共查询到15条相似文献，搜索用时 948 毫秒
1.
土木工程结构的双层多重调谐质量阻尼器控制策略 总被引：4，自引：0，他引：4
李春祥 《地震工程与工程振动》2005,25(1):113-119
为能得到用尽可能少的调谐质量阻尼器(TMD)组成有效性和鲁棒性高的多重调谐质量阻尼器控制系统，本文提出了一种适用于土木工程结构的新控制策略——双层多重调谐质量阻尼器(DMT—MD)。使用定义的优化目标函数，评价了双层多重调谐质量阻尼器(DMTMD)的控制性能。数值结果表明，双层多重调谐质量阻尼器(DMTMD)比多重凋谐质量阻尼器(MTMD)具有更好的有效性和对频率调谐的鲁棒性。DMTMD比双重调谐质量阻尼器(DTMD)具有更好的有效性，而DMTMD和DT—MD对频率调谐的鲁棒性近似相同。因此，双层多重调谐质量阻尼器是一种先进的结构控制策略。 相似文献
2.
土木工程结构鲁棒控制的发展 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
评述了结构控制的发展,指出发展结构鲁棒控制策略的重要性。重点评述了结构双重调谐质量阻尼器(DTMD)和多重双重调谐质量阻尼器(MDTMD)的控制策略,提出了需进一步发展主动双重调谐质量阻尼器(ADTMD)和主动多重双重调谐质量阻尼器(AMDTMD)控制策略、此外,评述了结构鲁棒控制的设计准则与高层建筑和大跨桥梁在风与地震作用下的统一自适应主动鲁棒控制策略。 相似文献
3.
李春祥 《地震工程与工程振动》2005,25(5):169-176
提出了双层多重调谐质量阻尼器（DMTMD）和多重双重调谐质量阻尼器（MDTMD）控制策略。利用定义的优化目标函数,评价了最易制作DMTMD和MDTMD模型的性能。数值结果表明,DMTMD和MDTMD比基于任意整数或基于奇数的多重调谐质量阻尼器（AI-MTMD和ON-MTMD）具有更好的有效性和鲁棒性。MDTMD和DMTMD具有近似相同的有效性,但MDTMD比DMTMD具有更好的鲁棒性。总的来说,MDTMD的冲程大于DMTMD的冲程;DMTMD中小质量块的冲程大于AI-MTMD和ON-MTMD的冲程。 相似文献
4.
本文提出了一种新的控制策略——多重双重调谐质量阻尼器(以下简称为MDTMD)。MDTMD系统参数的可能组合形成十种MDTMD模型,本文评价其中最易制作的一种MDTMD模型。利用定义的优化目标函数,评价了MDTMD的控制性能。数值结果表明MDTMD比双重调谐质量阻尼器(DTMD)具有更好的有效性和对频率调谐的鲁棒性。但MDTMD的冲程大于DTMD的冲程。 相似文献
5.
基于Maxwell型阻尼器的多重调谐质量阻尼器性能评价 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
李春祥 《地震工程与工程振动》2004,24(2):141-144
研究了基于Maxwell型阻尼器的多重调谐质量阻尼器(MTD—MTMD)在控制结构地震反应方面的最优动力特性。利用建立的设置MTD-MTMD时结构的传递函数,定义了设置MTD—MTMD时结构的动力放大系数(DMF)。将MTD-MTMD的优化准则定义为结构最大动力放大系数的最小值的最小化(Min．Min．Max．DMF)。利用定义的优化准则,评价了Maxwell型阻尼器的松弛时间系数(RTC)对MTD—MTMD最优参数和有效性的影响。利用最大的MTD—MTMD动力放大系数(DMF),评价了RTC对MTD-MTMD冲程的影响。 相似文献
6.
非对称结构扭转振动多重调谐质量阻尼器(MTMD)控制的最优位置 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：1
研究了非对称结构扭转振动多重调谐质量阻尼器(MTMD)控制的最优位置。本文采用的MTMD具有相同的刚度、阻尼，但质量不同。基于导出的设置MTMD时非对称结构扭转角位移传递函数，建立了扭转角位移动力放大系数解析式。MTMD最优参数的评价准则定义为：非对称结构最大扭转角位移动力放大系数的最小值的最小化。MTMD的有效性评价准则定义为：非对称结构最大扭转角位移动力放大系数的最小值的最小化与未设置MTMD时非对称结构最大扭转角位移动力放大系数的比值。基于定义的评价准则，研究了非对称结构的标准化偏心系数(NER)和扭转对侧向频率比(TTFR)对不同位置MTMD最优参数和有效性的影响。 相似文献
7.
使用Kanai-Tajimi地震动模型,建立了主动调谐质量阻尼器(ATMD)结构系统的传递函数。将ATMD最优参数的评价准则定义为：设置ATMD结构均方根位移(解析式)的最小值的最小化。将ATMD有效性的评价准则定义为：设置ATMD结构均方根位移的最小值的最小化与未设置ATMD结构的均方根位移之比。根据逃择的评价准则,评价了地震卓越频率系数(EDFR)对ATMD抗震控制性能的影响。同时也评价了EDFR对被动调谐质量阻尼器(PTMD)抗震控制性能的影响。 相似文献
8.
本文研究了土-结构动力相互作用对采取不同控制措施的结构控制效果的影响。文中首先建立了主动调谐质量阻尼器(ATMD)、半主动磁流变阻尼器(MR)和被动多重调谐质量阻尼器(MTMD)等三种结构控制措施在时域中的控制算法和控制律，然后基于子结构法，采用间接边界元方法，通过傅里叶变换，推导了分别安装三种结构控制措施的受控结构在频域中的运动方程，数值仿真分析了某36层高层建筑的地震反应及其控制效果。结果表明，当采用ATMD或MTMD控制时，考虑土-结构动力相互作用后结构地震反应有所减小；当采用MR控制时，考虑土-结构动力相互作用后结构地震反应有很大程度的减小。由此看来，在设计软土地基上高层结构的结构控制措施时，不考虑土-结构动力相互作用对结构控制效果的影响是偏于安全的。 相似文献
9.
高柔结构在强风或地震等环境荷载作用下，往往会产生较大的变形和位移。采用调谐液体阻尼器对结构进行控制时，需要选择合适的水箱尺寸和水深，以期获得最好的减振效果。以往的调谐液体阻尼器参数优化往往基于等效线性模型或在小幅值激励下有较好精度的非线性浅水波动模型。采用了一种具有非线性阻尼和非线性刚度的等效调谐质量阻尼器模型对影响调谐液体阻尼器减振效率的主要参数进行了优化，该模型不再受小幅值激励的限制。优化结果表明，激励幅值对TLD的最优参数和减振效果有明显影响，同时水箱长度对TLD减振效果也有明显影响，这是基于线性模型TLD优化不能得到的结论。 相似文献
10.
SATMD与消能减震相结合的混合控制研究 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
根据模糊控制理论及抗震结构混合控制理论，利用自行设计的模糊控制器对波动调谐质量阻尼器（PTMD）子结构进行调谐控制以实现半自动化，同时在主结构上进行粘弹性阻尼器的优化设置，从而实现结构体系的多模态优化混合控制，最后提出半主动调谐质量阻尼器（SATMD）与消能减震相结合的混合控制实用设计方法。本文对推动结构混合控制理论的发展具有重要意义。 相似文献
11.
This paper develops a two‐stage optimum design procedure for multiple tuned mass dampers (MTMD) to reduce structural dynamic responses with the limitation of MTMD's stroke. A new performance index, which is a linear combination of structural response ratio and MTMD stroke ratio by a weighting factor α, is proposed; α is in the range from 0 to 1.0. The larger the α, the more important the stroke. The case of α=1.0 indicates that MTMD is locked. The analytical results show that the MTMD's stroke can be significantly suppressed with little sacrifice of structural control effectiveness when an appropriate α is selected. To verify the design algorithm, a 360 kg‐MTMD composed of five TMD units arranged in parallel was fabricated. Shaking table tests of a large‐scale three‐story building with and without the MTMD under earthquake excitations were conducted at the National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering (NCREE) in Taiwan. The experimental results show that MTMD is not only effective in mitigating the building responses but also is successful in suppressing its stroke. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 相似文献
12.
Chunxiang Li 《地震工程与结构动力学》2000,29(9):1405-1421
Multiple tuned mass dampers (MTMDs) consisting of many tuned mass dampers (TMDs) with a uniform distribution of natural frequencies are considered for attenuating undesirable vibration of a structure. The MTMD is manufactured by keeping the stiffness and damping constant and varying the mass. The structure is represented by its mode‐generalized system in the specific vibration mode being controlled using the mode reduced‐order method. The optimum parameters of the MTMD are investigated to delineate the influence of the important parameters on the effectiveness and robustness of the MTMD by conducting a numerical searching technique in two directions. The parameters include: the frequency spacing, average damping ratio, mass ratio and total number. The criterion selected for the optimization is the minimization of the maximum value of the dynamic magnification factor (DMF) of the structure with MTMD (i.e. Min.Max.DMF). In this paper, for the sake of comparison, the MTMD(II), which is made by keeping the mass constant and varying the stiffness and damping coefficient, and a single TMD are also taken into account. It is demonstrated that the optimum frequency spacing of the MTMD is the same as that of the MTMD(II) and the optimum average damping ratio of the MTMD is a little larger than that of the MTMD(II). It is also found that the optimum MTMD is more effective than the optimum MTMD(II) and the optimum single TMD with equal mass. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 相似文献
13.
A new method to design multiple tuned mass dampers (multiple TMDs) for minimizing excessive vibration of structures has been developed using a numerical optimizer. It is a very powerful method by which a large number of design variables can be effectively handled without imposing any restriction before the analysis. Its framework is highly flexible and can be easily extended to general structures with different combinations of loading conditions and target controlled quantities. The method has been used to design multiple TMDs for SDOF structures subjected to wide‐band excitation. Some novel results have been obtained. To reduce displacement response of the structure, the optimally designed multiple TMDs have distributed natural frequencies and distinct damping ratios at low damping level. The obtained optimal configuration of TMDs was different from the earlier analytical solutions and was proved to be the most effective. A robustness design of multiple TMDs has also been presented. Robustness is defined as the ability of TMDs to function properly despite the presence of uncertainties in the parameters of the system. Numerical examples of minimizing acceleration structural response have been given where the system parameters are uncertain and are modeled as independent normal variates. It was found that, in case of uncertainties in the structural properties, increasing the TMD damping ratios along with expanding the TMD frequency range make the system more robust. Meanwhile, if TMD parameters themselves are uncertain, it is necessary to design TMDs for higher damping ratios and a narrower frequency range. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 相似文献
14.
Active multiple tuned mass dampers (AMTMD) consisting of many active tuned mass dampers (ATMDs) with a uniform distribution of natural frequencies have been, for the first time, proposed for attenuating undesirable vibrations of a structure under the ground acceleration.The multiple tuned mass dampers (MTMD) in the AMTMD is manufactured by keeping the stiffness and damping constant and varying the mass. The control forces in the AMTMD are generated through keeping the identical displacement and velocity feedback gain and varying the acceleration feedback gain. The structure is represented by its mode‐generalized system in the specific vibration mode being controlled using the mode reduced‐order method. The optimum parameters of the AMTMD are investigated to delineate the influence of the important parameters on the effectiveness and robustness of the AMTMD by conducting a numerical searching technique. The parameters include the frequency spacing, average damping ratio, tuning frequency ratio, total number and normalized acceleration feedback gain coefficient. The criterion, which can be stated as the minimization of the minimum values of the maximum dynamic magnification factors (i.e. Min.Min.Max.DMF), is chosen for the optimum searching. Additionally, for the sake of comparison, the results of the optimum MTMD (the passive counterpart of AMTMD) and ATMD are also taken into account in the present paper. It is demonstrated that the proposed AMTMD can be expected to significantly reduce the oscillations of structures under the ground acceleration. It is also shown that the AMTMD can remarkably improve the performance of the MTMD and has higher effectiveness than ATMD. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 相似文献
15.
Chunxiang Li 《地震工程与结构动力学》2002,31(4):897-919
Multiple tuned mass dampers (MTMD) consisting of many tuned mass dampers (TMDs) with a uniform distribution of natural frequencies are taken into consideration for attenuating undesirable vibration of a structure under the ground acceleration. A study is conducted to search for the preferable MTMD which performs better and is easily manufactured from the five available models (i.e. MTMD‐1 – MTMD‐5), which comprise various combinations of the stiffness, mass, damping coefficient and damping ratio in the MTMD. The major objective of the present study then is to evaluate and compare the control performance of these five models. The structure is represented by its mode‐generalized system in the specific vibration mode being controlled by adopting the mode reduced‐order approach. The optimum parameters of the MTMD‐1 – MTMD‐5 are investigated to reveal the influence of the important parameters on their effectiveness and robustness using a numerical searching technique. The parameters include the frequency spacing, average damping ratio, tuning frequency ratio, mass ratio and total number. The criteria selected for the optimum searching are the minimization of the maximum value of the displacement dynamic magnification factor (DDMF) and that of the acceleration dynamic magnification factor (ADMF) of the structure with the MTMD‐1 – MTMD‐5 (i.e. Min.Max.DDMF and Min.Max.ADMF). It is demonstrated that the optimum MTMD‐1 and MTMD‐4 yield approximately the same control performance, and offer higher effectiveness and robustness than the optimum MTMD‐2, MTMD‐3, and MTMD‐5 in reducing the displacement and acceleration responses of structures. It is further demonstrated that for both the best effectiveness and robustness and the simplest manufacturing, it is preferable to select the optimum MTMD‐1. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 相似文献