共查询到19条相似文献，搜索用时 312 毫秒
1.
液化土体中桩基侧向动力响应一直是目前岩土工程界和地震工程领域关注的热点研究问题之一.本文基于振动台实验,首次将光纤布拉格光栅(FBG)技术应用到液化土体桩基侧向动力响应分析方法中.实验结果表明:采用FBG传感系统可以测得桩身侧向动力响应,与传统电阻式应变片法相比简洁方便;FBG测量土体位移同样有效可行,可代替以往加速度积分求解土体位移;后处理得到的桩基侧向动力p-y滞回曲线能更好地反映桩土之间真实的动力本构关系,并与干砂动力p-y曲线相比,探讨两种不同场地条件下桩基侧向动力响应机制与p-y曲线的发展变化模式,为以后液化土中桩基侧向动力响应问题的研究奠定了理论基础. 相似文献
2.
基于API规范的液化土层桩基p-y曲线修正计算公式 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
基于小型振动台拟静力试验和往返动荷载试验,将得到的静力p-y曲线及滞回曲线与基于静力方法提出的API规范方法进行对比研究,指出了采用目前API规范中的折减系数方法进行液化土层中桩基横向承载力计算时与实际不符并导致工程设计无法接受的原因。进行四种不同相对密度可液化土中大型振动台桩?土?承台动力相互作用大型振动台试验,考虑到API规范方法在工程中的广泛应用性和可接受性,在不改变其基本模式前提下,提出其中土体初始模量和极限土阻力两个修正参数,以地震波输入下的振动台试验对构建的公式进行验证,结果较为吻合。 相似文献
3.
《地震工程与工程振动》2021,41(5)
基于OpenSees计算软件建立液化微倾场地群桩-土动力相互作用有限元模型,分析液化微倾场地饱和砂土p-y曲线特性,系统研究了场地倾斜角度、桩径、地震作用幅值和基桩位置对饱和砂土动力p-y曲线特性影响。研究表明:土体即将液化时,桩基土反力达到峰值;土体液化后,土体表现出了流体特性;土反力峰值、桩土相对位移峰值和初始刚度随场地倾斜角度增加而增大;桩径越大,液化砂土的耗能效应越明显;随着地震作用幅值的增加,桩土相对位移峰值和土反力峰值也随之增加;液化微倾场地上坡桩受到的土体侧向流动力大于下坡桩。 相似文献
4.
液化土中桩基础动力反应试验研究 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
本文设计完成了包括三种密度饱和砂土和非液化干砂的多工况桩-土相互作用振动台动力试验,研究液化对土体和桩-承台动力反应的影响。通过试验和分析,得到了液化和非液化土层中土体水平加速度、侧向位移和桩-承台的水平加速度、侧向位移、桩身弯矩等指标的反应过程和模式,对比了液化和非液化条件对这些指标的影响方式,提出了各因素影响大小的分析结果。 相似文献
5.
《地震工程与工程振动》2015,(6)
为进一步研究土-结构相互作用(SSI)体系的抗震性能,以1∶4比例尺桥梁墩柱模型为试验对象,考虑土-结构相互作用,通过拟静力试验观察了试验现象,得到了模型滞回曲线、耗能能力等数据。通过有限元软件ABAQUS建立了与试验情况相同的有限元模型,并分析计算。建模分析结果与试验结果一致,在此基础上,以本模型为对象进行了地震反应时程分析,得到了不同地基条件下的位移时程曲线及桩身应力、桩身位移响应曲线,并用m法对比计算桩的位移响应曲线。分析结果表明:不同地基条件下群桩-土-刚度较大墩柱结构体系破坏形式不同;在地震作用下,短桩基础在桩的中段处应力达到最大值,有必要在此处予以加强;在地震作用较大时,m法计算的桩顶位移偏小,且m法无法计入群桩效应,可能导致群桩基础内力的计算偏于不安全,建议予以重视。 相似文献
6.
液化场地桥梁群桩基抗震分析简化方法 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
基于已完成的液化场地土—桩—桥梁结构地震相互作用振动台试验,利用两步法、等效单桩法,建立了液化场地群桩基础抗震分析的动力非线性文克尔地基梁模型。该模型考虑了桩—土相互作用的影响。首先,按照等刚度原则将群桩简化为等效单桩;其次,选用弹簧元件和阻尼原件并联的宏单元模拟桩—土动力相互作用;然后,计算地震作用下自由场地的土体位移和孔压比;最后,将地震作用下自由场地土体位移和孔压比作为模型的外部激励,计算桩的动力反应规律。将简化方法计算结果与液化场地桥梁桩基振动台试验结果进行对比发现,两者吻合较好,验证了简化方法的正确性。 相似文献
7.
分层液化土中桩基侧向动力反应机理的试验研究 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
饱和砂土中的桩基侧向动力响应研究一直是岩土工程界与地震工程领域关注的热点,尤其是群桩侧向动力响应机制是需要重点研究的课题之一。基于振动台试验,通过输入2种不同的波形,采用FBG光栅传感系统对饱和砂土中的单桩与群桩侧向动力响应特性和典型测试点的桩土动力p—y滞洄曲线进行研究。研究结果表明：振动初期,单桩和群桩试验孔压增长不大,随后单桩孔压迅速上升,振动后期逐渐下降至0.5,而群桩孔压则上升缓慢;单桩试验土表加速度在振动初期逐步升高后又迅速降低,且加速度放大值略大于台面加速度值,群桩试验土表加速度在振动初期逐渐升高时就达到了最大,且随着孔压比的升高,加速度没有继续放大,而是逐渐减小,直到后期与单桩试验土表加速度重合;饱和砂土液化对单桩承台加速度和位移的影响较大,群桩承台侧向动力响应对液化的敏感程度略低于单桩承台;在振动输入和承台输入相同的条件下,液化后的群桩基础比单桩基础能更好地抵抗侧向力的作用。 相似文献
8.
目前,我国尚缺乏液化场地桩-土-桥梁结构地震相互作用分析的合理数值模型与简化分析方法。鉴于此,直接针对振动台试验,基于非线性文克尔地基梁模型,考虑桩周参振土的质量惯性力、上部结构的惯性力、土体辐射阻尼等效应,建立了液化场地桩-土-桥梁结构地震相互作用的p-y曲线分析模型,并给出相应的简化方法。针对振动台试验进行了0.1g El Centro波输入下的分析,验证了桩-土地震相互作用分析方法的正确性,并且推荐了计算参数的合理选取方法,可用于液化场地桩-土地震相互作用的分析。提出的液化场地桩-土地震相互作用p-y曲线简化分析方法,为实际桥梁桩基抗震设计与分析提供一定参考。 相似文献
9.
目前地震作用下桩基水平动力响应一直是岩土工程界和地震工程领域关注的热点研究问题之一。本文基于振动台试验,通过不同的台面输入波形,引入FBG传感系统对土-群桩—承台结构水平动力响应特性及P-Y曲线主干线变化规律进行研究,并将群桩中各基桩和单桩P-Y曲线主干线与API规范推荐方法进行对比研究。结果表明：对于非液化土试验,各承台的加速度和位移较台面放大倍数普遍不大;饱和砂土试验单桩承台加速度和位移比群桩大2~3倍,群桩承台加速度和位移幅值分别是非液化土的2~3倍;非液化土试验桩基P-Y曲线主干线倾斜度与API规范方法符合较好,而饱和砂土中无论是单桩还是群桩P-Y主干线均需将API规范方法进行适当的折减。 相似文献
10.
目前地震作用下桩基水平动力响应一直是岩土工程界和地震工程领域关注的热点研究问题之一。本文基于振动台试验,通过不同的台面输入波形,引入FBG传感系统对土-群桩—承台结构水平动力响应特性及P-Y曲线主干线变化规律进行研究,并将群桩中各基桩和单桩P-Y曲线主干线与API规范推荐方法进行对比研究。结果表明：对于非液化土试验,各承台的加速度和位移较台面放大倍数普遍不大;饱和砂土试验单桩承台加速度和位移比群桩大2~3倍,群桩承台加速度和位移幅值分别是非液化土的2~3倍;非液化土试验桩基P-Y曲线主干线倾斜度与API规范方法符合较好,而饱和砂土中无论是单桩还是群桩P-Y主干线均需将API规范方法进行适当的折减。 相似文献
11.
The seismic response of pile foundations is a very complex process involving inertial interaction between structure and pile foundation, kinematic interaction between piles and soils, seismically induced pore-water pressures (PWP) and the non-linear response of soils to strong earthquake motions. In contrast, very simple pseudo-static methods are used in engineering practice to determine response parameters for design. These methods neglect several of the factors cited above that can strongly affect pile response. Also soil–pile interaction is modelled using either linear or non-linear springs in a Winkler computational model for pile response. The reliability of this constitutive model has been questioned. In the case of pile groups, the Winkler model for analysis of a single pile is adjusted in various ways by empirical factors to yield a computational model for group response. Can the results of such a simplified analysis be adequate for design in all situations?The lecture will present a critical evaluation of general engineering practice for estimating the response of pile foundations in liquefiable and non-liquefiable soils during earthquakes. The evaluation is part of a major research study on the seismic design of pile foundations sponsored by a Japanese construction company with interests in performance based design and the seismic response of piles in reclaimed land. The evaluation of practice is based on results from field tests, centrifuge tests on model piles and comprehensive non-linear dynamic analyses of pile foundations consisting of both single piles and pile groups. Studies of particular aspects of pile–soil interaction were made. Piles in layered liquefiable soils were analysed in detail as case histories show that these conditions increase the seismic demand on pile foundations. These studies demonstrate the importance of kinematic interaction, usually neglected in simple pseudo-static methods. Recent developments in designing piles to resist lateral spreading of the ground after liquefaction are presented. A comprehensive study of the evaluation of pile cap stiffness coefficients was undertaken and a reliable method of selecting the single value stiffnesses demanded by mainstream commercial structural software was developed. Some other important findings from the study are: the relative effects of inertial and kinematic interactions between foundation and soil on acceleration and displacement spectra of the super-structure; a method for estimating whether inertial interaction is likely to be important or not in a given situation and so when a structure may be treated as a fixed based structure for estimating inertial loads; the occurrence of large kinematic moments when a liquefied layer or naturally occurring soft layer is sandwiched between two hard layers; and the role of rotational stiffness in controlling pile head displacements, especially in liquefiable soils. The lecture concludes with some recommendations for practice that recognize that design, especially preliminary design, will always be based on simplified procedures. 相似文献
12.
Brendon A. Bradley Misko CubrinovskiJennifer J.M. Haskell 《Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering》2011
This paper presents the development, implementation, and application of a probabilistic framework for the pseudo-static analysis of pile foundations in liquefied and lateral spreading soils. The framework allows for rigorous consideration and propagation of the large uncertainties regarding quantification of seismic loads and soil–pile interaction relationships, which exist in the pseudo-static method. Building upon previous relationships proposed by others, the key features of the presented framework are outlined. In particular, the uncertainty estimation of the induced lateral soil displacements; superstructure inertia loads; and stiffness and strength of the liquefied soils are discussed in detail. The results of applying the pseudo-static method to a case study bridge structure are compared to that obtained using a rigorous seismic effective stress analysis within a similar framework. It is illustrated that the consideration of uncertainties in the pseudo-static framework provides enhanced communication of the foundation's seismic performance to end-users, and that the pseudo-static method provides seismic performance prediction consistent with that obtained using advanced seismic effective-stress analyses. 相似文献
13.
The present study aims to obtain p-y curves(Winkler spring properties for lateral pile-soil interaction) for liquefied soil from 12 comprehensive centrifuge test cases where pile groups were embedded in liquefiable soil. The p-y curve for fully liquefied soil is back-calculated from the dynamic centrifuge test data using a numerical procedure from the recorded soil response and strain records from the instrumented pile. The p-y curves were obtained for two ground conditions:(a) lateral spreading of liquefied soil, and(b) liquefied soil in level ground. These ground conditions are simulated in the model by having collapsing and non-collapsing intermittent boundaries, which are modelled as quay walls. The p-y curves back-calculated from the centrifuge tests are compared with representative reduced API p-y curves for liquefied soils(known as p-multiplier). The response of p-y curves at full liquefaction is presented and critical observations of lateral pile-soil interaction are discussed. Based on the results of these model tests, guidance for the construction of p-y curves for use in engineering practice is also provided. 相似文献
14.
为深入研究液化场地梁的约束对桥台震害模式的影响,首先在对唐山地震中胜利桥震害调查的基础上,采用有限元软件UWLC对该桥震害进行数值模拟分析,并将数值模拟结果与实际震害结果进行对比验证。研究结果表明:数值模拟结果与实际震害结果基本一致,说明采用UWLC软件进行震害数值模拟分析是可行的。然后对有、无桩基条件下梁的约束力和液化层厚度对桥台震害模式的影响分别进行数值模拟分析。研究结果表明:在地震作用下,桥梁发生落梁破坏后会导致桥台的滑移破坏更为严重。与无桩基的重力式桥台不同,桩基桥台的震害模式均表现为前倾式破坏,这主要是因为桩基础限制了桥台底部的水平移动。梁的约束力对桩基桥台震后残余位移的影响程度要明显小于无桩基桥台。对于重力式桥台,液化砂层对地震波的中高频段有一定滤波作用,反映出液化层的减震作用;而对于桩基桥台,由于桩-土-台身的相互作用,液化砂层的减震效果不明显。 相似文献
15.
根据Ｗｉｎｋｌｅｒ地基模型，对桩基础通过特性分析建立了合理的力学模型。在动力分析的基础上，给出了桩基础横向自振特性及在常轴力与横向地震载荷作用下的强迫反应解析解。文中的解析公式为桩基础动力分析提供了一种新的解析方法。 相似文献
16.
Suresh R. Dash Subhamoy Bhattacharya Anthony Blakeborough 《Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering》2010,30(1-2):32-39
This paper investigates the importance of bending–buckling interaction in seismic design of piles in liquefiable soils using numerical techniques. A pseudo-static analysis has been performed using a well documented case history, where the pile–soil interaction is modelled as a beam on nonlinear winkler foundation (BNWF). Six possible analytical methods, three force based and three displacement based, are performed in which the pile is subjected to both lateral and axial load. Three out of six analysis cases did not predict the failure of the piles when analysed only for bending (i.e., lateral loads only). The buckling analysis showed that the pile was also safe against pure buckling during full liquefaction. Further, two out of those three cases which did not predict failure in bending were reanalysed for bending–buckling interaction (i.e., lateral and axial loads acting simultaneously). These combined analyses showed a more realistic behaviour of pile response and did predict the pile failure. Hence, it can be concluded that if a pile is designed for bending and buckling criteria separately and safe for these individual design criteria, it may fail due to their combined effect. 相似文献
17.
为研究强震区跨断层桥梁桩基非线性动力相互作用特性,依托海文大桥实体工程,利用MIDAS/GTS有限元软件,建立了桩-土-断层相互作用模型,分析0.20~0.60g地震动强度下断层上下盘桩基加速度响应、桩顶水平位移、桩身弯矩以及桩身剪力响应情况。结果表明:覆盖层土体对桩身加速度放大作用明显,且随着输入地震动强度的增大,放大作用逐渐减弱;覆盖层对地震波的滤波作用显著,随着输入地震动强度的增大,滤波作用逐渐减弱;上盘桩基达到桩顶峰值加速度的时刻滞后于下盘;随着输入地震动强度的增大,上、下盘桩的桩顶产生的永久位移和水平位移峰值逐渐变大,上盘桩顶产生的永久位移和桩顶峰值位移均大于下盘,产生显著的"上盘效应";不同强度地震动作用下,断层上、下盘桩基弯矩均在上部土层界面处达到峰值,剪力均在基岩面处达到峰值,下盘桩基弯矩和剪力峰值大于上盘桩基,呈现出显著的"下盘效应"。在桥梁桩基抗震设计时,应着重考虑断层上、下盘桩基的差异和不同强度地震作用对桩基承载特性的影响。 相似文献
18.
采用多工况振动台实验研究液化对土层水平往返变形的影响.以干砂实验为参照,分析孔压增长与土层加速度和土层往返变形之间的关系.结果表明:液化将引起土表加速度显著降低,减小惯性力传递,但同时会引起土层往返剪应变明显增大.对往返变形而言,液化土层往返剪应变就可达到1%～5%的大变形状态,且液化土层往返剪应变沿深度呈下大上小分布.土层中孔压比0.4～0.8是往返变形出现放大的敏感段,在孔压比0.8左右而不是在1.0达到最大.作为其结果,土层液化将对刚性上部结构振动起减震作用,但同时增大的往返剪应变也易导致基础和地下结构破坏,特别是对液化层与下部非液化层交界处的构件更敏感. 相似文献
19.
合理有效地模拟桩-土-结构动力相互作用是软土地基条件下核岛厂房结构抗震适应性分析及地基处理的关键环节。以某拟建核岛厂房实际工程为研究背景，结合SuperFLUSH软件平台，以Goodman单元模拟桩与桩周土间的接触效应，采用等价线性法描述近场软土地基非线性特性，并在模型底部和侧面引入黏性边界模拟半无限地基辐射阻尼效应，从而建立土质地基条件下桩-土-核岛结构相互作用分析模型。进而，通过对原状地基和嵌岩桩处理地基条件下核岛厂房的楼层反应谱、结构节点相对位移（绝对值）的对比分析，探讨考虑桩-土间接触效应的嵌岩桩基对核岛厂房结构的影响规律。研究成果可为实际工程中类似土质地基条件下核岛厂房结构的地基处理提供参考。 相似文献