首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到19条相似文献,搜索用时 109 毫秒
1.
前陆沉积与变形对郯庐断裂带同造山运动的制约   总被引:28,自引:14,他引:28       下载免费PDF全文
郯庐断裂带两侧的前陆沉积及其变形现象,揭示了该断裂带同造山活动的大量信息。合肥盆地东侧的郯庐断裂带旁,侏罗系沉积时出现了沉降中心与边缘相,显示这期间郯庐断裂带所处的张八岭隆起已移位至盆地东侧。砂岩的端元组份分析与碎屑白云母的电子探针分析显示,下扬子地区弧形展布的黄马青群与象山群前陆沉积的物源区为大别——苏鲁造山带,属于原地沉积,表明造山期郯庐断裂带已经出现。大别与苏鲁造山带周边都出现了强烈的前陆褶皱冲断带。合肥盆地前侏罗系基底上印支期的逆冲断层,在郯庐断裂带旁侧明显增多,指示该断裂带曾发生过同造山活动。下扬子地区前陆构造走向向郯庐断裂带方向偏转,反映它们形成时受到了郯庐断裂带左旋走滑运动的影响。这一系列前陆沉积与变形特征,指示郯庐断裂带在华北与华南板块的碰撞造山中以陆内变换断层的型式出现。该断裂带造山期运动中,东盘为主动盘,并发生了显著的逆时针旋转。独特的徐宿弧形逆冲——推覆构造,表明造山期郯庐断裂带左行平移幅度达350km。在该断裂带早白垩世的第二次平移中,断裂带向北延伸,又发生了约200km的左行平移。  相似文献   

2.
郯庐断裂带的前身是3条重要的边界断裂(古郯庐断裂、辽渤断裂和敦化-密山断裂),因而前白垩纪其两侧的“盆”“山”发育分属不同的造山动力学和成盆动力学系统。其西.扬子微大陆与华北微大陆之间的秦岭-大别造山带是印支期的碰撞造山带,兴-蒙造山带是海西期的阿尔泰型(增生弧型)造山带,燕山运动时两者都成为陆内造山带。“郯庐断裂带”以东,苏鲁造山带是苏皖地块与胶辽微大陆之间的燕山期碰撞造山带,延吉-清津造山带是胶辽微大陆与兴凯地块之间的印支期碰撞造山带;更北则是由一系列外来地体沿敦化-密山断裂拼贴在西伯利亚次大陆之上而形成的斜向汇聚-剪切造山带(属板间造山带)。在此基础上,分为海西-印支期、侏罗纪和白垩纪3个时代,详细剖析了“郯庐断裂带”两侧与上述造山作用耦合的典型的磨拉石盆地和火山岩盆地的演化及其对比,证实前白垩纪“郯庐断裂带”两侧的盆地各有其独立的发育史,不是被郯庐断裂带左行平移错断的同一个盆地。对“郯庐断裂带”两侧古生代-三叠纪陆表海的研究进一步证实其西的扬子微大陆、华北微大陆、布列亚-佳木斯地块与其东的苏皖地块、胶辽微大陆、兴凯地块曾分属独立的构造单元。早白垩世时,随着新特提斯洋的部分闭合,亚洲大陆的雏形出现,上述3条边界断裂连接成郯庐断裂带并成为陆内的左行走滑断层。  相似文献   

3.
文中通过对晚石炭世至早三叠世华南和华北地块古地理特征以及地层学证据的分析,认为中国东部的郯庐断裂带自海西期以来经历了两个主要发展阶段:第一阶段是广义的郯庐断裂带发展阶段,在海西期它是扬子地块北东缘呈宽缓弧形展布的边缘裂陷槽(或盆地)的边界;在印支期由于扬子地块与华北地块的碰撞,成为两地块的对接边界,具有逆冲推覆的性质,属广义的特提斯构造域。第二发展阶段从燕山期以来,发展成为一条平移断裂带,属于狭义的环太平洋构造域的平移系统。自晚石炭世至早三叠世的中国南方及华北东南部的岩相古地理资料显示了扬子地块与华北地块的对接始于晚二叠世早期,地块的抬升自南向北、自南东向北西方向呈迁移趋势;印支期的郯庐断裂带是一条北东、北北东展布的缓‘S’形的地块拼贴边界,在现今的郯庐断裂带上表现为残留的由北北西向南南东的斜向逆冲推覆的性质,表现为大别苏鲁造山带的中上部构造层的变形,即张八岭构造带及前陆褶皱冲断带的变形;燕山期以来则为众所周知的狭义的郯庐断裂带即郯庐平移断裂系统的一部分。  相似文献   

4.
郯庐断裂带形成演化的年代学研究   总被引:11,自引:0,他引:11  
通过对郯庐断裂带东侧张八岭蓝片岩带内白云母4 0 Ar - 3 9Ar年龄、断裂带内片麻状花岗岩中钾长石4 0 Ar- 3 9Ar年龄以及断裂带内断层泥K -Ar、ESR年龄的测定 ,并结合有关的地质和古地磁资料 ,厘定了郯庐断裂带形成和演化的过程 :(1)三叠纪 (2 44~ 2 0 9Ma)由于华北与扬子地块碰撞 ,郯庐断裂带形成为其主要左行平移时期 ;(2 )侏罗纪 (189~ 16 4Ma)时郯庐断裂东侧下扬子地块可能经历了逆时针转动 ;(3)白垩纪 (10 3~ 94Ma)开始郯庐断裂带伴随走滑平移而发生正断活动 ;(4)晚白垩—第三纪右旋平移阶段。郯庐断裂的形成与大别 -苏鲁变质带有关。  相似文献   

5.
陆元超  朱光  尹浩  张帅  牛漫兰 《地质学报》2022,96(10):3410-3425
郯庐断裂带起源于华北克拉通与扬子板块的汇聚过程中已被多数学者所认同。该断裂带的起源机制,涉及到这两个大陆板块的汇聚方式。可是,对于这一重要问题却长期存在着不同的认识。本文依据郯庐断裂带内部及其两侧前陆上构造与年代学研究成果,综合分析该断裂带的起源机制。郯庐断裂带内部残留的起源期构造为左行走滑韧性剪切带,所获得的白云母40Ar/39Ar同位素年龄为239~217 Ma。华北克拉通边缘的徐淮弧形逆冲-推覆构造,及九江地区扬子板块上的弧形褶皱带,分别为苏鲁造山带、大别造山带点碰撞的产物。郯庐断裂带西侧的华北克拉通边缘,在汇聚过程中呈现为刚性陆块的特征,没有出现大规模的牵引弯曲现象。而东侧的扬子板块前陆构造,在汇聚过程中却明显出现了大规模的牵引弯曲现象。断裂带东侧的张八岭隆起北段,出露了扬子板块上中地壳韧性拆离带,其中所获得的白云母40Ar/39Ar同位素年龄为245~218 Ma,其滑动方向受控于郯庐断裂带起源期的左行走滑运动。这一系列构造与年代学信息,表明郯庐断裂带起源于华北克拉通与扬子板块的汇聚过程中,代表了这两个大陆的斜向汇聚边界。该断裂带起源期的活动时限,与大别、苏鲁造山带内大陆深俯冲时间相吻合。在大别造山带北部的华北克拉通,原始应存在着向南的突出体(嵌入体),从而导致嵌入式碰撞与嵌入体边界的大陆斜向汇聚(起源期郯庐断裂带),符合嵌入式碰撞导致板片撕裂模式。  相似文献   

6.
郯庐断裂带中-南段走滑构造特征与变形规律   总被引:23,自引:13,他引:23       下载免费PDF全文
朱光  徐佑德  刘国生  王勇生  谢成龙 《地质科学》2006,41(2):226-241,255
在大别造山带东端和苏鲁造山带西端,郯庐断裂带存在着同造山期和早白垩世两期左旋走滑韧性剪切带,在张八岭隆起南段迄今为止只发现了早白垩世的走滑剪切带。这些剪切带由若干条小型韧性剪切带组成,带内糜棱岩都具有陡倾的糜棱面理和平缓的矿物拉伸线理。野外构造、显微构造及石英C轴组构皆指示了左旋走滑剪切指向。新生矿物组合和矿物变形行为分析显示大别山东端郯庐早、晚两期剪切带主要形成于中绿片岩相的变质温度环境,张八岭隆起南段剪切带主要形成于高绿片岩相的变质温度环境,苏鲁造山带西端郯庐早、晚两期剪切带则形成于高角闪岩相的变质温度环境。糜棱岩内基质中新生白云母的电子探针分析指示大别山东端和张八岭隆起南段出露的郯庐韧性剪切带形成于低压环境下,而苏鲁造山带西端的郯庐韧性剪切带形成于高压榴辉岩相环境。这些详细的构造研究显示:在华北与华南板块的碰撞造山期郯庐断裂带以左旋走滑构造型式存在,而在早白垩世太平洋构造域中它又再次发生了强烈的左行平移。  相似文献   

7.
郯庐断裂带中生代构造演化史: 进展与新认识   总被引:8,自引:0,他引:8  
总结出郯庐断裂带中生代运动学演化的过程与历史,概括为“两大运动时期、五个发展阶段”。第一运动时期对应于三叠纪—早侏罗世早期的“印支运动”,以扬子陆块与华北地块之间的拼合和碰撞造山为主导,郯庐断裂带经历了:①转换走滑阶段(240-220Ma),其走滑活动局限在大别和苏鲁超高压变质带之间。这个阶段的陆-陆深俯冲作用使苏鲁超高压变质带向西韧性挤出,导致徐淮弧形构造带的形成和发育。②左旋平移走滑阶段(220-190Ma),徐淮弧形构造带向南错移了约145km,并被大别山以北地区的东西向逆冲系统所吸收。左旋走滑扩展使郯庐断裂带贯穿整个华北和东北地区。第二运动时期对应于中、晚侏罗世至古新世时期的"燕山运动",郯庐断裂带的演化与东亚活动陆缘的演化紧密联系在一起,经历了③中、晚侏罗世至早白垩世早期挤压走滑活动,伴随着华北东部地区岩石圈、地壳增厚和郯庐左旋走滑断裂系的发育。④早白垩世以地壳伸展和陆内裂谷断陷作用为主,使早期增厚的华北克拉通岩石圈发生垮塌和减薄。⑤晚白垩世—古新世以右旋走滑为主,沿断裂带及其两侧发育一系列拉分盆地。系统地阐述了郯庐断裂带中生代发育过程与地质特征,及其在东亚大陆演化历史中独特的作用。  相似文献   

8.
根据大别-苏鲁造山带北缘和吉林-黑龙江东部的三叠纪浅变质加积杂岩特征标志,认为大别地区的板块缝合线为信阳-舒城断裂,苏鲁地区的为郯庐-鸭绿江断裂,且苏鲁造山带向北延入东北的吉林-黑龙江东部地区,而华北与扬子板块之间构造缝合线的东延部分则为郯庐-鸭绿江-图们江-延吉断裂。在此基础上,提出了亚洲东部三叠纪以来连续的俯冲-加积模型:(1)三叠纪扬子板块在华北板块向南突出部位(大别-苏鲁一带)发生点碰撞形成超高压变质岩,之后扬子板块由点碰撞逐渐向两侧旋转拼贴形成加积杂岩;(2)侏罗纪-新生代在三叠纪碰撞基础上,太平洋板块向欧亚大陆连续俯冲和加积,进而形成由三叠纪-新生代杂岩组成的欧亚大陆东部地区的巨大加积杂岩带。  相似文献   

9.
郯庐断裂带中生代构造演化史:进展与新认识   总被引:39,自引:2,他引:37  
总结出郯庐断裂带中生代运动学演化的过程与历史,概括为"两大运动时期、五个发辰阶段".第一运动时期对应于三叠纪一早侏罗世早期的"印支运动",以扬子陆块与华北地块之间的拼合和碰撞造山为主导,郯庐断裂带经历了:①转换走滑阶段(240~220Ma),其走滑活动局限在大别和苏鲁超高压变质带之间.这个阶段的陆一陆深俯冲作用使苏鲁超高压变质带向西韧性挤出,导致徐淮弧形构造带的形成和发育.②左旋平移走滑阶段(220~190Ma),徐淮弧形构造带向南错移了约145km,并被大别山以北地区的东西向逆冲系统所吸收.左旋走滑扩展使郯庐断裂带贯穿整个华北和东北地区.第二运动时期对应于中、晚侏罗世至古新世时期的"燕山运动",郯庐断裂带的演化与东亚活动陆缘的演化紧密联系在一起,经历了③中、晚侏罗世至早白垩世早期挤压走滑活动,伴随着华北东部地区岩石圈、地壳增厚和郯庐左旋走滑断裂系的发育.④早白垩世以地壳伸展和陆内裂谷断陷作用为主,使早期增厚的华北克拉通岩石圈发生垮塌和减薄.⑤晚白垩世一古新世以右旋走滑为主,沿断裂带及其两侧发育一系列拉分盆地.系统地阐述了郯庐断裂带中生代发育过程与地质特征,及其在东亚大陆演化历史中独特的作用.  相似文献   

10.
吴根耀  马力  梁兴  陈均亮 《地质通报》2008,27(3):308-325
郯庐断裂带的前身是3条重要的边界断裂(古郯庐断裂、辽渤断裂和敦化-密山断裂),因而前白垩纪其两侧的“盆”“山”发育分属不同的造山动力学和成盆动力学系统。其西.扬子微大陆与华北微大陆之间的秦岭-大别造山带是印支期的碰撞造山带,兴-蒙造山带是海西期的阿尔泰型(增生弧型)造山带,燕山运动时两者都成为陆内造山带。“郯庐断裂带”以东,苏鲁造山带是苏皖地块与胶辽微大陆之间的燕山期碰撞造山带,延吉-清津造山带是胶辽微大陆与兴凯地块之间的印支期碰撞造山带;更北则是由一系列外来地体沿敦化-密山断裂拼贴在西伯利亚次大陆之上而形成的斜向汇聚-剪切造山带(属板间造山带)。在此基础上,分为海西-印支期、侏罗纪和白垩纪3个时代,详细剖析了“郯庐断裂带”两侧与上述造山作用耦合的典型的磨拉石盆地和火山岩盆地的演化及其对比,证实前白垩纪“郯庐断裂带”两侧的盆地各有其独立的发育史,不是被郯庐断裂带左行平移错断的同一个盆地。对“郯庐断裂带”两侧古生代-三叠纪陆表海的研究进一步证实其西的扬子微大陆、华北微大陆、布列亚-佳木斯地块与其东的苏皖地块、胶辽微大陆、兴凯地块曾分属独立的构造单元。早白垩世时,随着新特提斯洋的部分闭合,亚洲大陆的雏形出现,上述3条边界断裂连接成郯庐断裂带并成为陆内的左行走滑断层。  相似文献   

11.
徐纪人  赵志新 《中国地质》2005,32(2):310-319
三维P波速度解析研究结果表明,苏鲁-大别超高压变质带岩石圈地壳速度结构均具有上地壳明显高速且上凸、中地壳增厚、下地壳埋藏较深且莫霍面下凹等基本特征。与大别地区相比较,苏鲁超高压变质带存在着上地壳波速更高,且地表高速区面积与上地壳高速体体积大于大别;而莫霍面下凹程度不如大别地区,地壳山根已逐步趋向消失等独特的区域特征。显示了苏鲁地区曾发生过更激烈的俯冲与折返构造运动,与大别地区相比,有更多高速、高密度的超高压变质岩折返到上地壳与地表;然而在造山运动过程中比大别更早进入了造山运动后期等特征。对比研究结果表明,苏鲁-大别地段的造山、演化过程中,在构造运动基本相似的背景下,存在着区域性特征。苏鲁地区的造山运动以及超高压变质作用,有起始略晚、发生时期较短但相对激烈、结束早、比大别更早进入了造山运动的后期等特征。笔者分析了苏鲁区域性特征形成的主要构造原因是,郯庐断裂带的大规模左旋走滑运动以及通过中国华北区域的大范围NXV—SE向扩张应力场的影响。其中,中生代以来大华北地区的大区域扩张应力场的影响可能是该区俯冲到地幔内的超高压变质岩能够大量折返回地表或上地壳的重要构造原因。  相似文献   

12.
《Gondwana Research》2013,24(4):1402-1428
The formation of collisional orogens is a prominent feature in convergent plate margins. It is generally a complex process involving multistage tectonism of compression and extension due to continental subduction and collision. The Paleozoic convergence between the South China Block (SCB) and the North China Block (NCB) is associated with a series of tectonic processes such as oceanic subduction, terrane accretion and continental collision, resulting in the Qinling–Tongbai–Hong'an–Dabie–Sulu orogenic belt. While the arc–continent collision orogeny is significant during the Paleozoic in the Qinling–Tongbai–Hong'an orogens of central China, the continent–continent collision orogeny is prominent during the early Mesozoic in the Dabie–Sulu orogens of east-central China. This article presents an overview of regional geology, geochronology and geochemistry for the composite orogenic belt. The Qinling–Tongbai–Hong'an orogens exhibit the early Paleozoic HP–UHP metamorphism, the Carboniferous HP metamorphism and the Paleozoic arc-type magmatism, but the three tectonothermal events are absent in the Dabie–Sulu orogens. The Triassic UHP metamorphism is prominent in the Dabie–Sulu orogens, but it is absent in the Qinling–Tongbai orogens. The Hong'an orogen records both the HP and UHP metamorphism of Triassic age, and collided continental margins contain both the juvenile and ancient crustal rocks. So do in the Qinling and Tongbai orogens. In contrast, only ancient crustal rocks were involved in the UHP metamorphism in the Dabie–Sulu orogenic belt, without involvement of the juvenile arc crust. On the other hand, the deformed and low-grade metamorphosed accretionary wedge was developed on the passive continental margin during subduction in the late Permian to early Triassic along the northern margin of the Dabie–Sulu orogenic belt, and it was developed on the passive oceanic margin during subduction in the early Paleozoic along the northern margin of the Qinling orogen.Three episodes of arc–continent collision are suggested to occur during the Paleozoic continental convergence between the SCB and NCB. The first episode of arc–continent collision is caused by northward subduction of the North Qinling unit beneath the Erlangping unit, resulting in UHP metamorphism at ca. 480–490 Ma and the accretion of the North Qinling unit to the NCB. The second episode of arc–continent collision is caused by northward subduction of the Prototethyan oceanic crust beneath an Andes-type continental arc, leading to granulite-facies metamorphism at ca. 420–430 Ma and the accretion of the Shangdan arc terrane to the NCB and reworking of the North Qinling, Erlangping and Kuanping units. The third episode of arc–continent collision is caused by northward subduction of the Paleotethyan oceanic crust, resulting in the HP eclogite-facies metamorphism at ca. 310 Ma in the Hong'an orogen and low-P metamorphism in the Qinling–Tongbai orogens as well as crustal accretion to the NCB. The closure of backarc basins is also associated with the arc–continent collision processes, with the possible cause for granulite-facies metamorphism. The massive continental subduction of the SCB beneath the NCB took place in the Triassic with the final continent–continent collision and UHP metamorphism at ca. 225–240 Ma. Therefore, the Qinling–Tongbai–Hong'an–Dabie–Sulu orogenic belt records the development of plate tectonics from oceanic subduction and arc-type magmatism to arc–continent and continent–continent collision.  相似文献   

13.
The Tan–Lu fault is a major strike-slip fault in eastern China that appears to offset the high-grade rocks of the Hong’an–Dabie–Sulu orogen left-laterally ∼540 km. We evaluate models for the collision between the South and North China blocks, published radiometric dates recording HP–UHP metamorphism and exhumation in the Hong’an–Dabie and Sulu terranes, and the timing of sinistral motion on the Tan–Lu fault to evaluate whether UHP rocks provide a piercing point for offset on the Tan–Lu fault. UHP metamorphism in Hong’an–Dabie was concurrent with Sulu based on U–Pb dating of coesite-bearing domains of zircon at 244 ± 5–226 ± 2 Ma for Hong’an–Dabie and 243 ± 4–225 ± 2 Ma for Sulu. Retrograde metamorphism began c. 220 Ma for both Hong’an–Dabie and Sulu, but retrograde zircon growth ended c. 214 Ma in Hong’an–Dabie and continued until c. 202 Ma in Sulu based on U–Pb dating of zircon domains external to coesite-bearing domains. Structures in Sulu are rotated 25° counter-clockwise from, but are broadly similar to, Hong’an–Dabie suggesting the two areas have a common Triassic orogenic history that pre-dates motion on the Tan–Lu fault, and that is consistent with paleomagnetic studies. We constructed a pre-Cretaceous restoration of the Hong’an–Dabie–Sulu belt that moves the Sulu terrane south, aligning the suture and the eclogite-facies isograd, and rotates Sulu c. 25° clockwise to re-align structures with Hong’an–Dabie. Our restoration is supported by published data and shows that the Hong’an–Dabie–Sulu orogen is a piercing point for post-collisional offset on the Tan–Lu fault and that these regions shared a common subduction–exhumation history. The Tan–Lu fault did not play a significant role in the Hong’an–Dabie–Sulu collision and likely developed later, in the Early Cretaceous.  相似文献   

14.
In the Central Orogenic Belt, China, two UHP metamorphic belts are discriminated mainly based on a detailed structural analysis of the Kanfenggou UHP metamorphic fragment exposed in the eastern Qinling orogen, and together with previous regional structural, petrological and geochronological data at the scale of the orogenic domain. The first one corresponds to the South Altun-North QaidamNorth Qinling UHP metarnorphic belt. The other is the Dabie-Sulu UHP and HP metamorphic belts. The two UHP metamorphic belts are separated by a series of tectonic slices composed by the Qiniing rock group, Danfeng rock group and Liuling or Foziling rock group etc. respectively, and are different in age of the peak UHP metamorphism and geodynamic implications for continental deep subduction and collision. Regional field and petrological relationships suggest that the Kanfenggou UHP metamorphic fragment that contains a large volume of the coesite- and microdiamond-bearing eclogite lenses is compatible with the structures recognized in the South Altun and North Qaidam UHP metamorphic fragments exposed in the western part of China, thereby forming a large UHP metamorphic belt up to 1000 km long along the orogen strike. This UHP metamorphic belt represents an intercontinental deep subduction and collision belt between the Yangtze and Sino-Korean cratons, occurred during the Paleozoic. On the other hand, the well-constrained Dabie-Sulu UHP and HP metamorphic belts occurred mainly during Triassic time (250-220 Ma), and were produced by the intracontinental deep subduction and collision within the Yangtze craton. The Kanfenggou UHP metamorphic fragment does not appear to link with the DabieSulu UHP and HP metamorphic belts along the orogen. There is no reason to assume the two UHP metamorphic belts as a single giant deep subduction and collision zone in the Central Orogenic Belt situated between the Yangtze and Sino-Korean cratons. Therefore, any dynamic model for the orogen must ac-count for the development of UHP metarnorphic rocks belonging to the separate two tectonic belts of different age and tectono-metamorphic history.  相似文献   

15.
The western Dabie orogen (also known as the Hong'an block) forms the western part of the Dabie–Sulu HP–UHP belt, central China. Rocks of this orogen have been subjected to pervasive ductile deformation, and include numerous quartz schists and felsic mylonites cropping out in ductile shear zones. Quartz textures in these mylonites contain important clues for understanding the movement sense of late-collisional extrusion and exhumation of high-pressure–ultrahigh-pressure (HP–UHP) rocks from the lower crustal level to the upper crustal level during Middle Triassic and Early Jurassic. The orientation and distribution of quartz crystallographic axes were used to confirm the regional shear sense across the orogen. The asymmetry of c-axis patterns consistently indicates top-to-the-southeast thrusting across the orogen in early structural stages. Later stages of deformation show different senses of movement in northern and southern parts of the orogen, with top-to-the-northwest sinistral shearing recorded in rocks north of the Xinxian HP–UHP eclogite-facies belt, and top-to-the-southeast dextral shearing south of the same unit.Based on our study on quartz c-axis fabrics and marco- to micro-scale structures, simultaneous southeastward shearing within a large part of the orogen and normal faulting north of the Xinxian HP–UHP unit is explained by upward extrusion in early stages of deformation. The extrusion process has been attributed to syn- and late-collisional processes, accounting for some earlier deformation in the western Dabie orogen such as metamorphic sequences around the core of the Xinxian HP–UHP eclogite-facies unit. Much higher pressure of deformation is also indicated in the aligned glaucophane and omphacite from blueschist and eclogite in the field. An orogen-parallel eastward extrusion of the Xinxian HP–UHP eclogite-facies unit, however, occurred diachronously in later stages of deformation. Therefore, a tectonic model combining an early upward extrusion with a later eastward extrusion is presented. Two different stages and types of extrusion for exhumation of HP–UHP rocks are suitable to all of east central China. Geochronological data shows that the first, upward extrusion occurred during Middle Triassic, the second, eastward extrusion occurred during Late Triassic to Early Jurassic. These two extrusions are correlative with two stages of rapid exhumation of the Dabie HP–UHP rocks, respectively. These two-stage late-collisional (Middle Triassic to Early Jurassic) extrusion events bridge the gap between syn-collisional (Early to Middle Triassic) vertical extrusion and post-collisional (Cretaceous) eastward-directed lateral escape and provide vital clues to understanding the more detailed processes of exhumation of HP–UHP rocks.  相似文献   

16.
超高压变质岩生成问题中解决低密度大陆地壳深俯冲力学机制是一个关键问题。虽然俯冲地幔岩石可以裹携十几千米乃至几十千米尺度的陆壳块体到超高压变质深度,大规模的陆壳深俯冲需要特殊的构造条件。新西兰南岛北端研究表明,俯冲大洋板块能携带宽度达150km左右的窄条陆壳克服浮力达到超高压变质深度,而大陆板块碰撞的主体则浮在岩石圈上形成走滑断层。苏鲁-大别可能曾存在类似的构造条件:苏鲁西侧俯冲海洋板片首先拖曳苏鲁陆壳俯冲到超高压变质深度;随后大别以西俯冲大洋板片拖曳大别至超高压变质深度,而陆壳浮力导致苏鲁陆壳停止俯冲,飘浮的陆壳被北推而形成郯庐断裂;秦岭陆陆碰撞造山后大别超高压陆壳也折返;秦岭作为典型造山带,虽然不排除零星超高压变质的可能,但不具备大规模超高压变质的条件。  相似文献   

17.
大别山北大别杂岩的大地构造属性   总被引:12,自引:1,他引:11  
北大别杂岩主要由花岗质片麻岩及斜长角闪岩组成 ,含有不同类型、大小不等的麻粒岩岩块和变质超镁铁质岩块 ,侵入有大量白垩纪花岗岩和辉石 -辉长岩类。其中的花岗质片麻岩、斜长角闪岩具有岛弧环境的岩石地球化学特征 ,代表拼贴于扬子陆块北缘的新元古代古岛弧。北大别杂岩北可与庐镇关群相连 ,南俯于超高压变质岩之下 ,在三叠纪扬子陆块与华北陆块的碰撞过程中 ,曾与超高压变质岩一起俯冲到地幔深度并经受榴辉岩相变质作用 ,然后在折返过程中叠加了麻粒岩相及角闪岩相变质作用 ,是扬子陆块北缘陆壳俯冲基底的一部分  相似文献   

18.
商城 麻城断裂带在大别山的构造格局中占有重要地位,但长期以来对其形成时代缺乏精细的测年研究,有鉴于此,我们采用断裂带糜棱岩中黑云母单矿物~(40)Ar-~(39)Ar年代学方法测定其变形时代。结果表明,商麻断裂带形成于226 Ma左右,是扬子和华北两大板块碰撞后期的产物,是一条垂直于造山带走向的横向平移断层。在商麻断裂带的转换调节下,其两侧地块发生差异位移、抬升和相对旋转,导致东西两侧的超高压岩石的折返出露呈现出不同的特征。  相似文献   

19.
综合宽角反射、近垂直反射的探测结果和有关地质资料,对大别造山带地壳结构和超高压变质带研究显示:大别造山带地壳具有层块结构特征。沿安义-庄墓剖面,上地壳有7个弹性块体,中地壳有5个,下地壳有4个。扬子与华北地块的主缝合带是超高压变质带,扬子地块与大别造山带的现今分界线是与郯庐断裂相交的太湖-马庙断裂,磨子潭-晓天断裂是大别造山带的北界,北淮阳构造带呈楔状向下插入,它与华北地块的分界是肥中断裂。郯庐断裂在中、上地壳近于直立,下地壳向西倾斜。超高压变质带的厚度为5-7km,产状向北插入到北大别块体之下,折返过程是构造就位,不是大别山的均匀抬升,折返的主运动面是水吼-五河高温剪切带。  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号