共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 29 毫秒
1.
建议江苏采用和摒弃的地层单位名称 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
《江苏地层清理项目组》以现代地层学理论为指导，经３年的工作，搜集了江苏１００多年来大量的晚太古代至第三纪地层资料。以岩石地层为主导，从近３００个地层单位名称后，经筛选，建议使用１０４个正式岩石地层单位和４个非正式岩石地层单位，对１６８个不使用的地层名称提出了理由。 相似文献
2.
地层学的几个基本问题及中国地层学可能的发展趋势 总被引：5，自引：2，他引：3
对地层学的几个基本问题,包括地层分类、国际地层表的建立、全球地层标准剖面及剖面点进行了讨论。在各种地层分类体系中,年代地层学和岩石地层学是分类中的主体,其他系统都居于补充或从属的地位。国际地层表是地质学的基本文件和地学研究的主要参照,其建立的基础应是地史上关键性地质事件的记录,其方法应是多学科的综合研究。前寒武纪与显生宙划分的建立标准应是一致的。国际地层委员会制订的GSSP做出了重大贡献,但所定点位不够稳定,点位以外无法对比,在实践上和认知上都有不足。可考虑用多学科综合研究,寻觅接近等时的物理界面取代剖面点作为地层界面。在中国地层研究方面,以三次全国地层会议为准,分阶段概括论述了半世纪以来做出的主要成果。对今后中国地层研究的可能趋势提出了一些看法。主要是:应从系统论、整体观和复杂性观点的高度开展多学科的融合,共同解决地层的时空关系和划分对比等复杂问题;应当扩大服务面和扩展研究面,着重开展以古环境和古气候为中心的地层研究,协助解决与经济建设中的资源与环境两大主题有关的地质课题;制订2008年后的中、长期规划,改进GSSP程序,持续完善《国际地层表》这一永恒任务;开展高分辨率、高精度地层学研究,建立融合及协调多种分支学科的综合地层学;扩大地层学对整个地球科学的服务,使中国地层学研究进入一个新的阶段。 相似文献
3.
International Subcommission on Stratigraphic Classification [Report No. 7a; editor H. D. Hedberg]: Introduction to an International Guide to Stratigraphic Classification, Terminology, and Usage. Boreas, Vol 1, pp. 199–211. Oslo, 1st September, 1972. [Co-published with Lethaia, Vol. 5, pp. 283–295]. The International Subcommission on Stratigraphic Classification (ISSC), a subcommission of the IUGS Commission on Stratigraphy, has been working for the last 15–20 years towards the preparation of an International Guide to Stratigraphic Classification, Terminology, and Usage. The purpose of the Guide is to promote international agreement on principles of stratigraphic classification and to establish internationally acceptable stratigraphic terminology and rules of stratigraphic procedure. The Introduction explains the background of its preparation. 相似文献
4.
A different understanding of the stratigraphic science methodology is considered. The classical geohistorical content of stratigraphy is set against the latest formal classification approach recorded in the International Stratigraphic Guide. Some provisions of the Stratigraphic Code of Russia and the International Stratigraphic Guide are studied. The described confrontation between the two concepts can be expressed by a formula: stratotype or limitotype. 相似文献
5.
解读国际地层委员会2004年前寒武纪地层表及2004-2008年参考方案 总被引：17，自引：5，他引：12
国际地层委员会前不久公布了2 0 0 4年“国际地层表”,并专门提出了“2 0 0 4—2 0 0 8年前寒武纪年表参考方案”。在2 0 0 4年版“国际地层表”中,新建了埃迪卡拉系,其时限从6 30 Ma至5 4 2 Ma。“2 0 0 4—2 0 0 8年前寒武系划分参考方案”指出应该根据唯一客观的物理标准——现存的岩石记录,对前寒武纪地质年表重新进行界定。前寒武纪的地层界线应标定于地层记录中的关键事件或转变点上,以突出反映地球系统演化的巨变。在介绍有关埃迪卡拉系的背景、地质特征和时限的同时,对“参考方案”中有关前寒武系划分原则和具体划分方案的新思路进行了介绍和评述,对“参考方案”中值得商榷的问题进行了初步分析,并对我国前寒武纪年代表制定中有关重点提出了建议 相似文献
6.
7.
H. R. E. Staines 《Australian Journal of Earth Sciences》2013,60(2):83-106
Abstract Stratigraphic nomenclature in Australia was regulated from 1950 by four successive editions of the Australian Code of Stratigraphic Nomenclature. The International Stratigraphic Guide was adopted for stratigraphic nomenclature in Australia in 1978 and thus superseded the Australian Code. Certain provisions of the Code and certain Australian practices still pertained, however, and these have been formulated as Notes, intercalated with extracts from Chapters 2–5 of the International Guide to form the Field Geologist's Guide to Lithostratigraphic Nomenclature in Australia. Biostratigraphic and chronostratigraphic nomenclatures are excluded. The lithostratigraphic nomenclature of igneous and metamorphic rock units is also excluded, as recommendations are still being formulated. Procedures for reserving, defining, and publishing stratigraphic names are administered by the Stratigraphic Nomenclature Committee in conjunction with the Bureau of Mineral Resources through the Bureau's Central Register of Stratigraphic Names. 相似文献
8.
9.
《Russian Geology and Geophysics》2007,48(8):668-674
In dividing supracrustal strata, formation and horizon have been and are basic stratigraphic units. Stratigraphic boundaries of a formation, a natural geologic body, are drawn mostly on the basis of its composition. Paleontological remains constrain the formation in time and spatially locate it in the Earth's crust. Boundaries between formations can be of three types: strictly stratigraphic, parastratigraphic, and allostratographic. The stratigraphic interval can range from a fraction of a horizon or chronozone to several stages. At the boundary between two systems the adjacent parts of the formation can relate to both systems. The main stratigraphic characteristics for recognizing horizons are paleontologic (biostratigraphic) features, revealed by zonal, paleoecosystemic (ecostratigraphic), bioeventual, and other methods to make a basis for their immanent signature. Horizon can be characterized by boundaries of only two types: strictly stratigraphic and allostratigraphic. The stratigraphic interval of a horizon can vary from a single chronozone to a stage. Boundaries of neighboring horizons at the contact between two stages or systems should coincide with the latter. The stratigraphic units of the International Stratigraphic Chart, in contrary to formation and horizon, are characterized by borders of only one type — strictly stratigraphic. 相似文献
10.
《Russian Geology and Geophysics》2014,55(8):971-988
Data are provided on the new Ordovician stage standard of the International Stratigraphic Chart: Tremadocian, Floian, Dapingian, Darriwilian, Sandbian, Katian, and Hirnantian. Graptolite and conodont zonal and infrazonal successions are used for a precise estimation of the chrono- stratigraphic position of the boundaries of the previous and newly proposed Ordovician regional stratigraphic units (horizons) in the western Altai–Sayan Folded Area. The chronostratigraphic position of the boundaries of most of the Ordovician formations showing a wide lateral distribution in southern Siberia has been described in detail in terms of the new stage standard of the General Stratigraphic Scale of Russia. 相似文献
11.
安徽省第四纪岩石地层序列 总被引：4，自引：0，他引：4
依据《国际地层指南》（1979）和《中国地层指南及中国地层指南说明书》（2001,修订版）,总结多年的研究成果,按照多重地层划分原则,厘定安徽省第四纪地层序列,并结合年代地层和气候地层研究,试与最新的国际地层表（2004）和中国区域年代地层（地质年代）表（2002）对比。安徽省第四纪地层主要发育于淮北平原、江淮波状平原和沿江丘陵平原。平原与山麓、河谷与波状平原、河谷与垅状平原,分别平行地发育两套地层,其沉积环境不同,在剖面上相互交错;而且绝大部分岩石地层单位是穿时的 相似文献
12.
A. S. Biakov V. I. Shpikerman I. L. Vedernikov E. V. Tolmacheva 《Stratigraphy and Geological Correlation》2017,25(3):256-264
The Regional Stratigraphic Scale (RSS) of the Permian deposits in northeastern Russia represents the only complete stratigraphic succession of Permian marine deposits distinguished in Russia, which serves as a standard at the correlation of Permian deposits of all regions of the eastern part of the Boreal Biogeographic Superrealm. However, a high level of faunistic endemism makes it extremely difficult to correlate directly stratons of the RSS with stages of the International Stratigraphic Scale (ISS) of the Permian deposits. The first U–Pb SIMS age datings of zircons from felsic tuffs of the Omchak Formation of the Ayan-Yuryakh Anticlinorium (the lower part of the Permian Khivachian Horizon of the RSS of northeastern Russia) allowed us to obtain the important reference level for the Upper Permian subdivision of the Permian RSS. The zircon age of 257.1 ± 3.0 Ma is in good agreement with the stratigraphic position of the studied sample, which makes it possible to correlate the surrounding deposits with the Wuchiapingian Stage of the Permian deposits in the International Stratigraphic Scale. 相似文献
13.
山东省地层划分对比厘定意见 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
山东省地层大部属华北地层大区晋冀鲁豫地层区,再分为华北平原、鲁西及鲁东三个地层分区,鲁东南海域日照市平岛、达山岛及车牛山岛等属华南地层大区扬子地层区连云港地层分区。岩石地层分为27个（岩）群120个（岩）组12个正式段,还有相当数量的非正式段。恢复奥陶纪东黄山组、北庵庄组、土峪组、五阳山组、阁庄组、八陡组,并6个组为马家沟群;恢复二叠纪黑山组、万山组、奎山组和孝妇河组,并4个组为石盒子群;在青州—临朐地区识别出奥陶纪亮甲山组。地质代号原则上遵从最新的国家标准及行业标准。 相似文献
14.
近10年内,中国地层学史上发生过两件大事:一是“历史优先律事件”,表现为全国地层委员会具体组织并由其副主任程裕淇主编的《中国地层典》,对优先权法则不执行以出版为基础的“出版优先律”而执行不论发表与否仅以“尊重原始命名者”为基础的“历史优先律”;二是“优先律双重标准事件”,在全国地层委员会颁布的《中国地层指南》(修订版)内对优先律搞双重标准。这两个事件均表现对“优先权法则”国际共识内涵的偏离,偏离了以出版为基础的“出版优先律”。尤其不应该的是,当人们对“历史优先律”提出异议后,全国地层委员会不但不及时纠正“历史优先律”的片面观点,相反地却在修订中国地层命名法时,为了给“历史优先律”合法化创造条件,竟然在《中国地层指南》(修订版)内,对优先权搞双重标准。“历史优先律事件”和“优先律双重标准事件”破坏了地层命名法的标准性,颠倒了中国地层命名史,干扰了中国地层名称的管理,是全国地层委员会的失误。 相似文献
15.
《Russian Geology and Geophysics》2015,56(4):511-523
The history of the development of the General Stratigraphic Scale (GSS), its significance, purpose, and difference from the International Stratigraphic Chart (ISC) are briefly reported. The most global achievements in the GSS refinement based on the Proceedings of the All-Russian conference at the Geological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences (May 2013) are considered. The main problems related to the GSS improvement are formulated: the structure of the Precambrian and Quaternary stratigraphic scales, the location of the Vendian System in the GSS, formal substantiation of the “Russian” stages of the Cambrian, Carboniferous, and Permian Systems, and the significance of the regional limitotypes of the ISC subdivisions. 相似文献
16.
YAO Jianxin BO Jingfang HOU Hongfei WANG Zejiu MA Xiulan LIU Fengshan HU Guangxiao JI Zhansheng WU Guichun WU Zhenjie LI Suping GUO Caiqing LI Ya 《《地质学报》英文版》2016,90(4):1069-1081
Scientific research and productive practice for earth history are inseparable from the accurate stratigraphic framework and time framework. Establishing the globally unified, precise and reliable chronostratigraphic series and geological time series is the major goal of the International Commission on Stratigraphy(ICS). Under the leadership of the ICS, the countries around the world have carried out research on the Global Standard Stratotype-section and Points(GSSPs) for the boundaries of chronostratigraphic systems. In the current International Chronostratigraphic Chart(ICC), 65 GSSPs have been erected in the Phanerozoic Eonothem, and one has yet been erected in the Precambrian Eonothem. Based on the progress of research on stratigraphy especially that from its subcommissions, the ICS is constantly revising the ICC, and will publish a new International Stratigraphic Guide in 2020. After continual efforts and broad international cooperation of Chinese stratigraphers, 10 GSSPs within the Phanerozoic Eonothem have been approved and ratified to erect in China by the ICS and IUGS. To establish the standards for stratigraphic division and correlation of China, with the support from the Ministry of Science and Technology, the National Natural Science Foundation of China and the China Geological Survey, Chinese stratigraphers have carried out research on the establishment of Stages in China. A total of 102 stages have been defined in the "Regional Chronostratigraphic Chart of China(geologic time)", in which 59 stages were studied in depth. In 2014, the "Stratigraphic Chart of China" was compiled, with the essential contents as follows: the correlation between international chronostratigraphy and regional chronostratigraphy of China(geologic time), the distributive status of lithostratigraphy, the characteristics of geological ages, the biostratigraphic sequence, the magnetostratigraphy, the geological events and eustatic sea-level change during every geological stage. The "Stratigraphical Guide of China and its Explanation(2014)" was also published. Chinese stratigraphers have paid much attention to stratigraphic research in south China, northeast China, north China and northwest China and they have made great achievements in special research on stratigraphy, based on the 1:1000000, 1:250000, 1:200000 and 1:50000 regional geological survey projects. Manifold new stratigraphic units were discovered and established by the regional geological surveys, which are helpful to improve the regional chronostratigraphic series of China. On the strength of the investigation in coastal and offshore areas, the status of marine strata in China has been expounded. According to the developing situation of international stratigraphy and the characteristics of Chinese stratigraphic work, the contrast relation between regional stratigraphic units of China and GSSPs will be established in the future, which will improve the application value of GSSPs and the standard of regional stratigraphic division and correlation. In addition, the study of stratigraphy of the Precambrian, terrestrial basins and orogenic belts will be strengthened, the Stratigraphic Chart of China will be improved, the typical stratigraphic sections in China will be protected and the applied study of stratigraphy in the fields of oil and gas, solid minerals, etc. will be promoted. On the ground of these actions, stratigraphic research will continue to play a great role in the social and economic development of China. 相似文献
17.
A Geologic Time Scale (GTS2004) is presented that integrates currently available stratigraphic and geochronologic information. Key features of the new scale are outlined, how it was constructed, and how it can be further improved. The accompanying International Stratigraphic Chart, issued under auspices of the International Commission on Stratigraphy (ICS), shows the current chronostratigraphic scale and ages with estimates of uncertainty for all stage boundaries. Special reference is made to the Precambrian part of the time scale, which is coming of age in terms of detail, and to the Neogene portion, which has attained an ultra-high-precision absolute-age calibration. 相似文献
18.
白垩纪年代地层学研究简述 总被引：7，自引：2，他引：5
简述国际白垩纪年代地层和地质年表研究现状,介绍马斯特里赫特阶、土仑阶和赛诺曼阶底界的GSSP及其生物地层学标志,其他阶推荐的GSSP定义标准以及中国陆相白垩系建阶进展。评述白垩系地质年表方案,根据我国辽西地区义县组尖山沟层研究的最新进展,提出考虑以12 5 Ma作为白垩系底界的年龄标准 相似文献
19.
20.
关于中国的海相三叠系建阶及下三叠统分阶界线 总被引：14，自引：1，他引：13
国际地层委员会提出将在近年内完成各地质年代中阶间界线层型的选定工作.全国地层委员会也于第3届全国地层委员会上提出了中国各时代地层的建阶方案.因此, 以阶为实体的年代地层学研究已成为当前地层学研究的焦点.介绍了国际三叠系年代地层划分方案及确定过程, 并列述了中国海相三叠系建阶方案.重点讨论了中国海相下三叠统各阶顶、底界线及其确定标准和标志, 提出了中国下三叠统建阶工作研究重点 相似文献