带方向吻合, 且电阻率变化各向异性系数的变化速率与钻孔倾斜仪测量的滑坡体深部位移变化的速率相应. 相似文献
9.
10.
我国50多年的视电阻率连续观测结果表明,大地震前近震中区域的视电阻率呈现出与主压应力方位有关的各向异性变化,即:垂直于主压应力方向观测的变化幅度最大,平行方向最小或不明显,斜交方向介于二者之间.目前我国定点台站视电阻率观测的探测范围主要在浅层沉积层以内,通常含有较多的含水裂隙.本文将地下岩土介质简化为由固体基质和含流体/气体裂隙组成的固液气三相介质,且基质、流体和气体具有标量形式的电阻率,推导出了包含基质和流体电阻率、裂隙率、饱和度和裂隙面积率因子的电阻率张量表达式.以裂隙的扩展/闭合表示应力作用下裂隙的变化,得到了电阻率随裂隙变化的微分形式,电阻率变化对裂隙体积变化放大系数的表达式和裂隙横向变化对纵向电阻率影响的横向权系数的表达式.在此基础上得到了介质电阻率和视电阻率的各向异性变化特征:对于含水裂隙介质,无论裂隙如何变化,均是最小主轴方向电阻率的变化幅度大于其他方向;对于含水孔隙介质,沿孔隙主要变化方向的主轴电阻率变化幅度大于其他方向.对于各向异性变化,视电阻率和介质电阻率存在π/2的方向差异.相较于含水岩石,无水岩石介质电阻率的各向异性变化不显著.本文提出的电阻率表达式可以对实验室和野外实际观测的许多结果做出合理的解释. 相似文献
11.
In the past, domestic and abroad scientific workers have done a large number of experiment researches on a great number of researches of experiment for the relationship between electrical resistivity change and the load stress on rock (Geoelectric Testing Group, Department of Geophysics, Peking University and Research Division, Seismological Brigade of Lanzhou, 1978; Zhang, 1981; Chen, et al, 1983; Zhao, et al, 1983; Zhang, Lu, 1983; Zhang, et al, 1985; Brace, Orange, 1968; Kurite, 1986; Teisseyre, 1989), such as imitating dynamic fracture of rock, frictional sliding course, and observing its resistivity change shape with a lot of experimental workssuch as simulating the dynamic course of crustal rocks fracturing and frictional slipping along the fracture surface, and observing its resistivity change shape with experiment. They found that, in the fracture process of rock under loading, not only its resistivity shape change notably, and its direction changes also very clearly, and therefore many scientific workers have shown strong interest in anisotropy of resistivity change, and have done some researches onfor it. 相似文献
12.
受压岩石在破裂过程中,视电阻率会出现明显的变化,其异常形态与实验条件有很大的关系. 实验中对磁铁石英岩样品施加了单轴压缩,岩石的破裂经反复加载和卸载实现,并在岩样的裂隙中注入了食盐溶液. 在实验的各阶段,对样品的主剖面重建出一系列内部真电阻率分布的图像,揭示了介质内的微细结构,从而探讨了视电阻率变化的原因. 实验发现,岩石中裂隙的存在及所含液体的饱和状态,是岩石在主破裂前控制电阻率变化的两个最重要的因素;低应力状态属常态导电过程,孔隙度的变化是主要因素;高应力状态属裂隙表面导电机制,随着破裂面在岩体内部出现,水和孔隙有了完全贯通的平面,多种导电机制都得以发挥作用. 此外,体导电结构的变化在宏观上表现为各向异性和图样有序性的增强. 相似文献
13.
Using the natural limestone samples taken from the field with dimension of 500 mm×500 mm×1 000 mm, the D-D (dilatancy-diffusion)
seismogeny pattern was modeled under the condition of water injection, which observes the time-space evolutionary features
about the relative physics fields of the loaded samples from deformation, formation of microcracks to the occurrence of main
rupture. The results of observed apparent resistivity show: 1 The process of the deformation from microcrack to main rupture
on the loaded rock sample could be characterized by the precursory spatial-temporal changes in the observation of apparent
resistivity; 2 The precursory temporal changes of observation in apparent resistivity could be divided into several stages,
and its spatial distribution shows the difference in different parts of the rock sample; 3 Before the main rupture of the
rock sample the obvious “tendency anomaly” and “short-term anomaly” were observed, and some of them could be likely considered
as the “impending earthquake” anomaly precursor of apparent resistivity. The changes and distribution features of apparent
resistivity show that they are intrinsically related to the dilatancy phenomenon of the loaded rock sample. Finally, this
paper discusses the mechanism of resistivity change of loaded rock sample theoretically.
This subject is supported by the key project during the 8-th “Five Year Plan” from the State Science and Technology Commission
of China (85-04-04). 相似文献
14.
Anisotropy of the apparent resistivity variation rate near the epicentral region for strong earthquakes 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
IntroductionThe geo-electrical anisotropy before earthquake is of special significance for the prediction of earthquake location and for the research on crustal stress status near the epicentral region. The anisotropy has been studied from various aspects (CHEN, et al, 1983; QIAN, et al, 1985, 1996; LU, et al, 1990a; MAO, et al, 1995; RUAN, et al, 1999). But the anisotropic phenomena presented by geo-electrical data are not practically satisfactory and not clear as compared with the res… 相似文献
15.
常规电测井一般通过测量供电电极的电流和测量电极之间的电位差来计算围岩的视电阻率并划分地层界面,而忽略了对电流参数的利用。本文基于欧姆定律,通过供电电极电流的变化定性分析其周围岩矿石电阻的变化,进而用电流强度变化曲线识别地层属性。理论分析和试验结果表明,供电电极电流大小取决于电极的接触电阻,而视电阻率大小取决两个测量电极之间或供电与测量电极之间介质的电阻率总和,因此,电流比视电阻率对地层的灵敏度要高一些。绘制电流强度测井曲线可以准确划分地层层位,确定地层厚度,且不增加成本。 相似文献
16.
Parts of the consecutive apparent resistivity monitoring stations of China have recorded clear diurnal variations. The relative amplitudes of diurnal variations at these stations range from 1.3‰ to 5.8‰. The daily accuracies of apparent resistivity observation are better than 1‰, because the background electromagnetic noise is rather low at these stations. Therefore, the diurnal variations of apparent resistivity recorded at these stations are real phenomena. The diurnal variation shapes can be divided into two opposite types according to their characteristics. One type is that the apparent resistivity data decreases during the daytime but increases during the nighttime(Type 1). The other type is the apparent resistivity data increases during the daytime but decreases during the nighttime(Type 2). There is a correspondence between the diurnal and annual variation patterns of apparent resistivity. For the monitoring direction with diurnal variation of Type 1, the apparent resistivity decreases in summer and increases in winter. However, for the monitoring direction with diurnal variation of Type 2, the apparent resistivity increases in summer and decreases in winter.
We take an analysis on the mechanism of apparent resistivity diurnal variation, combining the influence factors of water-bearing medium's resistivity, the electric structure of stations, and the apparent resistivity sensitivity coefficient(SC)theory. Intuitively, diurnal variation of apparent resistivity is caused by diurnal variation of medium resistivity in the measured area. The diurnal variation of medium resistivity will inevitably be caused by the factors with diurnal variation. Among the possible factors, there is diural variation in earth tide and temperature.
Our analysis displays that apparent resistivity diurnal variation is not caused by the usually-believed earth tide, but by the ground temperature difference between daytime and nighttime. The earth tide strain is too small to cause remarkable effects on the apparent resistivity data. On the other hand, the daily tide strain has two peak-valley variations, and its phase and amplitude has a period of approximate 28 days. However, the apparent resistivity data do not show these corresponding features to earth tide. Furthermore, the detection range of current apparent resistivity stations is within a depth of several hundred meters. Within this depth range, the medium deformation caused by solid tide can be regarded as uniform change. Therefore, all monitoring directions and all stations will have the same pattern of diurnal variation.
In general, the temperature increases in the daytime but decreases in the nighttime. For most water-bearing rock and soil medium, its resistivity decreases as temperature increases and increases as temperature decreases. Diurnal temperature difference affects about 0.4m of soil depth. Therefore, resistivity of this surface thin soil layer decreases in the daytime while increases in the nighttime. Under layered medium model, SC of each layer represents its contribution to the apparent resistivity. For the stations with positive SC of surface layer, apparent resistivity decreases in the daytime but increases in the nighttime. While for the stations with negative SC of surface layer, apparent resistivity diurnal variations display the opposite shape. 相似文献