首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到14条相似文献,搜索用时 109 毫秒
1.
对冷家溪群及其上覆板溪群斑脱岩中的锆石进行研究,测得冷家溪群小木平组斑脱岩SHRIMP锆石U-Pb年龄(822Ma±10Ma)和上覆板溪群张家湾组斑脱岩锆石U-Pb年龄(802.6Ma±7.6Ma),结合"江南造山带"东部变质基底双桥山群和西南地区四堡群、下江群的SHRIMP锆石U-Pb年龄,将冷家溪群与其相应的江南古陆变质地层明确定位于新元古界。该年龄对重新界定"武陵运动"的时限和进行同期地层的区域对比、构造演化研究都有重要意义。冷家溪群与双桥山群、梵净山群、四堡群、双溪坞群一样,均为低变质绿片岩系,构成了江南古陆地区的变质基底。多年来冷家溪群一直划归中元古界,并且视为"武陵运动"的主体,其时代的定位将影响整个江南古陆变质基底的地层划分和对比,也将制约江南造山带的地质背景和成矿条件解疑。上述锆石U-Pb年龄不仅标示了湘东地区新元古代地层的时代,也为江南古陆中部变质基底提供了新的、精确的年代学数据。  相似文献   

2.
首次获得黔桂地区晚前寒武纪四堡群凝灰岩(斑脱岩)锆石SHRIMP U-Pb年龄,结合新获得的侵位于四堡群的花岗岩锆石SHRIMP U-Pb年龄,将四堡群明确定位于新元古界。"江南造山带"普遍发育的新元古代四堡群(梵净山群、冷家溪群、双桥山群)和上覆的丹州群(下江群、板溪群、河上镇群)均为低变质绿片岩系,构成了江南古陆的变质基底。多年来四堡群一直划归中元古界,并且构成"四堡运动"的主体,其时代的定位一直影响着整个江南古陆变质基底的地层划分和对比,也制约着中国地质学家对江南造山带的地质背景和成矿条件解疑。通过对四堡群及其上覆地层中斑脱岩锆石的研究,精确地测定并获得了四堡群斑脱岩锆石的年龄841.7Ma±5.9Ma和黔东南摩天岭地区侵入四堡群的花岗岩锆石的年龄826.8Ma±5.9Ma。  相似文献   

3.
本文报道黔桂地区晚前寒武纪下江群沉积地层凝灰岩(斑脱岩)获得高精度的锆石年龄,结合侵位四堡群花岗岩锆石年龄和四堡群斑脱岩锆石SHRIMP U-Pb年龄,将下江群明确定位于新元古代晚期沉积。该年龄对为重新界定下江群时代及同期地层的区域对比和构造演化都有着重要意义。江南古陆普遍发育的晚元古代低变质绿片岩系四堡群(梵净山群、冷家溪群、双桥山群)及上覆地层丹州群(下江群、板溪群、河上镇群),两者之间的构造界面,是人们争论的主题,其时代的定位一直影响着整个江南古陆变质基底的地层划分和对比,同时制约着中国地质学家对江南造山带的地质背景和成矿条件解疑。本文通过下江群甲路组地层中斑脱岩的锆石研究,精确地测定了甲路组斑脱岩锆石年龄(814.0±6.3)Ma和清水江组斑脱岩锆石年龄(773.6±7.9)Ma。上述锆石年龄解决了黔桂地区新元古代晚期沉积时代问题。  相似文献   

4.
黔东地区梵净山群与下江群凝灰岩SHRIMP锆石U-Pb年龄   总被引:3,自引:0,他引:3  
根据黔东地区梵净山群回香坪组第6段凝灰岩SHRIMP锆石U-Pb年龄(840Ma±5Ma),结合下江群芙蓉坝组碎屑锆石年龄谱系及下江群新寨组(板溪群马底驿组)凝灰岩SHRIMP锆石U-Pb年龄(813.5Ma±9.6Ma),将其与广西四堡群和丹州群凝灰岩年龄进行对比。梵净山群回香坪组年龄与四堡群鱼西组凝灰岩年龄一致,2个地区均发育早期基性岩和枕状熔岩、晚期浅色花岗岩。该事件的精确定年对江南造山带西南端构造演化将有重要的地质意义。依据江南古陆新元古代低变质绿片岩的最新锆石U-Pb年龄,梵净山群(贵州)、四堡群(广西)、冷家溪群(湖南)、双桥山群(江西)与仓溪岩群(湖南)、宜丰岩群(江西)、张村群(江西),甚至与双溪坞群(浙西)在沉积年代上有一定的时间差,而上覆贵州下江群甲路组(814Ma)、广西丹州群合桐组(802Ma)、湖南板溪群张家湾组(802Ma)、江西登山群邓家组(766Ma)和浙江河上镇群骆家门组(791Ma)沉积起点的时间也不一致,但是两者之间均为角度不整合接触,反映出明显的造山事件。研究认为,不断地获得精确的地层年代数据将影响整个江南古陆变质基底的地层对比,并制约江南造山带的地质背景和成矿条件。  相似文献   

5.
赣西北新元古代修水组和马涧桥组SHRIMP锆石U-Pb年龄   总被引:11,自引:1,他引:10  
依据精确地测得的修水组凝灰岩SHRIMP锆石U-Pb年龄(824Ma±5Ma,MSWD=1.3),将修水组明确定位于双桥山群的最上部。结合"江南造山带"锆石U-Pb年龄:东部变质基底双桥山群,西部变质基底梵净山群、似盖层下江群和中部变质基底冷家溪群、似盖层板溪群的锆石SHRIMP U-Pb年龄,将双桥山群上部修水组明确地定位于"武陵运动"之下的新元古代地层。同时,首次在上覆地层马涧桥组火山凝灰碎屑岩中获得3组锆石U-Pb年龄,其中一组继承锆石(824Ma±5Ma,MSWD=1.9),反映了修水组被隆起和剥蚀的证据;而最年轻的一组锆石反映了沉积同时代的凝灰岩年龄为(769Ma±8Ma,MSWD=0.55)。依据该年龄数据,将马涧桥组明确定位于板溪期沉积地层。该年龄对限定区域地层对比和构造演化都有重要意义。上述锆石U-Pb年龄标示了赣西北地区同样存在820Ma界面上下的新元古代地层,为江南古陆变质地层的对比提供了新的年代学数据。  相似文献   

6.
江南古陆中段沧水铺群锆石U-Pb年龄和构造演化意义   总被引:5,自引:2,他引:3       下载免费PDF全文
江南古陆中段湖南益阳地区沧水铺群发育在冷家溪群和板溪群之间,其在地层柱中的位置一直是中国地质学家解疑江南造山带何时启动的关键层位。笔者在沧水铺群中的火山集块岩中获得锆石SHRIMP U-Pb年龄(821±13)Ma,再次验证了沧水铺群中的火山岩是820 Ma武陵运动之前的火山事件的产物,与武陵运动的启动有关,也说明该期火山岩与冷家溪群中大量的火山凝灰岩为同一构造运动的产物。  相似文献   

7.
本文报道在庐山筲箕洼组中获得细碧岩SHIRMP锆石U-Pb年龄(840±6) Ma,MSWD=1.3,流纹岩锆石U-Pb年龄(833±4) Ma,MSWD=1.4,和流纹岩锆石U-Pb年龄(831±3) Ma,对应的MSWD=1.47.而在星子群流纹岩中获得206pb/238U年龄为(825±5)Ma,对应的MSWD=0.46.笔者依据上述精确锆石年龄,首次提出将筲箕洼组明确定位于星子岩群之下.本文结合“江南造山带”锆石U-Pb年龄:东部变质基底的双桥山群,西部变质基底梵净山群和似盖层下江群以及中部变质基底冷家溪群和似盖层板溪群的锆石SHRIMP U-Pb年龄,将筲箕洼组定位于“武陵运动”之下的新元古代地层.依据星子岩群年龄数据,首次将星子岩群明确定位于筲箕洼组之上与双桥山群为同期的深变质岩.该年龄对限定区域地层对比和构造演化都有着重要意义.上述锆石U-Pb年龄标示了赣西北地区同样存在820 Ma界面上下的新元古代地层,为江南古陆变质地层的对比提供了新的年代学数据.  相似文献   

8.
通过西澳科庭大学离子探针中心的远程测试,在双桥山群横涌组和安乐林组斑脱岩中获得大量锆石,其SHRIMP U-Pb加权平均年龄为831 Ma±5 Ma(横涌组)、829 Ma±5 Ma(安乐林组),在河上镇群上墅组中获得加权平均年龄767 Ma±5 Ma。锆石SHRIMP U-Pb年龄表明华南地区广为发育的双桥山群应归入新元古界,该年龄为标定双桥山群在地层柱中的位置提供了准确的年代学依据。  相似文献   

9.
江南造山带东北段歙县岩群和昱岭关群是皖南地区重要的前寒武纪地层单元。本文对皖南地区歙县岩群昌前岩组和昱岭关群井潭组凝灰岩样品中的锆石进行了测年研究,获得昌前岩组凝灰岩SHRIMP锆石U-Pb年龄为852±6 Ma和840±11 Ma,井潭组凝灰岩SHRIMP锆石U-Pb年龄为809±10 Ma,为皖南地区新元古代地层格架的建立和地层的对比增添了可靠的年代学依据。根据最新获得的锆石U-Pb年龄数据,确定歙县岩群的时代与江南造山带区域范围内梵净山群、四堡群、冷家溪群、双桥山群以及溪口岩群相当,其上覆的昱岭关群与下江群、丹洲群、板溪群、马涧桥组、登山群以及上墅组等地层单元可以对比。  相似文献   

10.
提要:桂西北变质基底四堡群及上覆地层丹洲群之间存在着角度不整合,而丹洲群与南华纪地层之间为平行不整合,说明它们是隶属三个构造域的产物。其地层时代的定位影响着整个江南古陆变质基底地层的对比,也制约着华南地区沉积盖层的地质关系。根据丹洲群合桐组凝灰岩锆石U-Pb年龄(801±3) Ma、拱洞组锆石U-Pb年龄(786±6) Ma、南华系长安组的底界年龄(778±5) Ma和大塘坡组年龄(661±7) Ma,结合从桂北地区四堡群顶部沉积地层中凝灰砂岩获得的锆石U-Pb年龄(842±13) Ma和侵入四堡群火成岩锆石U-Pb年龄(834±4) Ma,将四堡群变质砂板岩明确定为形成于820 Ma之下的地层。该年龄对南华纪地层的区域对比和构造演化都有着重要意义。  相似文献   

11.
四堡群为一套出露于桂北黔东南地区、变形强烈的浅变质、陆源碎屑岩火山岩、系,厚度大于5000 m,其下未见底,上被丹洲群(下江群相当地层)所覆盖。桂北四堡群自下而上划分为九小组、文通组和鱼西组3组。样品A20140731-3采自于文通组,岩性为灰绿色熔结火山岩,首次分选出600余粒岩浆型锆石,完成SHRIMP U-Pb定年测点15个,获得加权平均年龄(860±13)Ma。这表明四堡群主体属于新元古界,进而分析、讨论了江南造山带主要地层对比关系。  相似文献   

12.
赣中周潭群副变质岩碎屑锆石U-Pb年代学   总被引:5,自引:3,他引:2  
对赣中周潭群副变质岩中的碎屑锆石开展了LA-ICP-MS U-Pb定年工作,两个石榴黑云母片岩和一个黑云母片岩三个样品中碎屑锆石给出的最年轻的年龄峰值分别为834±11Ma、830±11Ma和809±15Ma.这些碎屑锆石具有与江南造山带内冷家溪群及其相当地层类似的年龄谱型式和相近的最年轻的年龄峰值,表明周潭群应与它们有相似的形成历史和源区,产生于相似的构造环境.因此,周潭群在新元古代扬子地块与华夏地块拼接的过程中,应与冷家溪群、双桥山群等地层一样靠近扬子一侧,而不应属华夏地块.从黑云母片岩部分碎屑锆石的变质边获取的年龄分别为444±11Ma和438±11Ma,表明周潭群地层的变质作用发生在加里东期,与华夏地块其他地区的角闪岩相变质岩的变质年龄一致.相反,与周潭群同期的双桥山群、冷家溪群等地层均未达到角闪岩相变质.这表明,在扬子和华夏地块新元古代的拼接之后,二块体在(现在的)赣中地区又裂开,从而导致了周潭群和相邻的冷家溪群及双桥山群在加里东时期有不同的变质响应.  相似文献   

13.
As an important part of South China Old Land, the Jiangnan Orogenic Belt plays a significant role in explaining the assembly and the evolution of the Upper Yangtze Block and Cathaysia, as well as the structure and growth mechanism of continental lithosphere in South China.The Lengjiaxi and the Banxi groups are the base strata of the west section of the Jiangnan Orogenic Belt.Thus, the research of geochronology and tectonic evolution of the Lengjiaxi and the Banxi groups is significant.The maximum sedimentary age of the Lengjiaxi Group is ca.862 Ma, and the minimum is ca.822 Ma.The Zhangjiawan Formation, which is situated in the upper part of the Banxi Group is ca.802 Ma.The Lengjiaxi Group and equivalent strata should thus belong to the Neoproterozoic in age.The Jiangnan Orogenic Belt consisting of the Lengjiaxi and the Banxi groups as important constituents is not a Greenville Orogen Belt(1.3 Ga–1.0 Ga).The Jiangnan Orogenic Belt is a recyclic orogenic belt, and the prototype basin is a foreland basin with materials derived from the southwest and the sediments belong to the active continental sedimentation.By combining large amounts of dating data of the Lengjiaxi and the Banxi groups as well as equivalent strata, the evolutionary model of the western section of the Jiangnan Orogenic Belt is established as follows: Before 862 Ma, the South China Ocean was subducted beneath the Upper Yangtze Block, while a continental island arc was formed on the side near the Upper Yangtze Block.The South China Ocean was not closed in this period.From 862 Ma to 822 Ma, the Upper Yangtze Block was collided with Cathaysia; and sediments began to be deposited in the foreland basin between the two blocks.The Lengjiaxi Group and equivalent strata were thus formed and the materials might be derived from the recyclic orogenic belt.From 822 Ma to 802 Ma, Cathaysia continued pushing to the Upper Yangtze Block, experienced the Jinning-Sibao Movement(Wuling Movement); as result, the folded basement of the Jiangnan Orogenic Belt was formed.After 802 Ma, Cathaysia and the Upper Yangtze Block were separated from each other, the Nanhua rift basin was formed and began to receive the sediments of the Banxi Group and equivalent strata.These large amounts of dating data and research results also indicate that before the collision of the Upper Yangtze Block with Cathaysia, materials of the continental crust became less and less from the southwest to the east in the Jiangnan Orogeneic Belt; only island arc and neomagmatic arc were developed in the eastern section.Ocean-continent subduction or continent-continent subduction took place in the western and southern sections, while intra-oceanic subduction occurred in the eastern section.Comprehensive analyses on U-Pb ages and Hf model ages of zircons, the main provenance of the Lengjiaxi Group is Cathaysia.  相似文献   

14.
The South China Block was built up by the assembly of the Yangtze and Cathaysia blocks along the Neoproterozoic Jiangnan Orogenic Belt. The timing of the Jiangnan Orogeny remains controversial. The widespread orogeny–related Neoproterozoic angular unconformity that separates the underlying folded Sibao (ca.1000–820 Ma) and overlying Danzhou (ca.800–720 Ma) Groups was investigated. Six sedimentary samples, below and above the unconformity in three distal localities (Fanjingshan, Madiyi, and Sibao) yield detrital zircon with UPb ages ranging from 779 ± 16 Ma to 3006 ± 36 Ma, with a prominent peak at ca. 852 Ma. The youngest ages of 832 ± 11 Ma and 779 ± 16 Ma are revealed for the underlying Sibao and overlying Danzhou Groups, respectively. The detrital zircon UPb age relative probability plot of the Jiangnan Orogen matches well with those of the Yangtze and Cathaysia blocks since ca. 865 Ma. Integrating geological, geochemical and geochronological results, we suggest that the Paleo–South China Ocean began to subduct under the Yangtze block at ca. 1000 Ma, and was partly closed at ca. 865 Ma. Afterwards, the Yangtze and Cathaysia blocks initially collide at 865 Ma, forming the Jiangnan Orogen. This collision resulted in not only the folding of the Sibao Group, but also sediment deposition in a syn-collisional setting, which makes the upper part of the Sibao Group. The youngest S-type granite dated at ca. 820 Ma that intruded in the Sibao Group marks the late stage of the Jiangnan Orogeny.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号