共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 187 毫秒
1.
低磁纬度地区受斜磁化的影响,用常规方法很难准确确定磁性体的平面分布特征.为了研究位于低磁纬度地区普图马约盆地的磁性体分布特征,本文根据场的散度原理,假定磁△T异常为具有一定方向的矢量场,其方向与磁化方向一致,导出了磁△T异常视散度的计算方法;根据磁位与引力位的关系,在频率域中通过磁△T异常求取了磁源重力异常,并尝试利用拉普拉斯方程计算磁源重力异常垂向二阶导数.本文设计理论模型讨论了磁△T异常视散度、磁源重力异常垂向二阶导数的特征与磁性体平面分布特征的关系,证明了上述方法的有效性.进而利用上述方法推测了普图马约盆地磁性体的平面分布特征,结果表明:应用磁视散度及磁源重力异常确定的普图马约盆地磁性体分布与实际地质特征吻合较好,取得的成果对普图马约盆地相关地质研究及对低磁纬度地区的磁性体的确定有一定的参考意义. 相似文献
2.
磁张量梯度测量具有高分辨率、多参量的优点,能更准确地描述磁源体的分布特征,在矿产资源勘探中具有广阔的用途.磁异常解析信号具有受倾斜磁化干扰小的特点,且为了增强深部地质体的分辨能力,本文提出磁张量梯度数据的解析信号比值的均衡边界识别及空间位置反演技术.磁张量梯度数据的均衡边界识别方法为不同方向解析信号比值的反正切函数,在降低倾斜磁化干扰的同时能有效地均衡不同深度地质体的响应,提高了对较深地质体的分辨率;空间位置反演技术是建立解析信号比值与地质体位置参数的对应方程,利用解析信号比值与地质体的对应关系作为约束条件来反演获得地质体的水平位置和深度信息,具有无需已知任何先验信息的优势.通过磁性体张量异常试验表明解析信号比值的边界识别方法能清晰和准确地获得不同深度地质体的边界,所建立的反演方程能准确地计算出地质体的范围和深度,具有较高的水平分辨率和精度.将本文方法应用于实测磁张量梯度数据的解释,获得了地下铁矿的分布特征,为区域矿产资源潜力评价提供了翔实的基础资料. 相似文献
3.
为了探测二战时遗留的地下废弃炸弹,我们开展了磁总场梯度探测模拟实验.在此基础上探讨一些确定磁性体位置和范围的数据处理技术,如自适应化极、垂直二阶导数、三维解析信号及欧拉反褶积反演计算等.将这套数据采集的方法、数据处理的方法运用到实际的废弃炸弹探测中去,取得了一定的效果.研究表明:梯度磁测对于探测地表浅而小的磁性体效果较好、速度快,其数据采取自适应化极方法、垂直二阶导数的方法基本能够确定废弃炸弹的位置及个数,同时采用三维解析信号的数据处理方法能够确定废弃炸弹的方向,采用欧拉反褶积的方法能够确定废弃炸弹的埋藏深度. 相似文献
4.
高精度重、磁测量在大兴安岭找矿工作中的应用 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
根据以往的经验,在找矿勘查中,通常应用高精度磁法和电法,很少应用重力方法.本文通过小面积的大比例尺高精度重力工作,展示了重力工作在找矿勘查中所起的作用.尤其是在高纬度覆盖区,地表地质不甚明了、电法工作比较困难的情况下,可以发挥重力工作受环境干扰小的优势,寻找高密度地质体.在本矿区中,重力工作作为高精度磁测工作的重要补充,有利于更准确地确定矿体的位置和平面形态特征.由于高精度磁测方法寻找的是有磁性矿物,当矿体无磁性时,磁异常不能反映矿体的位置和形态.本文根据重力方法和磁测方法的原理,对矿区的地球物理场进行研究,给出本矿区识别矿体异常的原则,根据磁性矿物与铅锌矿伴生的特点,结合磁异常,如果重磁异常中心吻合较好,重磁异常幅值和梯度也较大,表明矿体异常的可靠性很大;当然,对磁异常表现为负磁异常的高频重力高异常也不能忽视,有可能是埋藏浅的无磁性金属矿的反映.所以,需要密切关注幅值大、梯度大的高频重力高异常. 相似文献
5.
为了探讨磁异常中正负异常形成的规律,开展强磁铁平面模拟实验及等值线制作工作,为了准确数据判断磁性体空间位置及个数,开展分量转换、化极、求导等数据处理数及转换工作.最后得出:①磁化方向的不同是形成正负异常的根源;②将△Z分量转换数据用于垂直二阶导数计算,能更加准确确定磁性体的空间位置及个数. 相似文献
6.
《地球物理学进展》2016,(4)
在现代城市建设中,战争时期留下的未爆炸弹(UXO)对人民的生命财产安全造成了极大的威胁.因此,未爆炸弹的探测和排除工作十分重要.本文提出利用实测总磁场数据进行未爆炸弹的地球物理探测,并基于异常的解析信号提出一种未爆炸弹的水平位置、深度反演方法.这一方法可利用不同延拓高度的总磁场异常数据的解析信号完成磁异常的解释,且无需进行原始磁异常的化极处理.对比其他基于异常解析信号的方法,本方法利用不同延拓高度的解析信号推导出地质体埋深与延拓高度之间的定量计算关系式,进而完成异常体埋藏深度的估计,无需计算磁异常的高阶导数,可获得较高的计算稳定性.该方法应用到无噪和噪声干扰的数据中,结果表明新方法可高效准确的获得目标体的埋藏深度.最后,我们将新提出的方法应用到国外未爆炸弹的磁异常数据中,对比欧拉反褶积反演结果,新方法可有效的获得未爆炸弹的水平位置和埋藏深度,可用于指导下一步的排除工作. 相似文献
7.
重磁异常相关成像法是一种快速确定场源位置的有效方法,其相关系数极大值表征地质体中心位置.现有方法需已知地质体构造指数,本文提出重磁不同阶梯度比值的相关成像方法,可有效去除构造指数的影响,并讨论不同组合梯度比值的应用效果.对于磁异常数据,考虑到剩磁的影响,将采用解析信号及其梯度的比值来获取地质体的分布.通过理论模型试验,证明梯度比值相关成像法可以确定地质体中心位置,也具备良好的抗噪性.此外,解析信号二阶垂直梯度与解析信号比值的相关成像结果最稳定,精度和分辨率最高,为了降低噪声的干扰,在二阶及以上导数计算时采用Laplace方程来完成.将本文方法应用于埃及Hamrawien地区的实测磁数据的解释,反演获得地下异常体的深度在680 m和808 m. 相似文献
8.
《地球物理学进展》2020,(3)
球形磁性地质体是地质勘探中广泛遇到的基本地质体之一,选择合适的磁异常分析方法对其磁场进行准确正演计算具有重要的意义.为了准确快速地求解球形磁性地质体磁场特征,本文提出了一种基于磁偶极子构造原理求解球形磁性地质体磁场的数值计算方法,对球形磁性地质体按半径由小增大进行多层单元分割,再对每层单元进行块单元分割,将每个块单元视为"磁偶极子",利用基本磁偶极子公式计算了所有块单元在探测平面(线)的磁场大小,同时分析了球体磁场的剖面特征,并将数值解与解析解结果进行了对比和误差分析,最后建立双球组合模型结合Comsol多物理场仿真工具对其仿真对比,验证了磁偶极子构造法求解球体磁场的准确性.研究结果表明:数值解法结果与解析解结果磁异常波动趋势完全一致;不同测点处绝对误差有所差别,但磁异常值均在1 nT以下.本文提出的数值解法无需复杂的数学推导,计算结果稳定可靠. 相似文献
9.
10.
11.
Analytic signal approach and its applicability in environmental magnetic investigations 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
Ahmed Salem Dhananjay Ravat T. Jeffrey Gamey Keisuke Ushijima 《Journal of Applied Geophysics》2002,49(4):787
We investigate the analytic signal method and its applicability in obtaining source locations of compact environmental magnetic objects. Previous investigations have shown that, for two-dimensional magnetic sources, the shape and location of the maxima of the amplitude of the analytic signal (AAS) are independent of the magnetization direction. In this study, we show that the shape of the AAS over magnetic dipole or sphere source is dependent on the direction of magnetization and, consequently, the maxima of the AAS are not always located directly over the dipolar sources. Maximum shift in the horizontal location is obtained for magnetic inclination of 30°. The shifts of the maxima are a function of the source-to-observation distance and they can be up to 30% of the distance. We also present a method of estimating the depths of compact magnetic objects based on the ratio of the AAS of the magnetic anomaly to the AAS of the vertical gradient of the magnetic anomaly. The estimated depths are independent of the magnetization direction. With the help of magnetic anomalies over environmental targets of buried steel drums, we show that the depths can be reliably estimated in most cases. Therefore, the analytic signal approach can be useful in estimating source locations of compact magnetic objects. However, horizontal locations of the targets derived from the maximum values of the AAS must be verified using other techniques. 相似文献
12.
通过对单一边界、双边界、多边界以及点(线)质量模型重力异常解析信号振幅和重力异常垂向导数解析信号振幅的极值位置空间变化规律研究表明,重力异常垂向导数解析信号振幅和化极磁力异常解析信号振幅的极值位置相同,且与重力异常解析信号振幅的极值位置空间变化规律相似.利用位场解析信号振幅极大值位置能够准确识别单一直立边界地质体的边缘位置,但不能准确识别其它任何形体的边缘位置,其识别结果的偏移量大小随地质体的埋深、水平尺寸以及倾斜程度等变化.虽然重力异常垂向导数解析信号振幅比重力异常解析信号振幅的峰值更加尖锐、横向识别能力更强,其极大值位置更靠近地质体上顶面边缘位置,但均受地质体埋深的影响较大;随着埋深的增加,位场解析信号振幅的极大值位置会快速收敛到形体的"中心位置",其轨迹类似"叉子状";且对多边界模型会出现"极大值位置盲区"而无法识别其边缘位置.通过这些理论研究表明,位场解析信号振幅只能识别单一边界地质体的边缘位置;而不宜用来识别多边界地质体的边缘位置,但可以用来识别多边界地质体的"中心位置". 相似文献
13.
A new method is proposed to interpret magnetic anomalies due to a thin dike, a sphere, and a fault like structure, where depth, horizontal location, effective magnetization intensity and effective magnetization inclination of a buried structure are simultaneously obtained. The proposed method is based on Fair function minimization and also on stochastic optimization modeling. This new technique was firstly tested on a theoretical synthetic data randomly generated by a chosen statistical distribution from a known model with different random noises components. This mathematical simulation shows a very close agreement between the assumed and the estimated parameters. The applicability and validity of this method are thereafter applied to magnetic anomaly data taken from United States, Australia, India, and Brazil. The agreement between the results obtained by the new method and those obtained by other interpretative methods is good and comparable. Moreover, the depth obtained by such a method is found to be in high accordance with that obtained from drilling information. 相似文献
14.
全张量磁梯度数据具有高精度、高分辨率、多参量的优点,能更加清晰地刻画地质体的分布特征,综合利用磁张量梯度数据准确地获得地质体水平位置和深度信息是解释的主要目的.磁张量数据的方向解析信号具有减小倾斜磁化干扰的优点,常被用来圈定磁源体的水平位置,但解析信号强度随着地质体埋深的增加急剧衰减,难以有效识别较深的地质体.张量数据均衡边界识别技术,利用不同方向解析信号的比值函数,能有效地均衡不同深度地质体的响应,同时显示不同深度地质体的边界,提高了对较深地质体的分辨率.磁张量数据深度成像技术根据实测张量数据与假定模型张量数据的相关系数来给定地质体的深度,综合利用多参量数据联合反演提高了反演结果的准确性,且无需进行复杂的反演运算,是大数据量张量数据解释的有效方法.理论模型试验证明：磁张量数据均衡边界识别技术可清晰和准确地识别地质体的水平范围,受倾斜磁化干扰小;磁张量数据深度成像技术可准确地获得地质体的深度信息,具有较强的抗噪性.将上述方法应用于铁矿区实测航磁张量梯度数据解释,获得了铁矿体水平分布与埋深,深度结果与张量欧拉反褶积法计算结果一致. 相似文献
15.
An automated cross‐validation method to assess seismic time‐to‐depth conversion accuracy: a case study on the Cooper and Eromanga basins,Australia 
下载免费PDF全文
下载免费PDF全文 Selecting a seismic time‐to‐depth conversion method can be a subjective choice that is made by geophysicists, and is particularly difficult if the accuracy of these methods is unknown. This study presents an automated statistical approach for assessing seismic time‐to‐depth conversion accuracy by integrating the cross‐validation method with four commonly used seismic time‐to‐depth conversion methods. To showcase this automated approach, we use a regional dataset from the Cooper and Eromanga basins, Australia, consisting of 13 three‐dimensional (3D) seismic surveys, 73 two‐way‐time surface grids and 729 wells. Approximately 10,000 error values (predicted depth vs. measured well depth) and associated variables were calculated. The average velocity method was the most accurate overall (7.6 m mean error); however, the most accurate method and the expected error changed by several metres depending on the combination and value of the most significant variables. Cluster analysis tested the significance of the associated variables to find that the seismic survey location (potentially related to local geology (i.e. sedimentology, structural geology, cementation, pore pressure, etc.), processing workflow, or seismic vintage), formation (potentially associated with reduced signal‐to‐noise with increasing depth or the changes in lithology), distance to the nearest well control, and the spatial location of the predicted well relative to the existing well data envelope had the largest impact on accuracy. Importantly, the effect of these significant variables on accuracy were found to be more important than choosing between the four methods, highlighting the importance of better understanding seismic time‐to‐depth conversions, which can be achieved by applying this automated cross‐validation method. 相似文献
16.
A Fourier transformation of the magnetic field from a magnetized sphere allows a particularly simple interpretation of the parameters of the sphere. The depth to the centre and total magnetic moments of the sphere are related to the intercept and slope of the power spectrum. The horizontal centre and direction of magnetization are related to slope and intercept of the phase spectra in two perpendicular, horizontal directions. Examples with artificial data contaminated by various noise components are presented. 相似文献
17.
El-Sayed M. Abdelrahman Eid. R. Abo-Ezz Khalid S. Essa T.M. El-Araby Khaled S. Soliman 《Geophysical Prospecting》2007,55(3):433-446
We have developed a least‐squares minimization approach to depth determination using numerical second horizontal derivative anomalies obtained from magnetic data with filters of successive window lengths (graticule spacings). The problem of depth determination from second‐derivative magnetic anomalies has been transformed into finding a solution to a non‐linear equation of the form, f(z) = 0. Formulae have been derived for a sphere, a horizontal cylinder, a dike and a geological contact. Procedures are also formulated to estimate the magnetic angle and the amplitude coefficient. We have also developed a simple method to define simultaneously the shape (shape factor) and the depth of a buried structure from magnetic data. The method is based on computing the variance of depths determined from all second‐derivative anomaly profiles using the above method. The variance is considered a criterion for determining the correct shape and depth of the buried structure. When the correct shape factor is used, the variance of depths is less than the variances computed using incorrect shape factors. The method is applied to synthetic data with and without random errors, complicated regionals, and interference from neighbouring magnetic rocks. Finally, the method is tested on a field example from India. In all the cases examined, the depth and the shape parameters are found to be in good agreement with the actual parameters. 相似文献
18.
利用CHAMP数据恢复重力场的解算方法分为时域法和空域法.本文首先介绍了这两种方法恢复CHAMP重力场的基本原理和算法,分析了它们的优缺点.针对空域法中的延拓误差和格网化误差进行了讨论.计算表明:延拓误差中的截断误差部分影响量级约0.001 m2·s-2(均方误差意义下),最大误差仅为0.11 m2·s-2,可完全忽略;延拓误差中的参考重力场模型误差影响随参考场选取的不同而有所差异,整体而言小于0.1 m2·s-2,但最大误差可达1.3 m2·s-2,采用高精度的参考重力场模型能大大减小延拓误差影响.目前最常用的格网化方法包括加权平均方法和最小二乘配置方法,计算表明,利用30天的CHAMP数据进行2°×2°格网化处理,加权平均法的格网化误差在0.13 m2·s-2量级,最大误差可达1.58 m2·s-2,而最小二乘配置法的格网化误差在0.006 m2·s-2量级,最大误差仅为0.15 m2·s-2,明显优于加权平均法.文章最后对时域法和以快速最小二乘配置(FSC)为代表的空域法恢复60阶次的CHAMP重力场的精度进行了比较,结果表明:两种方法的得到的重力场模型精度相差不大,整体而言,时域法略优于空域法. 相似文献
19.
We presented using the correlation coefficient of the analytic signal of real data and the analytic signal of synthetic data generated by the assumed source to estimate the structural index and the depth of the source. First, we assumed that the causative sources are located at different locations in the underground and the structural index of the assumed source is changed from 0 to 3, and then we separately compute the correlation coefficients of the analytic signal of the measured data and the analytic signal of the anomaly generated by each assumed source, the correlation coefficient can get the maximum value when the location and structural index of the assumed source are consistent with the real source. We tested the correlation coefficient method on synthetic noise-free and noise-corrupted magnetic anomalies, and the inversion results indicate that the new method can successfully finish the inversion of magnetic data. We also applied it to measured magnetic data, and we obtain the structural index and the location of the source. 相似文献
20.
S.-E. HJELT 《Geophysical Prospecting》1975,23(2):323-334
Dip and magnetic susceptibility of very deep magnetic plates can be estimated approximately from either vertical, horizontal or total field measurements. A general accuracy of 2–5 degrees is easily obtained, if the other plate parameters, most notably horizontal position of the plate, are precisely determined. For reliable interpretation, measurements around the anomaly maximum or on the dip-side flank of the anomaly should be preferred. The depth extent of the plates must be great, some ten times the plate width at least. The method is best suited to form a part of a plate interpretation scheme, where the other plate parameters are found by some other suitable means. The method can be applied to a simultaneous determination of dips of several plates, but because of its error sensitivity an iterative formulation should then be preferred. 相似文献