共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 125 毫秒
1.
基于中国国家和四川区域数字地震台网记录,采用HypoDD方法精确定位了四川芦山ML2.0级以上地震序列的震源位置,采用CAP方法反演了36次ML4.0级以上地震的最佳双力偶震源机制解,并利用小震分布和区域应力场拟合了可能存在的发震断层面参数,从而综合分析了芦山地震序列的震源深度、震源机制和震源破裂面特征,探讨可能的发震构造.结果显示,7.0级主震的震源位置为30.30°N、102.97°E,初始破裂深度为15 km左右,震源矩心深度为14 km左右,最佳双力偶震源机制解的两组节面分别为走向209°/倾角46°/滑动角94°和走向23°/倾角44°/滑动角86°,可视为纯逆冲型地震破裂,绝大多数ML4.0级以上余震的震源机制也表现出与主震类似的逆冲破裂特征.ML2.0级以上余震序列发生在主震两侧,集中分布的长轴为30 km左右,震源深度主要集中在5～27 km,ML3.5级以上较大余震则集中分布在9～25 km的深度上,并揭示出发震断层倾向北西的特征.利用小震分布和区域应力场拟合得到发震断层参数为走向207°/倾角50°/滑动角92°,绝大多数余震发生在断层面附近10 km左右的区域.综合地震序列分布特征、主震震源深度和已有破裂过程研究结果,可以推测主震破裂过程自初始点沿断层的两侧扩展破裂,南侧破裂比北侧稍长,滑动量主要集中在初始破裂点附近,可能没有破裂到地表.综合本文研究成果、地震烈度分布和现有的科学考察结果,初步推测发震构造为龙门山山前断裂,也不排除主震震中东侧还存在一条未知的基底断裂发震的可能性. 相似文献
2.
利用双差定位方法对西藏比如MS6.1地震序列141次ML≥2.0地震进行重新定位,采用CAP波形反演方法获得主震的震源机制解,并运用最小空间旋转角方法比较不同机构发布的震源机制解的差异。重新定位后主震震中位置为(31.924°N,92.824°E),靠近余震区中心,震源深度为12.8 km;余震分布沿NE向展布,长约18 km。沿NE向深度剖面结果显示,在主震右上方存在5 km×10 km的近椭圆形地震破裂空区。主震的震源机制解为正断兼走滑型,最佳矩心深度为9.3 km,矩震级为5.98。结合重新定位后余震分布、主震与历史地震震源机制解及地质构造背景等分析,认为具有左旋运动性质的安多南缘断裂可能是该次地震序列的主要发震构造。 相似文献
3.
2022年6月1日在四川芦山发生了MS6.1地震。为厘清这次地震的发震构造与2013年4月20日芦山MS7.0地震是否相同，文中基于2013年4月20日—2022年7月1日四川地震台网记录到的芦山地区的震相数据，采用多阶段地震定位方法进行了精确定位，最终获得了6 992次ML≥1.0地震事件的精确定位结果，定位误差为：水平向0.5km,垂直向0.7km,走时残差0.18s。主震的精确位置为(30.382°N, 102.943°E),震源深度为15.6km。定位结果显示，2022年芦山MS6.1地震序列整体位于2013年芦山MS7.0地震序列北东端的西南侧，余震密集区NE-SW向长约10km, NW-SE向长约8km。整个芦山地震序列震中分布区域的长轴呈NE向，沿其走向的震源深度剖面显示，2022年6月1日芦山MS6.1主震和MS4.5最大余震的震源深度约为15km,与2013年芦山MS7.0主震的震源深度相当。M... 相似文献
4.
本文采用双差定位法对2017年8月8日至10月31日期间四川九寨沟MS7.0主震及5200个余震序列进行相对定位，得到4036个重定位地震事件.采用中国区域地震台网观测到的宽频带垂直分向波形数据和W震相反演方法，得到了主震震源机制解.重定位结果显示，余震序列分别沿NNW和SSE两个方向扩展，展布长度约58 km，且这些余震主要集中在22 km深度之上.余震分布的另一个重要特点是具有分区特性，即在主震NNW方向约5 km处存在明显的西北和东南两区余震活动分界线；西北区的余震由深至浅具有较好连续性，而东南区却在约10 km深度处存在不连续性.余震分布的这种分区特征，说明九寨沟地震震源区的地壳结构存在强烈的不均匀性.余震分布与主震破裂特征的一致性，证实了我们定位结果的可靠性.主震的震源机制解展示出节面Ⅰ的走向/倾角/滑动角分别为246°/83.7°/-177°，而节面Ⅱ的走向/倾角/滑动角为155.7°/87.1°/-6.3°，最佳质心深度为15.5 km，矩震级MW为6.5.根据余震分布较为垂直和主震震源机制解两节面的倾角均在80°以上，并结合野外地质调查结果，推测此次九寨沟地震为与节面Ⅱ参数相近的一次高角度的左旋走滑型事件. 相似文献
5.
2012年6月30日新疆维吾尔自治区新源-和静县交界发生MS6.6地震，该地震是2010年青海玉树7.1级地震和2013年4月20日四川芦山7.0级地震之间中国大陆发生的最大的地震.本文基于新疆数字地震台网记录的此次地震序列震相资料，分别用绝对和相对定位方法联合对其进行重新定位，重新定位后余震展布为NW向，主震位置为43.429°N，84.755°E，深度为21.8 km.基于新疆地震台网记录6.6级地震波形数据，本文用CAP方法反演了震源机制解和震源深度.结果显示：MS6.6地震震源机制解：节面Ⅰ走向39°，倾角46°，滑动角12°，节面Ⅱ走向301°，倾角81°，滑动角135°；震源深度为21 km，与利用地震震相到时确定的主震震源深度基本一致.主震震源机制解的节面Ⅱ与伊犁盆地北缘断裂走向和倾角基本一致，综合精确定位余震展布和伊犁盆地北缘断裂性质分析认为，新源-和静MS6.6地震发震构造是伊犁盆地北缘断裂，震源深度为21 km左右，是一个高角的内陆倾滑地震. 相似文献
6.
2010年9月3日16时35分46秒新西兰南岛Greendale附近发生了MW7.0地震, 震源深度约10.0 km. 2011年2月21日新西兰南岛又发生了MW6.1地震, 为2010年MW7.0主震后最大的一次余震, 震源深度约5.0 km, 发震断层为Christchurch南约9 km一条近东西走向逆冲的隐伏断层, 该地震造成Christchurch城内多处建筑物严重损毁. 本文分析了2010年新西兰地震事件MW7.0主震与MW6.1余震强地面运动的特征. 新西兰MW6.1余震近场强地面运动整体高于MW7.0主震. 将主震和余震的强震观测记录分别与新一代衰减关系(NGA)进行对比, 发现余震强震观测数据整体高于其震级对应的NGA. 分别选取距离主震和余震震中最近且强震观测记录最高的两个台站(GDLC台站和HVSC台站)作为参照台站, 建立动态复合震源模型(DCSM)及有限断层随机振动模型(SFFM)进行强地面运动的模拟计算, 分析两种模型的模拟结果并对比二者的优势及局限, 以便在未来工作中更好地通过模型计算强地面运动特征, 实现区域化特征快速、 实时分析及局部重点、 细致分析相结合的目标. 相似文献
7.
2018年11月26日台湾浅滩北缘发生MW5.7地震，震中不在已知的深大断裂上，且由于缺乏近台控制，破裂方向存疑.本文基于福建、广东和台湾的宽频带台站记录，利用微震检测技术获取了更加完整的余震序列，检测出的余震数量是福建台网定位结果的4倍，这些余震集中在2 km×8 km的近EW向条带内.同时利用GCAP方法反演了主震及5个强余震的震源机制解，反演结果显示主震及强余震均为高倾角的走滑型地震，主压应力方向为NW-SE向，反演得到的震源深度略有差异，主震震源深度14 km,MW3.9以上强余震的震源深度在12～17 km之间.主震东西两侧余震活动存在显著差异，其东侧余震活动主要集中在主震后一个月内，而西侧余震活动在主震后半年内都比较活跃，说明东侧应力水平在主震之后得到较为充分的释放.另外，穿过震中区的多道地震剖面揭示的震中区浅部活断层走向为EW,具有显著的走滑特征，其空间位置与余震分布、震源机制解吻合.基于余震的时-空分布、震源机制解和浅部活断层特征，推测此次MW5.7地震发震断层为近EW向的台湾浅滩断裂，可能是台湾岛B F... 相似文献
8.
利用南北地震带南段密集流动地震台阵的观测数据，采用波形互相关方法拾取Pn波走时，应用滑动时窗相关法识别sPn震相，通过sPn与Pn震相之间的走时差测定了芦山地震序列中28个ML4.0级以上余震的震源深度.结果表明，震源深度集中在10~20 km范围内，垂直余震带的北西-南东向震源深度剖面揭示，余震分布表现出西深东浅的特点，倾角大约为39°.这些余震在空间上具有较好的线性分布特征，推测可能发生在与主震有关的破裂面上或邻近位置，由此推测主震的破裂面倾角大约为39°.根据余震的空间分布特征，认为芦山地震的发震断层并非双石-大川断裂，可能是其东侧的一条隐伏断层. 相似文献
9.
根据2016年运城4.4级地震序列资料，进行余震精定位、主震震源机制和发震构造等研究。地震震中分布结果显示，本次地震的发生构造与以往该地区震群型地震发震构造不同，构造单元相对简单，发生在盐湖北岸断裂附近。余震双差精定位结果显示，余震优势分布呈NNE向，NW向也有零星活动。精定位后震源深度集中分布在15-24 km，平均深度20.2 km，断层剖面深度集中分布在18-23 km，倾向NW，与盆地地形构造吻合。采用Snoke与CAP方法得到的震源机制解基本一致，此次序列的主震错断方式为走滑兼逆冲，节面B参数与中条山山前断裂东段走向和倾向接近。综合认为，本次运城地震序列的余震呈NNE向优势分布，精定位结合地震震源机制结果，推断此次地震序列发震断裂为中条山山前断裂的NNE向隐伏断裂。 相似文献
10.
2010年4月14日青海玉树Ms4.7、Ms7.1、Ms6.3地震震源机制解与发震构造研究 总被引：2，自引：1，他引：1
在整合CSN和青海、西藏、四川区域台网宽频带数字地震记录的基础上,采用“Cut and Paste”方法研究了2010年4月14日青海玉树地震序列中M4.7级前震、Ms7.1级主震、Ms6.3级强余震的震源机制解和可能的矩心深度,并结合震中附近活动断裂分布与地表破裂带调查资料讨论了发震构造.结果表明2010年4月14日青海玉树M7.1级主震的破裂面为走向129°,倾角84°,滑动角17°,矩心深度6 km左右,矩震级6.8级;Ms4.7级前震的破裂面为走向114°,倾角67°,滑动角-5°,矩心深度11 km左右,矩震级4.2级;Ms6.3级强余震的破裂面为走向123°、倾角89°、滑动角9°,矩心深度6 km左右,矩震级5.7级.本次地震序列的发震构造为甘孜-玉树-风火山断裂,地震破裂时以左旋走滑为主,地表破裂的总体走向与主震的破裂面走向基本一致,前震-主震-强余震的震源性质综合研究可推测发震构造在浅部的倾角陡立,到了深部有所变缓. 相似文献
11.
On August 8, 2017, Beijing time, an earthquake of M7.0 occurred in Jiuzhaigou County, Aba Prefecture, Sichuan Province, with the epicenter located at 33.20°N 103.82°E. The earthquake caused 25 people dead, 525 people injured, 6 people missing and 170000 people affected. Many houses were damaged to various degrees. Up to October 15, 2017, a total of 7679 aftershocks were recorded, including 2099 earthquakes of M ≥ 1.0.
The M7.0 Jiuzhaigou earthquake occurred in the northeastern boundary belt of the Bayan Har block on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, where many active faults are developed, including the Tazhong Fault(the eastern segment of the East Kunlun Fault), the Minjiang fault zone, the Xueshan fault zone, the Huya fault zone, the Wenxian fault zone, the Guanggaishan-Daishan Fault, the Bailongjiang Fault, the Longriuba Fault and the Longmenshan Fault. As one of the important passages for the eastward extrusion movement of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau(Tapponnier et al., 2001), the East Kunlun fault zone has a crucial influence on the tectonic activities of the northeastern boundary belt of Bayan Kala. Meanwhile, the Coulomb stress, fault strain and other research results show that the eastern boundary of the Bayan Har block still has a high risk of strong earthquakes in the future. So the study of the M7.0 Jiuzhaigou earthquake' seismogenic faults and stress fields is of great significance for scientific understanding of the seismogenic environment and geodynamics of the eastern boundary of Bayan Har block.
In this paper, the epicenter of the main shock and its aftershocks were relocated by the double-difference relocation method and the spatial distribution of the aftershock sequence was obtained. Then we determined the focal mechanism solutions of 24 aftershocks(M ≥ 3.0)by using the CAP algorithm with the waveform records of China Digital Seismic Network. After that, we applied the sliding fitting algorithm to invert the stress field of the earthquake area based on the previous results of the mechanism solutions. Combining with the previous research results of seismogeology in this area, we discussed the seismogenic fault structure and dynamic characteristics of the M7.0 Jiuzhaigou earthquake. Our research results indicated that:1)The epicenters of the M7.0 Jiuzhaigou earthquake sequence distribute along NW-SE in a stripe pattern with a long axis of about 35km and a short axis of about 8km, and with high inclination and dipping to the southwest, the focal depths are mainly concentrated in the range of 2~25km, gradually deepening from northwest to southeast along the fault, but the dip angle does not change remarkably on the whole fault. 2)The focal mechanism solution of the M7.0 Jiuzhaigou earthquake is:strike 151°, dip 69° and rake 12° for nodal plane Ⅰ, and 245°, 78° and -158° for nodal plane Ⅱ, the main shock type is pure strike-slip and the centroid depth of the earthquake is about 5km. Most of the focal mechanism of the aftershock sequence is strike-slip type, which is consistent with the main shock's focal mechanism solution; 3)In the earthquake source area, the principal compressive stress and the principal tensile stress are both near horizontal, and the principal compressive stress is near east-west direction, while the principal tensile stress is near north-south direction. The Jiuzhaigou earthquake is a strike-slip event that occurs under the horizontal compressive stress. 相似文献
12.
Based on the phase report of Xinjiang Seismic Network, the Hutubi MS6.2 earthquake sequence ML ≥ 1.0 was relocated by the HypoDD method. The results show that the aftershocks were distributed along NE and NW direction. The aftershocks were in the depths of 5~15km. In addition, by using the digital waveforms of Xinjiang Seismic Network, the best double-couple focal mechanism of the main shock and some aftershocks of MS ≥ 3.8 were determined by the CAP method. Based on the above studies, the source depth, focal mechanism and aftershock distribution of the Hutubi MS6.2 earthquake were analyzed and the seismogenic structure was discussed. The nodal plane parameters of the best double-couple focal mechanism are strike 144°, dip 26°, rake 118°, and strike 293°, dip 67°, rake 77°, respectively. The moment magnitude MW is about 5.9, with centroid depth of 15.2km. These show that the main shock was a thrust type. Most focal mechanism solutions of the aftershocks were shown as a thrust type, which are similar to the main shock. It is speculated that the possible seismogenic fault of this earthquake is the Huorgosi-Manas-Tugulu Fault. 相似文献
13.
综合利用区域台站和流动台站(近台)的记录,基于初至P震相重新测定了2017年九寨沟序列M_S7.0主震和M_L≥3.0余震的震源位置,并利用较高精度的定位结果分析余震分布与地震构造的关系,解释发震断裂带的结构.获得的新认识有:(1)九寨沟主震震源深度为16km,位于余震带中段的南缘;余震主要分布深度为4～17km.(2)沿余震带的走向,余震分布与主震同震位错大小的分布明显相关.余震带中段8～16km深度存在的余震稀疏区与同震位错的高值区相吻合,应是发震断裂带主凹凸体的部位,也是主震时应变释放较充分的部位;余震带南东段10～18km深度的余震密集区对应了同震位错的亏损区之一,三次M_L≥5.0余震都发生于此;余震带西北段在5～10km之下既缺少余震,又属同震位错的亏损区,可能与那里多条断裂的交汇或合并造成的构造复杂性有关;余震带中-北西段3～5km深度的也缺少余震,也对应了浅部的同震位错亏损区.(3)证实了九寨沟地震的发震构造为虎牙断裂带北段,同时新揭示出发震断裂带表现为由主断裂和分支断裂构成的、向上分叉的花状结构,尺度约为4.5km宽(最大)、35km长,主断裂朝SW陡倾.这些反映主震破裂可能不只受控于单一的断裂,而有可能是沿主断裂发生主破裂,而沿分支断裂发生次要破裂.另外,本文对发震断裂带结构的分段解释,是遵循构造地质学原理去综合震源排列、震源机制解、地表断层已知位置、相邻剖面断层解释结果等信息的分析结果,而不仅仅依据余震的密集分布进行推断. 相似文献
14.
九寨沟地震(M_s7.0或M_w6.5)震中位于青藏高原巴颜喀拉块体东缘东昆仑断裂带东端塔藏断裂、岷江断裂和虎牙断裂交汇部位,中国地震局相关科研机构的研究人员曾将该震中区判定为玛沁—玛曲高震级地震危险区.地震应急科学考察期间没有发现地震地表破裂带,但地震烈度等震线长轴方位、极震区基岩崩塌和滑坡集中带、重新定位余震空间展布和震源机制解等显示出发震断层为NNW向虎牙断裂北段,左旋走滑性质,属东昆仑断裂带东端分支断层之一.此外,汶川地震后,在青藏高原东缘和东南缘次级活动断层上发生了包括2017年九寨沟地震(Mw6.5)、2014年鲁甸(M_w6.2)、景谷(M_w6.2)、康定(M_w6.0)等多次中强地震,显示出青藏高原东缘至东南缘各块体主干边界活动断层现今处于中等偏高的应变积累状态,即在巴颜喀拉、川滇等块体主干边界活动断层上具备了发生高震级(M_w≥7.0)地震的构造应力-应变条件,未来发生高震级地震的危险性不容忽视. 相似文献
15.
2017年四川九寨沟MS7.0地震是继2008年汶川MS8.0地震和2013年芦山MS7.0地震之后，青藏高原东缘在不到十年的时间内发生的第三个震级MS7.0以上的强震.这次地震发生在东昆仑断裂带东端，作为青藏高原东北缘的一条大型左旋走滑断裂带，东昆仑断裂带与东端其它构造之间的转换关系仍不清楚，因区内地质构造和地形复杂，东昆仑断裂带东端的主要构造仍缺少深入的研究.本文在总结区域地震构造活动特征、历史地震和现代地震基础上，通过东昆仑断裂带东端已有的和最近开展的活动构造定量研究结果，并结合现今GPS变形场资料和2017年九寨沟MS7.0地震灾害特征分析，发现东昆仑断裂带最东段塔藏断裂上的左旋走滑除了一小部分继续向东传播转移到文县断裂带上外，大部分转化为其南侧的龙日坝断裂带北段、岷江断裂和虎牙断裂上的近东西向地壳缩短，这可能是岷山隆起的构造机制，而2017年九寨沟MS7.0地震正是左旋走滑的东昆仑断裂带在东端继续向东扩展的结果. 相似文献
16.
STUDY ON SOURCE PARAMETERS OF THE 8 AUGUST 2017 M7.0 JIUZHAIGOU EARTHQUAKE AND ITS AFTERSHOCKS,NORTHERN SICHUAN 
下载免费PDF全文
下载免费PDF全文 WU Wei-wei WEI Ya-ling LONG Feng LIANG Ming-jian CHEN Xue-fen SUN Wei ZHAO Jing 《地震地质》1979,42(2):492-512
On August 8, 2017, a strong earthquake of M7.0 occurred in Jiuzhaigou County, Aba Prefecture, northern Sichuan. The earthquake occurred on a branch fault at the southern end of the eastern section of the East Kunlun fault zone. In the northwest of the aftershock area is the Maqu-Maqin seismic gap, which is in a locking state under high stress. Destructive earthquakes are frequent along the southeast direction of the aftershocks area. In Songpan-Pingwu area, only 50~80km away from the Jiuzhaigou earthquake, two M7.2 earthquakes and one M6.7 earthquake occurred from August 16 to 23, 1976. Therefore, the Jiuzhaigou earthquake was an earthquake that occurred at the transition part between the historical earthquake fracture gap and the neotectonic active area. Compared with other M7.0 earthquakes, there are few moderate-strong aftershocks following this Jiuzhaigou earthquake, and the maximum magnitude of aftershocks is much smaller than the main shock. There is no surface rupture zone discovered corresponding to the M7.0 earthquake. In order to understand the feature of source structure and the tectonic environment of the source region, we calculate the parameters of the initial earthquake catalogue by Loc3D based on the digital waveform data recorded by Sichuan seismic network and seismic phase data collected by the China Earthquake Networks Center. Smaller events in the sequence are relocated using double-difference algorithm; source mechanism solutions and centroid depths of 29 earthquakes with ML≥3.4 are obtained by CAP method. Moreover, the source spectrum of 186 earthquakes with 2.0≤ML≤5.5 is restored and the spatial distribution of source stress drop along faults is obtained. According to the relocations and focal mechanism results, the Jiuzhaigou M7.0 earthquake is a high-angle left-lateral strike-slip event. The earthquake sequence mainly extends along the NW-SE direction, with the dominant focal depth of 4~18km. There are few shallow earthquakes and few earthquakes with depth greater than 20km. The relocation results show that the distribution of aftershocks is bounded by the M7.0 main shock, which shows obvious segmental characteristics in space, and the aftershock area is divided into NW segment and SE segment. The NW segment is about 16km long and 12km wide, with scattered and less earthquakes, the dominant focal depth is 4~12km, the source stress drop is large, and the type of focal mechanism is complicated. The SE segment is about 20km long and 8km wide, with concentrated earthquakes, the dominant depth is 4~12km, most moderate-strong earthquakes occurred in the depth between 11~14km. Aftershock activity extends eastward from the start point of the M7.0 main earthquake. The middle-late-stage aftershocks are released intensively on this segment, most of them are strike-slip earthquakes. The stress drop of the aftershock sequence gradually decreases with time. Principal stress axis distribution also shows segmentation characteristics. On the NW segment, the dominant azimuth of P axis is about 91.39°, the average elevation angle is about 20.80°, the dominant azimuth of T axis is NE-SW, and the average elevation angle is about 58.44°. On the SE segment, the dominant azimuth of P axis is about 103.66°, the average elevation angle is about 19.03°, the dominant azimuth of T axis is NNE-SSW, and the average elevation angle is about 15.44°. According to the fault profile inferred from the focal mechanism solution, the main controlling structure in the source area is in NW-SE direction, which may be a concealed fault or the north extension of Huya Fault. The northwest end of the fault is limited to the horsetail structure at the east end of the East Kunlun Fault, and the SE extension requires clear seismic geological evidence. The dip angle of the NW segment of the seismogenic fault is about 65°, which may be a reverse fault striking NNW and dipping NE. According to the basic characteristics of inverse fault ruptures, the rupture often extends short along the strike, the rupture length is often disproportionate to the magnitude of the earthquake, and it is not easy to form a rupture zone on the surface. The dip angle of the SE segment of the seismogenic fault is about 82°, which may be a strike-slip fault that strikes NW and dips SW. The fault plane solution shows significant change on the north and south sides of the main earthquake, and turns gradually from compressional thrust to strike-slip movement, with a certain degree of rotation. 相似文献
17.
利用双差定位方法对玉树地震序列2010年4月14日至10月31日间发生的ML≥1.0地震进行双差定位,得到1545个地震的重定位结果.综合分析地震双差定位结果和玉树地震序列中强地震震源机制解,发现玉树MS7.3地震发震构造由北西向和北东东向两条相交断层组成,主震发生在北西走向的甘孜—玉树断裂带上,5月29日的MS5.9余震序列发生在北东东走向的一条隐伏断裂上,两条断裂均接近直立.甘孜—玉树断裂是羌塘地块和巴彦喀拉地块的构造边界,由于羌塘地块和巴颜喀拉地块的差异运动使甘孜—玉树断裂强耦合段应力高度积累,在应变能超过岩石强度时破裂失稳发生了MS7.3地震.主震断层的左旋滑动导致北东东向断层的正应力减小,库伦应力增加,45天后触发了MS5.9余震序列的活动. 相似文献
18.
2014年2月12日新疆于田发生MS7.3地震，该震前1天曾发生MS5.4前震，震后余震活动频繁.截止到2月20日12时，该地震序列记录到4000多次余震，最大余震为2月12日MS5.7地震，序列类型为前震—主震—余震型.该地震前震的b值明显低于该区域正常活动的b值和余震的b值.这次地震位于西昆仑断裂带与阿尔金断裂带的交汇区域的阿什库勒断裂北段，震源机制解为走滑型.余震区NE向长70 km、宽20 km，分为主余震分布区和次余震分布区，其中ML4.0以上强余震基本位于NE向主余震分布区，N--S向的次余震分布区则以ML3.0左右地震分布为主，显示该部分可能受到主震的触发作用.于田地区曾发生的2008年3月21日MS7.3地震的震源机制解为正断型，距这次地震约100 km；2012年8月12日发生的MS6.2地震的震源机制解为正断型，距这次地震约10 km.该地区的发震构造背景是:在NE向阿尔金断裂带尾端向SW方向延伸过程中，左旋走滑作用逐渐转换为拉张作用，形成多条左旋走滑兼具拉张作用的断裂. 2014年于田MS7.3地震的发震模式表现为:左旋走滑的阿什库勒断裂北段与南段因速率差异而产生的小型构造盆地，在区域拉张作用力下顺时针旋转；2008年MS7.3张性地震后区域的伸展作用增强，导致盆地南侧的苦牙克断裂发生2012年MS6.2张性地震，该地震引起2014年MS5.4前震，两者激发其后在盆地北侧阿什库勒断裂发生了2014年MS7.3主震. 相似文献
19.
Zujun Xie Yong Zheng Huajian Yao Lihua Fang Yong Zhang Chengli Liu Maomao Wang Bin Shan Huiping Zhang Junjie Ren Lingyun Ji Meiqin Song 《中国科学:地球科学(英文版)》2018,61(3):339-352
At GMT time 13:19, August 8, 2017, an Ms7.0 earthquake struck the Jiuzhaigou region in Sichuan Province, China, causing severe damages and casualties. To investigate the source properties, seismogenic structures, and seismic hazards, we systematically analyzed the tectonic environment, crustal velocity structure in the source region, source parameters and rupture process, Coulomb failure stress changes, and 3-D features of the rupture plane of the Jiuzhaigou earthquake. Our results indicate the following: (1) The Jiuzhaigou earthquake occurred on an unmarked fault belonging to the transition zone of the east Kunlun fault system and is located northwest of the Huya fault. (2) Both the mainshock and aftershock rupture zones are located in a region where crustal seismic velocity changes dramatically. Southeast to the source region, shear wave velocity at the middle to lower crust is significantly low, but it rapidly increases northeastward and lies close to the background velocity across the rupture fault. (3) The aftershock zone is narrow and distributes along the northwest-southeast trend, and most aftershocks occur within a depth range of 5–20 km. (4) The focal mechanism of the Jiuzhaigou earthquake indicates a left-lateral strike-slip fault, with strike, dip, and rake angles of 152°, 74° and 8°, respectively. The hypocenter depth measures 20 km, whereas the centroid depth is about 6 km. The co-seismic rupture mainly concentrates at depths of 3–13 km, with a moment magnitude (Mw) of 6.5. (5) The co-seismic rupture also strengthens the Coulomb failure stress at the two ends of the rupture fault and the east segment of the Tazang fault. Aftershocks relocation results together with geological surveys indicate that the causative fault is a near vertical fault with notable spatial variations: dip angle varies within 66°–89° from northwest to southeast and the average dip angle measures ~84°. The results of this work are of fundamental importance for further studies on the source characteristics, tectonic environment, and seismic hazard evaluation of the Jiuzhaigou earthquake. 相似文献
20.
利用云南东川地区10个宽频带流动台站的连续波形数据,采用基于深度学习的自动震相拾取方法和震相关联技术,对2020年东川ML4.2地震序列分别进行绝对定位和相对定位,获得了该地震序列的高精度地震定位结果,得到东川ML4.2地震序列的212个余震事件,约为中国地震台网目录给出的余震数目的5倍,丰富了ML≤3.0余震;精定位结果表明东川ML4.2主震震源深度为5.19 km,余震震源深度集中在3~6 km,余震序列分布长轴呈NNE向展布;此次地震发生在小江断裂带西支,发震构造与乌龙拉分盆地的构造演化有关。 相似文献