共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 375 毫秒
1.
INTRODUCTIONManyhlstoric andrecent eaythquakes occurred along the Zhan9lakou－Penglal fanfaut zone situatedIn h。northern part of North China seismic regl()n(Fig．l),Including Sanhe－Pinggu MS．0 earthquakeonseptemberZ,1679 and Tangshan M7．8 eal’thquake on July28,1976．Afterthe Tangshanearthquake,a seismic quiescence along this zone lasted for 20 or more yeas without M 3 6．0eafthquake．Butonjanuary20,1998 theZhangbel M6．2 eafthquake occurred·Then the seismicactivity tends to … 相似文献
2.
History of Paleoseismic Activity Along the Hohhot Segment of Daqingshan Piedmont Fault in the Late Quaternary 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
INTRODUCTIONTheDaqingshanpledmont扭nit Is an irllt,oltant active normal tsult In the active fault－depressionzone——Hetao ault－depression zone In the northern part of Ordos Block,North China．It lies in ENEdirection long the southern pledmont of Daqingshan Mountain,dips to south,and extends for 200 kmor。。The fault was formed In the Eocene and strongly activated In the Cenozolc．Its verticaldlspl。ement exceeds 2400 m since the Quaternary(Rese。h Group on Ordos Block,State… 相似文献
3.
Textual research of Wudu earthquake in 186 B.C. in Gansu Province, China and discussion on its causative structure 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
On the basis of the textual research on the historical earthquake data and the field investigation of Wudu earth- quake occurred in 186 B.C., we suggest that the earthquake parameters drawn from the present earthquake catalogs are not definite and amendments should be made. The heavily-damaged area of this earthquake should be located between Jugan township of Wudu County and Pingding township of Zhouqu County. Its epicenter should be in the vicinity of Lianghekou in Wudu County with a magnitude of about 7~7 41 and an intensity of about IX~X. The major axis direction of the heavily-damaged area should be in the WNW direction that is approximately consistent with the strike of the middle-east segment of Diebu-Bailongjiang active fault zone, and the origin time should match up to that of the latest paleoearthquake event [before (83±46) B.C.] obtained by the trench investigation. Certain seismic rupture evidences are still preserved on this fault segment. Therefore, we propose on the basis of comprehensive analysis that the causative structure of the M 7~7 4/1 Wudu earthquake in 186 B.C. should be in the middle-east segment of Diebu-Bailongjiang active fault zone. 相似文献
4.
Zhang Langping 《中国地震研究》2007,21(2):147-155
The variation of Load/Unload Response Ratio (LURR) against time for earthquakes in Kerman Province, Iran, on February 22, 2005, M6.4 and in Lorestan Province, Iran, on March 31, 2006, M6.1, has been calculated and analysed in this paper. The tempo-spatial scanning of LURR in the region of Iran during January 1, 2003 to March 31, 2006 has been conducted, with 1 year as a time-window, 1 month as a time-step, and the comparison of the LURR anomalous regions in 2004 with the actual earthquakes with M≥5.0 in the next year (2005) is also given, which shows that 11 earthquakes with M≥5.0 occurred in LURR anomalous regions while 12 earthquakes with M≥5.0 in LURR regions in 2005. Furthermore, the seismicity in this region is studied by investigating the evolvement of the anomalous LURR regions. 相似文献
5.
<正>An earthquake with M7. 1 occurred in Yushu,Qinghai Province,China,at 07:49 a. m. on April 14,2010,according to the Chinese Seismic Station Network. The sequence is a fore-mainafter-shock type sequence. A foreshock with M4. 7 occurred 2 hours and 11 minutes before the main shock. There were 12 foreshocks and 2385 aftershocks until June 31,2010. In which,there are 21 aftershocks between M3. 0 and M3. 相似文献
6.
Xu Wenjun Zhao Weiming Chai Chizhang Jin Yanlong Sun Lixin Zheng Sihu Satoshi Miura 《中国地震研究》2001,15(3):252-265
INT正ODU**!0厂Nln以la Is located In the nol’th segmentdthe North－southselsnuc Belt,Whlchls thejuncturedthe Qinghai－Xizang(Dbet)block,Alxa block and Odos block．In that region,the tectonic activity。svery strong;。y strong earthquakes occu。d In history,such as the 1739 ingluo M。8．0 earthqu拙eandl920 Halyuan M。8．5 eafthquake,etc．; Merately strongeaFthquakes are still veryactlve atpresent,onlyln the Wuzhong－un斟m area,there have been7 e血hquakes tvlth M。＞5．0 to occ… 相似文献
7.
Analysis on small-earthquake composite fault plane solutions from 1961 to 1999 in Xinfengjiang reservoir area 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
Introduction XFJ reservoir has been about 40 years since its water loading in 1959 and has induced a great number of earthquakes. The largest one was the M = 6.1 earthquake occurred on March 19, 1962. Since then, a large amount of seismologists in our country have made many researches on the in-duced earthquake. In the paper, we have studied XFJ reservoir earthquakes and their relation with water cyclic fluctuation by using the mechanism solutions of small earthquakes occurred in these 40 y… 相似文献
8.
General Seismic Zoning Map of the USSR( GSZ- 78) ,included in the Building Code,inspite of relative improvement in comparison with previous ones( 1 937,1 95 7,1 96 8) ,is charac-terized by significantreduction of seismic hazard.In some regions strong earthquakes exceed-ing the predicted intensity occurred almost every year.Such cases in Kazakhstan are theearthquakes of Bakanasskoye( 1 979,M=1 4,I=6～ 7) and Zaysanskoye( 1 990 ,M=7.0 ,K=1 6 ,I=8) .Besides,there are territories that are … 相似文献
9.
Relocation of the 1998 Zhangbei-Shangyi earthquake sequence using the double difference earthquake location algorithm 总被引：4，自引：0，他引：4
Introduction On January 10, 1998, at 11h50min Beijing Time (03h50min UTC), an earthquake of ML=6.2 occurred in the border region between the Zhangbei County and Shangyi County of Hebei Province. In total 87 events with ML3.0 were recorded by Beijing Telemetry Seismic Network (BTSN) before March of 1999. Before relocation the preliminary hypocenters determined by BTSN showed an epicentral distribution of 25 km long and 25 km wide without any predominate orientation. The epicentral a… 相似文献
10.
ConsldeMle research has been po山med on the卜quency－删哪tude relation since仇tenbe恰Rlchterproposed the relationLog N＝a＋bM ()WhereM Is the nunlmumm昭nltude In the data sam卫ie for a celtaln region,N Is the cumulativeMquency ofevents In a celtaln time Interval ithm用刃ltude h锣rthan or equal to M,and a and bfilE COllstsfitS．Experimental researches on the G－R relation coMmed that the b decreases ith the de耶e ofbeteing6nelty and density Of the c。ohs In the。dlum(Mogi,1967)．The … 相似文献
11.
1966年邢台地震群的发震构造模型——新生断层形成?先存活断层摩擦粘滑? 总被引：7，自引：0，他引：7
通过对邢台地震极震区浅层探测、新生代深浅构造运动的分期、地壳上地幔结构特征剖析及其与震源参数的对比等研究,指出邢台地震区控制早第三纪盆岭构造发育的铲形断裂及其下部向东缓倾的滑脱面与邢台地震的发生无关;邢台地震群是在最新构造应力场作用下,受北西向断层或横向障碍体阻隔的不连续“深断裂”依次向上撕裂状破裂扩展、引起相邻斜列状深断裂间应力迁移和加载等三维破裂过程的产物;邢台地震断层是先存地壳“深断裂”向上撕裂状扩展的“新生断层”。 相似文献
12.
根据邢台7-2 级和6-8 级地震震中区的浅层和超浅层地震勘探结果,查明了震中区浅部铲形断裂的性质及活动年代,认为新河断裂(F1) 自晚更新世以来已不再活动,它不是发震断裂。另外,结合该区深地震反射剖面和深地震测深剖面结果,讨论了震中区的深浅部构造形态及它们的相互关系,从而确定了发震断裂应为震源之下的高倾角超壳断裂①。邢台地震的发生是由于地幔岩浆的上侵作用产生附加应力场,并与区域构造应力场共同作用使该断裂重新活动,引发了邢台地震,并引起浅部断层及地表物质的运动 相似文献
13.
Study on coupling between deep and shallow structures of Xingtai area and some significant questions
IntroductionIn order to gain a clear idea of the deep tectonic environment of Xingtai earthquake area,three wide-angle deep seismic renectionlrefraction profiles have been conducted through the are4they are Yuanshi--Ji'nan profile, Renxian--Wuqing profile and Tat' an--LongyaM inzhou profi I e.The Yuanshi--Ji'nan profile passes through the epicenter of the Ms=7.2 main shock andTat' ~ongyaO--X inzhou profi ie passes through the ep icenter of the Ms=6. 8 earthquake. Duringthe "Eighth Five-… 相似文献
14.
用深地震反射方法研究邢台地震区地壳细结构 总被引：59，自引：23，他引：59
为了取得邢台地震区的地壳细结构,1990年冬,国家地震局地球物理研究所等实施了一条穿过华北平原中部束鹿断陷盆地的深地震反射剖面.经过叠加和偏移后的剖面显示出清晰的地壳细结构图像.剖面图上1-4s之间的强反射对应于由一组正断层产生的沉积层变形,其中新河断裂为束鹿盆地和新河凸起之间的边界主断裂,它伸展到8km以下深处.在5s左右显示出一组较强的反射界面,它可能对应于脆性上地壳的下界面.10-11s之间的壳-幔过渡带包含一组振幅大、连续性好的强反射,在震源下方的Moho界面上似乎被间断.岩浆从上地幔顶部侵入到地壳中,使得地壳可能出现部分熔融,这一过程是产生扩张盆地和发生邢台地震的主要原因. 相似文献
15.
云南省西南部,发育一组由不同断裂组成的北东向断裂构造带,沿这些断裂数十年来相继发生过多次强震.本文以其中的南汀河西支断裂为研究对象,采用深地震反射剖面方法,获得了断裂及两侧地壳精细结构和构造图像.探测结果表明:研究区纵向上,分为上、下两层地壳结构,总厚度约为31.25~35.6 km;横向上,以南汀河西支断裂为界,两侧反射特征差异较大,分别以弧状或倾斜反射波组为主·测线经过地区,莫霍面反射特征较为清晰,为2-3个反射同相轴组成的反射条带.南汀河西支断裂为一个由5条分支断层组成的断裂带,呈花状结构,反映了一种走滑挤压的应力状态.断裂带下方,存在一条切穿下地壳及莫霍面并延伸至上地幔的深大断裂·这种深、浅断裂共存的构造格局是控制南汀河地区地震孕育和发生的重要因素之一. 相似文献
16.
20世纪六七十年代以来， 华北地区发生了一系列强烈地震． 强烈地震的孕育、 发生和发展与深部构造密切相关． 近50年来， 我国地震科学领域在强烈地震的地震构造和深部环境方面开展了大量的研究． 深部地球物理探测和地震层析成像结果揭示了华北地区地壳结构的基本特征， 并在强烈地震发生的深部构造环境等问题上取得了重要进展． 本文在回顾华北地区地壳上地幔结构探测的基础上， 对1966年邢台MS7.2， 1976年唐山MS7.8， 1975年海城MS7.3和1679年三河—平谷M8.0地震的地震构造和深部构造环境进行评述． 深部地球物理数据的综合分析表明， 震源下方的低速异常带， 高角度超壳深断裂， 地壳深浅构造的不一致， 偏低的上地幔顶部速度和局部隆起的莫霍界面， 是华北伸展构造区深部孕震环境的共同特征． 相似文献
17.
采用深地震反射剖面探测,结合地表地质信息,本文对芦山地区的地壳结构、深浅构造和隐伏活动断裂进行了分析.研究结果表明:该区上地壳结构特征清晰,深度约为15km左右;区内断裂由于受青藏高原向东南方向的推挤和坚硬的四川盆地阻挡的联合作用均属逆冲断裂,其中双石—大川断裂以低角度向深部延伸,主要表现为纯逆冲的运动学性质,并与周边小断裂共同组成叠瓦状断层构造.而广元—大邑断裂为上陡下缓式逆冲断裂,与其六条分支断裂共同组成了"正花状"构造,断裂活动是以逆冲为主,并伴随着小的水平滑动,是一条斜向逆冲的断裂.在芦山地震发震断裂的2km范围内推测存在一陡一缓两条断裂,并根据三者形态推测其在18km或以上收敛到一起并向深部延伸,从而使它们在芦山地震中被同时激活.研究结果揭示了研究区近地表活动断裂和地壳深部构造之间的关系,为进一步研究龙门山断裂带的深部构造环境、深浅构造关系以及断裂的活动性提供了有利的依据. 相似文献
18.
19.
IntroductionTheYanqing-Huailaibasin,whichconsistsoftheYanqing-FanshanandHuailai-Zhuolusub-basins,ismainlycontrolledbythenorthboundaryfaultsofthesub-basins.AsabasictectonicunitattheintersectionofthenortheasternendoftheNNE-trendingShanxigrabensystemandtheNW-trendingZhangjiakou-Penglaifaultzone,ithaskepttheintensivetectonicactivityintheQuaternary(YANG,1982;XU,DENG,1988;XU,MA,1992;FANG,etal,1993;Pavlides,etal,1999).Overthepastdecade,manyresearchershaveconductedstudiesonthedetailedstr… 相似文献
20.
THE SOURCE PARAMETERS AND SEISMOTECTONIC IMPLICATIONS OF THE SEPTEMBER 4, 2017 ML4.4 LINCHENG EARTHQUAKE 
下载免费PDF全文
下载免费PDF全文 LI He XIE Zu-jun WANG Yi-xi WANG Xiao-shan DONG Yi-bing ZHANG Hui PENG Zhao LIU Wen-bing GAO Ye WANG Li-xia 《地震地质》2019,41(3):670-689
At 3:05, September 4, 2017, an ML4.4 earthquake occurred in Lincheng County, Xingtai City, Hebei Province, which was felt obviously by surrounding areas. Approximately 60km away from the hypocenter of Xingtai MS7.2 earthquake in 1966, this event is the most noticeable earthquake in this area in recent years. On the one hand, people are still shocked by the 1966 Xingtai earthquake that caused huge disaster, on the other hand, Lincheng County is lack of strong earthquakes. Therefore, this quake has aroused widespread concerns by the government, society and seismologists. It is necessary to clarify whether the seismogenic structure of this event is consistent with the previous seismicity and whether it has any new implications for the seismic activity and seismic hazard in this region. Therefore, it is of great significance to study its seismogenic mechanism for understanding the earthquake activity in Xingtai region where a MS7.2 earthquake had occurred in 1966.
In this study, the Lincheng earthquake and its aftershocks are relocated using the multi-step locating method, and the focal mechanism and focal depth are determined by the "generalized Cut and Paste"(gCAP)method. The reliability of the results is analyzed based on the data of Hebei regional seismic network. In order to better constrain the focal depth, the depth phase sPL fitting method is applied to the relocation of focal depth. The inversion and constraint results show that aftershocks are mainly distributed along NE direction and dip to SE direction as revealed by depth profiles. Focal depths of aftershocks are concentrated in the depths of 6.5~8.2km with an average of about 7km. The best double-couple solution of the mainshock is 276°, 69° and -40° for strike, dip and slip angle for nodal plane I and 23°, 53° and -153° for nodal plane Ⅱ, respectively, revealing that it is a strike-slip event with a small amount of normal-fault component. The initial rupture depth of mainshock is about 7.5km obtained by the relocation while the centroid depth is 6km derived from gCAP method which was also verified by the seismic depth phase sPL observed by several stations, indicating the earthquake is ruptured from deep to shallow. Combined with the research results on regional geological structure and the seismic sequence relocation results, it is concluded that the nodal plane Ⅱ is the seismogenic fault plane of this earthquake.
There are several active faults around the hypocenter of Lincheng earthquake sequence, however, none of the known faults on the current understanding is completely consistent with the seismogenic fault. To determine the seismogenic mechanism, the lucubrated research of the MS7.2 Xingtai earthquake in 1966 could provide a powerful reference. The seismic tectonic characteristics of the 1966 Xingtai earthquake sequence could be summarized as follows:There are tensional fault in the shallow crust and steep dip hidden fault in the middle and lower crust, however, the two faults are not connected but separated by the shear slip surfaces which are widely distributed in the middle crust; the seismic source is located between the hidden fault in the lower crust and the extensional fault in the upper crust; the earthquake began to rupture in the deep dip fault in the mid-lower crust and then ruptured upward to the extensional fault in the shallow crust, and the two fault systems were broken successively. From the earthquake rupture revealed by the seismic sequence location, the Lincheng earthquake also has the semblable feature of rupturing from deep to shallow. However, due to the much smaller magnitude of this event than that of the 1966 earthquake, the accumulated stress was not high enough to tear the fracture of the detachment surface whose existence in Lincheng region was confirmed clearly by the results of Lincheng-Julu deep reflection seismology and reach to the shallower fault. Therefore, by the revelation of the seismogenic mechanism of the 1966 Xingtai earthquake, the seismogenic fault of Lincheng earthquake is presumed to be a concealed fault possessing a potential of both strike-slip and small normal faulting component and located below the detachment surface in Lincheng area. The tectonic significance indicated by this earthquake is that the event was a stress adjustment of the deep fault and did not lead to the rupture of the shallow fault. Therefore, this area still has potential seismic hazard to a certain extent. 相似文献