共查询到19条相似文献，搜索用时 390 毫秒
1.
非跳点网格在模式动力—物理过程的耦合方面具有独特的优势,但是由于二阶精度差分方案下非跳点网格频散误差较大而很少被使用于数值天气预报模式。随着近年来数值模式计算精度的不断提高,非跳点网格在频散关系方面的计算误差是否会发生变化还有待研究。本文在高阶精度差分格式下通过浅水波方程对跳点网格和非跳点网格的频散关系进行理论分析和数值试验,主要得到以下结论:（1）在低波数区跳点网格的频散关系基本不随计算精度的提高而变化,但是非跳点网格下的频散关系则随着计算精度的提高而更加接近真实解。在四阶精度下,非跳点网格的频散关系已经非常接近跳点网格。（2）差分精度提高以后,在高波数区非跳点网格仍然存在频率极大值,而且极值中心随着计算精度的提高而逐渐向更高波数区移动。跳点网格在计算精度提高以后高波数区的频率仍然随波数单调增加,且更接近真实解。（3）在高阶精度非跳点网格模拟试验的基础上,结合高阶扩散项对高频短波进行滤除,可以得到与二阶精度跳点网格相接近的模拟结果。总之,在高阶精度有限差分方案下利用非跳点网格构造模式动力框架是一种比较可行的做法。 相似文献
2.
Runge-Kutta算法与Li差分法不同阶数配合对计算精度影响研究 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
为了充分发挥高阶Li空间微分方案（Li, 2005 ）的优点,实现了时间积分为2~6阶Runge-Kutta（简称RK）格式的偏微分方程求解算法（简称RKL算法）。然后通过多组数值试验,研究了时间积分阶数对计算误差的影响。线性平流方程的试验结果表明对于方波函数型初值,2、4、5和6阶RK算法能获得和3阶精度差不多的结果,而对于高斯函数型的初值,高阶RKL算法可以取得较好的计算效果。RK为5（6）阶时,对应的Li微分阶数可达9（10）阶,总误差控制在10-7（10-8）以内。随RK阶数增加Li微分有效阶数有增加的趋势,而总误差在逐渐减小。计算非线性无粘Burgers方程时,RKL算法能否获得好的计算结果,除了受初始场形式的影响,还与计算的目标时刻有关。当目标时刻解的各阶导数连续（且未出现无穷大数值时）,高阶（RK为4~6阶）算法是有效的;若出现了导数间断、或导数为无穷大,就会碰到冲击波解类型的问题,此时高阶RK算法也无法获得很高精度的数值解。此非线性的算例中,Li微分阶数仍然随RK阶数增加而增加,但增加的趋势不是线性的,具体变化关系可以通过实验结果拟合而获得。研究发现时间积分方案阶数大于3之后,对应的最优空间差分精度阶数可以比6阶提高很多,这再次证明了以前研究中6阶以上空间差分格式对结果无改进的现象,是由于没有使用足够高精度的时间积分方案引起的。相比于Taylor-Li（Wang,2017）算法,5~6阶的RK方法编程和实现简单,计算结果的精度比3阶算法要提高很多,因此,它是一种能够对复杂方程适用的简易高阶算法方案,具有一定的实用价值。 相似文献
3.
利用高阶Li空间微分方案(Li, 2005),实现了时间积分为3～6阶Runge-Kutta-Li(RKL)格式的求解算法。二维线性平流方程的试验结果表明:在计算稳定的条件下,各阶算法的计算误差随时间的推移基本上是线性增加的。非转动背景场的平流算例中（高斯型的初值）,高阶RKL算法可以取得较好的计算效果。与3、4、5、6阶RK算法配合的Li空间差分方案有效阶数可以达到5、7、9、10阶。RK 算法的阶数为5（6）阶时,总误差控制在10-7（10-8）以内。随RK阶数增加Li微分的有效阶数有增加趋势,且总误差逐渐减小。定常转速的背景场算例中（偏心的高斯型初值）,当RK阶数为3时,最优空间差分阶数为10;相应的阶数为4、5、6时对应的空间最优阶为16,22,22,总计算误差可以控制在10-15～10-16。随着精度的提高,误差的绝对值减小很迅速,说明算法是非常有效的。对于圆锥型初值（定常转速的背景场）,4、5、6阶RK算法和3阶算法的效果差不多。高阶算法对此类具有导数不连续点的算例,效果不如高斯初始场好,结果不能保持正定,有些地方误差出现下冲和上翘。随着空间差分精度的提高,非正定的解数量和数值减小,误差的绝对值减小,说明了算法在一定程度上是有效的,但并不适合追求极高的算法阶数。这与谱方法中的导数不连续问题有些相似,误差的产生主要源于导数的不连续性,差分类方法仅能获得与导数连续性阶数相当的算法精度。各种算例中,采用恰当的边界条件是必要的,例如旋转背景场算例,比较适合使用无穷远边界条件,否则会出现计算不稳定或无法将计算误差控制到较小的范围内。 相似文献
4.
采用新的均匀三点中心约束多矩有限体积方法（3-point Multi-moment Constrained finite-Volume scheme for Uniform Points with Center Constraints, MCV3_UPCC）,发展了一个三阶正定守恒的平流模式。三点多矩有限体积方法在单网格内定义等距的3个自由度,采用多矩约束条件并通过控制方程获得时间演变方程。新的三点中心约束多矩方法能在单网格内采用等距的3个点值及中心一阶、二阶导数作为约束条件进行空间4次多项式数值重构,获得3个自由度的时间演变方程;所构建的新数值方案具有三阶精度,边界通量连续性保证了其数值严格守恒。为了抑制该方法的非物理数值振荡,引入了边界保型限制器技术,它能够把数值解控制在既定物理场最小值（最小值为0时则保持数值正定）与最大值之间。数值试验表明新发展的三阶平流模式具有良好的计算精度,能够严格保持数值解的正定性和守恒性,同其他高精度平流模式相当,在实际大气模式水汽等平流输送应用中具备良好的发展潜力。 相似文献
5.
用有限区域模式进行试验研究，对比了嵌套网格与非均匀网格的优劣，指同非均匀网格具有明显的优点，提供了一种把均匀网格变换成非均匀网格的简单易行方法，并以ＭＭ２模式为实例进行了变换及数值模拟，其结果是令人满意的，该方案可以推广到全球模式中去。 相似文献
6.
一、引言数值天气预报的误差通常可分为两种类型:系统性误差和非系统性误差。系统性误差主要来自模式本身,例如模式模拟实际大气的能力、网格分辨率以及有限差分格式等造成的误差。而非系统性误差是由于模式以外的原因造成的,例如观测误差和初值化误差等。 相似文献
7.
在非均匀分层下,目前GRAPES（Global/Regional Assimilation and Prediction System）模式中使用的垂直差分方案只能达到一阶精度。本文设计了一种适用于非均匀分层的二阶精度垂直差分方案,并将它应用于改进GRAPES模式动力框架的垂直离散化过程。一维廓线理想试验结果表明:二阶精度方案可以减少差分计算误差,而这种改进的幅度相对于差分计算本身引起的误差来说仍然是比较小的。通过密度流试验对修改后的模式动力框架进行测试,结果表明二阶方案可以保持模式动力框架的准确性和稳定性。进一步利用实际资料开展批量测试,发现二阶方案可以降低模式高空要素场的预报误差,而且这种改进随着预报时间的延长变得更为明显。最后选择一次典型的华南暴雨过程进行模拟,同样发现二阶精度方案对于48小时之后的降水会有一定程度的改进。 相似文献
8.
该文就球面上求解Ｈｅｌｍｈｏｌｔｚ方程的问题提出了一个多重网格有限差分法，有限差分风格的分辨率在纬度方向（即经向）不变而在经度方向（即纬向）可变，以使球面上网格点的实际间隔大致保持均匀，在每个网格点，把其残差减小到给定量所需要的ＣＰＵ时间与网格分产率无关，由于可变网络距的结果，其离散误差要比二阶误差稍糟些，该解算方法适用于球面上的一般椭圆型方程，对不宜做均匀网格距求解的一些问题也是有用的。 相似文献
9.
阴阳网格上质量守恒计算性能分析 总被引：3，自引：1，他引：2
质量守恒数值计算是球面准均匀阴阳网格构造全球大气环流模式的重要条件,也是提高阴阳网格应用质量的重要技术手段。本文针对通量形式平流方程,在球面坐标上采用多种理想数值试验对阴阳网格上的三种守恒计算方案和边界插值非守恒计算方案进行了比较检验。发现,质量守恒方案不仅对全球数值积分重要,还影响数值计算精度,满足局地守恒条件的全球强迫守恒方法可以获得较高的精度;网格内质量均匀分布的阴阳网格边界通量一致性守恒强迫计算方案,实现了在不增加计算误差条件下保证局地和全球守恒的目的,且具有很小的计算负担,可以作为阴阳网格上全球质量强迫守恒的有效计算方案;而网格质量的线性分布可以有效提高阴阳网格的数值积分计算精度,但在一定程度上会增加计算负担。 相似文献
10.
11.
本文提出了一种用于双向套网格模式的变格距差分计算方案。该方案在不同格距的网格区采用不同精度的差分格式，它自然地连接粗细网格，避免了一般套网格方案在粗细网格相重合点上进行的重复计算。用解析法和数值试验证明了:它与其它一些变格距差分格式相比，对短波的穿透能力有明显改进，虚假的反射也较小。应用该方案建立了正压原始方程双向套网格模式，并采用空间分解和时间分解计算方法。这不仅使二维问题转化为二个一维问题，而且二维套网格也可简化为一维均匀网格和一维套网格两部分，从而使计算和程序简化。用理想场为初值所做的一系列数值试验表明，该模式中的波可以自由进出粗细网格区，计算稳定。最后，还用该模式做了台风路径预报试验，给出了一些试验结果。 相似文献
12.
Summary Most finite-difference numerical weather prediction models employ vertical discretizations that are staggered, and are low-order (usually second-order) approximations for the important terms such as the derivation of the geopotential from the hydrostatic equation, and the calculation of the vertically integrated divergence. In a sigma-coordinate model the latter is used for computing both the surface pressure change and the vertical velocity. All of the above-mentioned variables can diminish the accuracy of the forecast if they are not calculated accurately, and can have an impact on related quantities such as precipitation.In this study various discretization schemes in the vertical are compared both in theory and in practice. Four different vertical grids are tested: one unstaggered and three staggered (including the widely-used Lorenz grid). The comparison is carried out by assessing the accuracy of the grids using vertical numerics that range from second-order up to sixth-order.The theoretical part of the study examines how faithfully each vertical grid reproduces the vertical modes of the governing equations linearized with a basic state atmosphere. The performance of the grids is evaluated for 2nd, 4th and 6th-order numerical schemes based on Lagrange polynomials, and for a 6th-ordercompact scheme.Our interpretation of the results of the theoretical study is as follows. The most important result is that the order of accuracy employed in the numerics seems to be more significant than the choice of vertical grid. There are differences between the grids at second-order, but these differences effectively vanish as the order of accuracy increases. The sixth-order schemes all produce very accurate results with the grids performing equally well, and with the compact scheme significantly outperforming the Lagrange scheme. A second major result is that for the number of levels typically used in current operational forecast models, second-order schemes (which are used almost universally) all appear to be relatively poor, for other than the lowest modes.The theoretical claims were confirmed in practice using a large number (100) of forecasts with the Australian Bureau of Meteorology Research Centre's operational model. By comparing test model forecasts using the four grids and the different orders of numerics with very high resolution control model forecasts, the results of the theoretical study seem to be corroborated.With 8 Figures 相似文献
13.
The calculation scheme of the smoothed-level and hybrid (SLEVE-hybrid for short) coordinates in numerical forecasting model is not limited to one. It is divided into the semi-analytical scheme and the finite differential scheme in
terms of the various differential methods of the coordinate deformation variables. Comparing the dynamic equation and the long-time batch simulation results of the two schemes, the present study draws the following conclusions. The first-
order finite difference accuracy of the coordinate deformation variables in the finite differential scheme is theoretically lower than that in the semi-analytical scheme. The larger the vertical gradient of the layer thickness is, the larger the
relative errors of the finite differential scheme are. The long-time batch simulation test in the GRAPES model dynamic core demonstrates that the bias of the temperature and the geopotential height in the semi-analytical scheme is smaller
under the default layering, while the simulation difference of the two schemes is greatly reduced when the layering is more uniform. 相似文献
14.
高精度迎风偏斜格式的比较与分析 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
利用一种具有任意阶精度的一般显式有限差分公式构造出高精度迎风偏斜格式，并利用 Fourier分析法评估了这些迎风偏斜格式的耗散误差与频散误差。结果表明，偶阶精度格式的数值相速度快于实际相速度，而奇阶精度格式的数值相速度慢于实际相速度。并且，偶阶精度格式的耗散误差与频散误差低于相邻的奇阶精度格式。为了检验这些格式的计算性能，在一维问题上进行了应用。首先，考虑恒定风场条件下的一维平流试验。主要选择两种不同的初始条件来评价数值格式的精度，这两种试验问题分别是高斯函数、方波函数。试验结果表明，随着数值格式精度的提高，数值格式的误差逐渐减小。而对于高于六阶精度的格式来说，改进的程度并不是很大。其次，应用各阶格式到具有两种不同初始条件的无粘Burgers方程。数值结果表明，随着数值格式阶数的增加，数值结果也得到了明显改进。而对于高于六阶精度的格式来说，进一步的变化并不明显。总之，在兼顾效率与精度条件下六阶迎风偏斜格式是最好的。 相似文献
15.
《热带气象学报(英文版)》2021,(2)
The calculation scheme of the smoothed-level and hybrid(SLEVE-hybrid for short) coordinates in numerical forecasting model is not limited in number. It is divided into the semi-analytical scheme and the finite differential scheme in terms of the various differential methods of the coordinate deformation variables. Having compared the dynamic equation and the long-time batch simulation results of the two schemes, the present study draws the following conclusions. The first-order finite difference accuracy of the coordinate deformation variables in the finite differential scheme is theoretically lower than that in the semi-analytical scheme. The larger the vertical gradient of the layer thickness is, the larger the relative errors of the finite differential scheme are. The long-time batch simulation test in the GRAPES model dynamic core demonstrates that the bias of the temperature and the geopotential height in the semianalytical scheme is smaller under the default layering, while the simulation difference of the two schemes is greatly reduced when the layering is more uniform. 相似文献
16.
Three-Step Difference Scheme for Solving Nonlinear Time-Evolution Partial Differential Equations 
下载免费PDF全文
下载免费PDF全文 In this paper, a special three-step difference scheme is applied to the solution of nonlinear time-evolution equations, whose coefficients are determined according to accuracy constraints, necessary conditions of square conservation, and historical observation information under the linear supposition. As in the linear case, the schemes also have obvious superiority in overall performance in the nonlinear case compared with traditional finite difference schemes, e.g., the leapfrog（LF） scheme and the complete square conservation difference（CSCD） scheme that do not use historical observations in determining their coefficients, and the retrospective time integration（RTI） scheme that does not consider compatibility and square conservation. Ideal numerical experiments using the one-dimensional nonlinear advection equation with an exact solution show that this three-step scheme minimizes its root mean square error（RMSE） during the first 2500 integration steps when no shock waves occur in the exact solution, while the RTI scheme outperforms the LF scheme and CSCD scheme only in the first 1000 steps and then becomes the worst in terms of RMSE up to the 2500th step. It is concluded that reasonable consideration of accuracy, square conservation, and historical observations is also critical for good performance of a finite difference scheme for solving nonlinear equations. 相似文献
17.
Qian Yongfu 《大气科学进展》1988,5(2):159-170
In numerical weather prediction (NWP), the accuracy of vertical interpolation of the initial data is a problem which is greatly concerned by people. In this paper, we specify vertical distributions of the temperature and the geopotential height fields and examine three interpolation methods, i.e. the Lagrangian polynomial inter-polation method (hereafter abbreviated to LP method), the linear interpolation method (LN method) and the local spline interpolation method (LS method) proposed by the author. The examination shows that when the vertical resolution of the initial data is high enough, for example, the number of the given data levels N is 10 or more, all the three methods get good accuracy of interpolation, especially, the LP and the LS methods have very little errors almost tending to zero, while the LN method has a little larger errors than the two formers and the errors at various levels have the same sign. When N is reduced to 5, the LP and the LS methods still have quite good accuracy and similar error distributions, while the LN method has less accuracy. If the geopo-tential height field needs to be adjusted in order to satisfy the hydrostatic equilibrium with the temperature field which is assumed fixed, then the LS method has minimum errors. The examination also indicates that the vertical resolution with at least 5 levels of initial data can keep the interpolation accuracy. Otherwise the accuracy will not be guaranteed no matter which method is used.It is also pointed out in this paper that the temperature and the geopotential height fields can be given inde-pendently in numerical prediction models in order to keep higher interpolation accuracy. However, the hydro-static equation should be finite differenced in other way which is somewhat different from the conventional one. In other words, the time dependent difference form of the equation should be used, so that the initial interpola-tion accuracy could have influence on the time integration. 相似文献
18.
在数值预报和数值模拟中,描述空间微分项的最主要的方法是有限差分法,但使用差分方法会引入截断误差.伍荣生1979年指出,通过在原物理场的基础上构造一个新的物理场,替代原物理场进行差分计算,可以达到减小误差的目的.该文是伍荣生1979年工作的继续,目的在于解释伍荣生1979年所构造的差分格式并得到更为一般化的差分格式.文中给出新的差分格式结合了经典有限差分方法的快速计算和谱方法的高精度的优点.如果在一个给定的网格上对气象要素场进行离散傅里叶级数展开,则基函数(正弦或余弦)的频谱是事免已知的.作者将伍荣生1979年构造物理场的方法视为对物理场的一次平滑,探讨了获取二次平滑场、多次平滑的一般化方法.获取平滑场的基奉原理是使得在固定频谱上的差分逼近程度达到最优.通过对频谱上的累计误差的下降速度分析表明,平滑次数的上限为3次.数值分析的结果表明,二次平滑的最大误差是未作任何平滑的最大误差的0.04倍,在使用相同计算代价的情况下,二次平滑的最大误差是经典的差分格式的0.3倍.平流试验的结果也表明,新的差分格式即一次平滑、二次平滑方案的结果远远优于经典的差分格式.新的差分格式意义在于,在不加密网格的情况下提供了一条提高数值计算精度的途径. 相似文献
19.
Y. Wang 《Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics》1996,61(1-2):27-38
Summary The classical forward-in-time upstream advection scheme for uniform flow field has been extended to include non-uniform and time-dependent advective flow. This generalised scheme is described in one dimension for an advective flow which varies both in time and in space. The classical upstream advection scheme is only first-order accurate both in time and in space if the advective flow is not uniform. Higherorder accuracy in both time and space, however, can be easily obtained in the generalised scheme.This generalised scheme with third-order accuracy is applied to the one-dimensional inviscid Burgers equation (socalled self-advection problem), two-dimensional steady flow, and to a time-split shallow water equation model. The results are compared with those obtained from the Takacs' (1985) scheme and from a standard third-order semi-Lagrangian scheme, and also with those obtained from the fourth-order Lax-Wendroff scheme of Crowley (1968) in the time-split shallow water equation model. It is shown that the generalised scheme performs as well as, but is more efficient than, the standard semi-Lagrangian scheme with same order. It is much more accurate than the Takacs' scheme which has large dissipation errors, especially for the flow with strong deformation. In contrast, the generalised scheme has very weak dissipation and has much better dispersion and shapeconserving properties. Although the fourth-order Lax-Wendroff scheme has higher accuracy and can give more accurate numerical solutions for uniform advective flow or solid rotational flow (Crowley, 1968), it is inferior to the generalised third-order scheme for non-uniform flow with strong deformation or large spatial gradients. This generalised scheme, therefore, has considerable application potential in different numerical models, especially for the models using time-split algorithms.With 8 Figures 相似文献